Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-11-14-Speech-2-261"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-11-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Legislative and work programme of the Commission for 2007 (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061114.36.2-261"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-11-14-Speech-2-2622
lpv:speaker	lp:Angelika Beer2
lpv:spokenAs	member; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; G/EFA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 member; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 chair; Delegation for relations with Iran (2004-09-20--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, as foreign and security policy coordinator for the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance, I should like to make a number of critical remarks. A few points have been raised. Mrs De Keyser expressed exactly what I feel when she questioned where we stand. We can see the arc of crisis over Iraq, Iran, Libya – the Middle East. Europe, a global player, makes professions yet comes up with a static work programme consisting of, on the one hand, a banal statement of the problems devoid of political substance and, on the other, instruments that – those of them that are actually new – the Commission does not even acknowledge as a quantum leap. At this point I should like to express our disappointment that the five new external-policy instruments that are due to enter into force as of 1 January, and that will support the Commission’s external policy, civil conflict prevention, crisis management and reconstruction work for the first time, are not given due attention, but instead constitute just a single indent in the work programme. Then there is the Commission’s concept of ‘neighbourhood policy’. The Commission must clarify in political terms what it means when people now talk of ‘neighbourhood policy light’. A political definition is no longer being given for this. Any old words are being used, and I have the impression that a political definition is virtually being avoided. I should like to finish with a positive comment. I welcome the fact that the Commission is tackling the defence-equipment market at long last; it is just that what the programme has to say about this it has been saying for years. Parliament has given the green light, and awaits results at long last. Consequently, I am afraid we are not satisfied in this regard."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph