Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-14-Speech-2-245"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-14"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (küsimused nõukogule)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060214.27.2-245"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-14-Speech-2-246⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Hans Winkler⁶
lpv:spoken text	". I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@en⁴
lpv:translated text	"I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@cs¹ "Jeg går ud fra, at dette ikke er et spørgsmål, som jeg skal svare på. Vi accepterer bestemt, at Domstolen er en institution, der, som De har sagt, er grundlagt af medlemsstaterne, og vi accepterer, at Domstolen afgør og dømmer, og at medlemsstaterne skal acceptere disse domme. Det betyder ikke, at man ikke kan kommentere dommen."@da² ". Ich gehe davon aus, dass das nicht wirklich eine Frage ist, die ich beantworten kann. Natürlich akzeptieren wir, dass der Gerichtshof eine Einrichtung ist, die, wie von Ihnen beschrieben, von den Mitgliedstaaten eingesetzt wurde, und wir akzeptieren, dass der Gerichtshof Entscheidungen trifft und Urteile fällt und dass die Mitgliedstaaten diese Urteile zu akzeptieren haben. Das bedeutet nicht, dass man diese Urteile nicht kommentieren kann."@de⁹ "Θεωρώ ότι αυτό δεν είναι πραγματικά μία ερώτηση στην οποία μπορώ να απαντήσω. Δεχόμαστε ασφαλώς ότι το Δικαστήριο είναι ένα θεσμικό όργανο το οποίο συγκροτείται, όπως περιγράψατε, από τα κράτη μέλη, και δεχόμαστε ότι το Δικαστήριο αποφασίζει και εγκρίνει αποφάσεις και ότι τα κράτη μέλη υποχρεούνται να δέχονται αυτές τις αποφάσεις. Αυτό δεν σημαίνει ότι κάποιος δεν δύναται να σχολιάζει τις αποφάσεις."@el¹⁰ ". Me parece que realmente no puedo responder a esa pregunta. Es cierto que aceptamos que el Tribunal es una institución creada, como lo ha descrito usted, por los Estados miembros, y aceptamos que el Tribunal decida y dicte sentencias y que los Estados miembros hayan de aceptarlas. Ello no significa que no se puedan hacer comentarios sobre la sentencia."@es²⁰ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@et⁵ ". (EN) Pidän tätä kysymyksenä, johon en oikeastaan voi vastata. Hyväksymme taatusti sen, että tuomioistuin on jäsenvaltioiden perustama toimielin, kuten totesitte, ja hyväksymme myös, että tuomioistuin tekee päätöksiä ja antaa tuomioita ja että jäsenvaltioiden on nämä tuomiot hyväksyttävä. Tämä ei tarkoita sitä, ettei tuomioita saisi kommentoida."@fi⁷ ". Je suppose qu’il ne s’agit pas réellement d’une question à laquelle je peux répondre. Nous admettons naturellement que la Cour est une institution formée par les États membres, ainsi que vous l’avez décrit, et nous admettons que la Cour arrête des décisions et prononce des arrêts et que les États membres doivent accepter ces arrêts. Cela ne signifie pas que les arrêts ne peuvent être commentés."@fr⁸ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@hu¹¹ "Ritengo che questa sia davvero una domanda alla quale non posso dare una risposta. Sicuramente conveniamo che, come ha detto lei, la Corte è un’Istituzione costituita attraverso gli Stati membri, così come conveniamo che la Corte si pronuncia ed emette sentenze che gli Stati membri hanno il dovere di accettare. Questo non significa che non si possa esprimere il proprio parere sulla sentenza."@it¹² "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@lt¹⁴ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@lv¹³ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@mt¹⁵ "Dat lijkt me niet een vraag waar ik antwoord op kan geven. We aanvaarden dat het Hof, zoals u zelf aangeeft, een door de lidstaten aangestelde instelling is. We aanvaarden ook dat het Hof beslist en uitspraken doet, en dat de lidstaten zich aan die uitspraken hebben te houden. Maar dat betekent niet dat je niet over die uitspraken kunt discussiëren."@nl³ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@pl¹⁶ "Admito que não é, de facto, uma pergunta a que possa responder. Para nós, o Tribunal é obviamente uma Instituição criada, como disse, pelos Estados-Membros; e, para nós, o Tribunal decide e profere os seus acórdãos e os Estados-Membros têm de os acatar. Não quer isso dizer que não se possa tecer qualquer comentário sobre os acórdãos."@pt¹⁷ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@sk¹⁸ "I take it that this is not really a question that I can answer. We certainly accept that the Court is an institution set up, as you have described, by the Member States; and we accept that the Court decides and passes judgment and that the Member States have to accept that judgment. That does not mean that one cannot comment on the judgment."@sl¹⁹ ". Jag utgår från att detta egentligen inte är en fråga som jag kan besvara. Vi accepterar säkerligen att domstolen är en institution som upprättats, såsom ni beskrivit det, av medlemsstaterna. Vi accepterar också att domstolen fattar beslut om och fäller domar och att medlemsstaterna måste acceptera dessa domar. Detta innebär inte att man inte kan kommentera domarna."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Hans Winkler,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,7,13,4} "President-in-Office of the Council"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "neuvoston puheenjohtaja"⁷