Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-03-08-Speech-2-712-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-03-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Industrial policy for the globalised era (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110308.30.2-712-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-03-08-Speech-2-713-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Lambert van Nistelrooij2
lpv:spokenAs	member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-24--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Christen Democratisch Appèl (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Commissioner, the manufacturing industry remains important, even in the knowledge-based economy of today and tomorrow. Maintaining high-value production in Europe remains essential and, at the same time, it is a mainstay of the knowledge and learning of many people in our countries and of the continued development of our competitiveness. This report rightly sets industry high on the European agenda and that is important for both large industry and small and medium-sized enterprises. In Europe, we can boast excellence in many fields. I am thinking of the energy, space travel and automotive industries, which are all doing splendidly at the moment. Then I am also thinking of the automotive industry’s supply chain, which is essential for Europe. Just look how clever and clean the EU 2020 strategy is! However, I do have one concern, and that is globalisation. We have rightly established The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and we will soon have the European patent. Nevertheless, Commissioner Tajani has put the issue of the necessity of a worldwide level playing field on the agenda. It is great that Chinese companies are investing in Europe, but we should have a level playing field there. If it is, indeed, the case that large government funds are being invested in this, then something is wrong. Returning to protectionism is not one of our goals – as Mr Audy has just said – but this is about ensuring the necessary transparency in key sectors, such as the ICT and other key European sectors. This is not a European veto. We are not saying ‘these are the shareholders, those are the supervisors’, but it is really important that we, representing Europe, look into this properly. It would not be out of place to start a debate on this, in response to Mr Lange’s excellent report. It will continue. Commissioner Tajani, I wish to invite you to join in that debate."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph