Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-02-11-Speech-4-992"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100211.12.4-992"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:translated text |
"−
We are voting against the interim agreement because its terms are not in line with European laws. It is not acceptable that the police in Portugal can only access the bank details of a person on the basis of a warrant but that millions of pieces of data can be sent to be interpreted and analysed by the US police without any judicial control.
We recognise the need for transatlantic cooperation in the fight against international crime and, particularly, against terrorism.
We would emphasise that this cooperation should be established on the basis of mutual trustworthiness and respect for the principles of reciprocity, proportionality and respect for citizens’ rights.
We condemn the way in which the Council has behaved with respect to the European Parliament, failing to mention information and presenting matters as a
. It is essential that this is not repeated in the future and that there is rigorous compliance with the Treaty of Lisbon.
Approving a poorly negotiated agreement does not just mean having a bad agreement in place for nine months. It means having an inadequate basis for negotiating the long-term agreement and allowing the transfer of millions of pieces of data, to be stored for many years. We urge the Council and the Commission to negotiate a better agreement that respects the European Parliament resolutions."@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples