Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-24-Speech-2-285"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20061024.33.2-285"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@en4
lpv:translated text
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@cs1
"Hr. formand! Det er et interessant spørgsmål, der bestemt er mere vidtrækkende end - og sandsynligvis går helt uden for - anvendelsesområdet for det oprindelige spørgsmål, der blev stillet mig. Det er ikke desto mindre fascinerende. Jeg mener, at man bedst kan forbedre, styrke og uddybe energiefterspørgsels- og energiforsyningsforholdet mellem Europa og Rusland og dermed gøre det mere tilfredsstillende ved først og fremmest at presse Rusland til at vedtage andre og mere gennemsigtige politikker for fri transit, der styres af globale handelsregler. Jeg ser ingen grund til, at energivarer ikke skal underlægges globale handelsregler ligesom alle andre varer. Men jeg mener også, at man bedst kan styrke energiforholdet mellem Rusland og EU ved at forankre energiforholdet i et bredere sæt af handelsforhandlinger og handelsaftaler, der skal have til formål at integrere de russiske og europæiske økonomier under ledelse af retfærdige og gennemsigtige markedsregler samt aftalte normer og standarder. Det er i denne forbindelse at jeg ser frem til at forfølge dette emne som en del af de mere vidtgående handelsforhandlinger, som forhåbentlig følger efter Ruslands tiltrædelse af WTO."@da2
". Das ist eine sehr interessante Frage, die weit über den Rahmen der mir ursprünglich gestellten Frage hinausgeht und diesen möglicherweise völlig sprengt. Trotzdem ist sie faszinierend. Meines Erachtens kann die Beziehung zwischen Europa und Russland in Bezug auf die Energienachfrage und das Energieangebot am besten dadurch verbessert, gestärkt, vertieft und befriedigender gestaltet werden, indem wir Russland vor allem drängen, andere, transparentere Maßnahmen im Hinblick auf den freien Transit zu ergreifen, die sich an den globalen Handelsregeln orientieren. Ich sehe keinen Grund, weshalb Energieerzeugnisse nicht ebenso wie alle anderen Erzeugnisse globalen Handelsregeln unterliegen sollten. Ich glaube aber auch, dass die Energiebeziehung zwischen Russland und der EU am besten dadurch gefestigt werden kann, dass man sie in einem umfassenderen System von Handelsgesprächen und -vereinbarungen verankert, deren Ziel eine Integration der russischen und europäischen Wirtschaft wäre, die von fairen und transparenten Marktregeln und vereinbarten Normen und Standards geprägt wäre. Ausgehend davon sehe ich der Weiterverfolgung dieser Angelegenheit im Rahmen weiter reichender Handelsgespräche, zu denen es hoffentlich nach dem Beitritt Russlands zur WTO kommen wird, mit Interesse entgegen."@de9
". Είναι μια ενδιαφέρουσα ερώτηση, που σίγουρα υπερβαίνει κατά πολύ την αρχική ερώτηση που μου τέθηκε, και μάλιστα είναι πιθανώς τελείως εκτός αυτής. Ωστόσο, είναι συναρπαστική. Πιστεύω ότι ο καλύτερος τρόπος για να βελτιώσουμε, να ενισχύσουμε, να εμβαθύνουμε, να καταστήσουμε πιο ικανοποιητική τη σχέση ενεργειακής προσφοράς και ζήτησης μεταξύ της Ευρώπης και της Ρωσίας είναι, καταρχάς, να πιέσουμε τη Ρωσία να εγκρίνει άλλες, περισσότερο διαφανείς, πολιτικές ελεύθερης διαμετακόμισης που να διέπονται από τους κανόνες του διεθνούς εμπορίου. Δεν βλέπω κανένα λόγο για να μην υπόκεινται τα ενεργειακά προϊόντα στους κανόνες του διεθνούς εμπορίου όπως κάθε άλλο προϊόν. Πιστεύω επίσης, όμως, ότι ο καλύτερος τρόπος για να ενισχύσουμε την ενεργειακή σχέση μεταξύ της Ρωσίας και της ΕΕ είναι μέσω της εδραίωσης αυτής της ενεργειακής σχέσης σε μια ευρύτερη δέσμη εμπορικών διαπραγματεύσεων, με σκοπό την ολοκλήρωση της οικονομίας της Ρωσίας και της Ευρώπης η οποία να διέπεται από δίκαιους και διαφανείς κανόνες αγοράς και συμπεφωνημένους κανόνες και πρότυπα. Σε αυτό το πλαίσιο αναμένω με ενδιαφέρον τη συζήτηση του θέματος, ως μέρος των ευρύτερων εμπορικών διαπραγματεύσεων που ελπίζω ότι θα ξεκινήσουν μετά την ένταξη της Ρωσίας στον ΠΟΕ."@el10
". Esta es una pregunta fascinante, una pregunta que indudablemente va mucho más allá del ámbito de la pregunta original que se me ha planteado y, de hecho, probablemente se sitúa casi totalmente fuera del mismo. No obstante, es fantástica. Creo que la mejor forma de mejorar, reforzar, profundizar y hacer más satisfactoria la relación entre la oferta y la demanda de energía entre Europa y Rusia es, en primer lugar, presionar a Rusia para que adopte otras políticas más transparentes de libre tránsito, regidas por las normas del comercio internacional. No veo ninguna razón para la que los bienes energéticos no deban estar sujetos a las normas del comercio internacional, como cualquier otro bien. Sin embargo, también creo que la mejor forma de reforzar la relación en el ámbito de la energía entre Rusia y la Unión Europea consiste en fundamentar esa relación en un conjunto más amplio de acuerdos y negociaciones comerciales, cuyo objeto sería conseguir la integración de las economías rusa y europea gobernadas por normas de mercado justas y transparentes y por reglas y criterios acordados. En ese contexto espero tratar este tema en el marco de las negociaciones comerciales más amplias que confío que comiencen tras la adhesión de Rusia a la OMC."@es20
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@et5
". Esititte mielenkiintoisen kysymyksen, joka varmastikin ulottuu alkuperäisen kysymyksen soveltamisalaa paljon pidemmälle. Luultavasti se on jopa täysin sen soveltamisalan ulkopuolella. Se on kuitenkin mielenkiintoinen kysymys. Mielestäni paras tapa parantaa, lujittaa ja syventää energian kysynnän ja toimituksen suhdetta Euroopan ja Venäjän välillä ja tehdä siitä entistä tyydyttävämpi, on ensinnäkin painostaa Venäjää hyväksymään muita, entistä avoimempia vapaata siirtoa koskevia toimintaperiaatteita, joita säännellään kansainvälisillä kauppasäännöillä. En näe mitään syytä, miksi energiatuotteisiin ei pitäisi soveltaa kansainvälisiä kauppasääntöjä samaan tapaan kuin kaikkiin muihinkin tuotteisiin. Katson kuitenkin myös, että paras tapa lujittaa Venäjän ja EU:n välistä energiasuhdetta on kytkeä se laajempiin kauppaneuvotteluihin ja -sopimuksiin, joiden tavoitteena on Venäjän ja eurooppalaisten talouksien yhdentyminen oikeudenmukaisten ja avointen markkinasääntöjen sekä sovittujen normien ja standardien mukaisesti. Odotankin toiveikkaana, että tätä tavoitetta edistetään osana laajempia kauppaneuvotteluja, joiden toivon käynnistyvän Venäjän liityttyä WTO:hon."@fi7
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@hu11
". Si tratta di un argomento interessante, che senza dubbio si allontana di gran lunga dall’oggetto dell’interrogazione iniziale che mi è stata rivolta, e infatti probabilmente ne esula quasi del tutto. Nonostante ciò lo trovo affascinante. Ritengo che il modo migliore per progredire, rafforzare, approfondire, rendere più soddisfacente il rapporto in termini di domanda e offerta di energia tra Europa e Russia sia, prima di tutto, sollecitare la Russia ad adottare altre e più trasparenti politiche di libero transito disciplinate dalle regole in materia di scambi a livello mondiale. Non vedo il motivo per cui i beni attinenti all’energia non debbano essere soggetti alle regole sul commercio mondiale al pari di qualsiasi altra merce. Tuttavia, ritengo anche che il modo migliore per potenziare i rapporti tra Russia e Unione europea in materia di energia sia inserire tali relazioni in una serie più ampia di negoziati e accordi sul commercio, al fine di dare vita all’integrazione dell’economia russa ed europea determinata da regole di mercato eque e trasparenti, nonché da norme e stabiliti. E’ in tale contesto che auspico di perseguire tale obiettivo nell’ambito di negoziati commerciali più ampi cui spero si darà avvio dopo l’adesione della Russia all’OMC."@it12
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@lt14
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@lv13
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@mt15
"Dit is een intrigerende vraag die beslist een stuk verder gaat dan de vraag die oorspronkelijk aan mij is gesteld. Wij begeven ons nu waarschijnlijk zelfs op een heel ander terrein, maar dat neemt niet weg dat dit een fascinerend onderwerp is. De beste manier waarop wij de betrekkingen tussen Europa en Rusland waar het gaat om vraag en aanbod op energiegebied kunnen verbeteren, versterken, intensiveren en voor beide partijen bevredigender kunnen maken, is in de eerste plaats door Rusland ervan te overtuigen dat het een ander, transparanter beleid moet gaan hanteren voor een vrije doorvoer. Dat beleid moet in ieder geval gebaseerd zijn op de handelsregels van de WTO. Ik zie niet in waarom energieproducten niet net als alle andere producten ook aan die mondiale handelsregels onderworpen zouden moeten zijn. Ik ben echter ook van mening dat wij de energiebetrekkingen tussen Rusland en de EU het beste kunnen verbeteren door die betrekkingen te verankeren in een breder kader van handelsonderhandelingen en -overeenkomsten met als doel een integratie van de Russische en Europese economieën tot stand te brengen op basis van eerlijke en transparante marktregels en gezamenlijke normen. Tegen die achtergrond zie ik uit naar de bredere handelsonderhandelingen in het kader waarvan de verwezenlijking van dit doel dichterbij zou kunnen worden gebracht. Ik hoop dat die onderhandelingen een nieuwe impuls zullen krijgen na de toetreding van Rusland tot de WTO."@nl3
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@pl16
"Essa é uma questão intrigante, uma questão que vai seguramente mais além do, na verdade poderá até sair completamente, do âmbito da pergunta original que me foi apresentada. Não obstante é fascinante. Creio que a melhor maneira de melhorar, reforçar, aprofundar e tornar mais satisfatória a relação de aprovisionamento e procura de energia entre a Europa e a Rússia é, em primeiro lugar, pressionar a Rússia a adoptar não só outras políticas como políticas mais transparentes de livre trânsito que sejam regidas pelas normas do comércio global. Não vejo por que os produtos energéticos não devam ser sujeitos às normas comerciais globais como qualquer outro produto. Mas também acredito que a melhor maneira de reforçar a relação energética entre a Rússia e a UE é ancorando essa relação no domínio da energia num conjunto mais alargado de negociações e acordos comerciais, cujo objectivo seria gerar a integração das economias russas e europeias à luz de regras de mercado transparentes e justas, bem como de normas e padrões acordados. É nesse contexto que espero sinceramente poder trabalhar nesta matéria num quadro de negociações comerciais mais alargado, que espero se iniciem após a adesão da Rússia à OMC."@pt17
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@sk18
"That is an intriguing question, one which certainly goes far wider than, and indeed probably almost entirely steps outside, the scope of the original question put to me. Nonetheless it is fascinating. I believe that the best way of improving, strengthening, deepening, making more satisfactory the energy demand and supply relationship between Europe and Russia is, first of all, to press Russia to adopt other, more transparent policies of free transit that are governed by global trade rules. I see no reason why energy goods should not be subject to global trade rules like any other good. But I also believe that the best way to strengthen the energy relationship between Russia and the EU is by anchoring that energy relationship in a wider set of trade negotiations and agreements, the object of which would be to bring about integration of the Russian and European economies governed by fair and transparent market rules and agreed norms and standards. It is in that context that I look forward to pursuing this subject as part of the wider trade negotiations that I hope will open up following Russia’s accession to the WTO."@sl19
". Det är en intressant fråga. Den går helt klart längre och förmodligen fullständigt utanför omfattningen av den ursprungliga frågan som ställdes till mig. Icke desto mindre är den fascinerande. Jag anser att det bästa sättet att förbättra, förstärka, fördjupa och göra förhållandet mellan utbyte och efterfrågan på energi mellan EU och Ryssland mer tillfredsställande är, först och främst, att pressa Ryssland till att anta andra och öppnare riktlinjer för fri transitering som styrs av internationella handelsregler. Jag ser ingen anledning till att energiprodukter inte skulle lyda under internationella handelsregler precis som alla andra varor. Men jag anser även att det bästa sättet att förstärka energiförbindelsen mellan Ryssland och EU är att förankra den i en bredare uppsättning handelsförhandlingar och avtal som ska styras av rättvisa och öppna marknadsregler samt överenskomna normer och standarder. Avsikten med dessa handelsförhandlingar och avtal är att skapa samverkan mellan Rysslands och EU:s ekonomier. Det är i det sammanhanget som jag ser fram emot att gå vidare med denna fråga som en del av de mer omfattande handelsförhandlingar som jag hoppas kommer att öppnas efter att Ryssland har anslutit sig till WTO."@sv21
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Member of the Commission"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4
"Peter Mandelson,"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph