Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-401"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-13"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (küsimused nõukogule)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061213.38.3-401"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-13-Speech-3-402⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Baroness Sarah Ludford⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² unknown; Liberal Democrat Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² vice-chair; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-26--2007-02-14)²² substitute; ECON (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)²² member; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²²
lpv:translated text	"Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@cs¹ "Tak, fru minister, men det ligger sådan, at det andet møde ikke fandt sted, så man må sætte spørgsmålstegn ved prioriteringen. Og at have udvalgets formand til stede ved kun ét møde om året er virkelig ikke det helt store. Som Parlament var vi ikke involveret i udarbejdelsen af denne strategi for terrorbekæmpelse eller i den planlagte foranstaltning, trods gentagne anmodninger. De var i gang med diskussioner - vi havde en forhandling tidligere på eftermiddagen om det automatiske identifikationssystem, som De kendte til i september 2005, selv om De ikke fortalte det til os. Hvis der virkelig er et ønske om at holde os underrettet om alle vigtige begivenheder inden for terrorbekæmpelse, hvorfor fik vi så ikke noget at vide om det? Hvorfor deltager vi ikke i alle diskussioner med USA om sikkerhed og beskyttelse af personoplysninger? Jeg tillader mig at tvivle på Deres engagement i denne dialog."@da^2,2 "Vielen Dank, Frau Ministerin, aber Tatsache ist doch, dass die zweite Sitzung nicht stattfand, sodass man sich schon fragen muss, wo die Prioritäten liegen. Dass der Vorsitzende des Ausschusses nur an einer Sitzung im ganzen Jahr teilnimmt, ist auch nicht gerade berauschend. Wir als Parlament waren trotz wiederholter Forderungen nicht in die Erarbeitung dieser Strategie zur Terrorismusbekämpfung oder in die geplanten Maßnahmen eingebunden. Sie haben also Gespräche geführt – wir hatten heute Nachmittag bereits eine Diskussion über das „Automated Targeting System“, über das Sie schon im September 2005 Bescheid wussten, uns aber nichts davon sagten. Wenn es wirklich die Zusage gibt, uns über alle wichtigen Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Terrorismusbekämpfung auf dem Laufenden zu halten, wieso haben wir davon nichts gewusst? Warum werden wir nicht in all die Gespräche mit den USA über Sicherheit und Datenschutz einbezogen? Ihre Bereitschaft zum Dialog kann ich hier ehrlich gesagt nicht erkennen."@de⁹ "Σας ευχαριστώ, κυρία Υπουργέ, αλλά γεγονός είναι ότι η δεύτερη συνάντηση δεν πραγματοποιήθηκε, οπότε οφείλει κανείς να αμφισβητήσει το κατά πόσον αυτό το θέμα αποτελεί προτεραιότητα. Η δε συμμετοχή του προέδρου της επιτροπής σε μία μόνο συνεδρίαση κατά τη διάρκεια ενός ολόκληρου έτους δεν είναι ιδιαιτέρως εντυπωσιακή. Ως Κοινοβούλιο, δεν συμμετείχαμε στην κατάρτιση αυτής της στρατηγικής κατά της τρομοκρατίας ή στον σχεδιασμό των επιμέρους ενεργειών, παρά τα επανειλημμένα μας αιτήματα. Πραγματοποιήσατε διάλογο – συζητήσαμε σήμερα το απόγευμα σχετικά με το Αυτόματο Σύστημα Στοχοποίησης, την ύπαρξη του οποίου γνωρίζατε τον Σεπτέμβριο του 2005, αλλά δεν μας είπατε τίποτε. Αν έχετε όντως τη βούληση να μας τηρείτε ενήμερους για όλες τις σημαντικές εξελίξεις στον τομέα της καταπολέμησης της τρομοκρατίας, γιατί δεν ενημερωθήκαμε για αυτό το θέμα; Γιατί δεν μπορούμε να μετάσχουμε σε όλες τις συζητήσεις με τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες για τα θέματα ασφάλειας και προστασίας της ιδιωτικής ζωής; Επιτρέψτε μου να διαφωνήσω μαζί σας όσον αφορά την προσήλωσή σας σε αυτόν τον διάλογο."@el¹⁰ "Gracias, señora Ministra, pero lo cierto es que la segunda reunión no tuvo lugar, de modo que tenemos que cuestionar la prioridad. E invitar al presidente de la comisión parlamentaria únicamente a una reunión por año no es nada del otro mundo. El Parlamento no participó en la elaboración de esta estrategia antiterrorista ni en las actuaciones previstas, a pesar de sus repetidas solicitudes. Ustedes estaban deliberando; esta tarde hemos celebrado un debate sobre el Sistema de Selección Automática cuya existencia ustedes conocían desde septiembre de 2005, aunque no nos lo dijeron. Si realmente existe un compromiso para mantenernos informados de todos los hechos importantes en el ámbito de la lucha antiterrorista, ¿por qué no se nos informó de ello? ¿Por qué no participamos en todas las deliberaciones sobre seguridad y privacidad con los Estados Unidos? Me permito dudar de su compromiso con este diálogo."@es²⁰ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@et⁵ "Kiitos, arvoisa ministeri. Toista tapaamista ei kuitenkaan järjestetty, joten herää kysymys, kuuluiko se ensisijaisiin tavoitteisiin. Valiokunnan puheenjohtajan kutsuminen vain yhteen kokoukseen vuodessa ei todellakaan ole kovin vaikuttavaa. Parlamentti ei voinut osallistua tämän terrorismin vastaisen strategian eikä terrorismia koskevien toimintasuunnitelmien laatimiseen, vaikka se pyysi toistuvasti mahdollisuutta siihen. Teillä oli meneillään neuvotteluita – me keskustelimme aiemmin tänä iltapäivänä niin sanotusta ATS-tietokannasta ( ), josta te tiesitte jo syyskuussa 2005, mutta josta ette kertoneet meille. Jos olette todella sitoutuneet pitämään meidät ajan tasalla kaikesta terrorismin torjunnan alalla tapahtuvasta tärkeästä kehityksestä, miksi emme saaneet kuulla tästä? Miksi emme ole mukana kaikissa Yhdysvaltain kanssa turvallisuudesta ja yksityisyydestä käytävissä keskusteluissa? Saanen olla eri mieltä siitä, että olette muka sitoutuneet tähän vuoropuheluun."@fi⁷ "Je vous remercie, Madame la Ministre, mais, en réalité, la deuxième réunion n’a pas eu lieu, d’où la nécessité de s’interroger sur les priorités. En outre, il n’y a pas de quoi se réjouir de la participation du président de la commission à une seule réunion en un an. Nous, en tant que députés européens, n’avons pas été impliqués dans l’élaboration de cette stratégie de lutte contre le terrorisme ni des mesures prévues, malgré les multiples demandes formulées en ce sens. C’est vous qui teniez la barre - nous avons eu un débat en début d’après-midi sur le système de ciblage automatisé, dont vous avez été informée dès septembre 2005 et que vous nous avez caché. S’il est vrai que vous souhaitez nous informer de toutes les nouveautés importantes dans le domaine de la lutte contre le terrorisme, comment se fait-il que nous n’en ayons pas été mis au courant? Pourquoi ne sommes-nous pas impliqués dans toutes les discussions qui se tiennent avec les États-Unis au sujet de la sécurité et du respect de la vie privée? Permettez-moi d’être d’un autre avis concernant votre volonté d’encourager ce dialogue."@fr⁸ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@hu¹¹ "La ringrazio, signora Ministro, ma resta il fatto che il secondo incontro non ha avuto luogo, pertanto ci si interroga su quali siano le priorità. E non ci stupisce molto che il presidente della commissione abbia presenziato ad un solo incontro in un anno. Noi come Parlamento non siamo stati coinvolti nella preparazione di tale strategia antiterrorismo o nelle azioni pianificate, malgrado i reiterati solleciti. Voi avete tenuto discussioni – noi abbiamo avuto un dibattito questo pomeriggio sul sistema ATS, di cui voi siete venuti a conoscenza più o meno nel settembre 2005, anche se non ci avevate informato. Se esiste realmente un impegno nel tenerci informati su tutti gli importanti sviluppi nel settore dell’antiterrorismo, perché non eravamo a conoscenza di questa misura? Perché non veniamo coinvolti in tutte le discussioni con gli Stati Uniti in materia di sicurezza e ? Mi consenta di dissentire sul vostro impegno sul dialogo in questione."@it¹² "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@lt¹⁴ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@lv¹³ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@mt¹⁵ "Hartelijk dank, mevrouw de minister, maar feit blijft dat de tweede bijeenkomst niet heeft plaatsgevonden en dus de vraag gesteld kan worden waar de prioriteiten liggen. Bovendien ben ik niet bepaald onder de indruk van het feit dat de voorzitter van de commissie één keer per jaar op de bijeenkomst aanwezig is. Wij als Parlement waren niet betrokken bij het opstellen van deze strategie voor terrorismebestrijding, noch bij de actieplannen, ondanks herhaalde verzoeken hiertoe. U heeft daarover gesproken; we hebben eerder vanmiddag een debat gehad over het (ATS), waarvan u in september 2005 weliswaar op de hoogte was, maar waarover u ons desondanks niets heeft verteld. Indien er werkelijk een verplichting bestaat om ons op de hoogte te houden van alle belangrijke ontwikkelingen op het gebied van terrorismebestrijding, waarom wisten wij daar dan niets van? Waarom zijn wij niet betrokken bij het overleg met de Verenigde Staten over veiligheid en gegevensbescherming? Ik hoop dat u begrijpt dat ik met u van mening verschil over de mate van uw inzet voor deze dialoog."@nl³ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@pl¹⁶ "Muito obrigada, Senhora Ministra, mas é um facto que a segunda reunião não se realizou e, portanto, temos de questionar a prioridade. E ter o presidente da comissão especializada em apenas uma reunião no espaço de um ano, não é realmente nada de muito impressionante. Na nossa qualidade de Parlamento não fomos envolvidos na elaboração desta estratégia de luta contra o terrorismo nem nos planos de acção, isto apesar dos inúmeros pedidos nesse sentido. V. Exas. tiveram debates – nós tivemos um debate anteriormente, na tarde de hoje, acerca do sistema ATS, de que a Senhor Ministra tinha conhecimento desde Setembro de 2005, embora não nos tenha dado conta desse facto. Se há realmente um compromisso em nos manter informados acerca de todos os desenvolvimentos importantes no domínio da luta contra o terrorismo, por que não fomos informados a este respeito? Por que não somos convidados a participar em todas as discussões com os Estados Unidos sobre segurança e privacidade? Permita-me discordar do empenho de V. Exa. em relação a este diálogo."@pt¹⁷ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@sk¹⁸ "Thank you, Minister, but the fact is that second meeting did not take place, so one has to question the priority. And to have the chairman of the committee at just one meeting in one year is really not very stunning. We as the Parliament were not involved in the drawing up of this counter-terrorism strategy or in the action planned, despite repeated requests. You were having discussions – we had a debate earlier this afternoon about the Automated Targeting System, which you knew about in September 2005, although you did not tell us. If there really is a commitment to keep us informed of all important developments in the field of counter-terrorism, why did we not know about that? Why are we not involved in all the discussions with the United States on security and privacy? I beg to differ on your commitment to this dialogue."@sl¹⁹ "Jag tackar ministern men faktum är att det andra mötet aldrig ägde rum, så man måste ifrågasätta prioriteringen. Att utskottets ordförande bara är närvarande vid ett möte ett år är verkligen inte speciellt imponerande. Vi i parlamentet var inte delaktiga i upprättandet av den här strategin mot terrorism eller i de åtgärder som planerades, trots vår upprepade önskan. Ni förde diskussioner och vi hade en debatt tidigare i eftermiddags om det automatiska identifieringssystemet (ATS), som ni kände till i september 2005 men som ni inte nämnde för oss. Om det verkligen finns ett åtagande att hålla oss informerade om all viktig utveckling inom kampen mot terrorism, varför kände vi inte till det? Varför är vi inte delaktiga i alla diskussioner med Förenta staterna rörande säkerhet och integritet? Jag stöder inte ert åtagande för den här dialogen."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Automated Targeting System"³ "Automatic Targeting System"⁷ "Sarah Ludford (ALDE ). –"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "privacy"¹²