Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-15-Speech-4-136"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2007-02-15"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explicaţii privind votul⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070215.20.4-136"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-02-15-Speech-4-137⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Mary Lou McDONALD⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Sinn Féin (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²³ substitute; LIBE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)²³ member; Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway and to the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)²³ member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²³ member; EMPL (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)²³ substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)²³
lpv:translated text	"Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@cs¹ "Blandt årsagerne til, at jeg ikke kan støtte denne betænkning, er: henvisningen til brug af kampenheder (kampgrupper) og styrket samarbejde med NATO den uklare brug af udtrykket "radikalisering" som indikator for "ikkedemokratiske handlinger" støtten til samarbejde mellem medlemsstaters og tredjelandes sikkerheds- og efterretningstjenester og politi-, rets- og toldmyndigheder, hvilket bringer emnet databeskyttelse på bane og udgør en forringelse af borgerrettigheder og respekt for menneskerettigheder sammenblandingen af politi-, sikkerheds- og efterretningstjenester, hvilken kan føre til magtmisbrug over for borgerne, som det skete for nyligt i Irland sammenkædningen af interne politikker med terrorisme fører til elimineringen af strukturen på tværs af søjlerne, hvilket trækker logikken i udkastet til en EU-forfatning frem. Statsterrorisme nævnes ikke. Nogle af de grundlæggende årsager til vold (besættelse, uretfærdigheder, sociale og økonomiske årsager) nævnes dårligt nok. Betænkningen retter søgelyset mod islam, hvorved den skaber diskrimination og underminerer respekt for forskellige religioner og kulturer."@da² ". Aus folgenden Gründen, unter anderen, kann ich diesem Bericht nicht meine Zustimmung geben der Hinweis auf den Einsatz von Kampfeinheiten (battle groups) und die verstärkte Zusammenarbeit mit der NATO; die vage Verwendung des Terminus ‚Radikalisierung’ als Indiz für ‚nicht demokratische Aktionen’; die Förderung der Zusammenarbeit zwischen Sicherheits- und Nachrichtendiensten sowie den Polizei-, Justiz- und Zollbehörden der Mitgliedstaaten und von Drittstaaten, was das Problem des Datenschutzes aufwirft und eine Verschlechterung im Bereich der bürgerlichen Freiheiten und der Achtung der Menschenrechte bedeutet; die Vermischung von Polizei-, Sicherheits- und nachrichtendienstlichen Kräften, was zum Missbrauch von Macht zum Nachteil der Bürger führen könnte, wie wir es jüngst in Irland erfahren haben; die Verknüpfung von Innenpolitik und Terrorismus führt zur Beseitigung der ‚Interpillar’-Struktur, was der Logik des Verfassungsentwurfs für die EU entspricht; Nirgends wird der Staatsterrorismus erwähnt. Einige grundlegende Ursachen der Gewalt (Beschäftigung, Ungerechtigkeit, sozioökonomische Ursachen) werden kaum genannt. Der Bericht weist mit dem Finger auf den Islam, fördert damit die Diskriminierung und untergräbt die Achtung vor anderen Religionen und Kulturen."@de⁹ "Μεταξύ των λόγων για τους οποίους δεν μπορώ να υποστηρίξω αυτήν την έκθεση είναι: η αναφορά στη χρησιμοποίηση μάχιμων μονάδων και στην ενισχυμένη συνεργασία με το ΝΑΤΟ· η αόριστη χρησιμοποίηση του όρου «ριζοσπαστικοποίηση» ως δείκτη για «μη δημοκρατικές ενέργειες»· η προώθηση της συνεργασίας στο εσωτερικό των υπηρεσιών ασφάλειας και πληροφοριών, των δικαστικών αρχών και των τελωνειακών αρχών των κρατών μελών και τρίτων χωρών, που θέτει το θέμα της προστασίας δεδομένων και αποτελεί επιδείνωση των πολιτικών ελευθεριών και του σεβασμού των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων· η ανάμειξη αστυνομικών δυνάμεων και δυνάμεων ασφαλείας και πληροφοριών, που μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε κατάχρηση εξουσίας εις βάρος των πολιτών, όπως είδαμε πρόσφατα στην Ιρλανδία· η διασύνδεση των εσωτερικών πολιτικών με την τρομοκρατία έχει ως αποτέλεσμα την εξάλειψη της δομής των εσωτερικών πυλώνων, προβάλλοντας τη λογική του σχεδίου Συντάγματος της ΕΕ. Δεν αναφέρεται πουθενά η κρατική τρομοκρατία. Ορισμένα από τα βασικά αίτια της βίας (κατοχή, αδικία, κοινωνικά και οικονομικά αίτια) μόλις που αναφέρονται. Η έκθεση στοχοποιεί το Ισλάμ, καλλιεργώντας τις διακρίσεις και υπονομεύοντας τον σεβασμό των διαφορετικών θρησκειών και πολιτισμών."@el¹⁰ ". Entre las razones por las que no puedo apoyar este informe están: la referencia a la utilización de unidades de combate (grupos de combate) y la cooperación reforzada con la OTAN; la vaguedad del término «radicalización» como indicador de «acciones no democráticas»; la promoción de la cooperación entre los servicios de seguridad e inteligencia y las autoridades policiales, judiciales y aduaneras de los Estados miembros y de terceros países, lo que plantea la cuestión de la protección de datos y supone una merma de las libertades civiles y del respeto a los derechos humanos; la mezcla de fuerzas policiales, de seguridad y de inteligencia, lo que podría llevara a abusos de poder contra los ciudadanos, como hemos visto recientemente en Irlanda; la interconexión de políticas internas con el terrorismo lleva a la eliminación de la estructura entre pilares, lo que favorece la lógica del proyecto de Constitución para la UE. No hay alusión alguna al terrorismo de Estado. Algunas de las causas profundas de la violencia (la ocupación, la injusticia, las condiciones sociales y económicas) apenas se mencionan. El informe señala con el dedo al islam, incitando a la discriminación y socavando el respeto de las diferentes religiones y culturas."@es²¹ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@et⁵ "Vastustan tätä mietintöä muun muassa seuraavista syistä: Mietinnössä viitataan taisteluosastojen käyttöön ja Naton kanssa tehtävän yhteistyön lisäämiseen. Mietinnössä käytetään epämääräisellä tavalla termiä "radikalisoituminen", jolla viitataan "epädemokraattiseen toimintaan". Tekstissä puhutaan jäsenvaltioiden ja yhteisön ulkopuolisten maiden turvallisuus- ja tiedustelupalvelujen sekä poliisin, oikeus- ja tulliviranomaisten yhteistyön tehostamisesta, mikä nostaa esiin tietosuojaa koskevan ongelman sekä uhkaa kansalaisvapauksia ja ihmisoikeuksien kunnioittamista. Mietinnössä yhdistetään poliisivoimat, turvallisuus- ja tiedustelupalvelut, mikä saattaa johtaa kansalaisiin kohdistuvaan vallan väärinkäyttöön, kuten Irlannissa on viime aikoina nähty. Kun sisäpolitiikka liitetään terrorismin torjuntaan, poistetaan pilarien välinen rakenne, mikä on EU:n perustuslakiluonnoksen logiikan mukaista. Tekstissä ei mainita sanallakaan valtion harjoittamaa terrorismia. Tekstissä mainitaan hädin tuskin joitakin väkivallan perimmäisiä syitä (työttömyyttä, epäoikeudenmukaisuutta, sosiaalisia ja taloudellisia syitä). Mietinnössä osoitetaan syyttävällä sormella islamia, mikä on omiaan lisäämään syrjintää ja heikentämään erilaisten uskontojen ja kulttuurien kunnioittamista."@fi⁷ ". Voici quelques-unes des raisons pour lesquelles je ne peux soutenir ce rapport: la référence à l’utilisation d’unités de combat (groupes de combats) et au renforcement de la coopération avec l’OTAN; l’utilisation vague du terme «radicalisation» en tant qu’indicateur des «actions non démocratiques»; la promotion de la coopération entre les services de sécurité et de renseignement et les autorités policières, judiciaires et douanières des états membres et des pays tiers, qui soulève la question de la protection des données et constitue une atteinte aux libertés civiles et au respect des droits de l’homme; le mélange des services politiques, de sécurité et de renseignement, qui pourrait conduire à un abus de pouvoir à l’encontre des citoyens, comme nous l’avons récemment vu en Irlande; les liens entre les politiques internes et le terrorisme conduit à l’élimination de la structure par pilier, ce qui suit la logique du projet de Constitution de l’UE. Il n’est fait aucune mention du terrorisme d’état. Certaines des causes qui sont à l’origine de la violence (l’occupation, l’injustice, les problèmes sociaux et économiques) sont à peine évoquées. Le rapport montre l’Islam du doigt, encourageant la discrimination et portant atteinte au respect des différentes religions et cultures."@fr⁸ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@hu¹¹ ". Tra le ragioni che mi impediscono di sostenere questa relazione ricordo: il riferimento all’impiego di unità di combattimento e al rafforzamento della cooperazione con la NATO; il vago uso del temine “radicalizzazione” come indicatore di “azioni non democratiche”; la promozione della cooperazione tra servizi di sicurezza e di e autorità giudiziarie, doganali e di polizia degli Stati membri e di paesi terzi; ciò solleva il problema della protezione dei dati e provoca il deterioramento delle libertà civili e del rispetto dei diritti umani; l’intreccio tra forze di polizia, di sicurezza e di che può condurre ad abusi di potere contro i cittadini, come di recente si è constatato in Irlanda; lo stretto collegamento delle politiche interne con la lotta al terrorismo porta all’abolizione della struttura articolata in pilastri, promuovendo la logica del progetto di Costituzione dell’Unione europea. Non si fa parola del terrorismo di Stato. Si menzionano appena le cause di fondo della violenza (occupazione, ingiustizia, cause economiche e sociali). La relazione punta il dito contro l’ alimentando le discriminazioni e incrinando il rispetto per religioni e culture differenti."@it¹² "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@lt¹⁴ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@lv¹³ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@mt¹⁵ "Enkele redenen waarom ik dit verslag niet kan steunen zijn: de opmerking over het gebruik van gevechtseenheden en de versterking van de samenwerking met de NAVO; het vage gebruik van de term "radicalisering" als een indicator voor niet-democratische acties: de bevordering van de samenwerking tussen veiligheids- en inlichtingendiensten en politiële, gerechtelijke en douane-instanties van de lidstaten en van derde landen, die vragen oproept over het punt van de gegevensbescherming en die een aantasting van de burgerlijke vrijheden en de eerbiediging van de mensenrechten inhoudt; het vermengen van politie-, veiligheids- en inlichtingendiensten, wat tot machtsmisbruik ten nadele van de burgers kan leiden, zoals we onlangs hebben gezien in Ierland; de koppeling van binnenlands beleid met terrorismebeleid resulteert in de afschaffing van de pijlerstructuur en dringt de logica van de ontwerp-Grondwet voor de Europese Unie op. Staatsterrorisme wordt niet genoemd. Een aantal van de oorzaken die aan de wortel van geweld liggen (bezetting, onrecht, sociale en economische oorzaken) wordt nauwelijks genoemd. In het verslag wordt met de vinger gewezen naar de islam, waarmee discriminatie wordt gestimuleerd en het respect voor andere religies en culturen wordt ondermijnd."@nl³ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@pl¹⁶ "Algumas das razões pelas quais não posso dar o meu voto favorável ao relatório em apreço: a referência à utilização de “grupos de combate” ( ) e cooperação reforçada com a NATO; a utilização vaga do termo “radicalização” como um indicador de “acções não democráticas”; a promoção da cooperação entre serviços de segurança, serviços de informação e polícia, autoridades judiciais e aduaneiras dos Estados-Membros e países terceiros, levantando a questão da protecção de dados e representando uma deterioração das liberdades cívicas e do respeito pelos direitos humanos; mistura de polícia, forças de segurança e serviços de informação, podendo levar a abuso de poder contra os cidadãos, tal como aconteceu recentemente na Irlanda; a interligação das políticas internas com o terrorismo resulta na eliminação da estrutura interpilares, dando primazia à lógica do projecto de Constituição da UE. Não é mencionado o terrorismo de Estado. Algumas das causas profundas da violência (ocupação, injustiça, causas sociais e económicas) são escassamente mencionadas. O relatório aponta um dedo acusador ao Islão, promovendo a discriminação e subvertendo o respeito pelas diferentes religiões e culturas."@pt¹⁷ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@ro¹⁸ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@sk¹⁹ "Among the reasons I cannot support this report are: the reference to the use of combat units (battle groups) and enhanced cooperation with NATO; the vague use of the term ‘radicalisation’ as an indicator for ‘non-democratic actions’; the promotion of cooperation between security and intelligence services and police, judicial and customs authorities of the Member States and third countries, raising the issue of data protection and constituting a deterioration of civil liberties and respect for human rights; the mixing of police, security and intelligence forces, which could lead to abuse of powers against the citizens, as has been seen recently in Ireland; the interlinking of internal policies with terrorism results in the elimination of the inter-pillar structure, bringing forward the logic of the draft EU Constitution. There is no mention of state terrorism. Some of the root causes of violence (occupation, injustice, social and economic causes) are barely mentioned. The report points the finger at Islam, fostering discrimination and undermining respect for different religions and cultures."@sl²⁰ "Jag kan inte stödja betänkandet av bland annat följande orsaker: hänvisningen till användandet av stridsenheter (stridsgrupper) och ökat samarbete med Nato den oklara användningen av begreppet ”radikalisering” som ett tecken på ”icke-demokratiska åtgärder” främjandet av samarbete mellan säkerhets- och underrättelsetjänster, samt mellan medlemsstaternas och tredjeländers polisiära och rättsliga myndigheter samt tullmyndigheter, vilket väcker frågan om uppgiftsskydd och innebär en försämring av de civila friheterna och respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna blandningen av polisiära styrkor och styrkor från säkerhets- och underrättelsetjänsten, som skulle kunna leda till maktmissbruk gentemot medborgarna, vilket nyligen inträffade i Irland sammankopplingen mellan den inre politiken och bekämpningen av terrorismen, som skulle resultera i att strukturen mellan pelarna eliminerades, och att logiken i utkastet till konstitutionsfördrag främjades. Det finns ingen hänvisning till statsterrorism. Vissa av grundorsakerna till våldet (ockupation, orättvisa, sociala och ekonomiska orsaker) nämns knappt. I betänkandet pekar man ut Islam, underblåser diskriminering och undergräver respekten för olika religioner och kulturer."@sv²²
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Mary Lou McDonald (GUE/NGL ),"^{18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4} "battle groups"¹⁷ "in writing"^{18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4} "intelligence"¹² "islam"¹²