Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-244"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-13"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Obrazložitev glasovanja⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061213.27.3-244"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-13-Speech-3-245⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Marian Harkin⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	member; REGI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² substitute; EMPL (2004-09-03--2007-01-14)²² unknown; - (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²²
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@cs¹ "Hr. formand! Jeg vil blot gerne forklare, hvorfor jeg stemte imod ændringsforslag 1 til Higgins-betænkningen, med andre ord ændringen af retsgrundlaget fra traktatens artikel 308 til artikel 159. Jeg kan godt forstå, hvorfor mange medlemmer af Parlamentet støtter dette, eftersom det vil udvide Parlamentets beføjelser, idet fonden har økonomiske samt sociale og arbejdsmarkedsmæssige mål. Parlamentet holder sig naturligvis inden for sine beføjelser. Men jeg er bekymret over, at der kan være utilsigtede konsekvenser, fordi det er usandsynligt, at Rådet vil acceptere dette, og det vil betyde en forsinkelse. Hvis denne forsinkelse indtræffer, vil det føre til en forsinkelse af finansieringen af projekter, der allerede er godt i gang. Det vil efter min mening få meget alvorlige konsekvenser, fordi der er tale om et politisk meget følsomt tidspunkt for Nordirland. Vi er i færd med at tage det sidste skridt, og jeg mener ikke, at vi har brug for nogen negative signaler fra EU. Det er i en vis udstrækning også en hul sejr for Parlamentet, eftersom dette bliver sidste gang, Parlamentet bliver bedt om at godkende finansieringen af programmet, eftersom det slutter i 2010. Desuden stemte jeg ved en fejl imod ændringsforslag 169 til Hieronymi-betænkningen. Jeg trykkede ganske enkelt på den forkerte knap. Jeg skulle have trykket på "plus"."@da² "Herr Präsident! Ich möchte kurz erläutern, warum ich Änderungsantrag 1 zum Bericht Higgins abgelehnt habe, der auf die Änderung der Rechtsgrundlage von Artikel 308 auf Artikel 159 des EG-Vertrags abzielt. Ich kann verstehen, dass viele Mitglieder des Parlaments diesen Antrag unterstützen, denn er bewirkt eine Ausweitung der Befugnisse des Parlaments, da mit dem Fonds wirtschaftliche und soziale Ziele verfolgt werden. Dagegen ist nichts einzuwenden, das ist das gute Recht des Parlaments. Doch ich befürchte, dass dies unbeabsichtigte Konsequenzen haben könnte, denn ich halte die Zustimmung des Rates für unwahrscheinlich und glaube, dass deshalb eine Verzögerung eintreten wird. Sollte es tatsächlich zu einer solchen Verzögerung kommen, hätte dies zur Folge, dass die Finanzmittel für bereits laufende Projekte nicht rechtzeitig bereitgestellt werden können. Ich denke, dass dies angesichts der besonders schwierigen politischen Phase, in der sich Nordirland derzeit befindet, sehr ernste Konsequenzen hätte. Wir stehen kurz vor einem Abschluss und was wir am allerwenigsten gebrauchen können, sind negative Signale von der EU. Zudem ist dies in gewisser Hinsicht ein wertloser Sieg für das Parlament, da das Programm 2010 ausläuft und es deshalb das letzte Mal ist, dass das Parlament aufgefordert ist, seine Zustimmung zur Finanzierung des Programms zu erteilen. Außerdem ist mir bei der Abstimmung über den Änderungsantrag 169 zum Bericht von Frau Hieronymi ein Fehler unterlaufen. Ich habe einfach den falschen Knopf gedrückt. Ich wollte mit Ja stimmen."@de⁹ "Κύριε Πρόεδρε, θέλω απλώς να εξηγήσω γιατί καταψήφισα την τροπολογία 1 επί της έκθεσης Higgins, με άλλα λόγια την αλλαγή της νομικής βάσης από το άρθρο 308 της Συνθήκης στο άρθρο 159. Κατανοώ τους λόγους για τους οποίους ορισμένοι συνάδελφοι υποστηρίζουν αυτήν την αλλαγή, η οποία ενισχύει τις αρμοδιότητες του Κοινοβουλίου, καθόσον το ταμείο έχει οικονομικούς και κοινωνικούς στόχους. Το Κοινοβούλιο κινείται, βεβαίως, εντός των αρμοδιοτήτων του. Ωστόσο, ανησυχώ για το ενδεχόμενο εμφάνισης ανεπιθύμητων επιπτώσεων, διότι θεωρώ απίθανο να συμφωνήσει το Συμβούλιο, οπότε θα σημειωθεί καθυστέρηση. Μια τέτοια καθυστέρηση, εάν προκύψει, θα έχει ως συνέπεια να καθυστερήσει η χρηματοδότηση έργων τα οποία βρίσκονται ήδη σε εξέλιξη. Θεωρώ ότι αυτό θα είχε σοβαρές επιπτώσεις, καθόσον την περίοδο που διανύουμε η πολιτική κατάσταση στη Βόρεια Ιρλανδία είναι εξαιρετικά ευαίσθητη. Ετοιμαζόμαστε να κάνουμε το μεγάλο βήμα, και ειλικρινά δεν νομίζω ότι θα ήταν χρήσιμο να λάβουμε αρνητικά μηνύματα από την ΕΕ. Επίσης, σε κάποιο βαθμό θα είναι μια άδοξη νίκη για το Κοινοβούλιο, δεδομένου ότι αυτή είναι η τελευταία φορά που ζητείται από το Σώμα να εγκρίνει χρηματοδότηση του προγράμματος, ενόψει του τερματισμού του το 2010. Τέλος, ψήφισα λανθασμένα επί της τροπολογίας 169 στην έκθεση Hieronymi. Απλούστατα, πάτησα λάθος κουμπί. Έπρεπε να είχα πατήσει το «συν»."@el¹⁰ "Señor Presidente, solo quiero explicar por qué me he opuesto a la enmienda 1 al informe Higgins, es decir, a la sustitución del fundamento jurídico del artículo 308 del Tratado por el del artículo 159. Puedo entender por qué muchos diputados al Parlamento lo apoyarían, ya que ampliaría el poder del Parlamento, porque el fondo tiene objetivos económicos y sociales. Por supuesto, el Parlamento está en su derecho. Sin embargo, me preocupa que pueda haber consecuencias no intencionadas, porque creo que no es probable que el Consejo esté de acuerdo, con lo que se producirá un retraso. Ese retraso, si llega a producirse, comportará la demora de la financiación de proyectos que ya están en marcha. Creo que esto tendría consecuencias muy serias, porque, actualmente, nos encontramos en un momento muy delicado políticamente en Irlanda del Norte. Estamos a punto de dar el paso definitivo y realmente no creo que necesitemos señales negativas de la UE. Asimismo, en cierta medida, se trata de una victoria vacía para el Parlamento, ya que esta será la última vez que se pida al Parlamento que apruebe fondos para el programa, porque termina en 2010. También me he equivocado al votar sobre la enmienda 169 al informe Hieronymi. Sencillamente he pulsado el botón equivocado. Debería haber pulsado el botón «más»."@es²⁰ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@et⁵ "Arvoisa puhemies, haluan vain selittää, miksi vastustin Higginsin mietinnön tarkistusta 1, toisin sanoen että oikeusperustaksi vaihdetaan perustamissopimuksen 159 artikla 308 artiklan tilalle. Ymmärrän kyllä, miksi monet parlamentin jäsenet kannattavat tätä, sillä se laajentaa parlamentin toimivaltaa, koska rahastolla on taloudellisia ja sosiaalisia tavoitteita. Parlamentti vaatii luonnollisesti oikeuksiaan. Pelkään kuitenkin, että tällä voi olla tahattomia seurauksia, koska minusta on epätodennäköistä, että neuvosto suostuu tähän, ja se aiheuttaa viivästystä. Toteutuessaan viivästyminen vaikuttaisi meneillään olevien hankkeiden rahoituksen viivästymiseen. Katson, että tällä voi olla vakavia seurauksia, koska kyseessä on nyt poliittisesti erittäin herkkä ajankohta Pohjois-Irlannissa. Olemme valmiita ottamaan lopullisen askeleen, enkä todellakaan katso EU:sta tulevia kielteisiä merkkejä tarpeellisiksi. Jossakin määrin kyseessä olisi myös parlamentille tyhjä voitto, sillä tämä on viimeinen kerta, kun parlamenttia pyydetään hyväksymään ohjelman rahoitusta, sillä se päättyy vuonna 2010. Äänestin myös väärin Hieronymin mietinnön tarkistusta 169 koskevassa äänestyksessä. Painoin yksinkertaisesti väärää nappia. Minun piti painaa plus-nappia."@fi⁷ "Monsieur le Président, je voudrais juste expliquer pourquoi j’ai voté contre l’amendement 1 au rapport Higgins, à savoir celui relatif au remplacement de l’article 308 du Traité par l’article 159 comme base juridique. Je peux comprendre pourquoi de nombreux députés pouvaient le soutenir, étant donné que cela étendra les compétences du Parlement, le Fonds ayant des objectifs économiques et sociaux. Le Parlement, bien entendu, est dans son droit. Toutefois, je crains que cela n’ait des conséquences non souhaitées, car je crois qu’il est peu probable que le Conseil soit d’accord, ce qui entraînera un retard. Ce retard, s’il se produit, reporterait le financement de projets qui sont déjà en cours. Je pense que cela entraînerait de très graves conséquences, car il s’agit actuellement d’une période particulièrement sensible sur le plan politique en Irlande du Nord. Nous sommes sur le point de prendre une décision finale et je ne pense vraiment pas que nous ayons besoin de signaux négatifs de la part de l’UE. Aussi, dans une certaine mesure, il s’agit d’une fausse victoire pour le Parlement, étant donné que c’est la dernière fois qu’il doit approuver le financement du programme, celui-ci s’achevant en 2010. En outre, je me suis trompée lors du vote sur l’amendement 169 au rapport Hieronymi. Je me suis simplement trompée de bouton. J’aurais dû appuyer sur le «plus»."@fr⁸ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@hu¹¹ "Signor Presidente, vorrei semplicemente motivare la mia opposizione all’emendamento n. 1 alla relazione Higgins, in altre parole alla modifica della base giuridica dall’articolo 308 all’articolo 159 del Trattato. Posso capire perché molti colleghi siano favorevoli a tale modifica, che di fatto, alla luce degli obiettivi economici e sociali del fondo, estenderebbe i poteri del Parlamento, il quale ha ovviamente il diritto di agire in tal senso. Temo però che possano esservi conseguenze impreviste, poiché credo che il Consiglio difficilmente sarà d’accordo e questo provocherà un ritardo. In tale ipotesi siffatto ritardo avrà l’effetto di rinviare lo stanziamento dei finanziamenti a progetti che sono già stati avviati. Penso che le conseguenze sarebbero molto gravi perché, dal punto di vista politico, questo è un periodo particolarmente delicato per l’Irlanda del Nord. Stiamo per compiere l’ultimo passo e credo proprio che l’UE non debba inviare segnali negativi. In una certa misura, inoltre, si tratta di una vittoria futile per il Parlamento, perché sarà in ogni caso l’ultima volta che gli verrà chiesto di approvare i finanziamenti per il programma, che infatti scadrà nel 2010. Inoltre, ho votato per sbaglio sull’emendamento n. 169 alla relazione Hieronymi. Ho semplicemente premuto il tasto sbagliato. Avrei dovuto premere il tasto “più”."@it¹² "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@lt¹⁴ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@lv¹³ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@mt¹⁵ "Mijnheer de Voorzitter, ik wil alleen uitleggen waarom ik gekant ben tegen amendement 1 op het verslag-Higgins , met andere woorden tegen de verandering van de rechtsgrondslag artikel 308 van het Verdrag in artikel 159. Ik begrijp waarom veel Parlementsleden dit zouden steunen. Daarmee zou immers de macht van het Parlement worden vergroot, omdat het fonds economische en sociale doelstellingen heeft. Het Parlement staat hier natuurlijk in zijn recht. Ik maak mij echter zorgen over de ongewenste gevolgen ervan, omdat het onwaarschijnlijk is dat de Raad ermee zal instemmen, wat verder uitstel zou betekenen. Deze vertraging zou dan leiden tot vertraging van de financiering van reeds in gang gezette projecten. Ik denk dat de gevolgen ernstig zullen zijn, omdat met name Noord-Ierland een politiek bijzonder gevoelige periode doormaakt. Wij staan op het punt om de laatste stap te zetten, en ik denk echt niet dat we nu behoefte hebben aan negatieve signalen vanuit de EU. Eigenlijk is het ook een loze overwinning voor het Parlement, omdat dit de laatste keer is dat het zijn goedkeuring moet hechten aan de financiering van dit programma, dat immers in 2010 eindigt. Voorts heb ik verkeerd gestemd over Amendement 169 op het verslag-Hieronymi. Ik heb op de verkeerde knop gedrukt. Ik had op de ‘plus’ moeten drukken."@nl³ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@pl¹⁶ "Senhor Presidente, quero apenas explicar por que razão me opus à alteração 1 ao relatório do senhor deputado Higgins, por outras palavras, à mudança da base jurídica do artigo 308º do Tratado para o artigo 159º. Posso compreender por que motivo muitos deputados a este Parlamento a apoiarão, pois alargará os poderes do Parlamento na medida em que o fundo tem objectivos económicos e sociais. Claro que o Parlamento está no seu direito. Contudo, essa posição preocupa-me porque poderá ter repercussões inesperadas, atendendo a que não é provável, creio eu, que o Conselho concorde, o que equivalerá a um atraso. Esse atraso, a acontecer, terá como consequência o atraso no financiamento de projectos que já estão em curso. Na minha opinião, as consequências são extremamente graves, pois este é um momento particularmente sensível, do ponto de vista político, na Irlanda do Norte. Estamos prestes a dar o último passo e não me parece, de facto, que precisemos de quaisquer sinais negativos vindos da UE. Também é, até certo ponto, uma vitória oca para o Parlamento, dado que será a última vez que o Parlamento será chamado a pronunciar-se sobre o financiamento deste programa, visto que termina em 2010. Quero também dizer que votei erradamente na alteração 169 ao relatório Hieronymi. Pura e simplesmente premi o botão errado. Deveria ter premido "plus"."@pt¹⁷ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@sk¹⁸ "Mr President, I just want to explain why I opposed Amendment 1 to the Higgins report, in other words the changing of the legal basis from Article 308 of the Treaty to Article 159. I can understand why many Members of Parliament would support this, as it will extend the power of Parliament because the fund has economic and social objectives. Parliament, of course, is within its rights. However, I am concerned that there may be unintended consequences because I believe that the Council is unlikely to agree and that this will mean a delay. That delay, if it happens, would have the effect of delaying funding to projects that are already under way. I think this would have very serious consequences because it is a particularly sensitive time politically in Northern Ireland at the moment. We are about to take the final step and I really do not think we need any negative signals coming from the EU. Also, to some extent, it is a hollow victory for Parliament as this will be the last time that Parliament will be asked to approve funding for the programme because it finishes in 2010. Also, I voted in error on Amendment 169 to the Hieronymi report. I simply pressed the wrong button. I should have pressed ‘plus’."@sl¹⁹ "Herr talman! Jag vill bara förklara varför jag motsatte mig ändringsförslag 1 till Jim Higgins betänkande, med andra ord en ändring av den rättsliga grunden från artikel 308 i fördraget till artikel 159. Jag kan förstå varför många parlamentsledamöter skulle vilja stödja detta. Det kommer att utvidga parlamentets inflytande eftersom fonden har ekonomiska och sociala mål. Parlamentet är naturligtvis i sin fulla rätt. Emellertid är jag orolig över att det kan föra med sig oavsedda konsekvenser eftersom det inte är troligt att rådet kommer att instämma och att detta kommer att innebära en fördröjning. En sådan fördröjning skulle innebära fördröjd finansiering av projekt som redan har inletts. Jag tror att detta skulle få mycket allvarliga följder eftersom det nu är en särskilt politiskt känslig tid i Nordirland. Vi står inför det slutliga steget och jag anser verkligen inte att vi behöver några negativa signaler från EU. Det är också i viss utsträckning en ihålig seger för parlamentet eftersom detta är sista gången som parlamentet tillfrågas om att godkänna finansiering för programmet, eftersom det löper ut 2010. Dessutom röstade jag fel om ändringsförslag 169 till Ruth Hieronymis betänkande. Jag tryckte helt enkelt på fel knapp. Jag skulle ha tryckt på ”plus”."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Marian Harkin (ALDE ). –"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,14,16,16,11,11,13,4}