Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-05-Speech-3-257"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100505.69.3-257"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"−
I voted against this report. The reason for this is that Mr Le Foll advocates a common forestry policy. Forestry policy is a national matter: there are very large differences between the EU Member States. I also believe that, apart from cross-border environmental issues, it is not appropriate for agricultural policy to be decided at Union level, particularly after enlargement of the EU to 27 countries. However, as long as the EU’s common agricultural policy exists, I want the decisions to be as good as possible with the clear purpose of tackling climate change. I have great sympathy for many of Mr Le Foll’s proposals for tackling the climate threat, the key issue of our time, but recommending a common forestry policy is the wrong way to go."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples