Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-04-Speech-2-175"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Amended proposal for a directive on services in the internal market and Communication on Directive 96/71/EC (posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060404.21.2-175"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-04-Speech-2-1762
lpv:speaker	lp:Pierre Jonckheer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; DROI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2005-05-24--2007-02-26)3 substitute; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Ecologistes Confédérés pour l'Organisation de Luttes Originales (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, Commissioners, I think we should be delighted that the Commission has yielded to the double pressure of the European Parliament and of the Council. I believe that, given the current state of affairs in Europe, this is a shining example of the fact that parliamentary democracy within the European Union can work and that the Commission can effectively take on board the amendments voted for by the European Parliament. The European Parliament has substantially improved the Commission’s original proposal. That being so, I wish to emphasise the fact that the fundamental objections that we made, and which justified our group’s unanimous vote against it, still remain. They mainly concern two points: the scope of the Directive and the confirmed inclusion of services of general economic interest. Our group is in favour of a specific directive on services of general economic interest because we fear that their inclusion in this directive may stand in the way of any new proposal by the Commission. The second objection concerns the compromise reached on Article 16, which does not increase the legal certainty of the text and in fact takes us back to the case law of the Court, as well as to the requirement for the Court to give a ruling on a case by case basis, contrary to the wishes of the Commission and of Parliament. The ball is now in the court of the Council, to whom it falls to define its common position. In this respect, the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance unanimously calls for the Council to amend and to improve this text, particularly in relation to the two points that I have just mentioned."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph