Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-18-Speech-4-027"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-11-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Decision on urgent procedure2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991118.2.4-027"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-11-18-Speech-4-0282
lpv:speaker	lp:Olivier Dupuis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PETI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; EMPL (1999-09-16--2000-01-17)3 member; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees for relations with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; TGI (1999-07-20--2001-10-02)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I think that Mr Voggenhuber wishes to speak against this proposal. I am myself speaking to say that this request in inadmissible, insofar as Rule 112 refers to Rule 60, which is about Commission proposals and legislative texts. Mr Barón Crespo has a very flexible view of our Rules of Procedure. Yesterday he spoke of Rule 60, today he is talking about Rule 61, on constitutional matters. Those present may observe the rich nature of Strasbourg nights and their capacity to cause our internal regulations to increase in number. In the preamble to Mr Napolitano’s report, there is explicit reference to Article 199 of the Treaty of Amsterdam and this Article refers explicitly to the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament. This is, then, further evidence that the procedure that Mr Barón Crespo requested yesterday has nothing to do with Rule 112. I therefore request, Madam President, that there should be no vote and that Mr Barón Crespo’s request is considered inadmissible."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph