Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-27-Speech-4-013"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060427.2.4-013"6
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
".
Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@en4
|
| lpv:translated text |
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@cs1
"Fru formand, jeg vil udtrykke min varmeste tak til Parlamentet og først og fremmest til ordføreren, hr. Titley, for hans betænkning - og ikke kun for betænkningen, men også for den energi, med hvilken han skubber på for at få indført denne meget vigtige facilitet for borgerne.
Det er meget opmuntrende at se, at Parlamentet anerkender eCall som et af de prioriterede områder i eSafety-initiativet, hvis det ikke er hovedprioriteten, og som den første komponent i Kommissionens initiativ for lancering af den intelligente bil, som jeg introducerede i februar sidste år. Jeg vil også takke Parlamentet, fordi det løbende støtter Kommissionen i dens bestræbelser på at få tilslutning fra medlemsstaterne. Som ordføreren sagde, er det vanskeligste ved projektet at få dem til at underskrive aftalememorandummet. Jeg håber oprigtigt, at Deres betænkning bliver et positivt signal til medlemsstaterne, således at vi kan få dem alle sammen med.
Det glæder mig også, at Parlamentet kan tilslutte sig vores holdning til alarmnummeret 112, og jeg opfordrer medlemsstaterne til at gå videre med anvendelsen af alarmnummeret. Som bekendt har Kommissionen allerede taget skridt hertil ved at arrangere en konference på højt niveau om 112 i oktober sidste år og ved at nedsætte en ekspertgruppe om beredskabskommunikation.
Parlamentet ønsker at samordne indførelsen af eCall med tidsplanen for Galileo-programmet. Jeg er enig i, at Galileo vil give bedre positioneringsresultater, når det først er operationelt. Målet er imidlertid at få iværksat eCall snarest muligt, og jeg opfordrer derfor industrien til at udarbejde en løsning baseret på den nuværende teknologi, f.eks. GPS.
Jeg er enig med Parlamentet i, at cost-benefit-analysen er af afgørende betydning, særlig med hensyn til at overbevis andre om eCall, og jeg vil fremhæve de tal, som ordføreren lige har nævnt. Jeg tror, at cost-benefit-analysen viser, at man ikke blot kan redde menneskeliv, men at man også kan spare en hel del penge. Nogle medlemsstater, f.eks. Finland, har iværksat deres egen analyse, som jeg hilser velkommen, og Kommissionen har indledt en meget omfattende undersøgelse, der hedder eImpact.
Kommissionen mener, at industrien kan fremstille køretøjsmonterede systemer, som opfylder ydelseskriterierne og fås til rimelige priser, når de produceres i store mængder, så det er et spørgsmål om at komme i gang og derefter indføre systemet i alle biler. Vi i Kommissionen agter ikke at gribe ind over for industrien i denne forbindelse, men vi tilskynder udstyrsfabrikanter til at samarbejde med telekommunikationsleverandører og mobilnetoperatører med hensyn til udformningen af de køretøjsmonterede systemer, da de skal være pålidelige, robuste og funktionelle.
Jeg glæder mig over Parlamentets opfordring til de berørte parter om at undersøge anvendelsen af incitamenter. Forbrugerundersøgelser viser, at selv om forbrugerne sætter sikkerhed meget højt, er det ikke sikkert, at de er villige til at betale ekstra for sikkerhedsanordninger i biler. Med støtte fra Parlamentet vil vi gå videre i to retninger i drøftelserne om incitamenter, nemlig af de økonomiske incitamenter med medlemsstaterne og af en eventuel nedsættelse af forsikringspræmier med forsikringsbranchen.
Hvad angår spørgsmålet om at få eCall ud til brugere i landdistrikterne og isolerede områder, vil jeg understrege, at eCall er beregnet til alle, herunder de billigere bilmodeller. Det er ikke en luksusartikel til biler, men systemet er beregnet til alle borgere og biler. Hvor hurtigt det bliver udbredt, afhænger selvfølgelig af mange ting, f.eks. af hvorvidt det lykkes os at gennemføre incitamentordningerne. Jeg tror, at der kommer en eftermarkedløsning, som vil fremskynde anvendelsen af eCall.
Jeg kan forsikre Dem om, at eCall står meget højt på Kommissionens liste over prioriteter, og det glæder mig, at Parlamentet har hjulpet os med at gøre det til en af dens prioriterede områder. Vi vil derfor gå videre med vores fælles indsats for at forpligte medlemsstaterne til at indføre eCall."@da2
"Frau Präsidentin! Ich möchte mich ganz herzlich beim Parlament und allen voran beim Berichterstatter, Herrn Titley, für seinen Bericht bedanken – und zwar nicht nur für seinen Bericht, sondern auch für den Elan, mit dem er diese für die Bürger sehr wichtige Einrichtung voranbringen will.
Ich halte es für sehr ermutigend, wenn das Parlament eCall als eine der Prioritäten – wenn nicht sogar als die Priorität schlechthin – der e-safety-Initiative und als den ersten Baustein der von mir im Februar gestarteten Initiative „Intelligentes Fahrzeug“ anerkennt. Außerdem möchte ich dem Parlament dafür danken, dass es die Kommission in ihren Bemühungen, die Mitgliedstaaten mit ins Boot zu holen, fortwährend unterstützt. Wie der Berichterstatter schon sagte: Das Schwierige an dem Vorhaben ist, sie zur Unterzeichnung der gemeinsamen Absichtserklärung zu bewegen. Ich hoffe wirklich, dass von Ihrem Bericht ein positives Signal an die Mitgliedstaaten ausgeht, damit wir sie alle mit im Boot haben können.
Außerdem stelle ich mit Freude fest, dass das Parlament unsere Ansichten zur Notrufnummer 112 teilt und die Mitgliedstaaten auffordert, den Einsatz dieser Nummer zu fördern. Wie Sie wissen, hat die Kommission bereits entsprechende Schritte unternommen, indem sie vergangenen Oktober eine hochrangige Konferenz zur 112-Nummer veranstaltet und eine Sachverständigengruppe zur Notrufkommunikation eingesetzt hat.
Das Parlament würde die Einführung von eCall gern auf den Galileo-Zeitplan abstimmen. Ich stimme zu, dass mit Galileo eine bessere Standortbestimmung möglich sein wird, wenn es einmal in Betrieb ist. Unser Ziel ist jedoch, eCall so bald wie möglich einzuführen, und darum ermutige ich die Industrie zur Entwicklung einer Lösung, die sich auf die derzeit verfügbaren Technologien wie etwa GPS stützt.
Ich stimme dem Parlament zu, dass die Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse ein entscheidender Faktor ist, vor allem wenn es um die wirtschaftlichen Argumente für eCall geht, weshalb ich auf die Zahlen verweisen möchte, die Ihr Berichterstatter soeben genannt hat. Ich glaube, diese Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse zeigt, dass man nicht nur Leben retten, sondern auch eine Menge Geld sparen kann. Einige Mitgliedstaaten wie Finnland haben mit eigenen Analysen begonnen, was ich begrüße, und die Kommission hat eine sehr umfangreiche Studie namens eImpact eingeleitet.
Nach Ansicht der Kommission kann die Industrie Bordsysteme herstellen, die die Leistungskriterien zu erschwinglichen Preisen erfüllen können, wenn sie in großen Stückzahlen produziert werden. Man muss also nur anfangen und das System dann in allen Autos einbauen. Wir in der Kommission haben nicht die Absicht, der Industrie in dieser Frage hineinzureden, aber wir ermutigen die Gerätehersteller, mit Anbietern für Telekommunikationsausrüstung und Mobilfunkbetreibern bei der Gestaltung dieser Bordsysteme zusammenzuarbeiten, die zuverlässig, robust und funktionell sein müssen.
Ich begrüße den Aufruf des Parlaments an die Beteiligten, sich zu überlegen, wie man Anreize schaffen könnte. Verbraucherstudien deuten darauf hin, dass Verbrauchern zwar ihre Sicherheit sehr am Herzen liegt, sie aber womöglich nicht bereit sein werden, für Sicherheitsvorrichtungen in Autos extra zu bezahlen. Mit Unterstützung des Parlaments werden wir zur Frage der Anreize zwei Diskussionslinien weiterverfolgen, nämlich die finanziellen Anreize mit den Mitgliedstaaten und die mögliche Senkung der Versicherungsprämien mit der Versicherungsbranche.
Was die Verfügbarkeit von eCall für Nutzer in ländlichen und entlegenen Gebieten betrifft, so möchte ich darauf hinweisen, dass eCall für alle Automodelle vorgesehen ist, auch für die günstigsten. Es soll keine Sonderausstattung für Luxusfahrzeuge sein, sondern ist für alle Bürger und alle Autos gedacht. Wie schnell es allerdings Verbreitung findet, wird natürlich von vielen Dingen abhängen, so zum Beispiel auch davon, ob wir es schaffen, Anreizsysteme einzuführen. Ich glaube, die Lösung liegt auf dem Ersatzteilmarkt, durch den die Einführung von eCall beschleunigt wird.
Ich kann Ihnen versichern, dass eCall auf der Prioritätenliste der Kommission sehr weit oben steht, und es freut mich, dass uns das Parlament unterstützt hat, indem es das Thema auch für sich als Priorität eingestuft hat. Wir werden uns deshalb weiterhin gemeinsam bemühen, die Mitgliedstaaten zur Einführung von eCall zu verpflichten."@de9
".
Κυρία Πρόεδρε, θα ήθελα να εκφράσω τις θερμές ευχαριστίες μου στο Κοινοβούλιο και πρωτίστως στον εισηγητή, τον κ. Titley, για την έκθεσή του – και όχι μόνο για την έκθεσή του αλλά και για την ενεργητικότητα με την οποία προβάλλει αυτήν την πολύ σημαντική υπηρεσία για τους πολίτες.
Είναι πολύ ενθαρρυντικό να βλέπω ότι το Κοινοβούλιο αναγνωρίζει το eCall ως μία από τις προτεραιότητες της πρωτοβουλίας e-safety, αν όχι ως τη βασική προτεραιότητα, και ως το πρώτο βήμα της πρωτοβουλίας για τα ευφυή οχήματα, την οποία ξεκίνησα τον περασμένο Φεβρουάριο. Θα ήθελα επίσης να ευχαριστήσω το Κοινοβούλιο για τη διαρκή στήριξη που παρέχει στην Επιτροπή στις προσπάθειές της να συνασπίσει τα κράτη μέλη σε αυτήν την προσπάθεια. Όπως δήλωσε ο εισηγητής: το δύσκολο μέρος του σχεδίου είναι να πείσουμε τα κράτη να υπογράψουν το μνημόνιο συμφωνίας. Ελπίζω πραγματικά ότι η έκθεσή σας θα δώσει ένα θετικό μήνυμα στα κράτη μέλη ούτως, ώστε να διασφαλίσουμε τη συμμετοχή όλων.
Με χαρά επίσης σημειώνω ότι το Κοινοβούλιο συμμερίζεται τις απόψεις μας σχετικά με τον αριθμό έκτακτης ανάγκης 112 και καλεί τα κράτη μέλη να σημειώσουν πρόοδο σχετικά με τη χρήση αυτού του αριθμού. Γνωρίζετε ότι η Επιτροπή έχει ήδη λάβει μέτρα, διοργανώνοντας μια διάσκεψη υψηλού επιπέδου σχετικά με το 112 τον Οκτώβριο του περασμένου έτους και συστήνοντας μια ομάδα εμπειρογνωμόνων σχετικά με την επικοινωνία έκτακτης ανάγκης.
Το Κοινοβούλιο θα ήθελε να συγχρονίσει την εισαγωγή του eCall με το χρονοδιάγραμμα για το πρόγραμμα Galileo. Συμφωνώ ότι με τη θέση σε λειτουργία του Galileo θα βελτιωθούν οι επιδόσεις στον εντοπισμό θέσης. Ωστόσο, στόχος μας είναι να αναπτυχθεί το eCall το ταχύτερο δυνατόν, και επομένως ενθαρρύνω τον κλάδο να αναπτύξει μια λύση βάσει τεχνολογιών που είναι σήμερα διαθέσιμες, όπως το Παγκόσμιο Σύστημα Προσδιορισμού Θέσης (GPS).
Συμφωνώ με το Κοινοβούλιο ότι η ανάλυση κόστους-ωφέλειας είναι ζωτικής σημασίας, ιδιαίτερα για την προβολή πειστικών επιχειρημάτων για το eCall και θα ήθελα να τονίσω τα αριθμητικά στοιχεία που μόλις παρέθεσε ο εισηγητής σας. Πιστεύω ότι αυτή η ανάλυση κόστους-ωφέλειας δείχνει ότι όχι μόνον μπορείτε να σώσετε ζωές αλλά και να εξοικονομήσετε αρκετά χρήματα. Ορισμένα κράτη μέλη όπως η Φινλανδία έχουν ξεκινήσει τη δική τους ανάλυση, γεγονός που επικροτώ, και η Επιτροπή έχει ξεκινήσει μια εκτενή έρευνα που ονομάζεται eImpact.
Η Επιτροπή πιστεύει ότι ο κλάδος μπορεί να κατασκευάσει συστήματα εντός των οχημάτων, τα οποία θα πληρούν τα κριτήρια επιδόσεων και θα διατίθενται σε οικονομικά προσιτές τιμές όταν κατασκευάζονται μαζικά, οπότε το ζήτημα είναι να ξεκινήσουμε και έπειτα να εγκαταστήσουμε το σύστημα σε όλα τα αυτοκίνητα. Εμείς στην Επιτροπή δεν σκοπεύουμε να παρέμβουμε στη βιομηχανία σχετικά με αυτό το θέμα, αλλά ενθαρρύνουμε τους κατασκευαστές εξοπλισμού να συνεργαστούν με προμηθευτές εξοπλισμού τηλεπικοινωνιών και φορείς εκμετάλλευσης δικτύων κινητής τηλεφωνίας στον σχεδιασμό συστημάτων εντός των οχημάτων, τα οποία απαιτούν αξιοπιστία, αντοχή και λειτουργικότητα.
Χαιρετίζω την έκκληση που απηύθυνε το Κοινοβούλιο στους εμπλεκόμενους φορείς να εξετάσουν τη χρήση κινήτρων. Καταναλωτικές μελέτες δείχνουν ότι, παρότι οι καταναλωτές δίνουν πολύ μεγάλη αξία στην ασφάλεια, ίσως δεν είναι πρόθυμοι να πληρώσουν επιπλέον χρήματα για εξοπλισμούς ασφάλειας στα αυτοκίνητά τους. Με την υποστήριξη του Κοινοβουλίου θα συνεχίσουμε να προωθούμε δύο θέματα συζήτησης σχετικά με τα κίνητρα, δηλαδή τα οικονομικά κίνητρα με τα κράτη μέλη και την πιθανή μείωση των ασφαλίστρων με τον κλάδο των ασφαλίσεων.
Σχετικά με το θέμα της διάθεσης του eCall σε χρήστες αγροτικών και απομονωμένων περιοχών, θα ήθελα να τονίσω ότι το eCall απευθύνεται σε όλα τα μοντέλα αυτοκινήτων, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των πλέον οικονομικά προσιτών. Δεν αποτελεί εξοπλισμό των αυτοκινήτων πολυτελείας, αλλά απευθύνεται σε όλους τους πολίτες και σε όλα τα αυτοκίνητα. Το πόσο γρήγορα θα διαδοθεί η χρήση του θα εξαρτηθεί φυσικά από πολλούς παράγοντες, για παράδειγμα, από το εάν θα καταφέρουμε να εφαρμόσουμε προγράμματα παροχής κινήτρων. Πιστεύω ότι εδώ θα υπάρξει μεταγοραστική λύση, η οποία θα επιταχύνει τη διάδοση του eCall.
Μπορώ να σας διαβεβαιώσω ότι το eCall βρίσκεται πολύ υψηλά στον κατάλογο προτεραιοτήτων της Επιτροπής και χαίρομαι που το Κοινοβούλιο μάς βοήθησε καθιστώντας το μία από τις δικές του προτεραιότητες. Επομένως, θα συνεχίσουμε την κοινή μας προσπάθεια για τη δέσμευση των κρατών μελών σχετικά με το eCall."@el10
".
Señora Presidenta, deseo expresar mi más profundo agradecimiento al Parlamento, y especialmente a su ponente, el señor Titley, por su informe, aunque no solo por él, sino también por la energía con la que está impulsando este servicio para los ciudadanos.
Es muy alentador ver que el Parlamento reconoce eCall como una de las prioridades de la iniciativa e-safety, o incluso como la prioridad clave, y como la primera piedra de la iniciativa «Automóvil inteligente» que lancé el pasado mes de febrero. También quiero dar las gracias al Parlamento por su continuo apoyo a la Comisión en sus esfuerzos por involucrar a los Estados miembros. Como ha dicho el ponente: la parte difícil del proyecto es conseguir que firmen el memorando de acuerdo. Espero realmente que su informe enviará una señal positiva a los Estados miembros de modo que podamos incluirlos a todos.
También me complace que el Parlamento comparta nuestros puntos de vista sobre el número de urgencia 112 y pida a los Estados miembros que avancen en el uso de este número. Saben que la Comisión ya ha tomado medidas, organizando una conferencia de alto nivel sobre el 112 en octubre del año pasado y creando un grupo de expertos sobre comunicación de emergencia.
El Parlamento quiere simultanear la introducción de eCall con el calendario de Galileo. Estoy de acuerdo en que Galileo ofrecerá mejores prestaciones de posicionamiento una vez que esté operativo. Sin embargo, nuestro objetivo es el despliegue de eCall lo antes posible, y por ello aliento a la industria a desarrollar una solución basada en tecnologías actualmente disponibles, como el GPS.
Coincido con el Parlamento en que el análisis de rentabilidad es crítico, especialmente para exponer de forma convincente los argumentos a favor del proyecto eCall y destacaría las cifras que acaba de citar su ponente. Creo que este análisis de rentabilidad muestra que no solo se pueden salvar vidas, sino que también se puede ahorrar mucho dinero. Algunos Estados miembros, como Finlandia, han iniciado su propio análisis, lo cual celebro, y la Comisión ha iniciado un estudio muy exhaustivo llamado eImpact.
La Comisión cree que la industria puede producir dispositivos a bordo de los vehículos que cumplan los criterios de rendimiento a precios asequibles si se producen en grandes volúmenes, por tanto es cuestión de empezar e introducir entonces el sistema en todos los coches. En la Comisión no pretendemos presionar a la industria sobre este tema, pero estamos alentando a los fabricantes de equipos a que trabajen con los proveedores de equipos de telecomunicaciones y los operadores de redes móviles en el diseño de dispositivos integrados en los vehículos, que requieren fiabilidad, solidez y funcionalidad.
Celebro la petición del Parlamento de que las partes interesadas examinen el uso de incentivos. Las encuestas de consumidores indican que, aunque estos valoran mucho la seguridad, es posible que no estén dispuestos a pagar más por dispositivos de seguridad en los coches. Con el apoyo del Parlamento continuaremos buscando dos líneas de debate sobre el tema de los incentivos, concretamente los incentivos financieros con los Estados miembros y la posible reducción de las primas de seguros con las aseguradoras.
Con respecto al tema de poner eCall a disposición de los usuarios en las zonas rurales y aisladas, quiero señalar que eCall es para todos, incluidos los modelos de coches más asequibles. No es un dispositivo para coches de lujo, sino para todos los ciudadanos y para todos los coches. La rapidez con la que se extienda su uso dependerá, por supuesto, de muchas cosas, como por ejemplo de si conseguimos o no aplicar los esquemas de incentivos. Creo que habrá una solución basada en la instalación posterior que acelerará la introducción de eCall.
Puedo asegurarles que eCall ocupa un lugar destacado en la lista de prioridades de la Comisión y me complace que el Parlamento nos haya ayudado al convertirlo en una de sus prioridades. Por tanto, continuaremos nuestro esfuerzo común por comprometer a los Estados miembros con eCall."@es20
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@et5
".
Arvoisa puhemies, haluan kiittää lämpimästi parlamenttia ja varsinkin esittelijä Titleyä hänen mietinnöstään – enkä vain hänen mietinnöstään, vaan myös siitä tarmokkuudesta, jolla hän vie eteenpäin tätä kansalaisille erittäin tärkeää palvelua.
On erittäin rohkaisevaa nähdä, että parlamentti pitää eCall-järjestelmää yhtenä eSafety-aloitteen ensisijaisena ellei jopa tärkeimpänä tavoitteena sekä helmikuussa käynnistämäni älyautoa koskevan aloitteen ensimmäisenä rakennuspalikkana. Haluan kiittää parlamenttia myös siksi, että se tukee komissiota jatkuvasti tämän pyrkimyksissä saada jäsenvaltiot mukaan hankkeeseen. Kuten esittelijä totesi, hankkeen vaikein vaihe on saada jäsenvaltiot allekirjoittamaan yhteistoimintamuistio. Toivon todella, että mietintönne antaa jäsenvaltioille myönteisen viestin, niin että ne kaikki saadaan hankkeeseen mukaan.
Olen tyytyväinen myös siihen, että parlamentti yhtyy näkemyksiimme hätänumerosta 112 ja kehottaa jäsenvaltioita edistämään numeron käyttöä. Tiedätte, että komissio on jo ryhtynyt toimiin, ja se järjesti 112-numeroa koskevan korkean tason konferenssin viime vuoden lokakuussa sekä perusti hätäpuheluita käsittelevän asiantuntijaryhmän.
Parlamentti haluaisi sovittaa eCall-järjestelmän käyttöönoton yhteen Galileon käyttöönoton kanssa. Olen samaa mieltä siitä, että kun Galileon paikannusjärjestelmä otetaan käyttöön, paikannustoiminnosta saadaan tehokkaampi. Tavoitteemme on kuitenkin käynnistää eCall-järjestelmä mahdollisimman pian, ja siksi kannustan teollisuutta kehittämään ratkaisun, joka perustuu nykyisin käytössä olevaan tekniikkaan, esimerkiksi GPS-tekniikkaan.
Olen parlamentin kanssa samaa mieltä siitä, että kustannus–hyöty-analyysi on ratkaisevan tärkeä varsinkin, kun eCall-järjestelmästä pyritään tekemään liiketaloudellisesti vakuuttava. Haluaisin painottaa esittelijän juuri mainitsemia lukuja. Mielestäni kustannus–hyöty-analyysista käy ilmi, että järjestelmän avulla voidaan säästää paitsi ihmishenkiä myös paljon rahaa. Tietyt jäsenvaltiot, esimerkiksi Suomi, ovat käynnistäneet omat tutkimuksensa, mitä pidän myönteisenä. Myös komissio on käynnistänyt hyvin kattavan eImpact-nimisen tutkimuksen.
Komissio uskoo, että teollisuus voi tuottaa ajoneuvoihin asennettavia järjestelmiä, jotka täyttävät suorituskykyvaatimukset ja ovat kohtuuhintaisia, kun niitä tuotetaan suuria määriä. Kaikki riippuu nyt siis siitä, että hanke nyt aloitetaan ja järjestelmä otetaan käyttöön kaikissa autoissa. Komissio ei aio puuttua teollisuuden toimiin tässä asiassa, mutta kannustaa laitevalmistajia suunnittelemaan ajoneuvoihin asennettavia järjestelmiä yhteistyössä tietoliikennelaitteiden toimittajien ja teleoperaattoreiden kanssa, sillä järjestelmien on oltava luotettavia, kestäviä ja toimivia.
Suhtaudun myönteisesti siihen, että parlamentti kehottaa sidosryhmiä tarkastelemaan kannustimien käyttöä. Kuluttajatutkimuksista käy ilmi, että vaikka kuluttajat arvostavat suuresti turvallisuutta, he eivät ehkä halua maksaa ylimääräistä autojen turvaominaisuuksista. Parlamentin tuella aiomme jatkaa kannustimiin liittyvää keskustelua kahdella alalla, nimittäin rahallisista kannustimista jäsenvaltioiden kanssa sekä mahdollisista vakuutusmaksujen alennuksista vakuutusyhtiöiden kanssa.
Kun puhutaan eCall-järjestelmän ulottamisesta maaseudulla ja syrjäisillä alueilla eläville käyttäjille, haluan todeta, että järjestelmä on tarkoitettu kaikille, myös halvempiin ajoneuvomalleihin. Se ei ole autojen ylellisyystarvike vaan tarkoitettu kaikille kansalaisille ja kaikkiin autoihin. Järjestelmän käytön yleistymisen nopeus riippuu tietenkin monesta seikasta, esimerkiksi siitä, onnistummeko toteuttamaan kannustinohjelmia. Uskon, että tältä osin löydetään jälkiasennukseen liittyvä ratkaisu, joka nopeuttaa eCall-järjestelmän käyttöönottoa.
Voin vakuuttaa, että eCall on hyvin tärkeässä asemassa komission asialistalla, ja olen tyytyväinen siihen, että parlamentti on auttanut meitä tekemään siitä yhden ensisijaisista tavoitteistamme. Tämän vuoksi pyrimme jatkossakin saamaan yhdessä jäsenvaltiot sitoutumaan eCall-hankkeeseen."@fi7
"Madame la Présidente, je voudrais remercier chaleureusement le Parlement et surtout son rapporteur, M .Titley, pour son rapport - et pas seulement pour son rapport, mais aussi pour l’énergie avec laquelle il fait avancer ce système très important pour les citoyens.
Il est très encourageant de voir que le Parlement reconnaît eCall comme une des priorités de l’initiative eSafety, voire comme la priorité essentielle, et la première composante de l’initiative «voiture intelligente» que j’ai lancée en février dernier. Je voudrais également remercier le Parlement parce qu’il apporte un soutien continu à la Commission dans ses efforts en vue de rallier les États membres. Comme le rapporteur a dit: la partie difficile du projet consiste à leur faire signer le protocole d’accord. J’espère vraiment que votre rapport enverra un signal positif aux États membres de manière à ce que nous puissions les avoir tous à nos côtés.
Je suis heureuse de constater que le Parlement partage nos points de vue concernant le numéro d’appel d’urgence 112 et demande aux États membres de faire des progrès dans l’utilisation de ce numéro. Vous savez que la Commission a déjà entrepris des démarches en organisant une conférence de haut niveau concernant le numéro 112 en octobre de l’année dernière et en créant un groupe d’experts sur la communication d’urgence.
Le Parlement voudrait synchroniser l’introduction d’eCall avec le calendrier de Galileo. Je conviens que Galileo offrira de meilleures performances de positionnement une fois qu’il sera opérationnel. Néanmoins, notre objectif consiste à introduire eCall dès que possible. J’encourage donc l’industrie à développer une solution fondée sur les technologies actuellement disponibles, comme le GPS.
Je conviens avec le Parlement que l’analyse coût/avantage est cruciale, surtout pour convaincre les milieux d’affaires de l’intérêt d’eCall, et je voudrais souligner les chiffres que votre rapporteur vient de citer. Je pense que cette analyse coût/avantage montre que non seulement on peut sauver des vies, mais qu’on peut également économiser beaucoup d’argent. Certains États membres, comme la Finlande, ont commencé leur propre analyse, que je salue, et la Commission a commencé une étude très complète intitulée eImpact.
La Commission pense que l’industrie peut produire des systèmes embarqués qui remplissent les critères de performance à des prix abordables s’ils sont produits en grande série, il s’agit donc de démarrer et d’installer ensuite le système dans toutes les voitures. À la Commission, nous n’avons pas l’intention d’interférer avec l’industrie sur cette question, mais nous encourageons les fournisseurs d’équipement à travailler avec les fournisseurs d’équipement de télécommunication et les opérateurs des réseaux de téléphonie mobile à la conception des systèmes embarqués, qui nécessitent fiabilité, robustesse et fonctionnalité.
Je salue l’appel du Parlement, qui invite les parties prenantes à considérer l’utilisation d’incitants. Les études sur les consommateurs indiquent que, bien qu’ils apprécient beaucoup la sécurité, les consommateurs ne seraient peut-être pas prêts à payer plus pour des appareils de sécurité embarqués. Avec le soutien du Parlement, nous poursuivrons deux lignes de conduite sur la question des incitants, à savoir les incitants fiscaux avec les États membres et la réduction possible des primes d’assurance avec le secteur des assurances.
En ce qui concerne la question de la fourniture d’eCall aux utilisateurs en milieu rural et isolé, je voudrais signaler qu’eCall s’adresse à tout le monde, y compris les modèles automobiles plus abordables. Il ne s’agit pas d’un article pour voitures de luxe, mais pour tous les citoyens et pour toutes les voitures. La rapidité de sa diffusion dépendra bien sûr de nombreux facteurs, par exemple de la question de savoir si nous parviendrons à mettre en œuvre les programmes d’incitants. Je crois qu’il y aura ici une solution après-marché qui accélérera le décollage d’eCall.
Je puis vous assurer qu’eCall figure en bonne place sur la liste des priorités de la Commission. Je suis heureuse que le Parlement nous aide en faisant d’eCall une de ses priorités. Nous poursuivrons donc notre effort commun pour mobiliser les États membres à l’égard d’eCall."@fr8
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@hu11
".
Signora Presidente, vorrei rivolgere i miei più vivi ringraziamenti al Parlamento e soprattutto al relatore, onorevole Titley, per la relazione svolta, nonché per l’energia con cui sostiene questo importante dispositivo a vantaggio dei cittadini.
E’ davvero incoraggiante che il Parlamento riconosca eCall come una delle priorità, se non la principale, dell’iniziativa eSafety, e come il primo elemento costitutivo dell’iniziativa “automobile intelligente” avviata lo scorso febbraio. Vorrei inoltre ringraziare il Parlamento per il suo costante appoggio agli sforzi compiuti dalla Commissione al fine di coinvolgere gli Stati membri. Come ha affermato il relatore, la parte difficile del progetto sta nel convincere gli Stati membri a firmare il protocollo d’intesa. Mi auguro davvero che questa relazione lanci un segnale positivo agli Stati membri in modo da riuscire a coinvolgerli tutti.
Rilevo inoltre con piacere che il Parlamento condivide le nostre posizioni sul numero d’emergenza 112 e che esorta gli Stati membri a compiere progressi nell’utilizzarlo. Come sapete, la Commissione ha già compiuto passi in tal senso organizzando a ottobre dell’anno scorso una conferenza ad alto livello sul 112 e istituendo un gruppo di esperti sulle comunicazioni di emergenza.
