Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-16-Speech-2-212"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-11-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991116.10.2-212"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-11-16-Speech-2-2132
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 46 by Samuli Pohjamo (): The Commission has asked the Member States for proposals for Objective 2 regions and programmes. Some Member States have submitted their plans for support regions in the manner required by the Regulations, but others have not. It is vital to the regions that the programmes should enter into force immediately at the beginning of the year 2000. EU aid has a significant impact on the development of the regional economy, and there should not, therefore, be any gap between the old and the new programmes. How will the Commission proceed in its overall decision making with the aim of ensuring that countries which punctually forward their proposals for regions eligible for support and, subsequently, their Objective 2 programmes, do not suffer on account of other countries= delays?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Part II"1 "President."1 "Subject: Approval of Objective 2 proposals"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph