Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-14-Speech-3-246"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2007-02-14"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Dimensiunea externă a luptei împotriva terorismului (dezbatere)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070214.20.3-246"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-02-14-Speech-3-247⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Proinsias De Rossa⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFET (2007-01-31--2007-03-08)²³ unknown; Labour Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²³ member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²³ vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2004-09-20--2007-03-13)²³ member; EMPL (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)²³ member; Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (2006-01-19--2007-06-19)²³ member; PETI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)²³
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@cs¹ "Fru formand! Terrorhandlinger er altid kriminelle, men terrorisme er også altid et politisk projekt. Jeg mener, at dens aktuelle manifestation tager sigte på at nedbryde de humanitære værdier om lighed, uanset om det drejer sig om køn, religion eller nationalitet. Den tager også sigte på at undergrave borgerrettighederne - et pluralistisk demokratis borgerrettigheder. Men vi må være meget forsigtige, når vi omtaler de værdier. Hvis vi vælger at kalde dem "vores" værdier i stedet for at behandle dem som universelle værdier, mener jeg, at vi bidrager til "sammenstødet mellem civilisationer". Vores bedste forsvar af værdierne skal derfor primært være politisk. Vi må vise disse værdiers styrke ved at sikre frihed og livskvalitet for alle i Europa og hele verden. Der skal bestemt træffes sikkerhedsforanstaltninger såsom indsamling af efterretninger, retsforfølgning af lovovertrædere og naturligvis forebyggelse og retsforfølgning af tilskyndelse til had og vold. Men Fava-betænkningen, som vi drøftede længe i formiddags, viser, hvad der kan gå fuldstændig galt, hvis vi ikke er yderst forsigtige. Vi må undgå forenklede analyser. Vi må undgå antagelsen om, at enhver politisk eller religiøs fundamentalist er terrorist - det er ganske enkelt ikke rigtigt, og jeg mener, at det er vigtigt at huske på. Jeg kender mange fundamentalistiske katolikker, som ville være forfærdede ved tanken om, at nogen kunne finde på at begå en terrorhandling i deres navn. Jeg anmoder indtrængende om en mere dybtgående analyse end den, vi får for øjeblikket, og forsigtighed med ordvalget. Hvis det skal lykkes for os, må vi tackle ulighederne på vores kontinent, men også ulighederne på globalt plan."@da² ". Frau Präsidentin! Terroranschläge sind immer eine kriminelle Handlung, aber der Terrorismus ist auch stets ein politisches Projekt. Nach meiner Auffassung zielt der Terrorismus in seiner jetzigen Form darauf ab, die humanitären Werte der Gleichheit, ob nun zwischen den Geschlechtern, Religionen oder Nationalitäten, zu unterwandern. Auch sollen die Bürgerrechte – die Bürgerrechte einer pluralistischen Demokratie – untergraben werden. Wir müssen jedoch sehr vorsichtig sein, wenn wir von diesen Werten sprechen. Beanspruchen wir diese Werte für uns allein, anstatt sie als allgemeine Werte anzusehen, dann werden wir meines Erachtens in die Falle des „Kampfes der Kulturen“ tappen. Daher können diese Werte am besten auf politischer Ebene verteidigt werden. Wir müssen die Stärke dieser Werte unter Beweis stellen, in dem wir allen Europäern und allen Menschen auf der Welt Freiheit und Lebensqualität bieten. Sicherheitsmaßnahmen sind zweifelsohne unumgänglich: das Sammeln von nachrichtendienstlichen Informationen, die Verfolgung von Straftätern und auch die Verhinderung und Strafverfolgung der Aufwiegelung zu Hass und Gewalt. Doch der Bericht Fava, den wir heute Vormittag ausgiebig erörtert haben, zeigt, was alles in die falsche Richtung gehen kann, wenn wir hier nicht genau aufpassen. Vereinfachende Analysen gilt es zu vermeiden. Wir müssen uns von der Vorstellung befreien, dass jeder politische oder religiöse Fundamentalist auch ein Terrorist ist. Das ist einfach nicht wahr und muss meines Erachtens unbedingt bedacht werden. Ich kenne etliche fundamentalistische Katholiken, die entsetzt wären, wenn jemand in ihrem Namen einen Terroranschlag verüben würde. Ich würde mir wünschen, dass tiefer gehende Analysen erstellt werden als bisher und dass genauer auf die Wortwahl geachtet wird. Wenn wir wirklich Erfolge erzielen wollen, dann dürfen wir uns nicht nur mit Ungerechtigkeiten auf unserem Kontinent befassen, sondern müssen uns auch mit Ungerechtigkeiten auf der ganzen Welt beschäftigen."@de⁹ "Κυρία Πρόεδρε, οι τρομοκρατικές ενέργειες είναι πάντα εγκληματικές, αλλά η τρομοκρατία είναι επίσης πάντα ένα πολιτικό έργο. Πιστεύω ότι η σημερινή έκφρασή της αποσκοπεί να υπονομεύσει τις ανθρωπιστικές αξίες της ισότητας, είτε ως προς το φύλο, τη θρησκεία ή την εθνότητα. Προσπαθεί επίσης να υπονομεύσει τα πολιτικά δικαιώματα – τα πολιτικά δικαιώματα μιας πλουραλιστικής δημοκρατίας. Αλλά πρέπει να είμαστε πολύ προσεκτικοί όταν εκφράζουμε αυτές τις αξίες. Αν επιλέξουμε να τις χαρακτηρίσουμε αξίες «μας» αντί να τις αντιμετωπίσουμε ως οικουμενικές αξίες, πιστεύω ότι θα πέσουμε στην παγίδα της «σύγκρουσης των πολιτισμών». Συνεπώς, ο καλύτερος τρόπος για να προστατεύσουμε αυτές τις αξίες πρέπει να είναι καταρχήν πολιτικός. Πρέπει να επιδείξουμε τη δύναμη αυτών των αξιών διασφαλίζοντας την ελευθερία και την ισότητα της ζωής για όλους στην Ευρώπη και σε όλο τον κόσμο. Ασφαλώς πρέπει να εφαρμοστούν μέτρα ασφάλειας: η συγκέντρωση πληροφοριών, η ποινική δίωξη των παραβατών και, κυρίως, η πρόληψη και η τιμωρία της υποκίνησης μίσους και βίας. Αλλά η έκθεση Fava, για την οποία αφιερώσαμε πολύ χρόνο συζήτησης σήμερα το πρωί, υποδεικνύει τι μπορεί να πάει στραβά αν δεν είμαστε εξαιρετικά προσεκτικοί. Πρέπει να αποφύγουμε την υπεραπλουστευτική ανάλυση. Πρέπει να αποφύγουμε την αξίωση ότι κάθε πολιτικός ή θρησκευτικός φονταμενταλιστής είναι τρομοκράτης – αυτό δεν ισχύει και πιστεύω ότι είναι σημαντικό να το έχουμε αυτό υπόψη. Γνωρίζω πολλούς φονταμενταλιστές Καθολικούς οι οποίοι θα έφριτταν με την ιδέα ότι ο καθένας θα μπορούσε να διαπράξει μια τρομοκρατική ενέργεια στο όνομά τους. Απευθύνω έκκληση για βαθύτερη ανάλυση από αυτή που έχουμε σήμερα και για προσοχή όσον αφορά τη γλώσσα που χρησιμοποιούμε. Θα έλεγα ότι, αν θέλουμε να είμαστε επιτυχείς, πρέπει να αντιμετωπίσουμε τις ανισότητες στην ήπειρό μας, αλλά και παγκοσμίως."@el¹⁰ ". Señora Presidenta, los atentados terroristas son siempre criminales, pero el terrorismo es también siempre un proyecto político. Creo que su manifestación actual trata de subvertir los valores humanitarios de igualdad, ya sea por razones de género, religión o nacionalidad. Trata también de socavar los derechos civiles, los derechos civiles de una democracia plural. Pero hemos de tener mucho cuidado al expresar esos valores. Si decidimos llamarles «nuestros» valores en lugar de tratarlos como valores universales, creo que caeremos en la trampa del «choque de civilizaciones». Nuestra mejor defensa de esos valores tiene que ser, por tanto, principalmente política. Tenemos que demostrar la fuerza de esos valores para garantizar la libertad y calidad de vida de todos en Europa y en todo el mundo. Es evidente que hay que adoptar medidas de seguridad: la obtención de información, la persecución de los infractores de la ley y, de hecho, la prevención y persecución de la incitación al odio y a la violencia. Pero el informe Fava, cuyo debate nos ha llevado mucho tiempo esta mañana, indica que podemos equivocarnos de plano si no tenemos un cuidado extremo. Tenemos que evitar los análisis simplistas. Tenemos que evitar el supuesto de que todos los fundamentalismos políticos o religiosos son terrorismo, pues eso simplemente no es cierto y me parece importante que lo tengamos en cuenta. Conozco a muchos católicos fundamentalistas que se sentirían horrorizados ante la idea de que alguien cometiera un atentado terrorista en su nombre. Pido que se haga un análisis más profundo del que estamos haciendo actualmente y que tengamos cuidado con el lenguaje que utilizamos. Creo que si queremos ganar en esto tenemos que hacer frente a las desigualdades que existen en nuestro continente, pero también en el resto del mundo."@es²¹ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@et⁵ "Arvoisa puhemies, terroriteot ovat aina lainvastaisia, mutta terrorismilla on myös aina poliittiset tarkoitusperät. Mielestäni sen nykyisillä ilmenemismuodoilla pyritään vesittämään tasa-arvon humanitaarisia arvoja, liittyivätpä ne sukupuoleen, uskontoon tai kansallisuuteen. Niillä pyritään myös horjuttamaan kansalaisoikeuksia – moniarvoisessa demokratiassa vallitsevia kansalaisoikeuksia. Meidän on kuitenkin oltava varovaisia puhuessamme näistä arvoista. Jos päätämme kutsua niitä "meidän" arvoiksemme sen sijaan, että pitäisimme niitä yleismaailmallisina, joudumme mielestäni "kulttuurien yhteentörmäyksen" ansaan. Näiden arvojen paras puolustus onkin ensisijaisesti poliittinen. Meidän on osoitettava näiden arvojen voima turvaamalla vapaus ja elämänlaatu kaikille Euroopassa ja maailmassa. Turvatoimiin on tietenkin ryhdyttävä: on kerättävä tiedustelutietoa, lainrikkojat on asetettava syytteeseen ja kiihottaminen vihaan ja väkivaltaan on estettävä ja siihen syyllistyneet tuotava oikeuden eteen. Jäsen Favan mietintö, josta keskustelimme pitkään tänä aamuna, osoittaa kuitenkin, että voi tapahtua suuria virheitä, jos emme ole erittäin varovaisia. Emme saa tyytyä yksioikoisiin analyyseihin. Emme saa olettaa, että jokainen poliittinen tai uskonnollinen fundamentalisti on terroristi – se ei yksinkertaisesti ole totta, ja mielestäni meidän on tärkeää pitää tämä mielessä. Tunnen useita katolisia fundamentalisteja, joita kauhistuttaisi pelkkä ajatuskin siitä, että joku suorittaisi heidän nimissään terroriteon. Kehotan analysoimaan asiaa nykyistä syvällisemmin ja harkitsemaan kielenkäyttöämme. Olen sitä mieltä, että onnistuaksemme meidän on puututtava eriarvoisuuteen paitsi omassa maanosassamme, myös kaikkialla maailmassa."@fi⁷ ". Madame la Présidente, les actes terroristes sont toujours criminels, mais le terrorisme est également toujours un projet politique. Je pense que ses manifestations actuelles visent à détruire les valeurs humanistes d’égalité, qu’il s’agisse d’égalité entre les genres, les religions ou les nationalités. Le terrorisme vise aussi à saper les droits civils, les droits d’une démocratie plurielle. Mais nous devons faire preuve d’une grande prudence en exprimant ces valeurs. Si nous choisissons d’en parler comme de «nos» valeurs, plutôt que de les considérer comme des valeurs universelles, je pense que nous allons tomber dans le piège du «choc des civilisations». En conséquence, pour défendre au mieux ces valeurs, nous devons avant tout recourir à des moyens politiques. Nous devons prouver la force de ces valeurs, en garantissant la liberté et la qualité de vie à tous en Europe et dans le monde. Certes, il faut prendre des mesures de sécurité: collecte de renseignements, poursuite des criminels et, naturellement, prévention et poursuite devant les tribunaux de l’incitation à la haine et à la violence. Mais le rapport Fava, que nous avons longuement discuté ce matin, indique ce qui pourrait aller très mal, si nous n’adoptons pas une attitude d’extrême prudence. Nous devons éviter toute analyse simpliste. Il faut éviter de supposer que tout fondamentaliste politique ou religieux est un terroriste - ceci est tout simplement faux - et je pense qu’il est important que nous ne l’oubliions pas. Je connais de très nombreux catholiques fondamentalistes qui seraient horrifiés à l’idée que quelqu’un puisse commettre un acte terroriste en leur nom. J’appelle à une analyse plus approfondie que celle que nous faisons actuellement et à l’adoption d’un langage plus prudent que celui que nous utilisons. J’affirme que si nous voulons atteindre notre but, nous devons nous attaquer aux inégalités qui existent non seulement sur notre continent, mais aussi dans le monde entier."@fr⁸ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@hu¹¹ ". Signora Presidente, gli atti terroristici sono sempre criminali, ma il terrorismo è anche sempre un progetto politico. Credo che le sue attuali manifestazioni siano tese a sovvertire i valori umanitari di uguaglianza, tra generi, religioni o nazionalità. Cerca anche di danneggiare i diritti civili – i diritti civili di una democrazia pluralistica. Dobbiamo tuttavia essere cauti quando si tratta di esprimere questi valori. Se decidiamo di chiamarli i “nostri” valori invece di dar loro un carattere universale, credo che cadremo nella trappola dello “scontro di civiltà”. Il miglior modo per difenderli deve pertanto avere carattere principalmente politico. Dobbiamo dimostrare la forza di questi valori garantendo la libertà e la qualità di vita per tutti in Europa e nel mondo. Le misure di sicurezza devono certamente essere applicate: la raccolta di dati di i procedimenti giudiziari contro i criminali e, in particolare, la prevenzione e la perseguibilità dell’incitamento all’odio e alla violenza. Tuttavia la relazione Fava, alla cui discussione abbiamo dedicato molto tempo stamani, segnala che, se non siamo estremamente cauti, possiamo compiere gravi errori. Dobbiamo evitare le analisi semplicistiche. Dobbiamo respingere l’ipotesi per cui ogni fondamentalista politico o religioso è un terrorista – non è vero e ritengo sia importante ricordarlo. Conosco moltissimi fondamentalisti cattolici che inorridirebbero all’idea che qualcuno possa commettere un atto terroristico nel loro nome. Chiedo pertanto un’analisi più approfondita rispetto a quella attuale, e chiedo cautela in merito alle parole che usiamo. Se vogliamo ottenere risultati positivi, a mio avviso, dobbiamo affrontare il problema delle disuguaglianze nel nostro continente, ma anche a livello mondiale."@it¹² "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@lt¹⁴ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@lv¹³ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@mt¹⁵ ". Mevrouw de Voorzitter, terroristische daden zijn altijd crimineel, maar het terrorisme heeft ook altijd een politieke kant. Ik denk dat het terrorisme in zijn huidige verschijningsvorm erop gericht is de humanitaire waarden van gelijkwaardigheid te ondermijnen, of het nu gaat om de gelijkwaardigheid van mannen en vrouwen, of om die van religie of nationaliteit. Het probeert de burgerrechten te ondermijnen, de burgerrechten van een pluralistische democratie. Wanneer wij over die waarden spreken, moeten wij ons echter heel zorgvuldig uitdrukken. Als wij ze “onze” waarden noemen in plaats van ze als universele waarden te beschouwen, lopen we denk ik in de val van de “botsing van beschavingen”. Onze beste verdediging van die waarden moet daarom in de eerste plaats van politieke aard zijn. Wij moeten de kracht van die waarden laten zien door de vrijheid en levenskwaliteit voor iedereen in Europa en in de hele wereld te garanderen. Er moeten zeker veiligheidsmaatregelen worden toegepast: er moeten inlichtingen worden verzameld, wetsovertreders moeten worden vervolgd, en ook het aanzetten tot haat en geweld moet zeker worden voorkomen en strafrechtelijk vervolgd. Uit het verslag-Fava, waarover wij vanochtend langdurig hebben gesproken, blijkt echter duidelijk wat er vreselijk fout kan gaan als wij niet uiterst zorgvuldig zijn. Wij moeten ons niet laten verleiden tot simplistische analyses. Wij moeten ons verre houden van de veronderstelling dat iedere politieke of religieuze fundamentalist een terrorist is. Dat is gewoon niet waar, en ik denk dat het belangrijk is om dat vooral niet te vergeten. Ik ken heel veel fundamentalistische katholieken die bepaald geschokt zouden zijn bij het idee dat iemand uit hun naam een terroristische daad zou plegen. Ik zou willen pleiten voor een diepgaander analyse dan wij momenteel hebben, en voor behoedzaamheid ten aanzien van de formuleringen die wij gebruiken. Ik ben van mening dat wij om succes te hebben, moeten leren omgaan met ongelijkheden binnen ons continent, maar ook met ongelijkheden op wereldschaal."@nl³ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@pl¹⁶ "Senhora Presidente, os actos terroristas são sempre criminosos mas o terrorismo é sempre, simultaneamente, um projecto político. Penso que é objectivo do terrorismo actual subverter os valores humanitários de igualdade, quer se trate de igualdade de género, de religião ou de nacionalidade. O terrorismo visa, também, enfraquecer os direitos civis – os direitos civis de uma democracia pluralista. Mas há que usar da máxima cautela ao expressar esses valores. Se decidirmos chamar-lhes os "nossos" valores em lugar de os considerar valores universais estaremos a cair na armadilha do "choque de civilizações". Assim, a melhor defesa desses valores terá de começar por ser política. Temos de demonstrar a sua força garantindo liberdade e qualidade de vida para todos na Europa e globalmente. Não podemos prescindir de medidas de segurança: recolha de informação, acção penal contra quem infringe a lei e prevenção e criminalização do incitamento ao ódio e à violência. Todavia, o relatório Fava, que esta manhã discutimos tão longamente, mostra como tudo pode falhar se não formos muito prudentes. Há que evitar análises simplistas. Há que evitar partir do princípio de que todos os fundamentalistas políticos ou religiosos são terroristas - princípio que não é verdadeiro, não o esqueçamos. Conheço muitos católicos fundamentalistas que ficariam chocadíssimos com a ideia de que alguém pudesse cometer um acto terrorista em seu nome. Apelo a que procedamos a uma análise mais profunda do que a que fazemos actualmente e a que tenhamos cuidado com a linguagem que estamos a usar. Na minha opinião, se pretendemos ter sucesso, temos de lidar com as desigualdades no nosso continente mas também a nível global."@pt¹⁷ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@ro¹⁸ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@sk¹⁹ "Madam President, terrorist acts are always criminal, but terrorism is also always a political project. I think its current manifestation aims to subvert the humanitarian values of equality, whether it be between gender, religion or nationality. It also seeks to undermine civil rights – the civil rights of a plural democracy. But we have to be very careful in expressing those values. If we choose to call them ‘our’ values rather than treating them as universal values, I think we will fall into the trap of the ‘clash of civilisations’. Our best defence of those values, therefore, has to be primarily political. We must demonstrate the strength of those values by ensuring freedom and quality of life for all in Europe and globally. Security measures certainly have to be applied: the collection of intelligence, the prosecution of lawbreakers and, indeed, the prevention and prosecution of incitement to hatred and violence. But the Fava report, which we spent a long time discussing this morning, indicates what can go badly wrong if we are not extremely careful. We have to avoid simplistic analysis. We have to avoid the assumption that every political or religious fundamentalist is a terrorist – that is simply not true, and I think it is important that we bear that in mind. I know lots of fundamentalist Catholics who would be appalled at the idea that anybody would commit a terrorist act in their name. I would appeal for deeper analysis than we are currently getting, and caution about the language we are using. I would argue that, if we are going to be successful, we have to deal with inequalities on our continent, but also inequalities globally as well."@sl²⁰ "Fru talman! Terroristhandlingar är alltid kriminella, men terrorism är också alltid ett politiskt projekt. Jag anser att de uttryck som den nu tar sig syftar till att urholka de humanitära värderingarna om jämställdhet, antingen det gäller kön, religion eller nationalitet. Den strävar också efter att urholka de medborgerliga rättigheterna – de medborgerliga rättigheterna i en pluralistisk demokrati. Men vi måste vara mycket noga med hur vi uttrycker dessa värderingar. Om vi väljer att kalla dem för ”våra” värderingar i stället för att behandla dem som allmängiltiga värderingar menar jag att vi går i fällan med ”kampen mellan civilisationerna”. Vårt främsta försvar för dessa värderingar måste därför i första hand vara politiskt. Vi måste öppet visa vilken styrka dessa värderingar har genom att se till att alla i Europa och i världen får frihet och livskvalitet. Självfallet måste säkerhetsåtgärder vidtas, däribland insamling av underrättelser och åtal av lagbrytare. Naturligtvis måste också anstiftan till hat och våld förebyggas och lagföras. Men i Favabetänkandet, som vi diskuterade länge under förmiddagen, pekar man på vad som kan gå mycket snett om vi inte är oerhört försiktiga. Vi måste undvika förenklade analyser. Vi måste undvika antaganden om att alla politiska eller religiösa fundamentalister är terrorister, för det är helt enkelt inte sant. Det är viktigt att vi kommer ihåg det. Jag känner till många fundamentalistiska katoliker som skulle bli bestörta vid tanken på att någon skulle utföra terroristhandlingar i deras namn. Jag vill vädja om en djupare analys än den vi får för närvarande, och ett varsamt språkbruk. Om vi ska lyckas måste vi ta itu med ojämlikheter på vår kontinent men också i hela världen."@sv²²
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Proinsias De Rossa,"^{18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4} "intelligence"¹² "on behalf of the PSE Group"^{18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4}