Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-07-Speech-2-210"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050607.25.2-210"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"The European Union does not have at its disposal the ideal mechanisms for either generating or allocating resources. Nor has it adopted a 10- to 20-year perspective on specific economic and other policies. One has only to remember the long-term lack of effective supervision of agriculture.
Despite the huge efforts it made, which I appreciate, the temporary committee could not, at this stage, have achieved any more than it did, Mr Böge, and there is a chance that Parliament will vote in favour of this compromise. Whereas Parliament considers that resources should be set at 1.08% of gross national product, the Council considers, in contrast, that the figure should be between 1.03% and 1.05% of gross domestic product.
This shows that the future will be less about indices than about the correct mechanisms for distributing resources, and many pitfalls still lie in wait on the path to final agreement in the area of the financial perspective."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples