Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-13-Speech-3-210"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050413.17.3-210"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The 2006 budget concludes the 2000-2006 budget ‘planning’. With a sum of less than EUR 120 billion, it remains 20 times smaller than the US budget, for a Europe that is seeking an American-style constitution, without having the means, nor even the desire, for 450 million men and women to change their lives.
Within this budget can be found a litany of limited budgetary themes: leftovers to recover, minimal loans for the Balkans, mosquito nets required for children struck by malaria, the financial application of the CAP reform, chatter on the development of the countryside without country people, the paltry funds allocated to fishing, and so on.
It is a budgetary strategy lacking in originality, because it serves an absence of ideas. In pursuit of the Millennium Development Objectives, for instance, the budgetary authorities do not consider new customs duty technology, which, if made deductible, would allow an African country exporting in bulk to benefit from drawing rights on importing countries, which would be equal to the sum of customs duties sustained.
In 2006, as always, budgetary imagination is not high on the agenda in Brussels."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples