Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-05-Speech-4-131-250"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120705.19.4-131-250"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has proposed several amendments to its Statute together with the adoption of a regulation concerning temporary judges of the Civil Service Tribunal. The proposed amendments concern, to varying degrees, the three courts currently making up the CJEU: the Court of Justice, the General Court (EGC) and the Civil Service Tribunal. As well as substantive changes, two of the proposals concern staff changes and increases requiring additional resources and thus having a direct impact on the EU budget. The Court of Justice argues that its President’s workload has increased considerably with time and it would therefore be useful to appoint a Vice-President who could relieve or assist him in carrying out his duties in future. The President of the Court has a large number of responsibilities, which are crucial to the smooth running of the Court. There have been cases where appeals against the General Court’s orders for interim measures have sometimes taken over a year to be dealt with. The establishment of the office of Vice-President should help improve the situation in this area. The Court of Justice also argues that, for some years now, the gap between the number of cases processed by the General Court and the number of new cases has been widening and that the number of unprocessed cases is continually rising. The Court of Justice assumes that the number of cases per year will also continue to rise in the future. After weighing up the options, it has decided on the proposal to increase the number of judges as the only way to cope with the essential need for effectiveness, urgency, flexibility and consistency in Court of Justice case-law. I therefore voted in favour of this document."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples