Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-12-14-Speech-2-491"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Parliament's position on the new 2011 Draft Budget as modified by the Council (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101214.36.2-491"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-12-14-Speech-2-4922
lpv:speaker	lp:Marian-Jean Marinescu2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2010-10-22--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; EPP (2009-11-25--2012-02-02)3 unknown; Partidul Democrat-Liberal (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, tomorrow’s vote can bring to an end the first approval procedure for the annual budget, in keeping with the Treaty of Lisbon. Negotiations have obviously been difficult. Parliament has put forward extremely important political considerations, but the Council has refused to discuss them. Parliament initially presented a very strongly united front in maintaining its position. The Council was divided, but had the benefit of unanimity and blocked conciliation. We are currently in the position of agreeing on figures. The Council and Commission have accepted, through declarations, the large majority of the European Parliament’s requests. It would have been much better to have an interinstitutional agreement, which would have provided greater security for the future. Unfortunately, Parliament is no longer as united as it was at the start of the negotiations. As a result, there is a lack of funding for ITER. I believe that it is of paramount importance for us to give the Union the budget which it needs during this crisis period. We have the time we need before the future financial outlooks are approved to reach an agreement on the topics which are still unresolved. The Council needs to understand that it is not beneficial to the Union that the main European policies will be approved through codecision, while the financial resources required to implement these policies are decided on by only one of the parties involved in budgetary cooperation. Parliament must be involved at the same level in both aspects: political and financial."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph