Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-15-Speech-3-036"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-15"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Iraani vastandumine rahvusvahelisele üldsusele (arutelu)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060215.3.3-036"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-15-Speech-3-037⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Charles Tannock⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2006-02-06--2008-01-07)²² substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)²² vice-chair; DROI (2004-09-01--2007-01-14)²² member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)²² substitute; ECON (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)²² unknown; Conservative and Unionist Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-21--2009-07-13)²² substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2004-09-29--2007-03-13)²²
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@cs¹ "Hr. formand, Iran har i adskillige år forsøgt at eksportere sin fundamentalistiske revolution fra de shiamuslimske lande til Sunni-befolkningens områder, herunder Palæstina, hvor Iran gennem Syrien og terrorgruppen Hezbollah samarbejder med islamisk Jihad og Hamas, som begge er tilhængere af teokrati under sharia-lovgivningen. Et Iran med atomvåben er derfor en særlig trussel imod sikkerheden i den vestlige verden, og især i Israel. Der er ikke enighed om, hvordan man skal håndtere situationen i Iran, som helt klart overtræder traktaten om ikke-spredning af kernevåben og aftalerne med Storbritannien, Frankrig og Tyskland, men jeg bifalder afstemningen i Den Internationale Atomenergiorganisationen den 3. februar med henblik på at tage Iran op til behandling i FN's Sikkerhedsråd. Jeg bifalder endvidere Kinas og Ruslands forsinkede støtte. Den traditionelle pagt - hvormed Iran støtter Rusland i Den Islamiske Konference i forhold til Tjetjenien til gengæld for Ruslands støtte i forbindelse med atomteknologi og vetoret i Sikkerhedsrådet, når det er nødvendigt - er tilsyneladende ved at blive opløst. Kina afviser naturligvis yderligere spredning af kernevåben og er endvidere bekymret over sine egne islamiske trusler. Irans kompromisløshed og afvisning af Ruslands rimelige tilbud om berigning af uran er et vink med en vognstang for Rusland og Kina. Kun Syrien, Cuba og Venezuela afviste forslaget. Iran forpligtede sig straks til at genoptage den kommercielle berigning af uran, som kan anvendes som brændstof til kraftværker eller, som Iran i virkeligheden ønsker, til atombomber. Iran har nedlagt forbud imod uanmeldte besøg af inspektører fra Den Internationale Atomenergiorganisation. Vestlige efterretningstjenester hævder, at Iran anvender et netværk af skuffeselskaber til at købe dele til fremstilling af missiler og bomber fra Vesteuropa og ansætte fattige atomfysikere fra det tidligere Sovjetunionen. Jeg er enig med alle, der siger, at Vesten skal benytte alle muligheder for at forhindre atomvåben i Iran. Jeg tager skarpt afstand fra den forsonende udtalelse fra den britiske forsvarsminister, Jack Straw, som hævder, at et militært indgreb er utænkeligt, hvorimod hans chef, premierminister Tony Blair, helt korrekt ikke vil udelukke det."@da² "Herr Präsident! Seit einigen Jahren versucht der Iran, seine fundamentalistische Revolution über seine schiitischen Regionen hinaus in Gebiete mit sunnitischer Bevölkerung, dazu gehört auch Palästina, zu exportieren. Über Syrien und die den Terroristen nahe stehende Hisbollah werden Kontakte zum Islamischen Jihad und zur Hamas geknüpft, die beide Gottesstaaten errichten wollen, in denen die Scharia gilt. Eine Atommacht Iran ist daher eine enorme Bedrohung für die Sicherheit des Westens und Israels im Besonderen. Es gibt keinen Konsens über die Vorgehensweise gegenüber dem Iran, der eindeutig gegen den Atomwaffensperrvertrag und seine Abkommen mit Großbritannien, Frankreich und Deutschland verstößt. Ich begrüße den Beschluss der IAEO vom 3. Februar, den Atomstreit mit dem Iran vor den Sicherheitsrat der Vereinten Nationen zu bringen. Außerdem freue ich mich über die nachträgliche Zustimmung Chinas und Russlands zu diesem Schritt. Die bisher übliche Abmachung – nach der der Iran in der OIC die Haltung Russlands in der Tschetschenien-Frage verteidigt und Russland im Gegenzug dafür bereit ist, bei der Beschaffung von Nukleartechnologie zu helfen und wenn nötig im Sicherheitsrat sein Veto einzulegen – scheint nun zu bröckeln. China lehnt naturgemäß eine weitere Verbreitung von Kernwaffen ab und ist zudem über die islamistische Bedrohung im eigenen Land besorgt. Die Unnachgiebigkeit des Iran und seine Ablehnung des entgegenkommenden Angebots von russischer Seite, die Urananreicherung zu übernehmen, haben Russland und China wachgerüttelt. Dieser Vorschlag wurde nur von Syrien, Kuba und Venezuela abgelehnt. Der Iran kündigte postwendend an, die Anreicherung von Uran in vollem Umfang wieder aufzunehmen, das entweder als Brennstoff für Kernkraftwerke oder, dem eigentlichen Ziel des Iran entsprechend, zum Bau einer Atombombe verwendet werden kann. Der Iran hat angeordnet, dass bis auf weiteres keine unangekündigten Besuche von IAEO-Inspektoren mehr durchgeführt werden dürfen. Berichten westlicher Geheimdienste zufolge versucht der Iran über ein Netz von Scheinfirmen Komponenten für den Bau von Raketen und Bomben aus Westeuropa zu beschaffen und Atomforscher aus der früheren Sowjetunion anzuwerben, die auf das Geld angewiesen sind. Ich schließe mich denjenigen an, die der Meinung sind, dass sich der Westen alle Optionen offen halten muss, um zu verhindern, dass der Iran in den Besitz von Atomwaffen gelangt. Ich finde es lächerlich, dass der britische Außenminister, Jack Straw, in seiner beschwichtigenden Erklärung sagte, ein militärisches Vorgehen komme nicht in Frage, während sein Chef, Premierminister Tony Blair, es zu Recht abgelehnt hat, eine solche Möglichkeit auszuschließen."@de⁹ "Κύριε Πρόεδρε, τα τελευταία χρόνια το Ιράν επιδιώκει να επεκτείνει τη φονταμενταλιστική του επανάσταση πέρα από τη περιοχή των σιιτών σε περιοχές όπου διαβιούν πληθυσμοί Σουνιτών, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της Παλαιστίνης, όπου μέσω της Συρίας και της εκπροσώπου της, της τρομοκρατικής οργάνωσης Χεζμπολάχ, δικτυώνεται με την ισλαμική Τζιχάντ και τη Χαμάς, οι οποίες είναι αμφότερες προσηλωμένες στον θεοκρατικό νόμο της Σαρία. Ένα Ιράν οπλισμένο με πυρηνικά όπλα είναι εξαιρετικά επικίνδυνο για την ασφάλεια της Δύσης και ιδιαίτερα του Ισραήλ. Δεν υπάρχει συναίνεση όσον αφορά την αντιμετώπιση του Ιράν, το οποίο παραβιάζει κατάφωρα τη Συνθήκη για τη μη διάδοση των πυρηνικών όπλων και τις συμφωνίες του με τη Βρετανία, τη Γαλλία και τη Γερμανία, αλλά χαιρετίζω το αποτέλεσμα της ψηφοφορίας στις 3 Φεβρουαρίου στους κόλπους του ΔΟΑΕ με την οποία αποφάσισε να παραπέμψει το Ιράν στο Συμβούλιο Ασφαλείας των Ηνωμένων Εθνών. Χαιρετίζω επίσης την καθυστερημένη στήριξη της Κίνας και της Ρωσίας. Η παραδοσιακή συμφωνία –με βάση την οποία το Ιράν υποστηρίζει τη Ρωσία στον ΟΙΔ όσον αφορά την Τσετσενία με αντάλλαγμα την υποστήριξή του από τη Ρωσία στον εφοδιασμό του με πυρηνική τεχνολογία και την άσκηση βέτο στο Συμβούλιο Ασφαλείας όταν χρειάζεται– φαίνεται πλέον να διαλύεται. Η Κίνα ασφαλώς αντιτίθεται στην περαιτέρω διάδοση των πυρηνικών όπλων και επίσης ανησυχεί για τις δικές της εγχώριες ισλαμικές απειλές. Η αδιαλλαξία του Ιράν και η άρνησή του να αποδεχτεί τη λογική ρωσική προσφορά για εμπλουτισμό ουρανίου αφύπνισαν τη Ρωσία και την Κίνα. Μόνον η Συρία, η Κούβα και η Βενεζουέλα απέρριψαν την πρόταση. Οι Ιρανοί ανέλαβαν αμέσως να συνεχίσουν, σε εμπορική κλίμακα, την παραγωγή εμπλουτισμένου ουρανίου, το οποίο μπορεί να χρησιμοποιηθεί είτε ως καύσιμο σε εγκαταστάσεις παραγωγής ενέργειας είτε, όπως πραγματικά επιθυμούν, στον πυρήνα μιας ατομικής βόμβας. Διέταξαν να σταματήσουν οι αιφνίδιες επισκέψεις των επιθεωρητών του ΔΟΑΕ. Οι δυτικές υπηρεσίες πληροφοριών ισχυρίζονται ότι το Ιράν χρησιμοποιεί ένα δίκτυο εικονικών εταιρειών προκειμένου να αγοράσει από τη Δυτική Ευρώπη υλικά για την κατασκευή πυραύλων και βομβών και για να προσλάβει φτωχούς πυρηνικούς επιστήμονες από την πρώην Σοβιετική Ένωση. Συμφωνώ με όλους όσους υποστηρίζουν ότι η Δύση δεν πρέπει να αποκλείσει καμία από τις διαθέσιμες επιλογές για την ανακοπή της πορείας του Ιράν προς την απόκτηση πυρηνικών όπλων. Θεωρώ γελοία την καθησυχαστική δήλωση του Υπουργού Εξωτερικών του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου, κ. Jack Straw, ο οποίος ισχυρίζεται ότι η ανάληψη στρατιωτικής δράσης είναι αδιανόητη, ενώ το αφεντικό του, ο Πρωθυπουργός κ. Tony Blair, ορθά αρνείται να αποκλείσει αυτό το ενδεχόμενο."@el¹⁰ "Señor Presidente, durante años Irán ha tratado de exportar su revolución fundamentalista más allá de su territorio chiita a las zonas de población sunita, incluida Palestina, en donde, a través de Siria y su representante terrorista, Hezbolá, se relaciona con la Yihad Islámica y Hamás, que propugnan teocracias donde impere la . Por lo tanto, un Irán con armas nucleares es especialmente peligroso para la seguridad occidental, y para la de Israel en particular. No existe consenso sobre el modo de tratar con Irán, que incumple sin duda el TNP y sus acuerdos con Gran Bretaña, Francia y Alemania, pero me complace la decisión del 3 de febrero del OIEA de remitir a Irán ante el Consejo de Seguridad de las Naciones Unidas. También celebro el tardío apoyo de China y Rusia. El pacto mutuo tradicional –por el que Irán respalda a Rusia en la OCI respecto a Chechenia a cambio del apoyo ruso con el suministro de tecnología nuclear y con su veto en el Consejo de Seguridad cuando sea necesario– parece estar disolviéndose. Por supuesto, China rechaza toda proliferación nuclear y también está preocupada por sus propias amenazas islamistas autóctonas. La intransigencia y el rechazo de la razonable oferta rusa sobre el enriquecimiento de uranio ha sido una llamada de atención para Rusia y China. Solamente Siria, Cuba y Venezuela han rechazado la propuesta. Los iraníes han declarado inmediatamente que reanudarán el enriquecimiento de uranio a escala comercial, el cual puede utilizarse como combustible para plantas nucleares o, como realmente desean, en el núcleo de una bomba atómica. Han ordenado la suspensión de las visitas no anunciadas de los inspectores del OIEA. Los servicios de inteligencia occidentales afirman que Irán está utilizando una red de empresas que sirven de fachada para tratar de comprar componentes para la producción de misiles y bombas a Europa Occidental y de contratar a los empobrecidos científicos nucleares de la antigua Unión Soviética. Estoy de acuerdo con quienes afirman que todas las opciones deben estar disponibles para que Occidente impida que Irán consiga armas nucleares. Me río de las apaciguadoras declaraciones del Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores del Reino Unido, Jack Straw, quien afirma que la acción militar es impensable, mientras su jefe, el Primer Ministro Tony Blair, se niega con razón a descartarla."@es²⁰ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@et⁵ "Arvoisa puhemies, Iran on muutaman vuoden ajan pyrkinyt viemään fundamentalistisen vallankumouksensa oman, shiiojen asuttaman alueensa ulkopuolelle sunnien asuttamille alueille, Palestiina mukaan lukien. Palestiinassa Iran toimii Syyrian ja sitä edustavan Hizbollah-terroristijärjestön välityksellä yhteistyössä Islamilaisen Jihadin ja Hamasin kanssa. Nämä molemmat järjestöt ovat sitoutuneet sharia-lain mukaisesti teokratiaan. Ydinaseistettu Iran on näin ollen erityisen vaarallinen länsimaiden ja etenkin Israelin turvallisuudelle. Toistaiseksi ei ole päästy yksimielisyyteen siitä, mitä tehdä Iranille, joka rikkoo selkeästi ydinsulkusopimusta sekä Ison-Britannian, Ranskan ja Saksan kanssa tekemiään sopimuksia. Pidän kuitenkin myönteisenä IAEA:n 3. helmikuuta tekemää päätöstä siirtää tämän kysymyksen käsittely YK:n turvallisuusneuvostolle samoin kuin Kiinan ja Venäjän, joskin odotettua myöhemmin, antamaa tukea. Iranin ja Venäjän perinteinen sopimus, jonka mukaan Iran tukee Venäjää Tšetšenian kysymyksen osalta Islamilaisten maiden järjestössä (OIC) ja Venäjä puolestaan toimittaa Iranille ydinteknologiaa ja käyttää tarvittaessa veto-oikeuttaan turvallisuusneuvostossa, näyttää nyt olevan purkautumassa. Kiina ei tietenkään hyväksy ydinaseiden leviämistä uusiin valtioihin ja on myös huolestunut islamin uhasta omalla maaperällään. Iranin myöntymättömyys ja kieltäytyminen uraanin rikastamista koskevasta Venäjän järkevästä tarjouksesta ovat avanneet Venäjän ja Kiinan silmät. Vain Syyria, Kuuba ja Venezuela torjuivat ehdotuksen. Iranilaiset ilmoittivat välittömästi käynnistävänsä uudelleen kaupallisessa laajuudessa tapahtuvan uraanin rikastamisen. Rikastettua uraania voidaan käyttää joko ydinvoimaloiden polttoaineena tai, kuten iranilaiset todellisuudessa toivovat, atomipommin valmistuksessa. He ovat myös päättäneet estää IAEA:n ilman ennakkovaroitusta tehtävät tarkastukset. Länsimaiden tiedustelupalvelut väittävät, että Iran käyttää pöytälaatikkoyhtiöiden muodostamaa verkostoa ostaakseen ydinohjusten ja -pommien valmistuksessa tarvittavia komponentteja Länsi-Euroopasta ja palkatakseen köyhtyneitä ydinfyysikoita entisestä Neuvostoliitosta. Olen samaa mieltä kaikkien niiden kanssa, joiden mielestä lännen on pidettävä kaikki vaihtoehdot avoimina estääkseen Iranin ydinaseistautumisen. Pidän naurettavana Ison-Britannian ulkoasiainministerin Jack Straw'n tyynnyttelevää lausuntoa, jossa hän väittää sotilaallisen toiminnan olevan erittäin epätodennäköistä, kun taas hänen esimiehensä, pääministeri Tony Blair, kieltäytyy aivan oikein sulkemasta tätä mahdollisuutta pois."@fi⁷ "Monsieur le Président, depuis quelques années, l’Iran cherche à exporter sa révolution fondamentaliste au-delà de ses territoires chiites, jusqu’aux régions où vivent les sunnites, y compris en Palestine, où, par l’intermédiaire de la Syrie et de son mandataire terroriste, le Hezbollah, il se concerte avec le Djihad islamique et le Hamas, deux groupes au service de théocraties basées sur la sharia. Par conséquent, un Iran doté de l’arme nucléaire est extrêmement dangereux pour la sécurité occidentale et pour celle d’Israël en particulier. Il