Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-04-25-Speech-3-331"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20070425.38.3-331"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@en4
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@cs1
"Spørgsmål nr. 2 er trukket tilbage. Spørgsmål nr. 3 af Sarah Ludford () For at gøre de retshåndhævende myndigheders efterforskning og strafforfølgning af personer, som har begået folkedrab, forbrydelser mod menneskeheden og krigsforbrydelser, mere effektiv vedtog Rådet afgørelse 2002/494/JHAom oprettelse af et europæisk net af kontaktpunkter vedrørende folkedrab og afgørelse 2003/335/JHAom efterforskning og strafforfølgning af alvorlige internationale forbrydelser. Hvilke planer har Rådet for at forbedre netværkets institutionelle infrastruktur for at styrke samarbejdet mellem de nationale myndigheder og bidrage til at skabe en konsekvent fremgangsmåde i medlemsstaterne med henblik på at kæmpe mod straffrihed for alvorlige internationale forbrydelser? Hvad er Rådets holdning med hensyn til et forslag om at gøre Eurojust til sekretariat for netværket? Vil Rådet overveje at sætte netværket på dagsordenen for møderne i artikel 36-udvalget (CATS) for at sikre en opfølgning af netværkkonklusionerne? Hvordan vil Rådet på baggrund af artikel 4 i Rådets afgørelse 2003/335/JHA behandle den nuværende mangel på specialiserede krigsforbrydelsesenheder i medlemsstaterne?"@da2
"Anfrage Nr. 2 wurde zurückgezogen. Anfrage Nr. 3 von Sarah Ludford () Im Hinblick auf eine Förderung der Effizienz der Ermittlung und strafrechtlichen Verfolgung von Personen, die für Völkermord, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Kriegsverbrechen verantwortlich sind, durch die Gerichte, hat der Rat den Beschluss 2002/494/JIzur Einrichtung eines Europäischen Netzes von Anlaufstellen betreffend Personen, die für Völkermord, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Kriegsverbrechen verantwortlich sind, und den Beschluss 2003/335/JIbetreffend die Ermittlung und Strafverfolgung von Völkermord, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Kriegsverbrechen verabschiedet. Über welche Pläne verfügt der Rat zur Verbesserung der institutionellen Infrastruktur des Netzwerkes, um die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den nationalen Behörden zu verbessern und zur Schaffung eines einheitlichen Ansatzes der Mitgliedstaaten bei der Bekämpfung der Straflosigkeit für schwere internationale Verbrechen beizutragen? Wie steht der Rat zu dem Vorschlag zum Aufbau von EUROJUST als dem Sekretariat dieses Netzwerkes? Inwieweit beabsichtigt der Rat, das Netzwerk auf die Tagesordnung der Sitzungen des Artikel 36-Ausschusses (CATS) einzubeziehen, um die Weiterbearbeitung von Netzwerkschlussfolgerungen zu gewährleisten? Wie gedenkt der Rat vor dem Hintergrund von Artikel 4 des Beschlusses des Rates 2003/335/JI, den in den Mitgliedstaaten derzeit herrschenden Mangel an Spezialeinheiten in Bezug auf Kriegsverbrechen anzugehen?"@de9
"Η ερώτηση 2 αποσύρεται. Ερώτηση αριθ. 3 της κ. Sarah Ludford () Για να ενισχυθεί η αποτελεσματικότητα της έρευνας και της άσκησης διώξεων μέσω των δυνάμεων της τάξης εις βάρος προσώπων που διέπραξαν γενοκτονία, εγκλήματα κατά της ανθρωπότητας και εγκλήματα πολέμου, το Συμβούλιο ενέκρινε την απόφαση 2002/494/ΔΕΥγια την ίδρυση ευρωπαϊκού δικτύου σημείων επαφής σχετικά με τη γενοκτονία και την απόφαση 2003/335/ΔΕΥσχετικά με τη διεύρυνση και τη δίωξη σοβαρών διεθνών εγκλημάτων. Ποια σχέδια διαθέτει το Συμβούλιο για να βελτιώσει τη θεσμική υποδομή του δικτύου, ώστε να ενισχύσει τη συνεργασία μεταξύ των εθνικών αρχών και να συμβάλει στη δημιουργία συνεπούς προσέγγισης εκ μέρους των κρατών μελών στον αγώνα κατά της ασυλίας για σοβαρά διεθνή εγκλήματα; Ποια είναι η άποψη του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με την πρόταση να καθιερωθεί η EUROJUST ως γραμματεία του δικτύου; Προτίθεται το Συμβούλιο να εντάξει το δίκτυο στην ημερήσια διάταξη των συνεδριάσεων της επιτροπής του άρθρου 36, για να διασφαλιστεί η συνέχεια στα συμπεράσματα του δικτύου; Ενόψει του άρθρου 4 της απόφασης 2003/335/ΔΕΥ του Συμβουλίου, πώς προτίθεται το Συμβούλιο να αντιμετωπίσει το υπάρχον κενό σε μονάδες εντός των κρατών μελών οι οποίες θα ειδικεύονται στα εγκλήματα πολέμου;"@el10
"La pregunta n.º 2 ha sido retirada. Pregunta n.º 3 formulada por Sarah Ludford () ICon objeto de incrementar la eficacia de la investigación y el enjuiciamiento de las personas responsables de genocidio, crímenes contra la humanidad y crímenes de guerra, el Consejo adoptó la Decisión 2002/494/JAI(1) relativa a la creación de una Red europea de puntos de contacto sobre genocidio, y la Decisión 2003/335/JAI(2) sobre investigación y enjuiciamiento de crímenes internacionales. ¿Qué planes tiene el Consejo para mejorar la infraestructura institucional de la Red, con el fin de reforzar la cooperación entre las autoridades nacionales y contribuir a la creación de un enfoque coherente de los Estados miembros en su lucha contra la impunidad de los crímenes internacionales? ¿Cuál es la posición del Consejo con respecto a la propuesta de que Eurojust sea la secretaría de la Red? ¿Va a examinar el Consejo la posibilidad de incluir la mencionada Red en el orden del día de las reuniones del Comité del artículo 36, con objeto de garantizar el seguimiento de las conclusiones de dicha Red? A la luz del artículo 4 de la Decisión 2003/335/JAI, ¿cómo va a abordar el Consejo la falta actual de unidades especializadas en crímenes de guerra en los Estados miembros?"@es21
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@et5
". Kysymys nro 2 on peruutettu. Seuraavana on Sarah Ludfordin kysymys nro 3 () Neuvosto on hyväksynyt päätöksen 2002/494/YOSjoukkotuhonnasta, ihmisyyttä vastaan tehdyistä rikoksista ja sotarikoksista vastuussa olevia henkilöitä koskevan eurooppalaisen yhteyspisteiden verkoston perustamisesta ja päätöksen 2003/335/YOSjoukkotuhontarikosten, ihmisyyttä vastaan tehtyjen rikosten ja sotarikosten tutkinnasta ja syytteeseenpanosta tehostaakseen lainvalvontaviranomaisten toimintaa näiden tutkiessa joukkotuhontaa, ihmisyyttä vastaan tehtyjä rikoksia ja sotarikoksia ja asettaessa henkilöitä syytteeseen mainituista teoista. Millä tavoin neuvosto aikoo parantaa verkoston institutionaalista infrastruktuuria vahvistaakseen kansallisten viranomaisten keskinäistä yhteistyötä ja edistääkseen jäsenvaltioiden yhtenäistä lähestymistapaa vakavia kansainvälisiä rikoksia koskevan rankaisemattomuuden torjunnassa? Mitä mieltä neuvosto on ehdotuksesta perustaa Eurojust-yksikkö verkoston sihteeristöksi? Harkitseeko neuvosto verkoston ottamista 36 artiklan komitean kokousten esityslistalle, jotta verkoston päätelmien seurannasta voidaan huolehtia? Kuinka neuvosto aikoo oikaista jäsenvaltioissa nykyisin ilmenevän sotarikoksiin erikoistuneiden yksiköiden puutteen, kun otetaan huomioon neuvoston päätöksen 2003/335/YOS 4 artikla?"@fi7
"La question n° 2 a été retirée. J’appelle la question n° 3 de Mme Ludford (): Afin de permettre aux autorités chargées de faire respecter la loi d’accroître l’efficacité des enquêtes et des poursuites pénales se rapportant aux personnes coupables de génocide, de crimes contre l’humanité et de crimes de guerre, le Conseil a adopté la décision 2002/494/JAIportant création d’un réseau européen de points de contact en ce qui concerne les personnes responsables de génocide et la décision 2003/335/JAIconcernant les enquêtes et les poursuites pénales relatives aux crimes internationaux graves. Quelles mesures le Conseil compte-t-il prendre pour améliorer l’organisation de ce réseau sur le plan institutionnel, et ce afin de renforcer la coopération entre les autorités nationales et de favoriser l’élaboration, par les États membres, d’une stratégie cohérente en matière de lutte contre l’impunité des crimes internationaux graves? Quelle est sa position à l’égard de la proposition visant à confier le secrétariat du réseau à Eurojust? Le Conseil entend-il inscrire le réseau à l’ordre du jour des réunions du Comité de l’article 36 (CATS) de manière à garantir un suivi des conclusions dudit réseau? Eu égard à l’article 4 de la décision 2003/335/JAI, comment le Conseil entend-il remédier à l’absence, à l’heure actuelle, d’unités spécialisées dans les crimes de guerre au sein des États membres?"@fr8
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@hu11
"L’interrogazione n. 2 è stata ritirata. Annuncio l’interrogazione n. 3 dell’onorevole Sarah Ludford (): Per aumentare l’efficacia delle autorità giudiziarie nell’accertamento e nel perseguimento di persone colpevoli di genocidio, di crimini contro l’umanità e di crimini di guerra, il Consiglio ha adottato la decisione 2002/494/GAIrelativa all’istituzione di una rete europea di punti di contatto in materia di genocidio e la decisione 2003/335/GAIrelativa all’accertamento e al perseguimento di gravi crimini internazionali. Quali misure prevede di adottare il Consiglio per migliorare l’infrastruttura istituzionale della rete, al fine di rafforzare la cooperazione tra le autorità nazionali e contribuire alla creazione di un’impostazione coerente da parte degli Stati membri nella lotta contro l’impunità in relazione a gravi crimini internazionali? Qual è l’atteggiamento del Consiglio sulla proposta di istituzionalizzare EUROJUST come segretariato della rete di punti di contatto? Prenderà il Consiglio in esame la prospettiva di inserire la rete nell’ordine del giorno delle riunioni del comitato dell’articolo 36 (CATS) per dare seguito alle conclusioni della rete stessa? Alla luce dell’articolo 4 della decisione del Consiglio 2003/335/GAI, quali iniziative intende adottare il Consiglio per far fronte all’attuale mancanza, negli Stati membri, di unità specializzate in crimini di guerra?"@it12
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@lt14
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@lv13
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@mt15
"Vraag 2 is ingetrokken. Vraag nr. 3 van Sarah Ludford (): Om de instanties voor rechtshandhaving in staat te stellen personen die verantwoordelijk zijn voor genocide, misdrijven tegen de menselijkheid en oorlogsmisdaden, doeltreffender te kunnen opsporen en vervolgen heeft de Raad Besluit 2002/494/JBZtot instelling van een Europees netwerk van aanspreekpunten inzake personen die voor genocide verantwoordelijk zijn, alsmede Besluit 2003/335/JBZ inzake opsporing en vervolging van ernstige internationale misdrijven goedgekeurd. Welke plannen heeft de Raad om de institutionele infrastructuur van het netwerk te verbeteren, de samenwerking tussen nationale autoriteiten te versterken en bij te dragen aan een consistente aanpak van de lidstaten als het gaat om bestrijding van straffeloosheid voor ernstige internationale misdrijven? Wat is de houding van de Raad ten aanzien van een voorstel om Eurojust met het secretariaat van het netwerk te belasten? Overweegt de Raad om het netwerk op de agenda te zetten van vergaderingen van comités overeenkomstig artikel 36 (CATS) om te zorgen voor de follow-up van conclusies inzake het netwerk? Hoe wil de Raad, gelet op artikel 4 van het Besluit van de Raad 2003/335/JBZ, het huidige gebrek aan gespecialiseerde eenheden inzake oorlogsmisdaden in de lidstaten aanpakken?"@nl3
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@pl16
"A pergunta nº 2 foi retirada. Pergunta nº 3, da deputada Sarah Ludford () A fim de aumentar a eficácia da investigação e perseguição penal, por parte das autoridades policiais, de pessoas acusadas de genocídios, crimes contra a humanidade e crimes de guerra, o Conselho adoptou a Decisão 2002/494/JHA, que cria uma Rede Europeia de pontos de contacto relativa a pessoas responsáveis por genocídios, crimes contra a humanidade e crimes de guerra e a Decisão 2003/335/JHA, relativa à investigação e instauração e perseguição penal de graves crimes internacionais. Quais são as medidas que o Conselho pretende adoptar para melhorar a infra-estrutura institucional da rede, a fim de reforçar a cooperação entre as autoridades nacionais e contribuir para a criação de uma abordagem coerente pelos Estados-Membros na luta contra a impunidade relativamente aos graves crimes internacionais? Qual é a opinião do Conselho a respeito da sugestão apresentada no sentido de fazer com que Eurojust seja o secretariado da rede? Irá o Conselho estudar a possibilidade de incluir a rede na ordem do dia das reuniões do Comité do artigo 36º (CATS), a fim de assegurar um acompanhamento das conclusões da rede? À luz do artigo 4º da Decisão 2003/335/JHA do Conselho, de que modo tenciona o Conselho responder à inexistência, actualmente, de unidades especiais especificamente responsáveis pela investigação e perseguição penal dos crimes de guerra nos Estados-Membros?"@pt17
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@ro18
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@sk19
"Question 2 has been withdrawn. Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () In order to increase the effectiveness of the investigation and prosecution by law enforcement authorities of persons who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the Council adopted Decision 2002/494/JHAon setting up a network of contact points on genocide and Decision 2003/335/JHAon the investigation and prosecution of serious international crimes. What plans does the Council have to improve the institutional infrastructure of the network, in order to strengthen cooperation among the national authorities and contribute to the creation of a consistent approach by Member States in the fight against impunity for grave international crimes? What is the attitude of the Council regarding a suggestion to establish EUROJUST as the secretariat for the network? Will the Council consider including the network on the agenda of the Article 36 Committee (CATS) meetings so as to ensure a follow up of network conclusions? In light of Article 4 of Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, how will the Council address the current lack of specialised war crimes units within Member States?"@sl20
"Fråga nr 2 har dragits tillbaka. Fråga nr 3 från Sarah Ludford () För att effektivisera de brottsbekämpande myndigheternas utredningar och lagföringar av personer som har gjort sig skyldiga till folkmord, brott mot mänskligheten och krigsförbrytelser antog rådet beslut 2002/494/RIFom inrättande av ett europeiskt nätverk av kontaktpunkter med avseende på folkmord och beslut 2003/335/RIFom utredningar och lagföring som avser allvarliga internationella brott. Vad tänker rådet göra för att förbättra nätverkets institutionella infrastruktur och därmed stärka samarbetet mellan de nationella myndigheterna och bidra till att skapa en konsekvent strategi i medlemsstaterna när det gäller kampen mot straffrihet för allvarliga internationella brott? Hur ställer sig rådet till förslaget att göra Eurojust till sekretariat för nätverket? Tänker rådet föra upp nätverket på föredragningslistan för artikel 36-kommitténs möten för att säkra en uppföljning av nätverkets slutsatser? Hur kommer rådet mot bakgrund av artikel 4 i rådets beslut 2003/335/RIF att behandla den nuvarande avsaknaden av specialiserade enheter för krigsförbrytelser i medlemsstaterna?"@sv22
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Aihe: Joukkotuhonnan, ihmisyyttä vastaan tehtyjen rikosten ja sotarikosten tutkiminen ja niistä syytteeseen asettaminen"7
"Angående: Utredningar och lagföring som avser folkmord, brott mot mänskligheten och krigsförbrytelser"22
"Assunto: Investigação e perseguição penal em caso de genocídios, crimes contra a humanidade e crimes de guerra"17
"Asunto: Investigación y enjuiciamiento de delitos de genocidio, crímenes contra la humanidad y crímenes de guerra"21
"Betreft: Onderzoek naar en vervolging van genocide, misdrijven tegen de menselijkheid en oorlogsmisdaden"3
"Betrifft: Ermittlung und strafrechtliche Verfolgung von Völkermord, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Kriegsverbrechen"9
"Objet: Enquêtes et poursuites pénales relatives aux génocides, aux crimes contre l’humanité et aux crimes de guerre"8
"Oggetto: Accertamento e perseguimento del genocidio, dei crimini contro l’umanità e dei crimini di guerra"12
"Om: Efterforskning og strafforfølgning vedrørende folkedrab, forbrydelser mod menneskeheden og krigsforbrydelser"2
"President."18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4
"Θέμα: Η έρευνα και η άσκηση διώξεων για γενοκτονίες, εγκλήματα κατά της ανθρωπότητας και εγκλήματα πολέμου"10

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Romanian.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
22http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz
23http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph