Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-12-14-Speech-2-226"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:2000 budget (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991214.9.2-226"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-12-14-Speech-2-2272
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Louis Bourlanges2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2002-03-07)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Union pour la démocratie française (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I did not understand a thing; I especially did not understand about point 1. Mr Wynn asked a specific question. You were asked to clarify your solemn declaration at the end of this afternoon’s debate when you said, if I correctly understood the translation which I heard, that the Council opposed a permanent review. (I am not about to say what a permanent review is but as you were the one who said it, you should know what it means.) You said that the Council opposed a permanent review “at this moment”. “At this moment” does not mean a thing. Mr Wynn asked you, Madam President-in-Office, if “at this moment” meant that the Council was opposed to a review of the financial perspectives for the year 2000, which would appear to us to be perfectly in keeping with the compromise which is being forged, or if “at this moment” meant something even vaguer? You were asked to reply, and you said that you would reply but your reply was incomprehensible. So please clarify, enlighten those of us who are not clever enough to understand when others speak in tongues."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph