Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-07-06-Speech-2-486"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2010-07-06"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Timpul afectat întrebărilor (întrebări adresate Comisiei)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100706.31.2-486"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-07-06-Speech-2-488⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Algirdas Šemeta⁶
lpv:spoken text	"The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@en⁴
lpv:translated text	"Při jednání by mělo být dosaženo toho, aby interní kontrola Soudního dvora Evropské unie byla v souladu s primárním právem použitelná i v případech, kdy je soulad jednání instituce, orgánu, úřadu či agentury Unie projednáván před Evropským soudem pro lidská práva, přičemž Soudní dvůr Evropské unie neměl před tím možnost rozhodnout o souladu projednávaného jednání s lidskými právy definovanými na úrovni Unie. Jakýkoliv procedurální nástroj, jenž by umožňoval Soudnímu dvoru Evropské unie posoudit soulad takového jednání s lidskými právy, by měl především ochránit subsidiaritu této procedury před Evropským soudem pro lidská práva a nikoli způsobovat v průběhu této procedury neopodstatněné prodlení."@cs¹ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@da² "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@de⁹ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@el¹⁰ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@es²¹ "Läbirääkimised peavad tagama, et Euroopa Liidu Kohtule esmaste õigusaktide alusel kuuluv liidus teostatava kontrolli õigus laieneb ka sellistele Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohtusse esitatud kohtuasjadele, mis käsitlevad liidu institutsioonide, asutuste, ametite või agentuuride vastu võetud õigusakti vastavust konventsioonile, kuid Euroopa Liidu Kohtul ei ole seni olnud võimalust teha otsust asjas, mis käsitleb taolise õigusakti vastavust liidu tasandil määratletud põhiõigustele. Taolisi menetluslikke vahendeid, mis annavad Euroopa Liidu Kohtule võimaluse hinnata nimetatud õigusaktide vastavust põhiõigustele, tuleks vaadelda kui subsidiaarsuse kaitse tagatist Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohtu menetluses ning ei tohiks menetluses põhjendamata viivitusi tekitada."@et⁵ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@fi⁷ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@fr⁸ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@hu¹¹ "I negoziati debbono garantire che il controllo interno preliminare della Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea, esercitato in conformità con il diritto primario, sia anche applicabile in casi in cui sia chiamata in causa la conformità di un provvedimento di un’istituzione, di un organismo, o ufficio, o agenzia dell’Unione europea rispetto a una convenzione, nell’ambito di in un caso portato dinnanzi la Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo, senza che la Corte di giustizia europea abbia avuto l’opportunità di emettere una sentenza in merito alla conformità di tale provvedimento rispetto ai diritti fondamentali definiti a livello dell’Unione europea. Qualunque espediente procedurale che consenta alla Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea di valutare la conformità di tali provvedimenti con i diritti fondamentali dovrebbe essere tesa a salvaguardare la sussidiarietà della procedura dinnanzi alla Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo, senza condurre a ritardi irragionevoli della procedura stessa."@it¹² "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@lt¹⁴ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@lv¹³ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@mt¹⁵ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@nl³ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@pl¹⁶ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@pt¹⁷ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@ro¹⁸ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@sk¹⁹ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@sl²⁰ "The negotiations should ensure that the internal control of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with primary law, is also applicable in cases where the conformity with a convention of an act of an institution, body, office, or agency of the Union is at stake in a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), but the Court of Justice of the European Union has not had the opportunity to rule on the compatibility of such an act with fundamental rights defined at the level of the Union. Any such procedural means allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union to assess the compatibility of such acts with fundamental rights should be meant to safeguard the subsidiarity nature of the procedure before the ECtHR, and should not result in causing unreasonable delays in such a procedure."@sv²²
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Algirdas Šemeta,"^{18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,22,2,10,7,3,13,4,21,9,17,12,8} "Member of the Commission"^{18,20,15,19,14,16,11,11,22,7,10,2,3,13,21,9,17,8} "Member of the Commission."⁴ "Membro della Commissione."¹² "a priori"^{18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,7,22,10,2,3,13,4,21,9,17,8} "komisjoni liige"⁵ "člen Komise."¹
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>⁶