Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-07-06-Speech-2-477"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100706.31.2-477"6
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies, including JTIs, is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes, the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus, they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@en4
|
| lpv:translated text |
"První část otázky paní Gutiérrez-Cortinesové zní, zda postup pro výběr vedoucích pracovníků společných technologických iniciativ zaručuje nezávislost na vlivu velkých firem.
Odpověď zní „ano“. Výběrová řízení na posty výkonných ředitelů ve společných technologických iniciativách se budou řídit pokyny pro jmenování vedoucích pracovníků agentur a společných podniků společenství. Tyto pokyny platí pro všechny orgány Evropské unie a výběrová řízení ve společných technologických iniciativách budou tedy plně v souladu s výběrovými řízeními do ostatních orgánů EU, jako jsou výkonné či regulační úřady. Podle těchto pokynů je tedy výběrové řízení do všech orgánů EU včetně společných technologických iniciativ založeno na odborné kvalifikaci a dosažených výsledcích, a zajišťuje tak rovné zacházení všem kandidátům.
V tomto smyslu tedy, jak to předepisují zmíněné pokyny, byli vedoucí pracovníci Komise většinově zastoupeni jak v předvýběrových komisích, tak v průběhu jednání Poradního výboru pro jmenování. To jsou jediné dva případy, kdy průmysl měl nějaký vliv, s výjimkou nepřímého vlivu zástupců průmyslu při hlasování v řídící radě v okamžiku samotného jmenování, kdy se vybírá z užšího seznamu kandidátů sestaveného Komisí.
Je třeba mít na paměti, že provozní náklady všech společných technologických iniciativ jsou částečně hrazeny ze zdrojů průmyslu – v případě ENIAC a ARTEMIS, dvou společných technologických iniciativ z oblasti nanotechnologií a vestavěných počítačových systémů, činí tento podíl až 67 %. Z toho vyplývá, že účast průmyslu na výběrovém řízení byla nezbytná a na místě, protože společné technologické iniciativy jsou založené na partnerství soukromého a veřejného sektoru.
Druhá část otázky zní, zda se v těchto výběrových řízeních zohlední závazek Evropské unie podporovat malé a střední podniky. Obecně vzato – jak již bylo zmíněno v souvislosti s pokyny pro jmenování – jsou kritéria pro výběr zaměstnanců každodenního provozu společných technologických iniciativ založena na odbornosti a dosažených výsledcích. V tomto ohledu je podpora malých a středních podniků důležitým politickým cílem Komise, ale nebude snadné ji aplikovat na kritéria pro výběr a jmenování zaměstnanců, pro něž platí služební řád zaměstnanců Evropské unie a tedy i zaměstnanců společných technologických iniciativ.
Výkonný ředitel či ředitelka a členové jeho či jejího týmu zaměstnanců jsou vázáni zásadami profesní etiky služebního řádu EU, podle nichž nesmí hájit nebo prosazovat zájmy žádné skupiny, ať by šlo o malé a střední podniky nebo o velké společnosti. Porušení tohoto závazku by podle služebního řádu EU vedlo k disciplinárnímu řízení. Ustavující předpisy společných technologických iniciativ však s malými a středními podniky počítají. Jejich součástí jsou nařízení, jež podporují účast a zastoupení malých a středních podniků na úrovni řídících rad."@cs1
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@da2
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@de9
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@el10
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@es21
"Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortinesi küsimuse esimeses pooles soovitakse teada, kas ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste kõrgemate tegevjuhtide valikumenetlus tagab sõltumatuse suurte äriühingute mõjusfäärist.
Vastus on jaatav. Ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste kõrgemate tegevjuhtide valikumenetlus lähtub ühenduse asutuste ja ühiste algatuste juhtide ametissenimetamise suunistest. Suunised kehtivad kõigile ELi asutustele ning seega tagavad ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste valikumenetluse täieliku kooskõla teiste ELi asutuste, näiteks rakendus- ja reguleerimisametite valikumenetlustega. Nõnda võetakse kõigi ELi asutuste, sh ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste puhul aluseks pädevus ja saavutused ning tagatakse kõigi kandidaatide võrdne kohtlemine.
Seega, nagu suunistes ette nähtud, olid nii eelvaliku komisjonis kui ka ametisse nimetamise küsimustega tegeleva nõuandekomitee menetluses enamuses komisjoni kõrgemad ametnikud. Need olid kaks ainsat menetluse etappi, kus tööstuse esindajail teatud osa oli, välja arvatud tööstuse esindajate kaudne osa, nimelt hääletus juhatuses, kus komisjoni välja valitud kandidaatide hulgast üks ametisse nimetati.
Tuleb märkida, et kõikide ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste jooksvaid ja tegevuskulusid katab osaliselt tööstus, näiteks ENIAC ja ARTEMIS on kaks nanotehnoloogia ja manussüsteemide ühist tehnoloogiaalgatust ja nende kuludest kaetakse kuni 67%. See viitab ka vajadusele kaasata tööstuse esindajad ning on kooskõlas ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste olemusega, kuna tegemist on avaliku ja erasektori partnerlusega.
Küsimuse teises pooles sooviti teada, kas valikutegemisel arvestatakse ELi kohustust toetada VKEsid. Vastus on järgmine: üldiselt tuleb ühise tehnoloogiaalgatuse igapäevast tegevust korraldava personali valikul lähtuda saavutustest ja pädevusest, nagu rääkisin seoses ametissenimetamise suunistega. VKEde toetamine on komisjonile väga tähtis poliitiline eesmärk, kuid seda ei ole nii lihtne väljendada kriteeriumidega, mille alusel töötajaid ametisse valitakse, sest ühiste tehnoloogiaalgatuste töötajate valiku protsessi reguleerivad ELi personalieeskirjad.
Tegevjuhtide ja nende personali suhtes kehtivad ELi personalieeskirjades sätestatud ametieetika põhimõtted ning neil ei ole lubatud kaitsta ega esindada kellegi erihuve, olgu need VKEd või suurettevõtted. Selle nõude rikkumise eest on ELi personalieeskirjades ette nähtud distsiplinaarkaristus. Sellegipoolest võetakse aga määrustes, millega ühised tehnoloogiaalgatused luuakse, arvesse VKEsid. Neis sisalduvad sätted, mis soosivad ja toetavad VKEde kaasamist ja esindatust juhatuse tasandil."@et5
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@fi7
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@fr8
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@hu11
"La prima parte dell’interrogazione dell’onorevole Gutiérrez-Cortines chiede se la procedura per la selezione degli alti dirigenti delle iniziative tecnologiche congiunte (ITC) garantisce l’indipendenza dall’influenza di grandi imprese.
La risposta è affermativa. La procedura per la selezione degli alti dirigenti delle ITC segue le linee guida per la nomina dei responsabili degli organismi comunitari e delle imprese comuni. Tali linee guida vengono applicate a tutti gli organismi dell’Unione europea e, pertanto, garantiscono che i processi di selezione delle ITC siano del tutto coerenti con quelli di altri organismi comunitari, quali le agenzie esecutive e di regolazione. Dunque, in tutti gli organismi dell’Unione europea, comprese le ITC, si procede in base alle competenze e al merito, con garanzia di parità di trattamento per tutti i candidati.
Dunque, come previsto da tali linee guida, gli alti funzionari della Commissione hanno rappresentato la maggioranza sia nelle commissioni di preselezione che in sede dei lavori del comitato consultivo per le nomine. Si tratta delle uniche due fasi della procedure in cui le grandi imprese hanno avuto un qualche ruolo, a parte il ruolo indiretto dei rappresentanti delle imprese al momento di effettuare le nomine, quando hanno espresso il loro voto all’interno del consiglio direttivo a partire da un elenco ristretto di candidati stilato dalla Commissione.
Si noti come i costi di operativi e di esercizio di tutte le ITC sono parzialmente coperti dalle aziende, per un importo pari al 67 per cento nel caso di ENIAC e ARTEMIS, due iniziative tecnologiche congiunte nei settori delle nanotecnologie e dei sistemi informatici integrati. Ciò dimostra quanto il loro coinvolgimento sia necessario e in linea con la natura delle ITC quali forme di partenariato pubblico-privato.
La seconda parte dell’interrogazione chiede se l’impegno dell’Unione europea a sostegno delle PMI viene tenuto in considerazione in tali procedure di selezione. La risposta è che, solitamente, i criteri per la selezione del personale per l’operatività quotidiana delle ITC devono essere fondati su competenza e merito, com’è stato detto poc’anzi rispetto alle linee guida per la nomina. In tal senso, la promozione delle PMI rappresenta un’importante obiettivo politico della Commissione che, tuttavia, potrebbe non tradursi facilmente nei criteri per la nomina del personale previsti dallo statuto del personale dell’Unione europea, quale ad esempio il personale delle ITC.
Il direttore esecutivo e il suo personale sono vincolati dello statuto del personale UE al rispetto dei principi di etica professionale, e pertanto non possono tutelare o rappresentare interessi specifici, né delle PMI né delle grandi aziende. Lo statuto prevede procedimenti disciplinari in caso di violazione di tali vincoli. Ciò detto, le norme che istituiscono le iniziative tecnologiche congiunte sono pensate per le PMI. Contengono disposizioni che incoraggiano e promuovono la partecipazione e la rappresentanza delle PMI a livello dei consigli direttivi."@it12
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@lt14
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@lv13
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@mt15
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@nl3
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@pl16
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@pt17
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@ro18
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@sk19
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@sl20
"The first part of Mrs Gutiérrez-Cortines’ question refers to whether the procedure for the selection of the JTI’s senior executive managers guarantees independence from the influence of large companies.
The answer is ‘yes’. The procedure for selecting the executive directors for joint technology initiatives follows the guidelines for the appointment of heads of community agencies and joint undertakings. The guidelines are applied to all EU bodies and hence ensure that JTI selection processes are fully coherent with those of other EU bodies such as executive agencies and regulatory agencies. In this way, the process for all EU bodies including JTIs is based on competence and merit and guarantees equal treatment to all candidates.
In this respect, as was prescribed in the guidelines, Commission senior staff members were a majority both in the pre-selection committees and during the proceedings of the Consultative Committee on Appointments. These are the only two steps of the procedure where industry was given a role in one way or the other, apart from the indirect role of industry representatives when they cast their vote in the governing board at the moment of the appointment itself, which is among candidates shortlisted by the Commission.
It is to be noted that the running and operational costs of all JTIs are partially covered by industry, up to 67% in the case of ENIAC and ARTEMIS, the two joint technology initiatives in the field of nanotechnologies and embedded computer systems. This implies that their involvement was necessary and in keeping with the nature of JTIs as public-private partnerships.
The second part of the question asks whether in those selection processes the EU commitment to supporting SMEs is taken into account. The answer is that, generally, staff selection criteria for the day-to-day operation of the JTI must be based – as mentioned earlier regarding the guidelines for appointment – on competence and merit. In this respect, the promotion of SMEs is an important political objective of the Commission but may not easily translate into selection criteria for the appointment of staff covered by the EU Staff Regulations such as JTI staff.
The executive director and his or her staff are covered by professional ethics principles in the EU Staff Regulations and thus they are not allowed to defend or represent any specific interest, be it SMEs or large companies. The EU Staff Regulations foresee disciplinary procedures for breaches of this obligation. Having said that, the regulations establishing the joint technology initiatives cater for SMEs. They contain provisions encouraging and promoting SME participation and representation at governing board level."@sv22
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Member of the Commission"18,20,15,19,14,16,11,11,22,7,10,2,3,13,21,9,17,8
"Máire Geoghegan-Quinn,"18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,22,2,10,7,3,13,4,21,9,17,12,8
|
| lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples