Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-24-Speech-2-197"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-24"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:2007. eelarveaasta üldeelarve projekt (III jagu) – 2007. eelarveaasta üldeelarve projekt (I, II, IV, V, VI, VII ja VIII jagu)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061024.31.2-197"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-24-Speech-2-198⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Piia-Noora Kauppi⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	member; FEMM (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2008-11-18)²² unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (2004-07-20--2008-12-31)²² substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2007-03-14)²² member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; JURI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²²
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@cs¹ "Hr. formand! Jeg vil gerne takke mine kolleger, hr. Elles og hr. Grech, der har gjort et betydeligt arbejde på EU's budget for 2007. Skønt jeg generelt støtter vores ordføreres holdning, må vi i sidste instans garantere tilstrækkelige midler til den fælles udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitik, og vi må finde en løsning på finansieringen af agenturerne. Men de igangværende forhandlinger kan kun baseres på gensidig forståelse af, at alle parter står fast ved deres tidligere forpligtelser. Jeg henvender i særdeleshed dette til Rådet, der gentagne gange har foreslået omfattende beskæringer i budgettet på områder, der er af stor betydning for Europa-Parlamentet. På vegne af Udvalget om Kvinders Rettigheder og Ligestilling vil jeg gerne rejse et par punkter, som desværre må rejses hvert år. Princippet om integration af kønsaspektet er indeholdt i Amsterdam-traktaten, der kræver et kønsligt ligestillingsperspektiv, som ikke alene skal anvendes på foranstaltninger, der specielt er beregnet til at fremme lige muligheder, men også inkorporeres i alle politikker på alle niveauer af budgetproceduren ved hjælp af budgetlægning, der tager hensyn til køn. Siden 2003, da Parlamentet vedtog en beslutning om budgetlægning, der tager hensyn til køn - dvs. at opbygge de offentlige budgetter ud fra et kønsligt perspektiv - har man taget hensyn til, at de offentlige budgetter, herunder EU's budget, ikke er kønsligt neutrale og har forskellig virkning for kvinder og mænd. En tilgang, der bygger på budgetlægning, som tager hensyn til køn, bør anvendes for at vurdere og omstrukturere alle relevante budgetprogrammer, foranstaltninger og politikker, såvel som til at fastlægge, i hvilken udstrækning der bevilliges ressourcer til metoder, der respekterer eller ikke respekterer ligestilling mellem kønnene og i sidste instans når kønslig neutralitet, hvor der tages samme hensyn uanset køn. Da den finske social- og sundhedsminister Tuula Haatainen talte til vores udvalg i begyndelsen af oktober, understregede hun integration af ligestillingspolitikker ved budgetplanlægningen og fremhævede det finske eksempel på at søge at sikre, at alle elementer, ikke kun på det nationale, men også på EU's budget, tager hensyn til politikker vedrørende kønslig ligestilling. Jeg håber bestemt, at det finske formandskab vil få succes hermed."@da² ". Herr Präsident! Ich möchte meinen Kollegen Herrn Elles und Herrn Grech für ihre umfangreiche Arbeit in Vorbereitung des Haushalts 2007 danken. Generell unterstütze ich den Ansatz unserer Berichterstatter, doch letztlich müssen wir dafür sorgen, dass uns ausreichend Mittel für die Finanzierung der gemeinsamen Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik zur Verfügung stehen, und wir müssen eine Lösung für die Finanzierung der Agenturen finden. Grundlage der laufenden Verhandlungen muss jedoch das gegenseitige Einvernehmen darüber sein, dass sich alle Seiten an ihre früheren Abmachungen halten. Damit meine ich ganz besonders den Rat, der wiederholt umfangreiche Kürzungen in Bereichen vorgeschlagen hat, die für das Europäische Parlament von großer Bedeutung sind. Ich möchte im Namen des Ausschusses für die Rechte der Frau und die Gleichstellung der Geschlechter einige Punkte ansprechen, die leider jedes Jahr angesprochen werden müssen. Der Grundsatz des Gender Mainstreaming ist im Vertrag von Amsterdam verankert. Danach gilt eine Geschlechtergleichstellungsperspektive nicht nur für Maßnahmen, die konkret die Chancengleichheit fördern sollen, sondern sie soll in sämtliche Politikmaßnahmen und auf allen Ebenen des Haushaltsprozesses durch Gender Budgeting einfließen. Seit 2003, als dieses Haus eine Entschließung zum Gender Budgeting annahm – also die Aufstellung öffentlicher Haushalte unter geschlechtsspezifischen Gesichtspunkten – muss die Tatsache berücksichtigt werden, dass öffentliche Haushalte, auch der EU-Haushalt, nicht geschlechtsneutral sind und sich unterschiedlich auf Frauen und Männer auswirken. Ein Gender-Budgeting-Ansatz sollte benutzt werden, um alle einschlägigen Haushaltsprogramme, Maßnahmen und Politiken zu bewerten und umzustrukturieren und festzustellen, inwieweit Mittel für beide Geschlechter gleichermaßen oder nicht zugewiesen werden, sowie letztendlich Geschlechterneutralität zu erreichen, d. h. eine geschlechtsunabhängige Gleichbehandlung. Als Tuula Haatainen, die finnische Ministerin für Soziales und Gesundheit, Anfang Oktober in unserem Ausschuss zu Gast war, unterstrich sie die Bedeutung des Mainstreaming in der Gleichstellungspolitik im Rahmen der Haushaltsplanung und verwies auf das finnische Beispiel. So ist man in Finnland bemüht, bei sämtlichen Maßnahmen im Rahmen nicht nur des nationalen, sondern auch des europäischen Haushalts Fragen der Gleichstellung zu berücksichtigen. Ich hoffe jedenfalls, dass sich der finnische Ratsvorsitz in diesem Punkt durchsetzen wird."@de⁹ "Κύριε Πρόεδρε, θα ήθελα να ευχαριστήσω τους συναδέλφους μου, τον κ. Elles και τον κ. Grech, που έχουν επιτελέσει σημαντικό έργο σχετικά με τον ευρωπαϊκό προϋπολογισμό για το 2007. Σε γενικές γραμμές, παρόλο που στηρίζω την προσέγγιση των εισηγητών μας, σε τελική ανάλυση πρέπει να εγγυηθούμε επαρκή χρηματοδότηση για την κοινή εξωτερική πολιτική και πολιτική ασφάλειας και πρέπει να εξεύρουμε μια λύση για τη χρηματοδότηση των οργανισμών μας. Ωστόσο, οι εν εξελίξει διαπραγματεύσεις μπορούν να βασιστούν μόνο στην αμοιβαία συμφωνία ότι όλες οι πλευρές τηρούν τις πρότερες δεσμεύσεις τους. Το απευθύνω αυτό στο Συμβούλιο ιδιαίτερα, το οποίο έχει επανειλημμένα προτείνει εκτεταμένες περικοπές στον προϋπολογισμό σε τομείς μεγάλης σημασίας για το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο. Εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής Δικαιωμάτων των Γυναικών και Ισότητας των Φύλων, θα ήθελα να θίξω ορισμένα θέματα τα οποία, δυστυχώς, πρέπει να ανακινούνται κάθε χρόνο. Η αρχή της ενσωμάτωσης της διάστασης του φύλου καθορίζεται στη Συνθήκη του Άμστερνταμ, που απαιτεί η προοπτική ισότητας των φύλων όχι μόνον να εφαρμόζεται σε μέτρα που προορίζονται ειδικά για την προώθηση των ίσων ευκαιριών, αλλά επίσης να ενσωματώνεται σε όλες τις πολιτικές παντός επιπέδου της δημοσιονομικής διαδικασίας μέσω της ενσωμάτωσης της διάστασης του φύλου στον προϋπολογισμό. Από το 2003, όταν το παρόν Σώμα ενέκρινε ψήφισμα για την ενσωμάτωση της διάστασης του φύλου –δηλαδή την κατάρτιση δημόσιων προϋπολογισμών από μια οπτική του φύλου– έχει ληφθεί υπόψη το γεγονός ότι οι δημόσιοι προϋπολογισμοί, περιλαμβανομένου του προϋπολογισμού της ΕΕ, δεν είναι ουδέτεροι από την άποψη του φύλου και έχουν διαφορετικό αντίκτυπο στις γυναίκες και τους άνδρες. Μια προσέγγιση ενσωμάτωσης της διάστασης του φύλου θα πρέπει να χρησιμοποιηθεί για την αξιολόγηση και την αναδιάρθρωση όλων των σχετικών δημοσιονομικών προγραμμάτων, μέτρων και πολιτικών, καθώς επίσης και να καθοριστεί σε ποιον βαθμό διατίθενται πόροι με ίσους ή άνισους τρόπους όσον αφορά το φύλο, και τέλος να επιτευχθεί ουδετερότητα από την άποψη του φύλου, όπου δίνεται ίση σημασία ανεξαρτήτως φύλου. Όταν η φινλανδή υπουργός Κοινωνικών Υποθέσεων και Υγείας, Tuula Haatainen, απευθύνθηκε στην επιτροπή μας στις αρχές Οκτωβρίου, υπογράμμισε την ενσωμάτωση πολιτικών ισότητας στον σχεδιασμό του προϋπολογισμού και επικαλέστηκε το φινλανδικό παράδειγμα που επιδιώκει να διασφαλίσει ότι όλες οι θέσεις, όχι μόνον στον εθνικό προϋπολογισμό αλλά επίσης στον προϋπολογισμό της ΕΕ, λαμβάνουν υπόψη τις πολιτικές ισότητας των φύλων. Ελπίζω, φυσικά, ότι η φινλανδική Προεδρία θα επιτύχει από αυτήν την άποψη."@el^10,10 ". Señor Presidente, quiero dar las gracias a mis colegas el señor Elles y el señor Grech, que han realizado un magnífico trabajo en relación con el presupuesto de la UE para 2007. Aunque en general comparto el punto de vista de los ponentes, en última instancia debemos garantizar una financiación suficiente de la Política Exterior y de Seguridad Común y tenemos que encontrar una solución para la financiación de las agencias. Sin embargo, las negociaciones en curso solamente se pueden basar en la aceptación mutua de que cada parte asuma sus compromisos anteriores. Con esto me dirijo especialmente al Consejo, que reiteradamente ha propuesto amplios recortes presupuestarios en ámbitos de gran importancia para el Parlamento Europeo. En nombre de la Comisión de Derechos de la Mujer e Igualdad de Género, deseo mencionar algunos asuntos que, por desgracia, hace falta recordar cada año. El principio de integración de la perspectiva de género está consagrado en el Tratado de Amsterdam, que exige no solo aplicar una perspectiva igualitaria a las medidas destinadas específicamente para promover la igualdad de oportunidades, sino incorporarla a todas las políticas en todos los niveles del proceso presupuestario por medio de la integración de la perspectiva de género en el presupuesto Desde 2003, cuando esta Cámara aprobó una resolución sobre la integración de la perspectiva de género en el presupuesto –esto es, la presupuestación con criterios de género–, se ha tenido siempre en cuenta el hecho de que los presupuestos públicos, incluido el de la UE, no son neutrales con respecto al género y repercuten de modo diferente en hombres y mujeres. La integración de la perspectiva de género en el presupuesto es un enfoque que debe utilizarse para evaluar y reestructurar todos los programas, medidas y políticas presupuestarias pertinentes y para determinar hasta qué punto se asignan los recursos de forma sexualmente equitativa y en qué medida se logra por último la neutralidad entre géneros, en que todas las personas reciben el mismo trato independientemente de su sexo. Cuando la Ministra finlandesa de Asuntos Sociales y Sanidad, Tuula Haatainen, se dirigió a nuestra comisión a principios de octubre, hizo hincapié en la integración de las políticas de igualdad en la planificación presupuestaria y aludió al propósito finlandés de garantizar que en todos los aspectos del presupuesto nacional y comunitario se tengan en cuenta las políticas de igualdad de género. Espero sinceramente que la Presidencia finlandesa logre su objetivo."@es²⁰ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@et⁵ ". Arvoisa puhemies, haluan kiittää kollegojani Ellesiä ja Grechiä, jotka ovat tehneet merkittävää työtä EU:n vuoden 2007 talousarvion parissa. Kannatan yleisesti ottaen esittelijöiden lähestymistapaa, mutta loppujen lopuksi meidän on varmistettava riittävä rahoitus yhteiselle ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikalle sekä löydettävä ratkaisu virastojen rahoitukseen. Parhaillaan käytävät neuvottelut voivat kuitenkin perustua keskinäiseen ymmärtämykseen siitä, että kaikki osapuolet noudattavat aiemmin antamiaan sitoumuksia. Sanon tämän erityisesti neuvostolle, joka on jatkuvasti ehdottanut laajoja budjettileikkauksia Euroopan parlamentille erittäin tärkeillä aloilla. Haluan ottaa naisten oikeuksien ja sukupuolten tasa-arvon valiokunnan puolesta esiin muutaman asian, joista on valitettavasti muistutettava joka vuosi. Tasa-arvon valtavirtaistamista koskeva periaate sisältyy Amsterdamin sopimukseen, jonka mukaan tasa-arvonäkökohdat eivät koske ainoastaan toimenpiteitä, joilla nimenomaisesti pyritään edistämään naisten ja miesten yhtäläisiä mahdollisuuksia, vaan ne on sisällytettävä myös talousarvioiden laatimisen kaikkiin vaiheisiin sekä kaikkiin talousarviota koskeviin politiikkoihin sukupuolinäkökohdat huomioon ottavan budjetoinnin avulla. Vuodesta 2003 lähtien, jolloin parlamentti antoi päätöslauselman tasa-arvonäkökohtien huomioimisesta julkisten talousarvioiden laatimisessa (gender budgeting), on otettu huomioon, etteivät julkiset talousarviot tai EU:n talousarviot ole sukupuolineutraaleja, sillä niillä on erilainen vaikutus naisiin ja miehiin. Sukupuolinäkökohdat huomioon ottavaa lähestymistapaa on sovellettava kaikkien tärkeiden talousarviota koskevien ohjelmien, toimien ja menettelytapojen arvioimisessa ja uudelleen järjestämisessä, ja on määritettävä, missä määrin varoja myönnetään tasa-arvonäkökohdat huomioon ottavalla tavalla. Lisäksi on pyrittävä sukupuolineutraalisuuteen, jossa toteutetaan tasa-arvoista ja sukupuolesta riippumatonta harkintaa. Kun Suomen sosiaali- ja terveysministeri Tuula Haatainen puhui valiokunnassamme lokakuun alussa, hän korosti tasa-arvotoimien valtavirtaistamista talousarvioiden suunnittelussa ja mainitsi esimerkkinä Suomen pyrkimyksen varmistaa, että tasa-arvonäkökohdat otetaan huomioon paitsi kansallisen talousarvion myös EU:n talousarvion kaikissa budjettikohdissa. Toivon tietenkin, että puheenjohtajavaltio Suomi onnistuu tässä tavoitteessa."@fi⁷ "Monsieur le Président, je voudrais remercier mes collègues, MM. Elles et Grech, qui ont réalisé un énorme travail sur le budget de l’Union pour 2007. En général, si je soutiens l’approche de nos rapporteurs, nous devons en dernière analyse garantir un financement suffisant de la politique étrangère et de sécurité commune et nous devons trouver une solution au financement des agences. Toutefois, les négociations en cours ne peuvent se baser que sur une compréhension mutuelle selon laquelle toutes les parties respectent leurs engagements précédents. Je m’adresse ici en particulier au Conseil, qui a proposé à maintes reprises de vastes réductions budgétaires dans des domaines très importants aux yeux du Parlement européen. Au nom de la commission des droits de la femme et de l’égalité des genres, je voudrais soulever quelques questions qui doivent malheureusement être soulevées chaque année. Le principe d’intégration de la dimension de genre est consacré par le traité d’Amsterdam, selon lequel une perspective d’égalité de genre n’est pas uniquement applicable aux actes visant spécifiquement à promouvoir l’égalité des chances, mais devrait être incorporée dans toutes les actions et à tous les niveaux de la procédure budgétaire au moyen de l’intégration de la dimension de genre dans le budget. Depuis 2003, lorsque cette Assemblée a adopté une résolution sur le «gender budgeting» (établissement des budgets publics selon la perspective de genre), le fait que les budgets publics, y compris le budget de l’Union, sont sexistes et ont une incidence différente sur les femmes et les hommes, a été pris en considération. Il faudrait utiliser une approche intégrant la dimension de genre pour évaluer et restructurer l’ensemble des programmes, des mesures et des politiques budgétaires concernés, ainsi que pour déterminer dans quelle mesure les ressources sont réparties ou non de façon équitable entre les deux genres et pour aboutir, en fin de compte, à une neutralité du point de vue du genre, en accordant une attention égale indépendamment du genre. Lorsque la ministre finlandaise des affaires sociales et de la santé, Tuula Haatainen, s’est adressée à notre commission début octobre, elle a insisté sur l’intégration des politiques d’égalité dans la planification budgétaire et elle a évoqué l’exemple finlandais, qui cherche à garantir que tous les points, non seulement du budget national, mais également du budget européen, tiennent compte des politiques d’égalité des genres. J’espère certainement que la présidence finlandaise réussira."@fr⁸ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@hu¹¹ "Signor Presidente, desidero ringraziare i miei colleghi, onorevoli Elles e Grech, per il notevole lavoro che hanno svolto sul bilancio dell’UE per il 2007. In generale, pur sostenendo l’approccio dei relatori, nell’analisi finale dobbiamo garantire una copertura finanziaria sufficiente per la politica estera e di sicurezza comune e dobbiamo trovare una soluzione per il finanziamento delle agenzie. Tuttavia, i negoziati in corso possono fondarsi unicamente sulla reciproca intesa che tutte le parti rispettino gli impegni pregressi. Rivolgo tale osservazione in particolare al Consiglio, che ha ripetutamente proposto ingenti tagli di bilancio in ambiti di grande rilevanza per il Parlamento europeo. A nome della commissione per i diritti della donna e l’uguaglianza di genere, vorrei sollevare alcune questioni che purtroppo si ripresentano ogni anno. Il principio dell’integrazione trasversale della dimensione di genere è sancito dal Trattato di Amsterdam, che richiede che la prospettiva di parità di genere sia applicata non soltanto alle misure specificatamente volte a promuovere le pari opportunità, ma sia anche integrata in tutte le politiche e a tutti i livelli del processo di bilancio tramite il . Dal 2003, quando il Parlamento ha approvato una risoluzione sul cioè la definizione dei bilanci pubblici secondo la prospettiva di genere – si è tenuto conto del fatto che i bilanci pubblici, incluso il bilancio UE, non sono neutrali dal punto di vista del genere e hanno effetti diversi sulle donne e sugli uomini. Per valutare e ristrutturare tutti i programmi, le misure e le politiche pertinenti di bilancio, come pure per determinare in quale misura le risorse sono assegnate nel rispetto o meno dell’uguaglianza di genere e in ultima analisi ottengono una neutralità di genere, in base a considerazioni di equità a prescindere dal genere, dovrebbe essere utilizzato un approccio di . Quando il ministro finlandese per gli Affari sociali e la sanità, Tuula Haatainen, si è presentata dinanzi alla nostra commissione all’inizio di ottobre, ha posto in rilievo l’integrazione delle politiche per l’uguaglianza nella pianificazione del bilancio e ha evocato l’esempio finlandese inteso a garantire che tutte le voci, non soltanto nel bilancio nazionale, ma anche in quello dell’UE, tengano conto delle politiche per l’uguaglianza di genere. Spero evidentemente che la Presidenza finlandese riesca in tale intento."@it¹² "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@lt¹⁴ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@lv¹³ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@mt¹⁵ "Mijnheer de Voorzitter, ik wil mijn collega’s, de heer Elles en de heer Grech, graag bedanken voor de grote hoeveelheid werk die zij hebben verzet in verband met de begroting van de EU voor 2007. Hoewel ik de aanpak van onze rapporteurs steun, vind ik meer in het algemeen dat wij ervoor moeten zorgen dat er uiteindelijk wel genoeg geld beschikbaar is voor het gemeenschappelijk buitenlands en veiligheidsbeleid. Daarnaast moeten wij een oplossing zien te vinden voor de financiering van de agentschappen. Voor de lopende onderhandelingen is het echter noodzakelijk dat alle partijen de verplichtingen nakomen die zij in een eerder stadium op zich hebben genomen. Deze opmerking is met name voor de Raad bedoeld, die herhaaldelijk grote bezuinigingen op de begroting heeft voorgesteld op gebieden waaraan het Europees Parlement groot belang hecht. Namens de Commissie rechten van de vrouw en gendergelijkheid wil ik een aantal kwesties aan de orde stellen die helaas elk jaar weer terugkomen. Het beginsel van gender mainstreaming is vastgelegd in het Verdrag van Amsterdam en dat betekent dat gendergelijkheid niet alleen van toepassing is op maatregelen die specifiek bedoeld zijn om gelijke kansen te bevorderen, maar doorgevoerd moet worden in alle beleidsmaatregelen en op alle niveaus van het begrotingsproces door middel van gender budgeting. In 2003 heeft dit Parlement een resolutie over gender budgeting aangenomen met als strekking dat overheidsbegrotingen vanuit een genderperspectief opgesteld moeten worden. Helaas is er geen verandering opgetreden en wordt er nog steeds geen rekening gehouden met het feit dat overheidsbegrotingen, inclusief de EU-begroting, niet genderneutraal zijn en een verschillende impact hebben op mannen en vrouwen. Er dient dan ook gebruik te worden gemaakt van een gender budgeting-benadering om alle relevante begrotingsgerelateerde programma's, acties en beleidsmaatregelen te evalueren en te herstructureren, en om te bepalen in welke mate de middelen op een vanuit genderoogpunt gelijke dan wel ongelijke wijze worden ingezet. Op deze manier dient het uiteindelijke doel van gendergelijkheid verwezenlijkt te worden, waarbij vrouwen en mannen gelijke kansen krijgen. Toen de Finse minister van Sociale Zaken en Volksgezondheid, Tuula Haatainen, de Commissie rechten van de vrouw begin oktober toesprak, benadrukte zij dat het belangrijk is dat beleidsmaatregelen voor het bevorderen van die gelijkheid in de budgettaire planning worden geïntegreerd. Zij heeft daarbij op het Finse voorbeeld gewezen omdat daar getracht wordt om bij alle beleidsaspecten rekening te houden met gendergelijkheid en dat niet alleen in de nationale, maar ook in de EU-begroting. Ik hoop van ganser harte dat het Finse voorzitterschap op dit vlak succes zal boeken."@nl³ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@pl¹⁶ "da Senhor Presidente, gostaria de agradecer aos meus colegas, os senhores deputados Elles e Grech, que fizeram um trabalho considerável com o orçamento da UE para o exercício de 2007. De forma geral, muito embora apoie a abordagem dos nossos relatores, temos de garantir, em última análise, financiamento suficiente para a Política Externa e de Segurança Comum, e há que encontrar uma solução para o financiamento das agências. Contudo, as negociações em curso só podem basear-se num entendimento mútuo de que todas as partes cumprem os compromissos assumidos anteriormente. Dirijo-me especialmente ao Conselho, que propôs, uma e outra vez, reduções orçamentais acentuadas em áreas de grande importância para o Parlamento Europeu. Em nome da Comissão dos Direitos da Mulher e da Igualdade dos Géneros, gostaria de levantar algumas questões que infelizmente têm de ser levantadas todos os anos. O princípio da integração do género está consagrado no Tratado de Amesterdão, o que requer que a perspectiva da igualdade de géneros não só se aplique às medidas concebidas especificamente para promover a igualdade de oportunidades, mas também deva ser incorporada em todas as políticas e a todos os níveis do processo orçamental através da orçamentação das questões de género. Desde 2003, quando esta Assembleia adoptou uma resolução sobre a orçamentação em função do género – isto é, elaborar os orçamentos públicos com base na perspectiva do género – o facto de que os orçamentos públicos, incluindo o orçamento da UE, não serem neutros do ponto de vista do género e terem um impacto diferente nas mulheres e nos homens foi tomado em conta. A abordagem da orçamentação em função do género deverá ser utilizada para avaliar e reestruturar todos os programas orçamentais, acções e políticas pertinentes, bem como para determinar até que ponto os recursos são atribuídos à igualdade entre géneros ou de forma desigual e, em última instância, para realizar a neutralidade em questões de género, segundo a qual deve ser prestada igual atenção independentemente do género. Quando Ministra Finlandesa dos Assuntos Sociais e da Saúde, Tuula Haatainen, se dirigiu à nossa comissão no início de Outubro, chamou a atenção para a integração das políticas de igualdade no planeamento orçamental e evocou o exemplo finlandês, país em que se procura garantir que todos as rubricas, não só no orçamento nacional mas também no da UE, tenham em conta as políticas de igualdade do género. Espero sinceramente que a Presidência finlandesa tenha sucesso nesta matéria."@pt¹⁷ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@sk¹⁸ "Mr President, I should like thank my colleagues, Mr Elles and Mr Grech, who have done considerable work on the EU budget for 2007. In general, although I support the approach of our rapporteurs, in the final analysis we must guarantee sufficient funding for common foreign and security policy and we must find a solution to the funding of the agencies. However, the ongoing negotiations can only be based on a mutual understanding that all sides abide by their earlier commitments. I address this to the Council in particular, which has repeatedly proposed extensive budget cuts in areas of great importance to the European Parliament. On behalf of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, I should like to raise a few points that unfortunately have to be raised every year. The principle of gender mainstreaming is enshrined in the Amsterdam Treaty, which requires a gender equality perspective not only to be applied to measures designed specifically to promote equal opportunities, but also to be incorporated into all policies at all levels of the budgetary process by means of gender budgeting. Since 2003, when this House adopted a resolution on gender budgeting – that is, building public budgets from a gender perspective – the fact that public budgets, including the EU budget, are not gender-neutral and have a different impact on women and men has been taken into account. A gender budgeting approach should be used to assess and restructure all pertinent budget programmes, measures and policies, as well as to determine to what extent resources are allocated in gender-equal or -unequal ways and ultimately achieve gender neutrality, where equal consideration is given regardless of gender. When the Finnish Minister for Social Affairs and Health, Tuula Haatainen, addressed our committee in early October, she highlighted the mainstreaming of equality policies in budgetary planning and evoked the Finnish example of seeking to ensure that all items, not only in the national, but also in the EU budget, take gender equality policies into account. I certainly hope that the Finnish Presidency will succeed in this respect."@sl¹⁹ ". Herr talman! Jag vill tacka mina kolleger James Elles och Louis Grech för det stora arbete som de lagt ned på EU:s budget för 2007. Även om jag stöder våra föredragandes strategi måste vi generellt garantera den gemensamma utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken tillräckligt med pengar i den slutliga analysen, och vi måste finna en lösning på finansieringen av byråerna. De pågående förhandlingarna kan dock bara grundas på den ömsesidiga förståelsen att alla sidor står fast vid sina tidigare åtaganden. Jag vänder mig särskilt till rådet, som upprepade gånger har föreslagit betydande budgetnedskärningar på områden som är av mycket stor betydelse för Europaparlamentet. Jag vill som talesman för utskottet för kvinnors rättigheter och jämställdhet mellan kvinnor och män ta upp några punkter som tyvärr måste tas upp varje år. Principen om integrering av jämställdhetsperspektivet är införd genom Amsterdamfördraget, vilket innebär att jämställdhetsperspektivet inte bara ska anläggas i frågor som syftar till att främja lika möjligheter utan ska införlivas i alla politiska beslut och på alla nivåer i budgetförfarandet genom så kallad . Sedan 2003, då Europaparlamentet antog en resolution om dvs. att utarbeta offentliga budgetar utifrån ett genusperspektiv – har man tagit hänsyn till att offentliga budgetar, däribland EU:s, inte är könsneutrala utan påverkar kvinnor och män olika. bör tillämpas för att utvärdera och omstrukturera alla relevanta budgetprogram, åtgärder och politiska beslut, avgöra i vilken mån resursfördelningen är könsneutral eller inte och slutligen uppnå könsneutralitet, där båda könen beaktas i lika hög grad. När den finska ministern för social- och hälsovårdsfrågor, Tuula Haatainen, talade till vårt utskott i början av oktober belyste hon integreringen av jämställdhet i budgetplanering och tog upp det finska exemplet som kännetecknas av en strävan att garantera att jämställdhetspolitiken beaktas på alla punkter, inte bara inom den nationella budgeten utan också inom EU:s budget. Jag hoppas verkligen att det finska ordförandeskapet kommer att lyckas i detta avseende."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,11,16,13} "Gender budgeting"²¹ "Piia-Noora Kauppi (PPE-DE ),"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality"⁴ "gender budgeting"^21,12