n’existe pas de consensus sur la manière de traiter avec l’Iran, qui viole clairement le traité de non-prolifération nucléaire et les accords qu’il a passés avec la Grande-Bretagne, la France et l’Allemagne, mais je me félicite que l’AIEA ait décidé, lors du vote du 3 février, de renvoyer l’Iran devant le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Je me réjouis également du soutien tardif de la Chine et de la Russie. L’entente traditionnelle - par laquelle l’Iran soutient la Russie au sein de la l’Organisation de la conférence islamique à propos de la Tchétchénie en échange du soutien russe dans l’approvisionnement en technologie nucléaire et, en cas de besoin, de son veto au Conseil de sécurité - semble disparaître aujourd’hui. Naturellement, la Chine refuse toute nouvelle prolifération nucléaire et s’inquiète des menaces des islamistes fomentées sur son propre territoire. L’intransigeance de l’Iran et le fait qu’il a rejeté l’offre raisonnable de la Russie concernant l’enrichissement de l’uranium ont constitué un avertissement pour la Russie et la Chine. Seuls la Syrie, Cuba et le Venezuela ont rejeté la proposition. Les Iraniens ont promis de reprendre l’enrichissement, à des fins commerciales, de l’uranium, qui peut être utilisé soit comme un combustible pour les centrales électriques, soit, comme ils le souhaitent réellement, au cœur d’une bombe atomique. Ils ont ordonné la fin des visites-surprises des inspecteurs de l’AIEA. Les services de renseignement occidentaux affirment que l’Iran se sert d’un réseau de sociétés-écrans afin d’essayer d’acheter en Europe occidentale des pièces destinées à la fabrication de missiles et de bombes et d’engager des scientifiques pauvres spécialisés dans le nucléaire et originaires de l’ancienne Union soviétique. Je suis d’accord avec tous ceux qui soutiennent que toutes les possibilités doivent être mises à la disposition de l’Occident afin d’empêcher l’Iran de se doter de l’arme nucléaire. Je trouve que la déclaration rassurante du ministre britannique des affaires étrangères, Jack Straw, est ridicule: il affirme que l’intervention militaire est inconcevable, tandis que son patron, le Premier ministre Tony Blair, refuse à juste titre de l’exclure."@fr⁸ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@hu¹¹ "Signor Presidente, da alcuni anni l’Iran tenta di esportare la rivoluzione fondamentalista oltre le sue terre sciite verso le aree di popolazione sunnita, tra cui la Palestina, dove, attraverso la Siria e i suoi semiterroristi, si lega alla islamica e ad entrambi votati a teocrazie governate dalla legge islamica, la . Un Iran dotato di armi nucleari è pertanto particolarmente pericoloso per la sicurezza dell’Occidente, soprattutto per quella d’Israele. Non vi è consenso su come trattare con l’Iran, che sta chiaramente violando il TNP e gli accordi con Regno Unito, Francia e Germania, ma concordo con il voto espresso dall’AIEA il 3 febbraio, favorevole a deferire il caso dell’Iran al Consiglio di sicurezza delle Nazioni Unite. Accolgo altresì con favore il tardivo sostegno di Cina e Russia. Il patto tradizionale – in base al quale l’Iran sostiene la Russia in seno al CIO contro la Cecenia, in cambio dell’aiuto russo nell’acquisizione della tecnologia nucleare e del veto in seno al Consiglio di sicurezza ove necessario – sembra ormai sciogliersi. Naturalmente la Cina rifiuta un’ulteriore proliferazione nucleare ed è inoltre preoccupata per le minacce interne di matrice islamica. L’intransigenza dell’Iran e il suo rifiuto della ragionevole offerta russa per l’arricchimento dell’uranio hanno rappresentato un segnale d’allarme per la Russia e la Cina. Solo Siria, Cuba e Venezuela hanno rifiutato la proposta. Gli iraniani hanno immediatamente promesso di riprendere l’arricchimento dell’uranio su scala commerciale, che può essere utilizzato o come combustibile per le centrali elettriche o, come in realtà desiderano, nel nucleo di una bomba atomica. Hanno posto fine alle ispezioni non annunciate dell’AIEA. Secondo l’ occidentale, l’Iran sta usando una rete di società di copertura per cercare di comprare componenti per la produzione di missili e bombe dall’Europa occidentale e di assumere scienziati nucleari impoveriti dell’ex Unione Sovietica. Concordo con tutti quelli che affermano che l’Occidente debba disporre di tutte le opzioni per evitare che l’Iran acquisisca armi nucleari. Trovo ridicola l’affermazione rassicurante del ministro degli Esteri britannico Jack Straw, secondo il quale l’azione militare è inconcepibile, mentre il suo capo, il Primo Ministro Tony Blair, giustamente si rifiuta di escluderla."@it^12,12 "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@lt¹⁴ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@lv¹³ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@mt¹⁵ "Mijnheer de Voorzitter, sinds een aantal jaar probeert Iran zijn fundamentalistische revolutie vanaf Sjiietisch grondgebied te exporteren naar gebieden met een Soennitische bevolking, waaronder Palestina, waar het via Syrië en diens terroristische vazal Hezbollah samenwerkt met de Islamic Jihad en Hamas, beide voorstander van een theocratie met Sharia-wetgeving. Een met kernwapens uitgerust Iran is dan ook buitengewoon gevaarlijk voor de veiligheid van het Westen, en voor die van Israël in het bijzonder. Er is geen consensus over de vraag hoe Iran moet worden aangepakt, wat een duidelijke inbreuk is op het NPT-Verdrag en zijn akkoorden met Groot-Brittanië, Frankrijk en Duitsland. Ik juich echter toe dat de IAEA met zijn stemming van 3 februari besloten heeft om de kwestie Iran voor te leggen aan de VN-Veiligheidsraad. Verder juich ik de - zij het late - steun van China en Rusland toe. Het traditionele verbond - waarbij Iran in de OIC Rusland steunt in de kwestie Tsjetsjenië, in ruil voor Russische steun bij het verkrijgen van nucleaire technologie, en indien nodig voor een veto van Rusland in de Veiligheidsraad - lijkt nu af te brokkelen. China verwerpt natuurlijk een verdere proliferatie van kernwapens en het is ook bezorgd over de islamitische dreiging op eigen bodem. De starheid van Iran en het feit dat het het redelijke Russische aanbod met betrekking tot het verrijken van uranium heeft afgeslagen, heeft bij Rusland en China de alarmbel doen rinkelen. Alleen Syrië, Cuba en Venezuela hebben het voorstel verworpen. De Iraniërs bezworen ons meteen dat zij de verrijking van uranium - dat kan worden gebruikt als brandstof voor kerncentrales of, zoals zij feitelijk willen, in de kern van een atoombom - wilden hervatten voor commerciële doelstellingen. Volgens westerse inlichtingendiensten maakt Iran gebruik van een netwerk van bedrijven als dekmantel voor het kopen in West-Europa van componenten voor de productie van raketten en bommen, en voor het inhuren van verarmde kernwetenschappers uit de voormalige Sovjet-Unie. Ik ben het met iedereen eens die zegt dat het Westen alle opties open moeten laten om een Iran met kernwapens te voorkomen. De geruststellende verklaring van de Britse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, Jack Straw, dat militaire actie ondenkbaar is, vind ik belachelijk, maar zijn baas, premier Tony Blair, weigert heel terecht om die mogelijkheid uit te sluiten."@nl³ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@pl¹⁶ "Senhor Presidente, o Irão está há anos a procurar exportar a sua revolução fundamentalista do seu território xiita para áreas de população sunita, incluindo a Palestina, onde, através da Síria e do seu braço terrorista Hezbollah, tem ligações com a Jihad Islâmica e o Hamas, ambos empenhados na instauração de teocracias sujeitas à lei islâmica. Um Irão com armamento nuclear é, por conseguinte, particularmente perigoso para a segurança do Ocidente e para a de Israel em particular. Não há consenso quanto ao modo de lidar com o Irão, que se encontra em clara violação do Tratado TNP e dos seus acordos com a Grã-Bretanha, a França e a Alemanha, mas saúdo a decisão de 3 de Fevereiro da AIEA de remeter a questão do Irão para o Conselho de Segurança da ONU. Saúdo também o apoio serôdio da China e da Rússia. O entendimento tradicional – pelo qual o Irão apoia a Rússia na OCI no que respeita à Chechénia em troca de apoio russo no acesso a tecnologia nuclear, e do respectivo veto no Conselho de Segurança quando necessário – parece estar em vias de ser rompido. A China, naturalmente, rejeita uma maior proliferação nuclear e está também preocupada com as ameaças islâmicas com que ela própria se debate na sua frente doméstica. A intransigência iraniana e a recusa da proposta razoável relativa ao enriquecimento de urânio feita pela Rússia funcionou como toque de alerta para a Rússia e a China. Os únicos países que rejeitaram a proposta foram a Síria, Cuba e a Venezuela. Os iranianos declararam imediatamente o propósito de retomar o enriquecimento de urânio à escala comercial, o qual pode ser usado tanto como combustível para centrais de produção de energia como, como é seu verdadeiro intento, no núcleo de uma bomba atómica. E puseram termo às visitas sem anúncio prévio de inspectores da AIEA. Os serviços de informações ocidentais alegam que o Irão está a usar uma rede de companhias de fachada para tentar comprar componentes para a produção de mísseis e bombas na Europa Ocidental e a contratar cientistas nucleares empobrecidos da antiga União Soviética. Concordo com todos os que defendem que o Ocidente não deve excluir antecipadamente opção nenhuma no esforço para impedir que o Irão se dote de armamento nuclear. Rio-me das declarações apaziguadoras feitas pelo Ministro dos Negócios Estrangeiros do Reino Unido, Jack Straw, segundo as quais a hipótese de acção militar é inconcebível, quando o seu superior, Primeiro-Ministro Tony Blair, se recusa justificadamente a descartá-la."@pt¹⁷ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@sk¹⁸ "Mr President, for some years Iran has sought to export its fundamentalist revolution beyond its Shia lands to Sunni population areas, including Palestine, where, through Syria and its proxy terrorist Hezbollah, it liaises with Islamic Jihad and Hamas, both committed to theocracies under Sharia law. A nuclear-armed Iran is therefore particularly dangerous to Western security, and that of Israel in particular. There is no consensus on how to deal with Iran, which is in clear breach of the NPT Treaty and its agreements with Britain, France and Germany, but I welcome the 3 February vote by the IAEA to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council. I also welcome China and Russia’s belated support. The traditional compact – whereby Iran supports Russia in the OIC over Chechnya in exchange for Russian support in supplying nuclear technology, and its Security Council veto when necessary – seems now to be dissolving. China naturally rejects further nuclear proliferation and is also worried by its own home-grown Islamist threats. Iran’s intransigence and refusal of the reasonable Russian offer on enrichment of uranium has been a wake-up call to Russia and China. Only Syria, Cuba and Venezuela rejected the proposal. The Iranians immediately pledged to resume commercial-scale enrichment of uranium, which can be used either as a fuel for power plants or, as they really wish, in the core of an atom bomb. They have ordered an end to the unannounced visits by the IAEA inspectors. Western intelligence alleges that Iran is using a network of front companies to try and buy components for missile and bomb production from western Europe and to hire impoverished nuclear scientists from the former Soviet Union. I agree with all those who say that all options must be left available to the West to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. I ridicule the appeasing statement by the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who claims that military action is inconceivable, whereas his boss, Prime Minister Tony Blair, rightly refuses to rule it out."@sl¹⁹ "Herr talman! Iran har i ett antal år försökt att exportera sin fundamentalistiska revolution bortom Shia-områdena till Sunni-befolkade områden, däribland Palestina, där man genom Syrien och deras terroristföreträdare Hizbollah etablerar kontakter med islamiska Jihad och Hamas, som båda är hängivna teokratier genom sharialagar. Ett Iran beväpnat med kärnvapen är därför särskilt farligt för säkerheten i västvärlden, och Israel i synnerhet. Det finns inget samförstånd om hur man ska hantera Iran, som uppenbart bryter mot fördraget om icke-spridning av kärnvapen och överenskommelserna med Förenade kungariket, Frankrike och Tyskland, men jag välkomnar IAEA:s beslut av den 3 februari att överlämna Iran till FN:s säkerhetsråd. Jag välkomnar också Kinas och Rysslands försenade stöd. Den traditionella pakten, där Iran ger Ryssland sitt stöd angående Tjetjenien i islamiska staternas organisation (OIC) i utbyte mot Rysslands hjälp med leveranser av kärnkraftsteknik och veto i säkerhetsrådet när det behövs, verkar lösas upp. Kina tillbakavisar självklart vidare kärnvapennedrustning och oroas också av egna inhemska islamistiska hot. Irans omedgörlighet och vägran att acceptera det överkomliga ryska förslaget om anrikning av uran har varit en väckarklocka för Ryssland och Kina. Endast Syrien, Kuba och Venezuela tillbakavisade förslaget. Iranierna lovade genast att återuppta anrikning av uran på kommersiell nivå, som kan användas antingen som bränsle för kärnkraftverk eller i kärnan i en atombomb om de verkligen vill. De har beordrat att de oannonserade besöken av IAEA:s inspektörer ska upphöra. Västerländsk underrättelsetjänst påstår att Iran använder ett nätverk av skenföretag för att försöka köpa delar till produktionen av missiler och bomber från Västeuropa och hyr in utfattiga kärnfysiker från forna Sovjetunionen. Jag håller med alla som menar att vi måste hålla alla möjligheter öppna för västvärlden för att stoppa ett Iran beväpnat med kärnvapen. Det är löjeväckande att Förenade kungarikets utrikesminister Jack Straw på ett blidkande sätt hävdar att ett militärt ingrepp är otänkbart, fastän hans överordnade, premiärminister Tony Blair, med rätta vägrar att utesluta det."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Charles Tannock (PPE-DE ). –"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "intelligence"¹²