Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-25-Speech-2-075-000"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20111025.7.2-075-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"One of the 12 priorities is the issue of intellectual property rights, including patents, and emphasis has been placed on how essential patents are for innovation, jobs and, of course, research. What is the Commission’s reaction to the recent ruling of the European Court of Justice that patents for the use of stem cells are not possible? I have to say that as a layman, I have struggled to understand the ruling, but what does the Commission make of this? What is its reaction, and what is it going to do to stop medicinal research in Europe being blocked with the result that it all goes to Asia and the United States, where you can patent such therapeutic inventions – which are, of course, essential, not only for research and innovation and jobs, but also for medicinal treatments?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph