Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-451"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-13"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Juhiload (uuestisõnastamine) (arutelu)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061213.39.3-451"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-13-Speech-3-452⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Gary Titley⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Canada (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-02-16)²² unknown; Labour Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² substitute; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²²
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@cs¹ "Hr. formand! Min medarbejder opdagede for nylig en hjemmeside, som helt åbent reklamerer med, at hvis man har fået frakendt kørekortet i ét land, finder de et kørekort et andet sted mod et vist gebyr. Det er helt klart uacceptabelt i et moderne samfund, og det er ligeledes uacceptabelt, at mennesker, der begår alvorlige lovovertrædelser i et land, kan undgå straf i et andet land. Dette forslag vil efterhånden gradvis bringe denne situation til ophør, men jeg beklager, at det vil vare så længe, og jeg håber, at processen kan fremskyndes. Dette forslag skaber enkelthed og gennemsigtighed og reducerer bureaukratiet, selv om jeg bemærker, at hr. Nattrass ikke gad blive for at høre denne bemærkning. Det er rent faktisk et centralt element i en bedre lovgivning. Det oprindelige forslag var langt mere bureaukratisk, og her i Parlamentet har vi gjort et godt stykke arbejde med at forenkle det. Det vil forbedre trafiksikkerheden og bekæmpe svig. Jeg glæder mig især over noget, som ingen har nævnt endnu: betænkningens fokus på kørelærernes kompetencer. Vi er nødt til at hæve niveauet af oplæringen af nye bilister i hele Den Europæiske Union. Jeg er ikke glad for forslagene om motorcykler: De er unødigt komplicerede, og der lægges ikke tilstrækkelig vægt på uddannelse i de tidligste faser samt kravene om obligatoriske prøver. Men jeg erkender, at der ikke er nogen reel støtte til dette i hverken Parlamentet eller Rådet, så jeg må erkende mit nederlag. I modsætning til nogle af de skrækhistorier, som mine kolleger har udbredt, er der meget lidt i dette forslag, der adskiller sig fra den eksisterende tradition og praksis i Det Forenede Kongerige."@da² "Herr Präsident! Mein Assistent entdeckte kürzlich eine Website, die ziemlich offen damit wirbt, für Personen, gegen die in einem Land ein Fahrverbot verhängt wurde, gegen eine Gebühr woanders einen Führerschein zu organisieren. Das ist in einer modernen Gesellschaft völlig inakzeptabel, und ebenso wenig ist es hinnehmbar, dass Menschen, die sich in einem Land ernsthafter Vergehen schuldig machen, in einem anderen Land ihrer Bestrafung entgehen können. Mit diesem Vorschlag werden solche Verhältnisse schrittweise abgeschafft, allerdings finde ich es schade, dass es so lange dauern wird, und ich hoffe, dass sich der Prozess beschleunigen lässt. Dieser Vorschlag sorgt für eine Vereinfachung, für mehr Transparenz und für einen Abbau von Bürokratie, auch wenn ich feststelle, dass Herr Nattrass es nicht für nötig hielt, hier zu bleiben, um dies zur Kenntnis zu nehmen. Genau genommen handelt es sich um ein entscheidendes Element zur besseren Rechtsetzung. Der ursprüngliche Vorschlag war viel bürokratischer, und wir im Parlament haben gut daran getan, ihn deutlich zu vereinfachen. Mit ihm wird die Sicherheit im Straßenverkehr verbessert und etwas gegen Betrug unternommen. Besonders froh bin ich über einen Aspekt, den noch niemand erwähnt hat, nämlich dass im Bericht ein Schwerpunkt auf den Kompetenzen der Fahrprüfer liegt. Wir müssen das allgemeine Niveau der Fahrausbildung in der gesamten Europäischen Union anheben. Nicht sehr glücklich bin ich mit den Vorschlägen im Motorradbereich: Sie sind unnötig kompliziert und legen keinen ausreichenden Schwerpunkt auf die allerersten Schritte der Ausbildung und die Notwendigkeit von Pflichtprüfungen. Allerdings sehe ich ein, dass es weder im Parlament noch im Rat eine echte Unterstützung hierfür gibt, sodass ich mich wohl geschlagen geben muss. Entgegen den Schauergeschichten, die von einigen Kollegen hier verbreitet wurden, weicht dieser Vorschlag nur in sehr wenigen Punkten von bestehenden Traditionen und Praktiken in Großbritannien ab."@de⁹ "Κύριε Πρόεδρε, ο βοηθός μου ανακάλυψε πρόσφατα μια ιστοσελίδα η οποία διαφημίζει εμφανέστατα ότι, αν σας έχει αφαιρεθεί η άδεια οδήγησης σε μια χώρα, μπορεί να σας εξασφαλίσει, έναντι αντιτίμου, άδεια οδήγησης κάποιας άλλης χώρας. Αυτό είναι σαφώς απαράδεκτο σε μια σύγχρονη κοινωνία, κατά τον ίδιο τρόπο που είναι απαράδεκτο άτομα τα οποία έχουν διαπράξει σοβαρά αδικήματα σε μια χώρα να μπορούν να αποφύγουν την τιμωρία σε μια άλλη. Αυτή η πρόταση θα θέσει σταδιακά τέρμα σε αυτήν την κατάσταση, αν και λυπούμαι που θα χρειαστεί να περάσει τόσος χρόνος, και ευελπιστώ ότι η διαδικασία μπορεί να επιταχυνθεί. Αυτή η πρόταση οδηγεί σε απλούστευση και σε μείωση της γραφειοκρατίας, αν και διαπιστώνω ότι ο κ. Nattrass δεν έκανε τον κόπο να παραμείνει στην Αίθουσα για να ακούσει αυτό το σχόλιο. Αποτελεί, ουσιαστικά, αποφασιστική παράμετρο της διοικητικής απλούστευσης. Η αρχική πρόταση ήταν πολύ πιο γραφειοκρατική, αλλά στο Σώμα καταφέραμε να την καταστήσουμε πολύ απλούστερη. Θα βελτιώσει την οδική ασφάλεια και θα καταπολεμήσει την απάτη. Χαιρετίζω ιδιαιτέρως κάτι που κανείς δεν έχει θίξει μέχρι στιγμής: την έμφαση που δίνεται στην έκθεση στις ικανότητες των εξεταστών. Πρέπει να βελτιώσουμε το γενικό επίπεδο εκπαίδευσης των οδηγών στο σύνολο της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης. Δεν αισθάνομαι να με ικανοποιούν οι προτάσεις σχετικά με τους μοτοσικλετιστές: είναι άσκοπα περίπλοκες και δεν δίνουν αρκετή έμφαση στην εκπαίδευση σε πρώιμο στάδιο και στην απαίτηση για υποχρεωτική εξέταση. Ωστόσο, αναγνωρίζω ότι δεν υπάρχει ουσιαστική στήριξη για αυτό ούτε στο Κοινοβούλιο ούτε στο Συμβούλιο, οπότε οφείλω να αποδεχτώ την ήττα. Σε αντίθεση με τις απόπειρες ορισμένων συναδέλφων μου να σπείρουν τον τρόμο μέσω παραπληροφόρησης, ελάχιστα στοιχεία αυτής της πρότασης μπορεί να θεωρηθεί ότι διαφέρουν από τις τρέχουσες παραδόσεις και πρακτικές του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου."@el^10,10 "Señor Presidente, mi asistente ha descubierto hace poco una página web que anuncia abiertamente que, a cambio de una comisión, a quien le haya sido retirado el permiso de conducción en un país le puede conseguir uno nuevo en otro. Esto es totalmente inaceptable en una sociedad moderna, igual que es inaceptable que quien cometa graves infracciones en un país pueda evitar que se le apliquen las sanciones en cualquier otro. Esta propuesta pondrá fin gradualmente a esta situación, pero lamento que vaya a tardar tanto, por lo que espero que el proceso pueda agilizarse. Es una propuesta que aporta sencillez y transparencia y elimina burocracia, aunque he notado que el señor Nattrass no se ha molestado en quedarse para escuchar esta observación. Se trata de un elemento clave para el proyecto de «legislar mejor»: la propuesta original era demasiado burocrática, y el Parlamento ha hecho un buen trabajo de simplificación. Mejorará la seguridad vial y ayudará a combatir el fraude. A mí personalmente me agrada un aspecto que aún nadie ha comentado: el énfasis que el informe hace en la competencia de los examinadores. Es preciso incrementar el nivel general de la formación de conductores en toda la Unión Europea. No me gustan las propuestas sobre motocicletas: son innecesariamente complejas y no hacen suficiente hincapié en la formación en las primeras etapas ni en la exigencia de exámenes obligatorios. Sin embargo, reconozco que esto no cuenta con suficiente apoyo ni en el Parlamento ni en el Consejo, con lo que admito mi derrota. Al contrario de las historias de terror que han contado algunos de mis colegas, apenas hay diferencia entre esta propuesta y la tradición y práctica existentes en el Reino Unido."@es²⁰ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@et⁵ "Arvoisa puhemies, avustajani löysi äskettäin Internet-sivun, jossa hyvin avoimesti mainostettiin, että ajo-oikeutensa yhdessä maassa menettäneet saisivat palkkiota vastaan ajokortin jostain muualta. Tällaista ei tietenkään voida hyväksyä nyky-yhteiskunnassa. Vastaavasti ei voida missään tapauksessa hyväksyä sitäkään, että vakavaan rikokseen yhdessä maassa syyllistynyt henkilö voi toisessa maassa välttyä rangaistukselta. Tämä direktiiviehdotus muuttaa vähitellen tuon tilanteen, mutta pahoittelen sitä, että prosessi kestää niin kauan, ja toivon, että sitä voidaan nopeuttaa. Tällä ehdotuksella edistetään yksinkertaisuutta ja avoimuutta sekä vähennetään byrokratiaa – huomaan tosin, ettei jäsen Nattrass ole vaivautunut jäämään kuulemaan tätä toteamusta. Se on itse asiassa oleellinen osa parempaa sääntelyä. Alkuperäinen ehdotus oli paljon byrokraattisempi, ja parlamentti onnistui yksinkertaistamaan sitä huomattavasti. Sen avulla lisätään liikenneturvallisuutta ja torjutaan väärennöksiä. Pidän erityisen myönteisenä asiaa, jota kukaan ei ole vielä maininnut, nimittäin sitä, että mietinnössä korostetaan kuljettajantutkinnon vastaanottajien pätevyyttä. Meidän on nostettava ajo-opetuksen tasoa koko Euroopan unionissa. En ole tyytyväinen moottoripyöriä koskeviin ehdotuksiin, sillä ne ovat liian monimutkaisia, eikä niissä korosteta tarpeeksi kaikkein varhaisimmissa vaiheissa annettava koulutusta ja vaatimusta pakollisista kokeista. Tunnustan kuitenkin, ettei tätä ei juuri tueta parlamentissa eikä neuvostossa, joten minun on myönnettävä tappioni. Toisin kuin eräät kollegani ovat levittämissään kauhutarinoissa väittäneet, tämä ehdotus eroaa hyvin vähän Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan nykyisestä perinteestä ja käytännöstä."@fi⁷ "Monsieur le Président, mon assistant est tombé récemment sur un site internet se vantant ostensiblement de pouvoir vous trouver, moyennant contribution financière, un permis de conduire ailleurs au cas où vous seriez interdit de conduite dans un pays. C’est tout à fait inacceptable dans une société moderne, de même qu’il est tout à fait inadmissible que des personnes qui se sont rendues coupables d’infractions graves dans un pays puissent éviter la sanction dans un autre. La présente proposition permettra de mettre progressivement un terme à cette situation, mais je déplore le fait que cela prendra tant de temps, et j’espère qu’il sera possible d’accélérer le processus. Synonyme de simplicité et de transparence, cette proposition allège les formalités administratives, bien que je constate que M. Nattrass n’a pas pris la peine de rester pour entendre cette observation. Il s’agit en fait d’une pièce maîtresse des efforts entrepris en vue d’une meilleure réglementation. La proposition initiale était nettement plus bureaucratique et nous, députés européens, sommes parvenus à la simplifier fortement. Elle permettra d’améliorer la sécurité routière et de combattre la fraude. Je me félicite en particulier de quelque chose dont personne n’a encore parlé: l’accent mis dans le rapport sur les compétences des examinateurs. Il convient de relever le niveau général de la formation des conducteurs à l’échelle de l’Union européenne. Par contre, je ne suis pas satisfait des propositions concernant les motocycles: elles sont excessivement complexes et n’insistent pas suffisamment sur la formation à un stade précoce et la nécessité de rendre les tests obligatoires. Néanmoins, j’admets qu’il est peu probable qu’une majorité en faveur de ces mesures se dégage, que ce soit au Parlement ou au Conseil. Je m’avoue dès lors vaincu. Contrairement à quelques rumeurs alarmistes que certains de mes collègues ont propagées, ce qui figure dans cette proposition diffère très peu des traditions et pratiques britanniques actuelles."@fr⁸ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@hu¹¹ "Signor Presidente, il mio assistente ha scoperto recentemente l’esistenza di un sito che proclama molto apertamente di essere in grado, dietro compenso, di procurare in un altro paese una patente di guida a coloro cui è stata ritirata. Ciò è chiaramente inaccettabile nella società attuale, così com’è del tutto inaccettabile che chi commette gravi infrazioni in un paese possa evitare di essere penalizzato in un altro. La proposta in esame metterà gradualmente fine a tale situazione; temo però che ci vorrà molto tempo e spero pertanto che sarà possibile accelerare questo processo. La proposta dà un contributo di semplicità e trasparenza e riduce la burocrazia; rilevo che l’onorevole Nattrass non si è preso la briga di restare qui ad ascoltare questa osservazione. Si tratta, in effetti, di un elemento decisivo ai fini di una migliore regolamentazione. La proposta originaria era molto più burocratica e il Parlamento ha fatto benissimo a semplificarla. La proposta migliorerà la sicurezza sulle strade e contrasterà le frodi. Sono particolarmente soddisfatto di un punto che nessuno ha ancora citato: l’importanza che la relazione attribuisce alle competenze degli esaminatori di guida. Dobbiamo elevare il livello generale della formazione fornita dalle scuole guida in tutta l’Unione europea. Non sono invece soddisfatto delle proposte per i motocicli: sono inutilmente complicate e non sottolineano a sufficienza l’importanza di una corretta preparazione già nelle primissime fasi, né prevedono come requisito l’obbligatorietà di un . Riconosco che per questi aspetti non c’è un vero interesse, né da parte del Parlamento né da parte del Consiglio, e quindi devo darmi per vinto. Nonostante gli episodi terrificanti narrati da alcuni colleghi, questa proposta si discosta ben poco dalla tradizione e dalla pratica consolidate nel Regno Unito."@it¹² "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@lt¹⁴ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@lv¹³ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@mt¹⁵ "Voorzitter, mijn assistent heeft onlangs een website ontdekt waarop openlijk wordt geadverteerd met de mogelijkheid om tegen betaling een rijbewijs elders te halen wanneer in het eigen land het rijbewijs is ingetrokken. Dat is duidelijk onacceptabel in een moderne maatschappij, even goed als het volstrekt onacceptabel is dat mensen die in het ene land zware overtredingen hebben begaan, in een ander land vervolging kunnen ontlopen. Dit voorstel zal geleidelijk een einde maken aan die situatie, maar ik betreur het dat het zo lang zal duren, en ik hoop dat de ontwikkeling kan worden versneld. Dit voorstel leidt tot vereenvoudiging en transparantie en reduceert bureaucratie, al valt het mij op dat de heer Nattrass niet de moeite heeft genomen om te blijven en naar die opmerking te luisteren. Het is in feite een sleutelelement voor betere regulering. Het oorspronkelijke voorstel was veel bureaucratischer, en we hebben hier in het Parlement goed werk verricht door het te vereenvoudigen. Het zal de veiligheid op de weg verbeteren en fraude bestrijden. Ik ben in het bijzonder blij met iets wat nog niemand heeft genoemd, namelijk met de nadruk die in het verslag wordt gelegd op de bekwaamheid van examinatoren bij rijexamens. We moeten het gemiddelde niveau van rijopleidingen in de hele Europese Unie verhogen. Ik ben niet blij met de voorstellen voor motorrijwielen. Ze zijn onnodig ingewikkeld en leggen niet genoeg nadruk op vroegtijdige opleiding en een verplicht examen. Ik constateer echter dat daarvoor niet werkelijk steun bestaat in het Parlement en de Raad, en ik moet mij daarbij neerleggen. In tegenstelling tot het spookbeeld dat door sommigen van mijn collega's wordt opgeroepen, wijkt dit voorstel maar op heel weinig punten af van de bestaande traditie en praktijk in het Verenigd Koninkrijk."@nl³ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@pl¹⁶ "Senhor Presidente, o meu assistente descobriu recentemente uma página Web, onde se publicita com toda a abertura que, para quem tiver a carta de condução apreendida num país, eles podem encontrar, mediante pagamento, uma carta de condução noutro país qualquer. Trata-se de algo claramente inaceitável numa sociedade moderna, tal como é completamente inaceitável que alguém que comete crimes graves num país, possa evitar o castigo num outro país. A presente proposta vai gradualmente pôr fim a esta situação, mas lamento que vá levar tanto tempo e espero que o processo possa ser acelerado. A presente proposta traz-nos simplicidade e transparência e diminui a burocracia, embora eu me aperceba que o senhor deputado Nattrass não se deu ao incómodo de ficar para ouvir essa observação. Trata-se, na realidade, de um elemento vital para uma melhor regulamentação. A proposta inicial era muito mais burocrática, e nós, aqui no Parlamento, fizemos um bom trabalho ao torná-la mais simples. Vai melhorar a segurança rodoviária e combater a fraude. Congratulo-me particularmente com algo que ninguém ainda mencionou: a ênfase dada no relatório às competências da parte dos examinadores de condução. Temos de elevar o nível geral do ensino da condução em toda a União Europeia. Estou pouco satisfeito com as propostas relativamente aos motociclistas: são desnecessariamente complexas e não dão a devida ênfase à formação nas fases mais incipientes e aos requisitos para os testes obrigatórios. No entanto, reconheço que não existe verdadeiro apoio para tal, nem no Parlamento nem no Conselho, portanto reconheço a derrota. Contrariamente às histórias assustadoras divulgadas por alguns dos meus colegas, pouco existe nesta proposta que difira da tradição e da prática existentes no Reino Unido."@pt¹⁷ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@sk¹⁸ "Mr President, my assistant recently discovered a website which advertises quite openly that if you have been banned for driving in one country they will find, for a fee, a driving licence somewhere else. That is clearly unacceptable in modern society, just as it is completely unacceptable that people who commit serious offences in one country can avoid being penalised in another country. This proposal will gradually end that situation, but I regret that it will take so long, and I hope the process can be speeded up. This proposal brings simplicity and transparency and cuts red tape, although I notice that Mr Nattrass has not bothered to stay to hear that observation. It is, in fact, a key element in better regulation. The original proposal was much more bureaucratic, and we in Parliament have done a good job of making it much simpler. It will improve road safety and combat fraud. I particularly welcome something nobody else has mentioned yet: the emphasis in the report on the competences of driving examiners. We need to raise the general level of driver training throughout the European Union. I am not happy with the motorcycle proposals: they are unnecessarily complex and do not give enough emphasis to training at the very earliest stages and the requirement for compulsory testing. However, I recognise that there is no real support for this either in Parliament or the Council, so I must concede defeat. Contrary to some of the scare stories some of my colleagues have spread, there is very little in this proposal that differs from existing UK tradition and practice."@sl¹⁹ "Herr talman! Min assistent upptäckte nyligen en hemsida som ganska öppet annonserar om att ifall man har blivit av med körkortet i ett land så kan man mot en avgift erhålla ett körkort i ett annat land. Detta är självfallet fullständigt oacceptabelt i ett modernt samhälle, på samma sätt som det är fullständigt oacceptabelt att människor som begår grova brott i det ena landet kan undgå att bli straffade i det andra landet. Det här förslaget kommer gradvis att eliminera denna situation, men tyvärr tar det lång tid och jag hoppas att processen kan påskyndas. Förslaget innebär enkelhet och öppenhet och minskar byråkratin, även om jag har lagt märke till att Michael Henry Nattrass inte har brytt sig om att stanna för att lyssna till denna iakttagelse. Det är i själva verket ett av de viktigaste villkoren för att få bättre bestämmelser. Det ursprungliga förslaget var mycket mer byråkratiskt och parlamentet har gjort ett bra jobb med att göra det betydligt enklare. Förslaget kommer att förbättra trafiksäkerheten och bekämpa bedrägerier. Jag välkomnar i synnerhet något som ingen annan hittills har nämnt, nämligen att det i betänkandet läggs vikt vid förarprövarnas kompetens. Vi behöver öka den allmänna nivån på förarutbildningen i hela EU. Jag är inte nöjd med förslagen om motorcyklismen. De är onödigt komplicerade och betonar inte nog vikten av att få utbildning från allra första början och kravet på obligatoriska prov. Jag inser emellertid att det inte finns något verkligt stöd för detta vare sig i Europaparlamentet eller i rådet, så jag måste se mig besegrad. Till skillnad från de skräckhistorier som några av mina kolleger har berättat finns det otroligt lite i förslaget som skiljer sig från befintlig tradition och praxis i Förenade kungariket."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Gary Titley (PSE ). –"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "test"¹²