Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-01-17-Speech-1-009"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-01-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Resumption of the session2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000117.1.1-009"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-01-17-Speech-1-0102
lpv:speaker	lp:Professor Sir Neil MacCORMICK2
lpv:spoken text	"Madam President, on a point of order. I would like your advice about Rule 143 concerning inadmissibility. My question relates to something that will come up on Thursday and which I will then raise again. The Cunha report on multiannual guidance programmes comes before Parliament on Thursday and contains a proposal in paragraph 6 that a form of quota penalties should be introduced for countries which fail to meet their fleet reduction targets annually. It says that this should be done despite the principle of relative stability. I believe that the principle of relative stability is a fundamental legal principle of the common fisheries policy and a proposal to subvert it would be legally inadmissible. I want to know whether one can raise an objection of that kind to what is merely a report, not a legislative proposal, and whether that is something I can competently do on Thursday."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Scottish National Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"MacCormick (Greens/ALE )."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph