Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-07-11-Speech-3-186"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-07-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070711.22.3-186"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-07-11-Speech-3-1872
lpv:speaker	lp:Zsolt László Becsey2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"I myself support the direction of the compromise reached in the matter of liberalisation of postal services. In one section, though, I abstained, and I will tell you why. Point 7/a mentions those states that have received a transitional period until 2013. I abstained because I find it unacceptable to state about certain groups of states, en bloc, without case-by-case scrutiny, why they are receiving this transitional period. Among them are the new Member States, and this is what I find offensive, as it relegates my country and the other new Member States to the status of the Third World. We did not, after all, individually examine who would receive this and on what grounds. I find it similarly unacceptable to say, in a slapdash fashion, that small states should receive transitional periods in certain matters, for which are these small states? We should therefore proceed with more precision, define more precisely who are we talking about. I hope that this will indeed be done at the second reading."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph