Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-12-16-Speech-4-029"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-12-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991216.2.4-029"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-12-16-Speech-4-0302
lpv:speaker	lp:Mihail Papayannakis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with South-east Europe (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 substitute; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Cyprus Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 substitute; PETI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; PECH (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras kai tis Proodou (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I should like to take advantage of the fact that certain members of the Council of Ministers are present. The Council was not represented during the debate yesterday although its presence had been requested. Would they please clarify the contents of the decisions taken yesterday or indeed the day before yesterday? These were of course taken before the European Parliament could give an opinion on the report now before us on the labelling of beef. According to my sources, the Council has decided to postpone the application of compulsory labelling for one year, whereas we believe this postponement should only be for a matter of months. It has also decided not to work on this issue with the European Parliament through the codecision procedure. As the Council is now present, I should like an explanation because it is clear that this vote does not make much sense now. ( )"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Applause"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph