Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-29-Speech-4-084-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-29"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Security scanners (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110929.5.4-084-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-29-Speech-4-085-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Luis de Grandes Pascual2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; JURI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Partido Popular (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; LIBE (2009-09-29--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Commissioner, as you know, in 2008, Parliament roundly rejected the motion for a resolution that was presented to it. Later, in the same terms, the report that I myself presented to the Chamber was approved by a comfortable majority, with a great consensus and with the effort of the Commission and the political groups. What were the reasons behind Parliament’s change of mind? Undoubtedly, seeing that all the requirements involved in accepting the use of these scanners were fulfilled, including the preservation of fundamental rights and, among these, in particular, the passenger’s dignity and privacy, non-discrimination, protection of personal data and protection of health. In this way, we established what type of scanners were suitable for guaranteeing passengers’ security, on the one hand, and preserving their rights in full, on the other. The scanners will not use ionising radiation, they will not be mandatory for Member States, nor for citizens, and they will all protect the rights described above. True, the Commission has captured all of these concerns in its proposed legislation but, in addition to scanners that use stick figures, it includes the possibility of another type which, whilst guaranteeing the same catalogue of rights, permits the inspection of an image of the passenger, albeit blurred. We accept the reasons why it has proven necessary to include this alternative as an authorised method of control. Parliament also defends the need to guarantee fair competition and thus avoid any monopolistic temptation. However, today we call on the Commission to retain all the precepts that we defended in my report, all the guarantees of preservation of fundamental rights. Moreover, we encourage it to work with industry and the Member States in order to ensure that in the near future, only automatic protection scanners are used and that no inspector is needed to view any image."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph