Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-05-09-Speech-1-218-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-05-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:One-minute speeches (Rule 150)2
dcterms:Language	"sk"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110509.23.1-218-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-05-09-Speech-1-219-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Anna Záborská2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; DEVE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Kresťanskodemokratické hnutie (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Pan-African Parliament (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, the Duff Report on the European elections has not, in the end, appeared on the agenda for this part-session. Let us use this time to consider it and then reject it next month. The idea of a ​​transnational list is absurd. I have several questions: Why would Slovak, German or Italian electors vote for people they cannot understand without an interpreter? How will their elected MEPs then represent them if they cannot even read letters sent to them by their constituents? How many times is a Greek MEP going to meet his Slovak voters? What are they going to discuss? Besides, only large Member States will benefit from a pan-European list. Approval of this report would vindicate all the Eurosceptics’ claims that the European Union harbours ambitions to become a multinational state. It will call into question the democratic legitimacy of this Parliament and alienate citizens from the European project even more."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph