Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-14-Speech-2-243"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-14"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (küsimused nõukogule)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060214.27.2-243"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-14-Speech-2-244⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Hans Winkler⁶
lpv:spoken text	". The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@en⁴
lpv:translated text	"The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@cs¹ "Institutionen EF-Domstolen er ubetvivleligt en vigtig del af EU. Ingen har nogensinde tvivlet på dette, og det er bestemt ikke noget, som Rådet nogensinde har drøftet som sådan, for det er hævet over enhver tvivl. Hvis nogen politiker, og for den sags skyld den østrigske kansler, bidrager til debatten om de europæiske institutioners funktion, drager det bestemt ikke selve EF-Domstolen som institution i tvivl. Vi må have lov til at drøfte EU's institutioners forskellige funktion, herunder Domstolen, men jeg gentager, at vi ikke på nogen måde drager institutionen selv i tvivl. Det er også noget, som Rådet som institution ikke har drøftet, og jeg kan derfor ikke give Dem mit svar på Rådets vegne. Jeg mener, at det er rimeligt at drøfte og tænke på, hvordan Domstolen og de andre institutioner fungerer. Det var et bidrag til debatten om Europas fremtid."@da² ". Die Institution des Europäischen Gerichtshofs stellt ohne Frage einen wichtigen Teil der Europäischen Union dar. Niemand hat das je bezweifelt, und das war auch nie Bestandteil der Diskussionen des Rates, weil es außer Frage steht. Wenn ein Politiker wie in diesem Fall der österreichische Bundeskanzler einen Beitrag zur Debatte über die Arbeitsweise der europäischen Institutionen leistet, dann wird damit keinesfalls die Institution des Europäischen Gerichtshofs selbst in Frage gestellt. Es muss uns gestattet sein, die Arbeitsweise der verschiedenen Institutionen der Europäischen Union, einschließlich des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, zu debattieren und zu diskutieren, aber, und das möchte ich wiederholen, wir stellen damit keinesfalls die Institution selbst in Frage. Der Rat als Institution hat dieses Problem nie diskutiert, und deshalb kann ich Ihnen keine Antwort im Namen des Rates geben. Meines Erachtens muss es möglich sein, über die Arbeitsweise des Gerichtshofs und der anderen Institutionen nachzudenken und zu diskutieren. Das war ein Beitrag zur Debatte über die Zukunft Europas."@de⁹ "Το θεσμικό όργανο του Ευρωπαϊκού Δικαστηρίου είναι αδιαμφισβήτητα σημαντικό στοιχείο της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης. Ποτέ κανείς δεν το έχει αμφισβητήσει αυτό και είναι ασφαλώς κάτι το οποίο δεν έχει συζητήσει ποτέ το Συμβούλιο, επειδή είναι πέρα από κάθε αμφισβήτηση. Εάν κάποιος πολιτικός, και στην προκειμένη περίπτωση ο αυστριακός καγκελάριος, συμβάλλει στη συζήτηση για τη λειτουργία των ευρωπαϊκών θεσμικών οργάνων, αυτό φυσικά δεν αμφισβητεί το θεσμικό όργανο του Ευρωπαϊκού Δικαστηρίου αυτό καθ’ αυτό. Πρέπει να μας επιτρέπεται να συνδιαλεγόμαστε και να συζητούμε για τη λειτουργία των διαφόρων θεσμικών οργάνων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, συμπεριλαμβανομένου του Ευρωπαϊκού Δικαστηρίου, επαναλαμβάνω, όμως, αυτό δεν σημαίνει επ’ ουδενί ότι αμφισβητούμε το ίδιο το θεσμικό όργανο. Είναι επίσης κάτι που δεν έχει συζητήσει το Συμβούλιο, ως θεσμικό όργανο, και συνεπώς δεν μπορώ να σας δώσω μία απάντηση εξ ονόματος του Συμβουλίου. Πιστεύω ότι είναι δικαιολογημένο να συζητούμε και να εξετάζουμε τον τρόπο λειτουργίας του Δικαστηρίου και των άλλων θεσμικών οργάνων. Αυτό ήταν μια συνεισφορά στη συζήτηση για το μέλλον της Ευρώπης."@el¹⁰ ". La institución del Tribunal Europeo es sin duda alguna un elemento importante de la Unión Europea. Nadie ha dudado nunca de esto y está claro que el Consejo no lo ha cuestionado jamás como tal, porque está fuera de toda duda. Si cualquier político, y en este caso el Canciller austriaco, contribuye al debate sobre el funcionamiento de las instituciones europeas, con ello no está cuestionando en absoluto la institución del propio Tribunal Europeo. Tenemos que poder debatir y cuestionar el funcionamiento de las diferentes instituciones de la Unión Europea, incluido el Tribunal Europeo, pero, repito, esto no significa en modo alguno que estemos poniendo en tela de juicio la propia institución. El Consejo, como institución, no ha hablado de esto y, por tanto, no puedo darles una respuesta en nombre del Consejo. Creo que está justificado hablar y pensar sobre el funcionamiento del Tribunal y otras instituciones. Esto ha sido una aportación al debate sobre el futuro de Europa."@es²⁰ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@et⁵ ". Euroopan yhteisöjen tuomioistuin on epäilemättä tärkeä osa Euroopan unionia. Kukaan ei ole koskaan epäillyt sitä, eikä neuvosto ole koskaan keskustellut asiasta sinänsä, koska asiasta ei ole pienintäkään epäilystä. Jos joku poliitikko, tässä tapauksessa Itävallan liittokansleri, osallistuu keskusteluun unionin toimielinten toiminnasta, tämä ei varmasti aseta kyseenalaiseksi itse Euroopan yhteisöjen tuomioistuinta. Meidän on sallittava keskustelu ja keskusteltava Euroopan unionin eri toimielinten, myös yhteisöjen tuomioistuimen, toiminnasta, mutta toistan vielä, ettemme millään lailla aseta kyseenalaiseksi itse toimielintä. Myöskään neuvosto ei ole toimielimenä keskustellut asiasta, enkä tästä syystä voi vastata teille neuvoston puolesta. Mielestäni on perusteltua keskustella ja pohtia sitä, miten tuomioistuin ja muut toimielimet toimivat. Tämä oli panos keskusteluun Euroopan tulevaisuudesta."@fi⁷ ". L’institution de la Cour européenne constitue sans conteste une facette importante de l’Union européenne. Nul ne l’a jamais mis en doute, et il ne s’agit certainement pas d’un sujet dont le Conseil ait jamais discuté en tant que tel tant il figure au-delà de toute interrogation. Si un politique quelconque, en l’occurrence le chancelier autrichien, participe au débat sur le fonctionnement des institutions européennes, cela ne saurait remettre en question l’institution de la Cour européenne elle-même. Nous devons être autorisés à débattre et à discuter du fonctionnement des différentes institutions de l’Union européenne, en ce compris la Cour de justice, mais je le répète, cela ne signifie en aucune manière que nous remettons en question l’institution à proprement parler. Il s’agit par ailleurs d’un sujet dont le Conseil, en tant qu’institution, n’a pas traité et je ne peux en conséquence formuler une réponse au nom du Conseil. Je pense qu’il est justifié de discuter et de réfléchir sur la manière dont la Cour et les autres institutions fonctionnent. Il s’agissait d’une contribution au débat sur l’avenir de l’Europe."@fr⁸ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@hu¹¹ "L’Istituzione della Corte di giustizia delle Comunità europee è indubbiamente un elemento importante dell’Unione. Nessuno lo ha mai messo in dubbio e sicuramente il Consiglio non ha mai contestato questo fatto, perché è fuori discussione. Se un politico, e in questo caso il Cancelliere austriaco, contribuisce al dibattito sul funzionamento delle Istituzioni europee, non per questo viene messa in discussione l’Istituzione della Corte di giustizia stessa. Dobbiamo poter dibattere e discutere del funzionamento delle varie Istituzioni comunitarie, compresa la Corte di giustizia, ma, lo ribadisco, questo non significa in alcun modo che stiamo mettendo in discussione l’Istituzione in sé. Si tratta inoltre di una questione di cui il Consiglio, come Istituzione, non ha discusso e pertanto non posso dare una risposta a suo nome. Credo sia legittimo discutere e riflettere sul funzionamento della Corte e di altre Istituzioni. Si trattava di un contributo al dibattito sul futuro dell’Europa."@it¹² "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@lt¹⁴ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@lv¹³ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@mt¹⁵ "Het Europees Hof van Justitie vervult als instelling beslist een belangrijke rol binnen de Europese Unie. Niemand zal daaraan twijfelen en de Raad heeft dat ook nooit ter discussie gesteld. Het staat immers buiten kijf. Als een politicus - of dat nu de Oostenrijkse kanselier is of iemand anders - een bijdrage levert aan het debat over het functioneren van de Europese instellingen, betekent dat nog niet dat daarmee het bestaansrecht van het Europees Hof van Justitie als instelling in twijfel wordt getrokken. Het staat ons vrij te discussiëren over het functioneren van de instellingen van de Europese Unie, en dus ook over het functioneren van het Hof van Justitie. Maar, ik herhaal, daarmee trekken we het bestaansrecht van het Hof als zodanig niet in twijfel. De Raad heeft daar als instelling nooit over gesproken. Ik kan u daarom namens de Raad geen antwoord geven. Ik geloof dat het volkomen aanvaardbaar is om te discussiëren over de wijze waarop het Hof en andere Europese instellingen functioneren. Dat was gewoon een bijdrage aan het debat over de toekomst van Europa."@nl³ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@pl¹⁶ "A Instituição do Tribunal de Justiça Europeu é, inquestionavelmente, uma parte importante da União Europeia. Ninguém alguma vez duvidou disso, e certamente que o Conselho jamais o discutiu como tal, porque a questão não se põe sequer. Se algum político, e neste caso concreto, o Chanceler austríaco, contribui para o debate sobre o funcionamento das Instituições europeias, isso não põe seguramente em causa a instituição do Tribunal de Justiça Europeu. É admissível que debatamos e discutamos o funcionamento das diferentes Instituições da União Europeia, incluindo o Tribunal Europeu de Justiça, mas, repito, isso não significa de forma alguma que ponhamos a própria instituição em causa. Também não foi um assunto que o Conselho, como instituição, tenha discutido, pelo que não lhe posso dar uma resposta em nome do Conselho. Creio que se justifica discutir e reflectir sobre o funcionamento do Tribunal e de outras instituições. Tratou-se de um contributo para o debate sobre o futuro da Europa."@pt¹⁷ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@sk¹⁸ "The institution of the European Court is without question an important part of the European Union. No one has ever doubted that and it is certainly not something that the Council has ever discussed as such, because it is beyond question. If any politician, and for that matter the Austrian Chancellor, contributes to the debate about the functioning of the European institutions, that certainly does not call into question the institution of the European Court itself. We must be permitted to debate and discuss the functioning of the different institutions of the European Union, including the European Court, but, I repeat, that in no way means we are calling the institution itself into question. It is also something that the Council, as an institution, has not discussed and I therefore cannot give you an answer on behalf of the Council. I believe that it is justified to discuss and think about how the Court and the other institutions function. That was a contribution to the debate on the future of Europe."@sl¹⁹ ". Institutionen EG-domstolen är utan tvekan en viktig del av Europeiska unionen. Ingen har någonsin tvekat i fråga om detta, och det är verkligen inget som rådet någonsin har diskuterat på det sättet, eftersom det inte kan ifrågasättas. Ett inlägg i debatten om EU-institutionernas funktion av någon politiker, eller den österrikiska förbundskanslern för den delen, innebär verkligen inte ett ifrågasättande av själva institutionen EG-domstolen. Vi måste kunna debattera och diskutera Europeiska unionens olika institutioners funktion, inklusive EG-domstolen, men jag upprepar att det inte på något sätt betyder att vi ifrågasätter själva institutionen. Detta är inte heller någonting som rådet som institution har diskuterat, och därför kan jag inte ge er något svar på rådets vägnar. Jag anser att det är berättigat att diskutera och överväga EG-domstolens och de andra institutionernas funktion. Det var ett inlägg i debatten om EU:s framtid."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Hans Winkler,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,7,13,4} "President-in-Office of the Council"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "neuvoston puheenjohtaja"⁷