Il Parlamento vorrebbe che l’introduzione di eCall fosse sincronizzata con il calendario fissato per il programma GALILEO. Convengo sul fatto che GALILEO, una volta operativo, garantirà migliori prestazioni in materia di posizionamento. Il nostro obiettivo è tuttavia introdurre eCall al più presto possibile e pertanto incoraggio l’industria a mettere a punto soluzioni fondate sulle tecnologie attualmente disponibili, come i GPS.
Sono d’accordo con il Parlamento sul fatto che l’analisi costi/benefici è decisiva, soprattutto quale argomentazione commerciale convincente a favore di eCall, e vorrei sottolineare le cifre appena citate dal relatore. Mi sembra che da questa analisi costi/benefici risulti che non solo è possibile salvare vite umane, ma anche risparmiare considerevoli somme di denaro. Alcuni Stati membri, come la Finlandia, hanno avviato valutazioni, di propria iniziativa, cosa che reputo positiva, e la Commissione ha iniziato a svolgere uno studio molto ampio chiamato eImpact.
La Commissione ritiene che l’industria sarà in grado di produrre sistemi a bordo dei veicoli all’altezza delle prestazioni richieste a prezzi accessibili, se tali dispositivi verranno prodotti in grandi quantitativi; si tratta pertanto di iniziare ad attuare il sistema e poi di introdurlo in tutte le vetture. La Commissione non intende esercitare pressioni sull’industria al riguardo, ma sta incoraggiando i produttori di dispositivi a collaborare con i fornitori di strumenti per le telecomunicazioni e con gli operatori delle reti mobili nella progettazione di sistemi a bordo dei veicoli che siano affidabili, robusti e funzionali.
Reputo positivo l’invito a tenere in considerazione il ricorso agli incentivi rivolto dal Parlamento ai soggetti coinvolti. Gli studi sui consumatori indicano che questi ultimi, sebbene attribuiscano capitale importanza alla sicurezza, non sono disposti a pagare di più per dispositivi di sicurezza installati a bordo delle automobili. Con il sostegno del Parlamento continueremo a portare avanti la discussione sugli incentivi seguendo due direzioni, chiedendo cioè incentivi finanziari agli Stati membri ed eventuali riduzioni dei premi al settore assicurativo.
Quanto al problema di mettere eCall a disposizione delle persone che vivono in zone rurali o isolate, vorrei far presente che eCall è per tutti i veicoli, anche per i modelli più economici. Non è un articolo per auto di lusso, ma per tutti i cittadini e per tutti i veicoli. La rapidità con cui il suo utilizzo si diffonderà dipenderà naturalmente da numerosi fattori, ad esempio dal successo o meno dell’applicazione dei sistemi di incentivi. Credo che si potrebbe installare tale dispositivo come accessorio, opzione, questa, che accelererà l’attuazione di eCall
Posso garantirvi che eCall è tra le principali priorità nel programma della Commissione e sono lieta che il Parlamento ci abbia aiutato inserendo questa iniziativa anche tra le sue priorità. Continueremo pertanto a impegnarci congiuntamente per far aderire gli Stati membri a eCall."@it12
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@lt14
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@lv13
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@mt15
".
Mevrouw de Voorzitter, ik zou het Parlement allerhartelijkst willen bedanken, en bovenal zijn rapporteur, de heer Titley, voor zijn verslag en daarnaast voor de energie waarmee hij aan de weg timmert om deze hoogst belangrijke voorziening voor de burgers te realiseren.
Het is zeer bemoedigend om te merken dat het Parlement eCall als een van de prioriteiten, zo niet de hoofdprioriteit, van het eSafety-initiatief beschouwt en tevens als eerste stap van het initiatief "De intelligente auto", waarvoor ik in februari jongstleden het startsein heb gegeven. Ik zou het Parlement ook willen bedanken voor zijn voortdurende steun aan de Commissie bij haar inspanningen om de lidstaten mee te krijgen. Zoals de rapporteur al zei: het probleem bij dit project is dat we de lidstaten zover moeten zien te krijgen dat ze het memorandum van overeenstemming ondertekenen. Ik hoop oprecht dat uw verslag een positief signaal zal zijn in de richting van de lidstaten, zodat ze allemaal zullen meedoen.
Ik ben blij te kunnen constateren dat het Parlement met ons op een lijn zit als het gaat om het alarmnummer 112 en dat het de lidstaten oproept voortgang te maken met het gebruik van dit nummer. Zoals u weet heeft de Commissie al stappen ondernomen door in oktober vorig jaar een conferentie op hoog niveau over 112 te organiseren en door een groep van deskundigen op het gebied van noodcommunicatie in het leven te roepen.
Het Parlement zou de invoering van eCall graag willen synchroniseren met het tijdschema voor het Galileo-programma. Ik kan beamen dat Galileo betere navigatieprestaties zal bieden zodra dit systeem operationeel is. Ons doel is echter om eCall zo snel mogelijk te implementeren, en daarom spoor ik de industrie aan om een oplossing te ontwikkelen die is gestoeld op technologieën die nu al beschikbaar zijn, zoals GPS.
Ik ben het met het Parlement eens dat de kosten-batenanalyse essentieel is, vooral ten behoeve van een overtuigend dossier voor eCall, en ik zou de cijfers die uw rapporteur zojuist citeerde willen onderstrepen. Ik denk dat deze kosten-batenanalyse laat zien dat u niet alleen levens kunt redden, maar bovendien flink wat geld kunt besparen. Sommige lidstaten, zoals Finland, werken aan een eigen analyse, hetgeen ik een prima initiatief vind, en de Commissie heeft een zeer grondige studie in gang gezet onder de naam eImpact.
De Commissie acht de industrie in staat om boordapparatuur te ontwikkelen die voldoet aan de prestatiecriteria en die tegen betaalbare prijzen kan worden aangeboden indien ze in grote hoeveelheden wordt geproduceerd. Het is dus een kwestie van de zaak op de rails zetten en vervolgens de apparatuur in alle auto's inbouwen. Wij in de Commissie zijn niet van plan ons op dit terrein met de industrie te bemoeien, maar we sporen producenten van apparatuur aan om samen te werken met leveranciers van telecommunicatieapparatuur en mobielenetwerkexploitanten bij het ontwerpen van de boordapparatuur, die betrouwbaar, sterk en functioneel moet zijn.
Ik ben ingenomen met de oproep van het Parlement aan alle betrokkenen om na te denken over het gebruik van prikkels. Uit consumentenonderzoeken blijkt dat consumenten weliswaar grote waarde hechten aan veiligheid, maar dat ze niet bereid zijn om extra te betalen voor veiligheidsvoorzieningen in auto's. Met steun van het Parlement zullen we op twee fronten verder discussiëren over stimulerende maatregelen, namelijk met de lidstaten over financiële prikkels en met het verzekeringswezen over mogelijke kortingen op verzekeringspremies.
Wat betreft de vraag hoe gebruikers in rurale en geïsoleerde gebieden de beschikking over eCall moeten krijgen, zou ik erop willen wijzen dat eCall bedoeld is voor alle – dus ook de goedkopere – automodellen. Het is geen accessoire voor alleen luxe auto's, maar een systeem voor alle burgers en voor alle auto's. Hoe snel het gebruik ervan ingang zal vinden, zal uiteraard van allerlei factoren afhangen, bijvoorbeeld van de vraag of we er al dan niet in slagen om stimulerende maatregelen te treffen. Op dit punt verwacht ik dat er na het op de markt brengen een oplossing zal komen waardoor eCall sneller ingang zal vinden.
Ik kan u verzekeren dat eCall zeer hoog op het prioriteitenlijstje van de Commissie staat en ik ben blij dat het Parlement ons heeft geholpen door het eveneens als prioriteit te bestempelen. We zullen dan ook doorgaan met onze gezamenlijke inspanningen om de lidstaten voor eCall te winnen."@nl3
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@pl16
"Senhora Presidente, gostaria de manifestar os meus mais profundos agradecimentos ao Parlamento e, sobretudo, ao seu relator, o senhor deputado Titley, pelo seu relatório – mas não só pelo relatório, também pela energia com que tem estado a defender este importante dispositivo para os cidadãos.
É muito encorajador verificar que o Parlamento reconhece o eCall como uma das prioridades da Iniciativa eSafety, se não mesmo como a prioridade, e como o principal elemento da Iniciativa sobre o Veículo Inteligente, que lancei em Fevereiro último. Gostaria de agradecer igualmente ao Parlamento o seu contínuo apoio à Comissão nos esforços que esta desenvolve para conseguir a adesão dos Estados-Membros. Como o relator afirmou, o aspecto mais difícil do projecto é conseguir que os Estados-Membros assinem o Memorando de Entendimento. Espero sinceramente que o vosso relatório transmita um sinal positivo aos Estados-Membros para que estes se juntem a nós.
Congratulo-me também por verificar que o Parlamento partilha da nossa opinião a respeito do número de emergência 112 e exorta os Estados-Membros a fazerem progressos na utilização deste número. Como sabem, a Comissão já deu passos nesse sentido, através da organização, em Outubro último, de uma conferência de alto nível sobre o 112 e da criação de um grupo de especialistas sobre comunicações de emergência.
O Parlamento gostaria de sincronizar a introdução do eCall com o calendário do Galileo. Concordo que, uma vez operacional, o Galileo oferecerá melhores possibilidades de detecção. No entanto, a nossa meta é tornar o eCall operacional o mais rapidamente possível e, por conseguinte, encorajo a indústria a desenvolver uma solução com base nas tecnologias actualmente disponíveis, como o GPS.
Concordo com o Parlamento que a análise custo-benefício é fundamental, especialmente para convencer a indústria quanto ao eCall, e gostaria de chamar a atenção para os números que o relator acaba de citar. Considero que a análise custo-benefício mostra que não só se salvam vidas, como também se poupam montantes muito consideráveis. Alguns Estados-Membros, como a Finlândia, deram início aos seus próprios estudos, que saúdo, e a Comissão lançou um estudo muito abrangente chamado
.
A Comissão considera que a indústria poderá produzir dispositivos a incorporar nos veículos que cumpram os critérios de desempenho a preços acessíveis, caso sejam produzidos em grandes quantidades, por isso o que importa é começar, e depois introduzir o sistema em todos os automóveis. Nós, na Comissão, não tencionamos intervir junto da indústria a este respeito, mas encorajamos os fabricantes de equipamento a trabalharem em conjunto com os fornecedores de equipamento de telecomunicações e os operadores de redes móveis na concepção dos sistemas a introduzir nos veículos, que exigem fiabilidade, robustez e funcionalidade.
Congratulo-me com o convite do Parlamento às partes interessadas para que cooperem na definição de incentivos. Os estudos de mercado mostram que, embora os consumidores valorizem muito a segurança, poderão não estar dispostos a pagar mais para disporem de dispositivos de segurança nos automóveis. Com o apoio do Parlamento, continuaremos a prosseguir duas vertentes no que respeita à discussão dos incentivos, a saber, incentivos financeiros com os Estados-Membros e a possível redução dos prémios de seguro com o sector das seguradoras.
No que respeita a levar o eCall aos utentes das zonas rurais e isoladas, gostaria de salientar que o serviço eCall é um serviço para todos, incluindo os modelos de automóveis mais acessíveis. Não se trata de um artigo de luxo para automóveis, mas sim de um dispositivo para todos os cidadãos e todos os automóveis. A rapidez da disseminação da sua utilização dependerá, evidentemente, de muitos factores, por exemplo, da nossa capacidade ou incapacidade de aplicar os regimes de incentivo. Penso que neste caso haverá uma solução pós-venda que acelerará a adopção do eCall.
Posso assegurar-vos que o serviço eCall é uma prioridade de topo na lista da Comissão, e regozijo-me com o apoio que nos é dado pelo Parlamento ao adoptar este tema como uma das suas prioridades. Continuaremos, por conseguinte, os nossos esforços comuns com vista a empenhar os Estados-Membros no serviço eCall."@pt17
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@sk18
"Madam President, I would like to express my warmest thanks to Parliament and most of all to its rapporteur Mr Titley for his report – and not only for his report but also for the energy with which he is pushing forward this very important facility for citizens.
It is very encouraging to see that Parliament recognises eCall as one of the priorities of the e-safety initiative, if not the key priority, and the first building block for the Intelligent Car Initiative which I launched last February. I would also like to thank Parliament because it gives the Commission continuous support in the efforts to get the Member States on board. As the rapporteur said: the difficult part of the project is getting them to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. I really hope that your report will give a positive signal to the Member States so that we can have them all on board.
I am pleased also to note that Parliament shares our views on the emergency number 112 and calls on Member States to make progress in the use of this number. You know that the Commission has already taken steps, by organising a high-level conference on 112 in October last year and by setting up an expert group on emergency communication.
Parliament would like to synchronise the introduction of eCall with the Galileo timetable. I agree that Galileo will offer better positioning performances once it is operational. However, our target is to roll out eCall as soon as possible, and therefore I encourage the industry to develop a solution based on currently available technologies, such as GPS.
I agree with Parliament that the cost-benefit analysis is critical, especially in making a convincing business case for eCall and I would like to underline the figures that your rapporteur has just quoted. I think this cost-benefit analysis shows that not only can you save lives, you can also save a good deal of money. Some Member States like Finland have started their own analysis, which I welcome, and the Commission has started a very comprehensive study called eImpact.
The Commission believes that the industry can produce in-vehicle systems that fulfil the performance criteria with affordable prices when produced in large volumes, so it is a question of getting started and then introducing the system in all cars. We in the Commission do not intend to intervene with the industry on this issue, but we are encouraging equipment manufacturers to work with telecommunication equipment suppliers and mobile network operators in the design of the in-vehicle systems, which require reliability, robustness and functionality.
I welcome Parliament’s call to the stakeholders to look into the use of incentives. Consumer studies indicate that, although they value safety very highly, consumers may not be willing to pay extra for safety features in cars. With the support of Parliament we will continue to pursue two lines of discussion on the issue of incentives, namely the financial incentives with the Member States and the possible reduction of insurance premiums with the insurance industry.
Regarding the issue of getting eCall to users in rural and isolated areas, I would like to point out that eCall is for all, including the more affordable car models. It is not a luxury car item but for all citizens and for all cars. How quickly its use will spread will of course depend on many things, for example, whether or not we manage to implement the incentive schemes. I believe that here there will be an after-market solution which will speed up the take-up of eCall.
I can assure you that eCall is very high on the Commission’s priority list and I am pleased that Parliament has helped us by making it one of its priorities. We will therefore continue our common effort to commit Member States to eCall."@sl19
".
Fru talman! Jag vill uttrycka mitt varmaste tack till parlamentet och framför allt till föredraganden Gary Titley för hans betänkande – och inte bara för hans betänkande utan även för den energi med vilken han driver fram detta mycket viktiga hjälpmedel för medborgarna.
Det är mycket uppmuntrande att se att parlamentet erkänner eCall som ett prioriterat mål i e-säkerhetsinitiativet, eller till och med ett nyckelmål, och den första byggstenen i initiativet ”Den intelligenta bilen” som jag lanserade i februari. Jag vill också tacka parlamentet eftersom det ger kommissionen fortsatt stöd i ansträngningarna att få med medlemsstaterna. Som föredraganden sa: det svåra med projektet är att få dem att underteckna samförståndsavtalet. Jag hoppas verkligen att ert betänkande ska ge en positiv signal till medlemsstaterna så att vi kan få med dem allihop.
Jag noterar även med tillfredsställelse att parlamentet delar vår åsikt om larmnumret 112 och uppmanar medlemsstaterna att gå framåt med användningen av detta nummer. Ni vet att kommissionen redan har vidtagit åtgärder genom att anordna en högnivåkonferens om 112 i oktober förra året och genom att inrätta en expertgrupp för kommunikation i nödsituationer.
Parlamentet vill synkronisera införandet av eCall med tidsplanen för Galileo. Jag håller med om att Galileo kommer att erbjuda högre prestanda vid positionsbestämning när det väl är i drift. Vårt mål är dock att införa eCall så snart som möjligt och därför uppmanar jag industrin att utveckla en lösning som grundar sig på den teknik som finns tillgänglig nu, som till exempel GPS.
Jag håller med parlamentet om att lönsamhetsanalysen är avgörande, särskilt när det gäller att skapa en övertygande affärsmodell för eCall, och jag vill understryka de siffror som er föredragande just har uppgett. Jag anser att denna lönsamhetsanalys visar att vi inte bara kan rädda liv utan att vi dessutom kan spara en hel del pengar. Vissa medlemsstater som exempelvis Finland har påbörjat en egen analys, vilket jag välkomnar, och kommissionen har inlett en mycket omfattande undersökning som kallas eImpact.
Kommissionen anser att industrin kan tillverka fordonssystem som uppfyller kriterierna för prestanda till överkomliga priser när de tillverkas i stora volymer, så det är en fråga om att komma igång och sedan införa systemen i alla bilar. Vi i kommissionen har inte för avsikt att blanda oss i industrins arbete i denna fråga, men vi uppmuntrar utrustningstillverkare att samarbeta med leverantörer av telekommunikationsutrustning och mobilnätsoperatörer för att utforma fordonssystemen, vilka måste vara tillförlitliga, robusta och funktionella.
Jag välkomnar parlamentets uppmaning till aktörerna att undersöka användningen av stimulansåtgärder. Konsumentundersökningar visar att konsumenterna, även om de värdesätter säkerhet i hög grad, kanske inte är villiga att betala extra för säkerhetsanordningar i bilar. Med parlamentets stöd kommer vi att fortsätta att föra diskussioner med två inriktningar när det gäller frågan om stimulansåtgärder, nämligen ekonomiska stimulansåtgärder med medlemsstaterna och en eventuell minskning av försäkringspremier med försäkringsindustrin.
När det gäller frågan om den nuvarande tillgången till eCall på landsbygden eller i isolerade områden vill jag påpeka att eCall är till för alla, inklusive billigare bilmodeller. Det är inte en anordning för lyxbilar utan för alla medborgare och för alla bilar. Hur fort användningen kommer att spridas kommer förstås att bero på många faktorer, till exempel om vi lyckas genomföra programmen för stimulansåtgärder eller inte. Jag tror att det kan uppstå en eftermarknadslösning här som kommer att påskynda införandet av eCall.
Jag kan försäkra er att eCall står mycket högt på kommissionens prioriteringslista och det gläder mig att parlamentet har hjälpt oss genom att göra det till en av sina prioriteringar. Vi kommer därför att fortsätta våra gemensamma ansträngningar för att engagera medlemsstaterna i eCall."@sv21
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Member of the Commission"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4
"Viviane Reding,"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4
"eImpact"17
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples