Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-419"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20061213.38.3-419"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@en4
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@cs1
"Jeg vil gerne takke rådsformanden for svaret. Jeg fik ikke et "ja" eller "nej" på mit spørgsmål, men et meget interessant sammendrag af problemerne med klimaforandringer - jeg er enig i det hele, men vidste det allerede i forvejen. Mit spørgsmål var, om Rådet er enigt i, at hindring af skovfjernelse må medtages i alle aftaler efter 2012 - med andre ord den anden aftaleperiode, hvis vi stadig taler Kyoto-sprog. Vil Rådet mene, at hindring af skovfjernelse bliver en del af vores værktøjer og mekanismer til reduktion af kuldioxidemissionerne?"@da2
"Ich danke der Ratspräsidentin für diese Antwort. Anstelle eines Ja oder Nein auf meine Anfrage habe ich eine sehr interessante Zusammenfassung über die Probleme des Klimawandels erhalten, womit ich voll und ganz einverstanden bin, doch weiß ich das bereits. Meine Frage war, ob der Rat auch der Ansicht ist, dass die Vermeidung von Abholzungen in eine Einigung für die Zeit nach 2012 – bzw. in den zweiten Verpflichtungszeitraum, um im Kyoto-Jargon zu bleiben – aufgenommen werden muss. Vertritt der Rat die Auffassung, dass die Vermeidung von Abholzungen Teil der Instrumente und Mechanismen zur Verringerung der CO2-Emissionen sein soll?"@de9
"Θέλω να ευχαριστήσω την Προεδρεύουσα του Συμβουλίου για την απάντησή της. Δεν απάντησε με «ναι» ή «όχι» στην ερώτησή μου, αλλά παραθέτοντας μια πολύ ενδιαφέρουσα σύνοψη των προβλημάτων της αλλαγής του κλίματος – πράγματα με τα οποία συμφωνώ, αλλά τα γνωρίζω ήδη. Η ερώτησή μου ήταν εάν το Συμβούλιο συμφωνεί με τη θέση ότι η αποφυγή της αποψίλωσης πρέπει να περιλαμβάνεται σε κάθε συμφωνία μετά το 2012 – με άλλα λόγια, κατά τη δεύτερη περίοδο δέσμευσης, αν εξακολουθούμε να συζητάμε με όρους του Πρωτοκόλλου του Κυότο. Δεν υιοθετεί το Συμβούλιο τη θέση ότι η αποφυγή της αποψίλωσης των δασών μπορεί να αποτελέσει ένα από τα μέσα και τους μηχανισμούς μας για τη μείωση των εκπομπών διοξειδίου του άνθρακα;"@el10
"Quiero dar las gracias a la Presidenta en ejercicio por su respuesta. No he obtenido un «sí» ni un «no» a mi pregunta, sino un compendio muy interesante de los problemas del cambio climático, todos los cuales comparto, pero que ya conozco. Mi pregunta era si el Consejo está de acuerdo en que la prevención de la deforestación debe incluirse en toda declaración relativa al periodo posterior a 2012, esto es, el segundo período de compromiso, si aún estamos hablando en términos de Kyoto. ¿Comparte el Consejo la opinión de que la prevención de la deforestación sería una de nuestras armas y mecanismos para reducir las emisiones de dióxido de carbono?"@es20
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@et5
"Haluan kiittää neuvoston puheenjohtajaa vastauksesta. En saanut kysymykseeni kyllä- tai ei-vastausta, vaan hyvin mielenkiintoisen tiivistelmän ilmastonmuutoksen ongelmista – joista olen kaikista samaa mieltä, mutta jotka kyllä tiesin jo. Kysymykseni oli, katsooko neuvosto, että metsien hävittämisen estäminen on tarpeen sisällyttää sopimuksiin vuoden 2012 jälkeen – toisin sanoen toisella velvoitekaudella, jos otamme vielä huomioon Kioton pöytäkirjan. Onko komissio sitä mieltä, että metsien hävittämisen estäminen kuuluu työvälineisiimme ja mekanismeihimme hiilidioksidipäästöjen vähentämisessä?"@fi7
"Je tiens à remercier la présidente en exercice du Conseil pour cette réponse. Elle n’a pas répondu par oui ou par non à ma question, mais m’a fourni une synthèse très intéressante des problèmes liés au changement climatique, dont je conviens - pour tous sans exception -, mais que je connais déjà. Ma question était la suivante: le Conseil a-t-il décidé que l’évitement du déboisement devait être inclus dans tout accord intervenant après 2012, soit la deuxième période d’engagement dans le jargon du protocole de Kyoto? Le Conseil estime-t-il que l’évitement du déboisement doit faire partie de nos outils et mécanismes visant à réduire les émissions de dioxyde de carbone?"@fr8
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@hu11
"Desidero ringraziare la Presidente in carica per la risposta. Non ho ottenuto una risposta affermativa o negativa alla mia domanda, ma un riassunto molto interessante sui problemi relativi ai cambiamenti climatici – sui quali concordo, ma di cui sono già a conoscenza. La mia domanda era se il Consiglio conviene che la prevenzione della deforestazione è una misura che deve figurare in ogni accordo successivo al 2012 – in altre parole, il secondo periodo di adempimento degli impegni, se continuiamo a parlare in termini di protocollo di Kyoto. Secondo l’opinione del Consiglio, la prevenzione della deforestazione figurerà tra gli strumenti e i meccanismi atti a ridurre le emissioni di biossido di carbonio?"@it12
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@lt14
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@lv13
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@mt15
"Ik wil de fungerend voorzitter danken voor dat antwoord. Ik heb geen “ja” of “nee” als antwoord op mijn vraag gekregen maar een zeer interessante opsomming van de problemen die klimaatverandering met zich meebrengt. Ik erken al die problemen, maar ik was er al van op de hoogte. Mijn vraag was of de Raad het ermee eens is dat het voorkomen van ontbossing in elke overeenkomst voor de periode na 2012 moet worden opgenomen, met andere woorden voor de tweede verbintenisperiode, als we nog steeds in Kyoto-termen praten. Is de Raad niet van mening dat het voorkomen van ontbossing onderdeel moet zijn van onze instrumenten en mechanismen in het kader van het reduceren van de koolstofdioxide-uitstoot?"@nl3
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@pl16
"Os meus agradecimentos à Senhora Presidente em exercício do Conselho pela sua resposta. Não me foi dito um “sim” ou um “não” à minha pergunta, mas obtive um interessantíssimo resumo dos problemas relacionados com as alterações climáticas – tudo questões com que concordo, mas de que já tenho conhecimento. A minha pergunta visa saber se o Conselho concordou em que a redução da desflorestação tem de ser incluída em qualquer acordo pós-2012 – por outras palavras, o segundo período de compromisso, falando ainda em termos Quioto. Entende o Conselho que a redução da desflorestação deveria fazer parte dos nossos instrumentos e mecanismos para reduzir as emissões de dióxidos de carbono?"@pt17
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@sk18
"I wish to thank the President-in-Office for that answer. I did not get a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my question, but a very interesting résumé of the problems of climate change – all of which I agree with, but I already know. My question was whether the Council agreed that avoided deforestation must be included in any post-2012 settlement – in other words, the second commitment period, if we are still talking in Kyoto terms. Would it be the Council’s view that avoided deforestation would be part of our tools and mechanisms for reducing carbon dioxide emissions?"@sl19
"Jag vill tacka rådsordföranden för svaret. Jag fick inget ”ja” eller ”nej” på min fråga, däremot en mycket intressant sammanfattning av klimatförändringens problematik – som jag håller med om, men jag är redan medveten om detta. Min fråga var huruvida rådet håller med om att stoppad skogsavverkning ska ingå i alla uppgörelser efter 2012 – med andra ord under den andra åtagandeperioden om vi fortfarande pratar om Kyotoavtalet. Är det rådets åsikt att stoppad skogsavverkning kommer att utgöra en del av våra verktyg och mekanismer för att minska koldioxidutsläppen?"@sv21
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Avril Doyle (PPE-DE ). –"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz
22http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph