Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-09-15-Speech-3-213"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-09-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19990915.12.3-213"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-09-15-Speech-3-2142
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--1999-10-12)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 2 by Per Gahrton (): During the European election campaign this year, the Swedish Prime Minister, Göran Persson, said that there was no possibility of a common EU defence becoming a reality as Sweden would use its veto as soon as the question came up for discussion. Pierre Schori, then Minister for Co-operation, claimed that there was a crucial difference between what the EU meant by effective crisis management and a common defence. According to Schori, the EU does not intend to develop a common defence but simply wishes to enhance its capabilities for effective crisis management. With regard to these statements, will the Council say whether the Treaties stipulate that the EU should develop a common defence? How does the Council interpret the decision of the Cologne Summit to integrate the WEU into the European Union? Is there a place for neutral Member States within the future common foreign and security policy?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Common EU defence policy"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph