Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-168"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-13"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Obrazložitev glasovanja⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061213.27.3-168"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-13-Speech-3-169⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Ian Hudghton⁶
lpv:spoken text	"I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; PECH (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² substitute; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² vice-chair; G/EFA (2005-05-24--2009-07-13)²² unknown; Scottish National Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² substitute; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²²
lpv:translated text	"I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@cs¹ "Jeg støttede initiativet fra min gruppe og andre medlemmer, som var et kompromis, hvor vi ville have bevaret det bedste i Reach-forslaget og samtidig opfylde mange af branchens ønsker. Som tingene står nu, er den nye lovgivning fuld af smuthuller og undtagelser, og jeg er bange for, at dette vil give mulighed for at fortsætte med at bruge giftige kemikalier i produktionen, selv når der findes sikrere alternativer."@da² ". . Ich habe die Initiative meiner Fraktion und anderer Abgeordneter unterstützt. Mit diesem Kompromiss hätten die besten Elemente des REACH-Vorschlags erhalten und vielen Bedenken der Wirtschaft Rechnung getragen werden können. Die jetzt vorliegende neue Verordnung ist voller Schlupflöcher und Ausnahmeregelungen und ich befürchte, dass sie die Verwendung toxischer Chemikalien in der verarbeitenden Industrie weiter zulässt, selbst wenn bereits sicherere Alternativen zur Verfügung stehen."@de⁹ ". Στήριξα την πρωτοβουλία της Ομάδας μου και άλλων βουλευτών, η οποία συνίστατο σε μια συμβιβαστική θέση που θα είχε διατηρήσει τα καλύτερα στοιχεία του REACH αντιμετωπίζοντας συγχρόνως πολλές από τις ανησυχίες των επιχειρήσεων. Όπως έχει διαμορφωθεί τώρα η κατάσταση, η νέα νομοθεσία είναι γεμάτη από κενά και εξαιρέσεις, πράγμα που με κάνει να ανησυχώ ότι θα επιτραπεί έτσι η συνέχιση της χρήσης τοξικών χημικών στον μεταποιητικό τομέα, ακόμα και όταν υπάρχουν ασφαλέστερες εναλλακτικές χημικές ουσίες."@el¹⁰ ". He apoyado la iniciativa presentada por mi Grupo y otros diputados, que era un compromiso que habría preservado lo mejor de las propuestas de REACH, al tiempo que se respondería a muchas de las preocupaciones del sector. En la situación actual, la nueva legislación está llena de lagunas y excepciones y mi preocupación es que se permitirá la continuación del uso de sustancias químicas tóxicas, incluso aunque existan alternativas más seguras."@es²⁰ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@et⁵ "Annoin tukeni ryhmäni ja muiden parlamentin jäsenten aloitteelle eli kompromissille, jolla olisi säilytetty REACH-ehdotuksen parhaat puolet ja vastattu samalla useisiin alan yritysten huolenaiheisiin. Tällä hetkellä uusi lainsäädäntö on täynnä porsaanreikiä ja poikkeuksia, ja pelkään, että myrkyllisten kemikaalien käyttöä valmistusteollisuudessa pystytään niiden varjolla jatkamaan, vaikka saatavilla olisi turvallisempia vaihtoehtoja."@fi⁷ ". J’ai soutenu l’initiative de mon groupe et d’autres membres, qui était un compromis qui aurait préservé la meilleure partie de la proposition REACH tout en répondant à bon nombre des préoccupations du secteur. Dans l’état actuel des choses, la nouvelle législation présente de nombreuses failles et exemptions et je crains qu’elle permette la poursuite de l’utilisation de substances chimiques toxiques dans la fabrication, même lorsque des alternatives plus sûres existent."@fr⁸ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@hu¹¹ ". Ho votato a favore dell’iniziativa del mio gruppo e di altri deputati, un compromesso che avrebbe preservato le parti migliori della proposta REACH rispondendo a molte delle preoccupazioni del settore. Così come stanno le cose, la nuova legislazione è piena di scappatoie e di esenzioni e temo che questo consentirà di continuare a utilizzare sostanze chimiche tossiche nella produzione, anche laddove esistono alternative più sicure."@it¹² "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@lt¹⁴ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@lv¹³ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@mt¹⁵ "Ik heb altijd steun gegeven aan het initiatief van mijn fractie en van andere afgevaardigden. Dat bestond uit een compromis waarin het beste van het REACH-voorstel behouden zou blijven en tegelijk tegemoet zou worden gekomen aan allerlei economische belangen. In haar huidige vorm zit de nieuwe wetgeving vol mazen en uitzonderingen en ik vrees dat die het mogelijk zullen maken om giftige chemicaliën in het productieproces te blijven gebruiken, zelfs als er veiliger alternatieven voorhanden zijn."@nl³ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@pl¹⁶ "Apoio a iniciativa do meu Grupo e de outros deputados, a saber, um compromisso que teria preservado o melhor da proposta REACH, respondendo ao mesmo tempo a muitas das preocupações das empresas. Na forma como as coisas estão, a nova legislação está cheia de lacunas e excepções e a minha preocupação é que isso permita continuar-se a utilizar substâncias químicas tóxicas, mesmo quando existem alternativas mais seguras."@pt¹⁷ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@sk¹⁸ "I supported the initiative by my group and other members, which was a compromise that would have preserved the best of the REACH proposal whilst answering many of the concerns of business. As things stand the new legislation is full of loopholes and exemptions and my concern is that this will allow the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing to continue, even when safer alternatives exist."@sl¹⁹ "Jag stödde det initiativ som togs av min grupp och andra ledamöter och som var en kompromiss som både skulle ha bevarat det bästa av Reach-förslaget och tillvaratagit många av näringslivets intressen. Som det nu är finns det fullt av kryphål och undantag i den nya lagstiftningen och jag oroar mig för att detta kommer att tillåta användningen av giftiga kemikalier vid tillverkning, också när säkrare alternativ finns."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE ),"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "in writing"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}