Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-19-Speech-3-098"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-05-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Outcome of the summit of 7 May 2010 and the ECOFIN meeting - What is the political relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the context of the current financial and economic crisis? - Consequences of the financial and economic crisis on the EU 2020 strategy and its governance - What is the relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the framework of the current financial and economic crisis? (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100519.3.3-098"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-05-19-Speech-3-0992
lpv:speaker	lp:Nuno Teixeira2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2010-01-18--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Partido Social Democrata (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Various aspects of the Lisbon Strategy in which there was little success can be identified. Few of the established objectives were achieved, owing to various factors: amongst others, the lack of political will and of instruments – not least financial ones. Local and regional authorities have also been pointing out that they were not involved enough, in either defining or implementing the strategy, and that European and national objectives did not match up well. All this tarred the Lisbon Strategy’s programme with a credibility deficit, which is also a result of the fact that, while it was defined in great detail, the way in which it was executed was not responsible enough. At a time of economic uncertainty, fragile public finances and high unemployment, the new 2020 strategy must be seen as an opportunity for reflection on the direction that the public wants for the European Union. Nevertheless, it will be difficult to all be headed in the same direction while the Member States and their regions – particularly the outermost regions – remain as unequal as they currently are. Perhaps it is also time for us to develop new types of economic, financial and even budgetary links, particularly in the euro area. I am convinced that such links can make a decisive contribution to achieving the goals that are currently being set, particularly those relating to territorial cohesion."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph