Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-07-06-Speech-2-147"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20100706.24.2-147"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular, small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@en4
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Pane předsedající, podpořila jsem pozměňovací návrh 15, protože podporuji udělení výjimky pro vnitrostátní, regionální, městskou, příměstskou a venkovskou linkovou dopravu na omezenou dobu. Vedla mě k tomu především obava, že některé požadavky a související náklady, které budou přeneseny zejména na malé a střední podniky, malé provozovatele, jsou takové povahy, že by to mohlo některým z nich zabránit v dalším pokračování činnosti. Domnívám se, že v některých případech by to jistě znamenalo stažení z některých tras a z některých trhů, což by mohlo způsobit, že pro některé zákazníky by už nemusela být veřejná doprava dostupná. Zejména mám obavu o dopravu ve venkovských oblastech. Městská a regionální doprava to pravděpodobně zvládne, ale pokud jde o dopravu na venkově, domnívám se, že by – pokud tento právní předpis projde – mohla hrozit situace, kdy dopravní provozovatelé nebudou tyto trasy nadále obsluhovat. Často v tomto Parlamentu hovoříme o nadměrném zatěžování malých a středních podniků, o nákladech atd. Domnívám se, že v současné hospodářské situaci by bylo rozumným kompromisem povolit na určitou dobu výjimku."@cs1
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@da2
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@de9
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@el10
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@es21
"Austatud juhataja! Toetasin muudatusettepanekut 15, kuna pooldan kodumaistele, piirkondlikele, linnaliiniveo, linnalähise liiniveo ja maakonnaliinidega seonduvatele bussiteenustele piiratud aja jooksul tehtavat erandit. Tunnen siin muret seetõttu, et mõned VKEdele esitatavad nõuded ning kulud võivad just väikeettevõtjatele nii suureks osutuda, et tagajärjeks on lausa äritegevuse lõpetamine. Olen kindel, et mõnedel juhtudel tõmbuvad nad teatud liinidelt ja turgudelt tagasi, mis jätab kliendid ilma juurdepääsust ühistranspordile. Kõige enam teeb mulle muret maapiirkondade transport. Linna- ja regionaaltranspordiga tõenäoliselt probleeme ei teki, kuid maapiirkondade transpordi osas esineb küllaltki reaalne oht – kui see õigusakt vastu võetakse –, et leiame end olukorrast, kus maapiirkondade transporditeenuse osutajad vastavatel liinidel enam ei tegutse. Räägime siin parlamendis alati VKEde ülekoormamisest ja kuludest ning muust sellisest. Arvan, et praegust majandusseisu arvesse võttes oleks mõistlikuks kompromissiks see, kui teeksime neile siinkohal kindlaks ajaperioodiks erandi."@et5
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@fi7
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@fr8
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@hu11
"Signor Presidente, ho appoggiato l’emendamento n. 15 in quanto sono a favore dell’esenzione per i servizi nazionali, regionali, urbani, suburbani e rurali per un periodo di tempo limitato. Presumo che la mia motivazione sia costituita dal fatto che alcuni requisiti e costi che dovranno essere sostenuti dalle PMI, e in particolare dai piccoli operatori, saranno tali da far rischiare ad alcuni il fallimento. Ritengo che in alcuni casi dovranno sicuramente abolire determinate tratte e mercati, privando i clienti del trasporto pubblico. Mi preoccupa in particolare il settore dei trasporti rurali. Forse i trasporti urbani e regionali sopravviveranno, ma per i trasporti rurali, credo che rischieremmo – se la legislazione dovesse essere promulgata – di trovarci in una situazione in cui gli operatori dei trasporti rurali cesseranno di servire tali tratte. In questa sede trattiamo spesso la questione degli oneri eccessivi per le PMI e dei costi. A mio avviso, nella situazione economica attuale, un compromesso ragionevole consisterebbe nell’autorizzare un’eccezione per un periodo di tempo prestabilito."@it12
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@lt14
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@lv13
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@mt15
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@nl3
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@pl16
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@pt17
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@ro18
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@sk19
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@sl20
"Mr President, I supported Amendment 15 because I support the exemption, for a limited time, for domestic, regional, urban, suburban and rural services. I suppose my concern here is that some of the requirements and costs that will be passed on to SMEs, in particular small operators, will be such that they may even put some of them out of business. Certainly I think that in some cases they may withdraw from certain routes and from certain markets and that will leave customers with no public transport availability. I am particularly concerned about the area of rural transport. Probably urban and regional transport will be all right but, when it comes to rural transport, I think we may be in danger – if this legislation goes through – of finding a situation where rural transport operators will no longer continue to work those routes. We always talk in this Parliament about overburdening SMEs and about costs and so on. I think that, in the current economic situation, a reasonable compromise would be to allow an exemption for a fixed period of time."@sv22
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Marian Harkin (ALDE ). -"18,20,15,19,14,16,11,7,22,10,2,3,13,21,9,17,8
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Romanian.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
22http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz
23http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph