Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-12-Speech-1-059-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Ongoing Doha negotiations (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110912.20.1-059-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-12-Speech-1-060-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Bas Belder2
lpv:spokenAs	chair; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 chair_of_the_bureau; EFD (2011-05-23--2014-06-30)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2012-02-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (2009-12-07--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, no progress has been made in the Doha negotiations. The Commissioner communicated this fact quite clearly. Originally, 2010 was supposed to be the year of breakthrough, but now that has changed to this year, 2011. However, we are still not seeing any real success in getting the Doha Round going. Even a minimum package for the least developed countries seems an unrealistic prospect. The failure of Doha would harm international trade and promote protectionism. Therefore, everyone will have to make concessions to give this round a chance of success. I asked a question almost two years ago during a similar debate, namely whether the WTO’s negotiating system had managed to keep adequate pace with globalisation. In my opinion, that question remains a relevant one. Of course, there is more to the WTO than just Doha, but the lack of results is putting the WTO’s credibility in jeopardy."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph