Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-770-000"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20110705.41.2-770-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Mr President, while saving lives must be of paramount concern to any legislature including this one, and to national governments, I believe in this case that citing that reason is disingenuous. On Amendment 2, it is clear that there would need to be harmonisation of fixed penalties – another small step towards a European superstate. I have driven in most European countries, including Eastern European countries, and driving conditions are highly inconsistent, as are signage and driving rules. How can you have a consistent policy here? I am glad the UK will be opting out, because one of the things we have, which some EU states do not have, is the right to appeal to a court: the right to appearance in court for all traffic offences. The position on this is inconsistent across the EU. Is the aim, in fact, to have a single complete legal system?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph