Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-01-Speech-4-134"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20070201.21.4-134"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
". I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@en4
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@cs1
"Jeg har stemt for forslagene om forældelsesfrister i grænseoverskridende tvister om personskader og dødsulykker. Jeg mener, at det er vigtigt, at Europas borgere har frihed til at rejse rundt i EU i en sikker viden om, at hvis der opstår problemer, vil de ikke stå over for unødvendige komplikationer med hensyn til at få afsluttet deres sag på rette vis på tværs af grænserne. Denne betænkning vil spille en rolle med hensyn til at sikre dette. Kommissionen opfordres til at gennemføre en undersøgelse af konsekvenserne af, at der findes forskellige forældelsesfrister på det indre marked, navnlig for borgere, der udøver deres friheder i henhold til traktaten. Det er vigtigt, at enhver ny lovgivning på området baseres på fakta, ikke mindst for at sikre, at al ny lovgivning indeholder specifikke og fokuserede foranstaltninger til at løse problemerne. Derfor har jeg stemt for Wallis-betænkningen, hvori det kræves, at Kommissionen fremlægger oplysninger, der gør det muligt at komme videre med lovgivningen."@da2
". Ich habe für die Vorschläge für Verjährungsfristen in grenzüberschreitenden Streitigkeiten aufgrund von Personenschäden und tödlichen Unfällen gestimmt. Ich halte es für wesentlich, dass europäische Bürger in der Europäischen Union Reisefreiheit genießen und dabei sicher sein können, dass sie im Notfall eine angemessene grenzüberschreitende Rechtshilfe erhalten, ohne dabei auf unnötige Hemmnisse zu stoßen. Mit diesem Bericht wird ein Beitrag dazu geleistet. Die Kommission wird darin aufgefordert, eine Untersuchung der Auswirkung unterschiedlicher Verjährungsfristen auf den Binnenmarkt und speziell auf Bürgerinnen und Bürger, die ihre gemäß dem EG-Vertrag bestehenden Freiheiten ausüben, durchzuführen. Es muss gewährleistet sein, dass sich alle neuen Rechtsvorschriften in diesem Bereich auf solide Fakten stützen, nicht zuletzt um sicherzustellen, dass alle künftigen Gesetze spezifische und zielgerichtete Maßnahmen vorsehen, um diese Probleme zu bewältigen. Ich habe daher für den Bericht Wallis gestimmt, in dem verlangt wird, dass die Kommission die Fakten für die weitere Ausarbeitung dieser Rechtsvorschrift vorlegt."@de9
"Ψήφισα υπέρ των προτάσεων σχετικά με τις προθεσμίες παραγραφής στις διασυνοριακές διαφορές που αφορούν τραυματισμούς προσώπων και θανατηφόρα ατυχήματα. Πιστεύω ότι είναι απαραίτητο να μπορούν οι ευρωπαίοι πολίτες να απολαμβάνουν την ελευθερία να ταξιδεύουν στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και να γνωρίζουν με βεβαιότητα ότι αν προκύψουν προβλήματα δεν θα αντιμετωπίσουν περιττά εμπόδια όταν εγείρουν αξίωση αποζημίωσης διασυνοριακού χαρακτήρα. Αυτή η έκθεση θα συμβάλει σε αυτήν τη διασφάλιση. Καλεί την Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή να συντάξει μελέτη σχετικά με τις συνέπειες που έχει η ύπαρξη διαφορετικών προθεσμιών παραγραφής στην εσωτερική αγορά και ιδίως στους πολίτες που κάνουν χρήση των ελευθεριών τους βάσει της Συνθήκης. Είναι σημαντικό η νέα νομοθεσία σε αυτόν τον τομέα να βασίζεται σε αδιάσειστα στοιχεία, ιδίως προκειμένου να διασφαλιστεί ότι κάθε μελλοντικός νόμος θα θεσπίζει ειδικά και εστιασμένα μέτρα για την αντιμετώπιση των προβλημάτων. Επομένως ψήφισα υπέρ της έκθεσης Wallis, η οποία ζητεί από την Επιτροπή να παράσχει τα αποδεικτικά στοιχεία προκειμένου να προχωρήσει αυτή η νομοθεσία."@el10
". He votado a favor de las propuestas sobre los plazos de prescripción en conflictos transfronterizos que entrañen lesiones y accidentales mortales. Me parece esencial que los ciudadanos europeos puedan tener la libertad de viajar en la Unión Europea y sentirse seguros sabiendo que si surgen problemas, no se encontrarán con restricciones innecesarias para obtener la indemnización legal que pueda corresponderles en otro país distinto del suyo. Este informe contribuirá a asegurarlo. En él se pide a la Comisión Europea que lleve a cabo una investigación sobre los efectos que tiene la existencia de plazos de prescripción diferentes en el mercado interior y, en particular, de la manera en que afecta a los ciudadanos en el ejercicio de las libertades que se les reconocen en el Tratado. Es importante que toda nueva propuesta legislativa en este ámbito se base en pruebas sólidas, sobre todo para asegurar que cualquier futura legislación introduzca medidas concretas y específicas para resolver los problemas. Así pues, he votado a favor del informe Wallis, que insta a la Comisión a presentar las pruebas necesarias para que esta ley pueda seguir adelante."@es21
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@et5
". Kannatin ehdotuksia, jotka koskevat henkilövahinkoihin ja kuolemaan johtaneisiin onnettomuuksiin liittyvissä rajatylittävissä riita-asioissa sovellettavia vanhentumisaikoja. Mielestäni on oleellista, että EU:n kansalaiset voivat matkustaa vapaasti Euroopan unionissa ja luottaa siihen, että he saavat rajatylittävissä asioissa asianmukaisen oikeussuojan ilman tarpeettomia esteitä, mikäli heille aiheutuu ongelmia. Mietinnöllä edistetään tämän asian varmistamista. Siinä kehotetaan komissiota teettämään tutkimus sisämarkkinoilla sovellettavien eripituisten vanhentumisaikojen vaikutuksista ja erityisesti niiden vaikutuksista kansalaisten mahdollisuuksiin käyttää perustamissopimuksen mukaisia oikeuksiaan. On tärkeää, että kaikki tätä alaa koskevat uudet säädökset perustuvat vahvaan näyttöön. Näin voidaan etenkin varmistaa, että kaikissa tulevissa säädöksissä säädetään konkreettisista ja kohdennetuista toimista, joilla näitä ongelmia voidaan käsitellä. Kannatin siksi Wallisin mietintöä, jossa komissiota vaaditaan esittämään näyttöä, jotta tässä lainsäädännössä voidaan edistyä."@fi7
". J’ai voté en faveur des propositions relatives aux délais de prescription applicables dans le cadre des litiges transfrontaliers en réparation de préjudices corporels ou d’accidents mortels. Je crois qu’il est essentiel que les citoyens européens puissent jouir de la liberté de voyager dans l’Union européenne et être rassurés sur le fait que, en cas de problèmes, ils ne se heurteront pas à des contraintes inutiles en tentant d’obtenir la réparation qui leur est due au-delà des frontières. Ce rapport permettra de garantir cela. Il invite la Commission européenne à effectuer une enquête sur les effets de l’existence de différences quant aux délais de prescription sur le marché intérieur et particulièrement sur les citoyens qui exercent les libertés que leur reconnaît le Traité. Il est essentiel que tout nouvel acte législatif dans ce domaine se fonde sur des preuves solides, notamment pour s’assurer que tout futur acte législatif propose des mesures particulières et ciblées permettant de résoudre les problèmes. J’ai donc voté en faveur du rapport Wallis, qui exige que la Commission présente les éléments de preuve afin de faire avancer cet acte législatif."@fr8
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@hu11
"Ho votato a favore delle proposte sui termini di prescrizione nelle controversie transfrontaliere riguardanti lesioni personali e incidenti mortali. Reputo essenziale che i cittadini europei possano godere della libertà di viaggiare all’interno dell’Unione ed essere certi del fatto che, se dovessero sorgere problemi, non dovranno far fronte a inutili restrizioni per ottenere un’adeguata riparazione legale oltre confine. La relazione farà la sua parte a tal fine: chiede alla Commissione di compiere un’indagine sugli effetti che l’esistenza di termini di prescrizione diversi ha sul mercato interno e in particolare sui cittadini che esercitano le loro libertà a norma del Trattato. E’ bene che qualunque nuova normativa in questo settore si basi su prove solide, anche per garantire che qualsiasi legge futura preveda misure specifiche e mirate per affrontare i problemi. Pertanto ho votato a favore della relazione Wallis, che chiede alla Commissione di fornire gli elementi probatori atti a permettere a questa legge di andare avanti."@it12
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@lt14
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@lv13
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@mt15
". Ik heb vóór de voorstellen over verjaringstermijnen voor grensoverschrijdende geschillen met betrekking tot letsel en dodelijke ongevallen gestemd. Mijns inziens is het essentieel dat de Europese burgers vrij kunnen reizen in de Europese Unie, en zich veilig kunnen voelen in de wetenschap dat mochten zich problemen voordoen, zij niet te maken zullen krijgen met onnodige beperkingen wanneer zij in een andere lidstaat naar de rechter willen stappen om schadevergoeding te eisen. Dit verslag zal bijdragen tot het waarborgen daarvan. De Europese Commissie wordt verzocht een onderzoek in te stellen naar de gevolgen van het bestaan van verschillende verjaringstermijnen op de interne markt, met name voor burgers die hun vrijheden uitoefenen in het kader van het Verdrag. Het is belangrijk dat nieuwe wetgeving op dit terrein altijd is gebaseerd op gedegen bewijs, niet in de laatste plaats om ervoor te zorgen dat eventuele toekomstige wetgeving specifieke en gerichte maatregelen bevat om de problemen aan te pakken. Daarom heb ik vóór het verslag-Wallis gestemd, waarin de Commissie wordt verzocht met bewijzen te komen op basis waarvan dergelijke wetgeving in werking kan treden."@nl3
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@pl16
"Votei a favor das propostas sobre os prazos de prescrição nos litígios transfronteiriços que envolvem ferimentos e acidentes mortais. Considero que é essencial que os cidadãos europeus possam gozar da liberdade de circularem na União Europeia, e saberem que, no caso de surgirem problemas, eles não enfrentarão, seguramente, restrições desnecessárias aos recursos jurídicos adequados em caso de litígios transfronteiriços. Este relatório tem um papel na garantia de que assim seja. Exorta a Comissão Europeia a levar a cabo um inquérito sobre os efeitos da existência de diferentes prazos de prescrição sobre o mercado interno e, em particular, sobre os cidadãos que exercem as liberdades previstas no Tratado. É importante que qualquer legislação nova nesta área se baseie em provas sólidas, sobretudo para assegurar que qualquer legislação futura introduza medidas específicas e orientadas para a solução do problema. Por conseguinte, votei a favor do relatório Wallis, que solicita à Comissão que apresente os dados que permitirão levar por diante esta legislação."@pt17
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@ro18
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@sk19
"I have voted in favour of the proposals on limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving injuries and fatal accidents. I believe it is essential that Europe’s citizens can enjoy the freedom to travel in the European Union, and be safe in the knowledge that should problems arise they will not face unnecessary constraints in getting proper legal redress across borders. This report will play a part in ensuring that. It calls for the European Commission to carry out an inquiry into the effects of the existence of differing limitation periods on the internal market, and particularly on citizens exercising their freedoms under the Treaty. It is important that any new legislation in this area is based on sound evidence, not least to ensure that any future law brings forward specific and focused measures to tackle the problems. I have therefore voted in favour of the Wallis report, which demands that the Commission bring forward the evidence to enable this law to go ahead."@sl20
"Jag har röstat för förslagen om preskriptionstider vid fall av kroppsskador och dödsolyckor vid gränsöverskridande tvister. Det är viktigt att EU:s medborgare kan njuta av friheten att resa i EU och känna sig trygga med vetenskapen att de, om det skulle uppstå problem, inte kommer att möta onödiga restriktioner för att få korrekt gränsöverskridande rättshjälp. Betänkandet kommer att bidra till att garantera detta. Kommissionen uppmanas att genomföra en undersökning om följderna av skillnaderna i preskriptionstid på den inre marknaden, i synnerhet för medborgare som utövar sina friheter inom ramen för fördraget. Det är viktigt att all ny lagstiftning på detta område bygger på solid bevisföring, inte minst för att man ska kunna garantera att man med framtida lagar tar fram speciella och fokuserade åtgärder för att ta itu med problemen. Därför har jag röstat för Wallisbetänkandet, där man yrkar på att kommissionen tar fram uppgifter som gör det möjligt att genomdriva denna lag."@sv22
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"David Martin (PSE ),"18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4
"in writing"18,5,20,15,1,19,14,16,11,13,4

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Romanian.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
22http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz
23http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph