Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-17-Speech-3-085"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-11-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991117.4.3-085"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-11-17-Speech-3-0862
lpv:speaker	lp:Paulo Casaca2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Socialista (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; CONT (1999-07-22--2001-12-11)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to raise three issues with regard to this report. Firstly, I have been given a voting list on which Amendment No 9 is not identified as an amendment by the Committee on Budgets. I would like this mistake to be rectified, at least on the voting list that has been attributed to my political group. Secondly, there is an Amendment No 31 that only existed in the German version until yesterday afternoon, and the Portuguese and English language versions contradict each other. The Portuguese version talks of the GNP whereas the English version talks about the GDP. These are two completely different financial concepts which have completely different financial consequences. I have no idea what this amendment means. Thirdly, I would like the Bureau to explain to me why it intends to proceed to a vote on Amendment No 31 when Amendment No 9 is established in our Rules of Procedure, Rule 130(2); in other words, why this amendment is moving further away from the original."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph