Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-06-11-Speech-1-028-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-06-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU trade negotiations with Japan (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120611.18.1-028-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-06-11-Speech-1-029-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jörg Leichtfried2
lpv:spokenAs	member; DROI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with India (2011-12-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; INTA (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Cariforum — EU Parliamentary Committee (2010-09-07--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr Wałęsa, I listened with great interest to what you had to say, and something struck me. I want to ask you about it in more detail, as we keep having a discussion about it and this point has never been conclusively cleared up. You said that the European Parliament should be involved, and take part, in the negotiations with Japan. There are two different schools of thought in this regard. The first says that we should not do so, but that we should evaluate the results at the end and provide our approval or rejection. The second school of thought is that we absolutely should get involved directly. Do you believe that it would be better if Members of this House were directly involved in the negotiations? If not, how do you think the European Parliament should get involved?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph