Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-24-Speech-2-167"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-24"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Selgitused hääletuse kohta⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061024.26.2-167"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-24-Speech-2-168⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:James Elles⁶
lpv:spoken text	"This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; BUDG (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² unknown; Conservative and Unionist Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)²²
lpv:translated text	"This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@cs¹ "Dette er en vigtig betænkning, som for en stor dels vedkommende fortjener at blive gennemført. Det er nødvendigt omgående at gøre noget for at forbedre inddrivelsesraten. Men mine britiske konservative kolleger og jeg kan ikke støtte betænkningen i sin helhed, fordi vi principielt ikke accepterer den langsigtede løsning på mange af problemerne på det område, der vedrører etableringen af en offentlig anklagemyndighed på europæisk plan, en idé, der gentages i denne betænkning (punkt 43-45). En sådan offentlig anklager ville udgøre en uacceptabel indblanding i medlemsstaternes forfatningsmæssige ansvar for deres juridiske systemer. Desuden vil en fremhævelse af dette, da der med rette er udbredt modstand mod indførelsen af det, udgøre en farlig omvej i forhold til at tage fat på de virkelige problemer. Af denne grund stemmer vi hverken for eller imod ved den endelige afstemning."@da² ". Dies ist ein wichtiger Bericht, und vieles daraus sollte umgesetzt werden. Dringendes Handeln ist geboten, um die Einziehungssätze zu verbessern. Meine britischen Kollegen und ich können den Bericht jedoch nicht in seiner Gesamtheit unterstützen, weil wir grundsätzlich nicht akzeptieren, dass die langfristige Lösung für viele Probleme in diesem Bereich in der Schaffung einer Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft liegt, eine Vorstellung, die in diesem Bericht wieder aufgegriffen wird (Ziffern 43-45). Eine solche Staatsanwaltschaft wäre eine unannehmbare Einmischung in die verfassungsmäßige Zuständigkeit der Mitgliedstaaten für ihre Rechtssysteme. Wenn man die Notwendigkeit dieses Konzepts betont, das zu Recht weithin auf Ablehnung trifft, dann bedeutet das zudem eine gefährliche Ablenkung davon, die wirklichen bestehenden Probleme in Angriff zu nehmen. Deshalb müssen wir uns bei der Schlussabstimmung der Stimme enthalten."@de⁹ "Πρόκειται για μια σημαντική έκθεση, το μεγαλύτερο μέρος της οποίας αξίζει να εφαρμοστεί. Απαιτείται επείγουσα δράση για τη βελτίωση των ποσοστών ανάκτησης. Ωστόσο, εγώ και οι συνάδελφοί μου του βρετανικού συντηρητικού κόμματος αδυνατούμε να στηρίξουμε την έκθεση συνολικά, επειδή δεν δεχόμαστε καταρχήν ότι η μακροπρόθεσμη λύση σε πολλά από τα προβλήματα στον εν λόγω τομέα είναι η θέσπιση της ευρωπαϊκής εισαγγελικής αρχής, μια ιδέα που επαναλαμβάνεται στην παρούσα έκθεση (παράγραφοι 43-45). Μια τέτοια εισαγγελική αρχή θα αποτελούσε απαράδεκτη παρέμβαση στη συνταγματική αρμοδιότητα των κρατών μελών για τα δικαστικά τους συστήματα. Επίσης, καθώς υπάρχει ευλόγως εκτεταμένη αντίθεση στη θέσπισή της, η υπογράμμιση της αναγκαιότητάς της συνιστά επικίνδυνη παρεκτροπή από την αντιμετώπιση των πραγματικών άμεσων προβλημάτων. Για αυτόν τον λόγο, είμαστε υποχρεωμένοι να απόσχουμε από την τελική ψηφοφορία."@el¹⁰ ". Es un informe importante, gran parte del cual merece ponerse en práctica. Urge tomar medidas para mejorar los índices de recuperación. Sin embargo, mis colegas, los conservadores británicos, y yo no podemos apoyar el informe en general porque no aceptamos en principio que la solución a largo plazo de muchos de los problemas en este terreno sea la creación de un Fiscal Europeo, una idea reiterada en este informe (apartados 43-45). Un Fiscal así supondría una interferencia inaceptable en la responsabilidad constitucional de los Estados miembros con respecto a sus sistemas judiciales. Además, como existe una amplia oposición a su introducción, hacer hincapié en su necesidad es una forma peligrosa de desviar la atención de los verdaderos problemas. Por este motivo no podemos más que abstenernos en la votación final."@es²⁰ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@et⁵ "Kyseessä on tärkeä mietintö, ja monet siinä ehdotetuista toimista ansaitsevat tulla toteutetuiksi. Perintäasteen parantamiseksi tarvitaan pikaisia toimia. En voi brittiläisten konservatiivikollegojeni tavoin kuitenkaan tukea mietintöä kokonaisuudessaan, koska emme hyväksy periaatteessa sen 43–45 kohdassa toistettua ajatusta, jonka mukaan pitkän aikavälin ratkaisuna moniin alan ongelmiin on Euroopan syyttäjäviranomaisen perustaminen. Euroopan syyttäjäviranomaisen perustaminen merkitsisi puuttumista jäsenvaltioiden perustuslailliseen vastuuseen omista oikeusjärjestelmistään, mitä emme voi hyväksyä. Lisäksi syyttäjäviranomaisen perustamista vastustetaan perustellusti laajalti, joten sen tarpeellisuuden korostaminen vie huomion pois käsillä olevien todellisten ongelmien ratkaisemisesta, mikä on vaarallista. Tästä syystä meidän on pakko äänestää tyhjää lopullisessa äänestyksessä."@fi⁷ "Il s’agit d’un rapport important, qui mérite en grande partie d’être mis en œuvre. Il faut agir rapidement pour améliorer le recouvrement. Toutefois, mes collègues conservateurs britanniques et moi-même ne pouvons soutenir le rapport dans l’ensemble, car nous n’acceptons pas en principe que la solution à long terme à de nombreux problèmes dans ce domaine soit la mise en place d’un procureur européen, idée que réitère ce rapport (aux points 43 à 45). Il s’agirait d’une ingérence inacceptable dans la responsabilité constitutionnelle des États membres à l’égard de leur système judiciaire. Par ailleurs, il y a une opposition généralisée à cette idée, à juste titre, soulignant que sa nécessité nous détourne dangereusement de la résolution des problèmes qui sont réellement en jeu. C’est pourquoi nous sommes obligés de nous abstenir lors du vote final."@fr⁸ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@hu¹¹ "Questa è una relazione importante e molti dei suoi punti meritano di essere applicati. E’ necessario intervenire con urgenza per migliorare i tassi di recupero. Tuttavia i miei colleghi del Partito conservatore britannico e io non possiamo appoggiare la relazione nel suo complesso perché non accettiamo, in linea di principio, che la soluzione a lungo termine a molti dei problemi del settore sia l’istituzione di un Procuratore europeo, un’idea ribadita nella relazione (paragrafi 43-45). Un Procuratore di questo genere costituirebbe un’ingerenza inaccettabile nella sfera costituzionale degli Stati membri per quanto attiene ai loro sistemi giudiziari. Inoltre, considerata l’opposizione giustamente assai diffusa nei confronti della sua introduzione, il fatto di sottolinearne la necessità rappresenta un pericoloso diversivo pur di non affrontare i veri problemi esistenti. Per questo motivo dobbiamo astenerci dal voto finale."@it¹² "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@lt¹⁴ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@lv¹³ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@mt¹⁵ "Dit is een belangrijk verslag en veel van de voorstellen die hierin vervat zijn, verdienen het om ook ten uitvoer te worden gelegd. Er zijn dringend maatregelen noodzakelijk om het terugvorderingspercentage te verhogen. Mijn Britse conservatieve collega’s en ik kunnen het verslag als geheel echter niet steunen, omdat wij het er in beginsel niet mee eens zijn dat de oprichting van een Europees openbaar ministerie – zoals aangehaald in de punten 43 tot en met 45 van het verslag – de oplossing op lange termijn is voor veel van de problemen op dit gebied. Een dergelijk openbaar ministerie zou namelijk een onaanvaardbare inbreuk zijn op de constitutionele verantwoordelijkheid die lidstaten voor hun rechtsstelsel hebben. Aangezien er daarnaast een terechte brede weerstand tegen de oprichting van zo’n instantie bestaat, brengt het benadrukken van de noodzaak het grote risico met zich mee dat de echte problemen uit het oog worden verloren. Dat is de reden dat wij ons genoopt zien ons bij de eindstemming van stemming te onthouden."@nl³ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@pl¹⁶ "Trata-se de um importante relatório, muito do qual merece ser posto em prática. É necessária actuação urgente para melhorar as taxas de recuperação. No entanto, eu e os meus colegas conservadores britânicos não podemos dar o nosso apoio ao relatório na sua generalidade, devido ao facto de não aceitarmos em princípio que a solução a longo prazo para muitos dos problemas neste domínio seja a criação de um Ministério Público Europeu, uma ideia reiterada no presente relatório (nºs 43-45). A existência de um tal Ministério Público seria uma interferência inadmissível na responsabilidade constitucional que os Estados-Membros têm sobre os seus sistemas judiciais. Acresce o facto de que, como existe oposição alargada à sua introdução, estar a dar ênfase à sua necessidade constitui uma perigosa diversão dos problemas reais que temos de enfrentar. Esta razão faz com que nos vamos abster na votação final."@pt¹⁷ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@sk¹⁸ "This is an important report, much of which deserves to be implemented. Urgent action is required to improve recovery rates. However, my British Conservative colleagues and I are unable to support the report overall because we do not accept in principle that the long-term solution to many of the problems in this field is the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, an idea which is reiterated in this report (paragraphs 43-45). Such a Public Prosecutor would be an unacceptable interference in the constitutional responsibility of Member States for their judicial systems. Furthermore, as there is rightly widespread opposition to its introduction, emphasising its necessity is a dangerous diversion from tackling the real problems at hand. For this reason we are obliged to abstain on the final vote."@sl¹⁹ ". Detta är ett viktigt betänkande, och mycket av det är värt att genomföra. Det krävs brådskande åtgärder för att förbättra återhämtningstakten. Mina brittiska konservativa kolleger och jag kan dock inte stödja detta betänkande i sin helhet, eftersom vi i princip inte godtar att den långsiktiga lösningen på många av problemen på detta område är inrättandet av en europeisk åklagarmyndighet, en idé som upprepas i detta betänkande (punkterna 43–45). En sådan åklagarmyndighet skulle utgöra en oacceptabel inblandning i medlemsstaternas konstitutionella ansvar för sina rättssystem. Eftersom det finns ett rättmätigt brett motstånd mot införande av en sådan skulle det dessutom vara ett allvarligt avsteg att betona dess nödvändighet jämfört med att ta itu med de faktiska förestående problemen. Av denna anledning är vi tvingade att lägga ned våra röster i den slutliga omröstningen."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"James Elles (PPE-DE ),"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "in writing"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}