Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-05-Speech-2-245"

Predicate	Value (sorted: none)
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@et⁵
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@sl¹⁹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@mt¹⁵
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@cs¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@sk¹⁸
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@lt¹⁴
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@pl¹⁶
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@hu¹¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	"Arvoisa puhemies, hyvät parlamentin jäsenet, koska minulla on niukasti puheaikaa, voin esittää vain yleisiä huomautuksia käsiteltäväksi jätettyjen tarkistusten periaatteista. Lisäksi on tarjolla uusia rahoitusmahdollisuuksia ympäristön parantamiseksi ja suojelemiseksi sellaisilla Natura 2000 -alueilla, joilla harjoitetaan kalatalousalan toimia. Muiden yhtäläisiä mahdollisuuksia koskevien säädösten lisäksi tuetaan kollektiivisia toimia, joiden tavoitteena on verkottuminen ja kokemusten vaihtaminen miesten ja naisten tasa-arvoa edistävien järjestöjen välillä. Komissio ei hyväksy seuraavia parlamentin mietintöön sisältyviä ehdotuksia. Alusten rakentaminen tai korvaaminen, vaikka kapasiteetti ei lisääntyisikään. Komissio ei voi hyväksyä ehdotusta, joka on vastoin sen suojelupolitiikkaa. Tällainen tuki ylläpitäisi laivaston liikakapasiteettia. Komissio ei ole valmis käsittelemään uudelleen tätä seikkaa, joka on sille edelleen yksi kestävän kalastuksen kulmakivistä. Sama koskee yhteisyritysten perustamiseen myönnettävää tukea. Tällainen tuki hyödyttää pääasiassa yksityisiä alusten omistajia ja olisi vastoin kansainvälisten järjestöjen kanssa tekemiämme sitoumuksia. Yksimielisyys vallitsee kuitenkin siitä, että tällaisten yhteisyritysten toteutettavuustutkimusta voidaan rahoittaa. Eri tyyppisten alusten moottoreiden vaihtamisesta puheen ollen toistan, että neuvoston käymien keskustelujen aikana komissio hyväksyi kompromissin, jonka mukaan pienimuotoista kalastusta harjoittavien alusten moottoreiden vaihtaminen on sallittua. Olen kuunnellut näkemyksiänne, jotka koskevat komission hyväksymien parametrien yli menevää tukea. Nämä näkemykset edellyttävät tietenkin lisäarviointia. Näkemykseni mukaan nuorten kalankasvattajien aseman parantamista ei tarvitse rahoittaa samalla tavalla kuin nuorten kalastajien aseman parantamista, sillä vesiviljelyllä ei ole samanlaisia ongelmia työntekijöiden saamisessa kuin kalastusalalla. Olen halukas tarkastelemaan tätä kysymystä lähemmin. Komissio on ehdottanut sisävesikalastuksen tuen palauttamista. Komissio ei kuitenkaan hyväksy pyyntöä sisävesikalastusta harjoittavien alusten rakentamiseen tarkoitetun tuen jatkamisesta, sillä myös sisävesikalastuksessa on noudatettava varovaisuutta joidenkin kalakantojen uhanalaisuuden ja tätä alaa koskevan vähäisen tutkimustiedon vuoksi. Aiomme siitä huolimatta kohdella sisävesikalastusta harjoittavia aluksia samalla tavoin kuin merikalastusaluksia. Lopuksi totean, että komissio on tarkastellut huolellisesti myös niitä parlamentin tarkistuksia, jotka koskevat hallinnointiin, seurantaan ja valvontajärjestelmiin liittyviä "monialaisia kysymyksiä". Kuten varmasti tiedätte, nämä säännökset perustuvat suurelta osin ehdotuksiin rakennerahastoja koskevaksi asetukseksi. Yhteisön säädösten keskinäisen johdonmukaisuuden säilyttämiseksi odotamme näistä ehdotuksista käytävien neuvottelujen riittävää edistystä. Komissio voi yhtyä muutamiin tarkistuksiin, jotka ovat myös osoitus neuvostossa saavutetusta edistyksestä. Niihin kuuluu pienimuotoista kalastusta harjoittavien alusten moottoreiden vaihdon tiukasti rajattu tukikelpoisuus, jonka avulla varmistetaan, ettei kalastuskapasiteetti kasva. Käsittelen seuraavaksi tuen myöntämistä pienimuotoista kalastusta harjoittaville nuorille kalastajille, jotka haluavat hankkia käytetyn kalastusaluksen. Neuvoston harkitsemien ehdotusten mukaan tällaisen tuen avulla voidaan hankkia vain alle 12 metrin pituisia aluksia, joissa ei käytetä vedettäviä pyydyksiä. Komission on tarkasteltava lähemmin parlamentin pyyntöä soveltaa tätä mahdollisuutta kaikkiin aluksiin. Sosioekonomisten toimenpiteiden soveltamisalaa on laajennettu koulutukseen ja korvauksiin, joita maksetaan toimintansa pysyvästi lopettaneissa kalastusaluksissa työskenteleville kalastajille. Vaatimus toiminnan väliaikaiseksi lopettamiseksi myönnettävän tuen yhdistämisestä kapasiteetin vähentämiseen peruutetaan ja korvataan palauttamalla voimaan KOR:a koskevat nykyiset säännökset, joissa vahvistetaan yhteisön maksuosuuden vähimmäismäärä toiminnan väliaikaisen lopettamisen yhteydessä. Neuvosto totesi, että Euroopan kalatalousrahastosta tukea saavat suunnitelmat, joita esitetään kiireellisten toimenpiteiden hyväksymisen seurauksena, kattavat myös pyyntialueen tosiaikaisen sulkemisen, kun siellä on hyvin paljon nuoria kaloja tai se toimii kutualueena. Neuvosto ehdottaa vesiviljelyn, jalostuksen ja kaupan pitämisen aloilla toimivien keskisuurten yritysten ottamista Euroopan kalatalousrahastosta myönnettävän tuen piiriin, vaikka painopiste onkin edelleen pien- ja mikroyrityksissä. Vesiviljelyn näkyvyyttä lisätään. Vesiviljely on todellakin sisällytetty kalatalousalan määritelmiin, ja vesiviljelyn tukeminen mainitaan nimenomaan yhdeksi Euroopan kalatalousrahaston tavoitteista ja tehtävistä. Uudelleen käyttöön otettavia toimia ovat sisävesikalastuksen tukeminen alusten rakentamista lukuun ottamatta sekä tuottajajärjestöjen perustaminen ja niiden rakenteiden uudistaminen."@fi⁷
lpv:translated text	". Herr talman, kära ledamöter! Med tanke på den begränsade tid jag har till mitt förfogande kan jag endast rent allmänt kommentera andemeningen i de ändringsförslag som lagts fram. Det finns nya finansieringsmöjligheter till att förstärka och skydda miljön i Natura 2000-områden som berörs av fiskeverksamhet. Förutom andra bestämmelser om lika möjligheter har vi lagt till stöd för gemensamma åtgärder inriktade på nätverk och erfarenhetsutbyte mellan organisationer som främjar jämställdhet mellan kvinnor och män i utvecklingen av fiskerinäringen och kustfiskeområdena. Kommissionen kan däremot inte acceptera följande förslag som ingår i ert betänkande. Byggande eller ersättande av fartyg, även om det inte medför någon kapacitetsökning. Kommissionen kan inte acceptera ett förslag som går emot vår bevarandepolitik. Sådant stöd skulle bidra till att fiskeflottans överkapacitet bibehålls. Kommissionen tänker inte ändra sig på den punkten, som för oss kvarstår som grundläggande för ett hållbart fiske. Detsamma gäller stöd för inrättandet av gemensamma företag. Sådant stöd gynnar främst privata fartygsägare och skulle strida mot åtaganden som vi gjort till internationella organisationer. Det råder dock enighet om att genomförbarhetsstudier av sådana gemensamma företag kan finansieras. Låt mig, när det gäller motorutbyten för alla typer av fartyg, upprepa att kommissionen under rådets överläggningar godtog en kompromiss som innebar att motorutbyten skulle tillåtas för små fartyg. Jag har lyssnat till era åsikter angående att utvidga stödet utanför de parametrar som redan accepterats av kommissionen. Tydligen måste detta granskas ytterligare. Jag anser att unga fiskodlare inte behöver finansieras på samma sätt som unga fiskare, eftersom vattenbruk inte har samma rekryteringsproblem som fångstsektorn. Jag kan tänka mig att undersöka detta ytterligare. Vi har föreslagit att stödet till inlandsfiske återinförs. Kommissionen kan dock inte acceptera en begäran om att utvidga stödet för uppbyggande av en fartygsflotta för inlandsfiske, eftersom försiktighet krävs även inom inlandsfisket, där vissa bestånd rapporteras befinna sig i en prekär situation, och med tanke på den begränsade kunskapen inom detta område. Vi anser dock att fartyg som är verksamma inom inlandsfiske bör behandlas på samma sätt som fartyg verksamma inom havsfiske. Vi har, avslutningsvis, även noggrant granskat era ändringsförslag gällande de ”horisontella frågor” som rör hantering, övervakning och kontrollsystem. Som ni säkert redan vet är dessa bestämmelser starkt inspirerade av förslagen om en reglering av strukturfonderna. I syfte att gemenskapens instrument skall stämma överens med varandra, avvaktar vi tills tillräckliga framsteg görs i förhandlingarna kring dessa förslag. Kommissionen har gått med på ett antal ändringsförslag, vilket återspeglar framstegen i rådet. Bland annat gäller det rätt till motorutbyten för småskaliga fiskefartyg under stränga villkor, så att fiskekapaciteten inte skall öka. När det gäller stöd till unga fiskare som är verksamma inom småskaligt fiske och önskar bli ägare till ett begagnat fiskefartyg, begränsar förslaget, som behandlats av rådet, ett sådant stöd till inköp av fiskefartyg med en total längd på under tolv meter och som inte använder släpredskap. Er begäran att tillämpa denna möjlighet på alla fartyg behöver granskas ytterligare. Socioekonomiska åtgärder har utvidgats till att gälla fortbildning och ersättning till besättningsmän på fartyg som berörs av beslut om att definitivt upphöra med verksamheten. Kravet på att bidraget till ett tillfälligt upphörande av verksamheten måste åtföljas av en minskning av kapaciteten är borttaget. I stället återinförs de nuvarande bestämmelserna för Fonden för fiskets utveckling som anger tröskelvärdet för gemenskapens stöd till alla typer av tillfälliga upphöranden. Vi konstaterade i rådet att de planer som finansieras av Europeiska fiskerifonden (EFF) och som lades fram efter godkännandet av katastrofåtgärderna även kan täcka omedelbara avstängningar på grund av koncentration av unga exemplar eller fortplantning. Stödet från EFF föreslås utvidgat till medelstora företag som är verksamma inom vattenbruks-, bearbetnings- och marknadssektorn, samtidigt som mikroföretag och små företag prioriteras. Vattenbruk lyfts fram bättre. Vi har faktiskt inkluderat vattenbruk i definitionen av fiskesektorn, och stöd till vattenbruk nämns uttryckligen som ett av EFF:s mål och uppdrag. Stöd till inlandsfiske, med undantag för fartygskonstruktion, och startande och omstrukturering av producentorganisationer återinrättas."@sv²¹
lpv:translated text	"Hr. formand, ærede medlemmer, i den begrænsede tid, jeg har til rådighed, kan jeg kun knytte overordnede kommentarer til principperne i ændringsforslagene. Der er nye støttemuligheder for at forbedre og beskytte miljøet i Natura 2000-områder, der berøres af fiskeri. Ud over andre bestemmelser om lige muligheder har vi tilføjet støtte til kollektive aktioner med sigte på netværksaktiviteter og udveksling af erfaringer blandt organisationer til fremme af lige muligheder for mænd og kvinder. Kommissionen kan ikke acceptere følgende forslag, der er medtaget i Deres betænkning. Bygning eller udskiftning af fartøjer, selv hvor kapaciteten ikke øges. Kommissionen kan ikke acceptere et forslag, der går imod vores bevaringspolitik. En sådan støtte ville bidrage til at fastholde overkapacitet i fiskerflåden. Kommissionen vil ikke give sig på dette punkt, som for os er og bliver grundlæggende for bæredygtigt fiskeri. Dette gælder også støtte til etablering af joint ventures. Denne form for støtte gavner hovedsagelig private fartøjsejere og går imod vores forpligtelser over for internationale organisationer. Der er dog enighed om, at der kan ydes støtte til undersøgelser af gennemførligheden af joint ventures. Hvad angår motorudskiftning på alle typer fartøjer, vil jeg gerne gentage, at Kommissionen under Rådets behandling af sagen accepterede et kompromis, der tillod motorudskiftning for små fartøjer. Jeg har lyttet til Deres synspunkter med hensyn til at udvide støtten ud over de parametre, som Kommissionen allerede har accepteret. Det skal der helt klart ses nærmere på. Jeg mener, at der ikke bør ydes etableringsstøtte til unge fiskeopdrættere i samme omfang som til unge fiskere, da akvakultursektoren ikke har samme rekrutteringsproblemer som fangstsektoren. Jeg er villig til at undersøge sagen nærmere. Vi har foreslået genindførelse af støtte til fiskeri i indre farvande. Kommissionen kan dog ikke acceptere anmodningen om at udvide støtten til bygning af fartøjer til fiskeri i indre farvande, fordi der også kræves forsigtighed i indre farvande, hvor situationen for nogle bestande er dårlig ifølge rapporterne, og i lyset af den begrænsede videnskabelige viden på dette område. Vi forudser imidlertid, at fartøjer, der fisker i indre farvande, skal behandles på samme måde som fartøjer, der fisker i havet. Endelig har vi også nøje undersøgt Deres ændringsforslag vedrørende de tværgående emner, hvad angår forvaltnings-, tilsyns- og kontrolsystemer. Som De sikkert er klar over, er disse bestemmelser i høj grad inspireret af forslagene til en forordning om strukturfondene. Af hensyn til sammenhængen mellem EF-instrumenterne afventer vi tilstrækkelige fremskridt i forhandlingerne om disse forslag. Kommissionen er enig i en række ændringsforslag, hvilket også afspejler Rådets fremskridt. Disse fremskridt omfatter berettigelse til støtte til motorudskiftning for små fartøjer under strenge betingelser for at sikre, at fiskerikapaciteten ikke øges. Hvad angår støtte til unge fiskere, der driver fiskeri af mindre omfang, og som ønsker at købe et brugt fiskerfartøj, begrænser Rådets forslag støtten til køb af fartøjer på under 12 m, som ikke anvender trukne redskaber. Deres anmodning om at lade denne mulighed gælde alle fartøjer kræver yderligere undersøgelse. Omfanget af samfundsøkonomiske foranstaltninger er udvidet med erhvervsuddannelse og erstatning til fiskere, der arbejder om bord på fartøjer, hvis aktivitet er bragt til endeligt ophør. Kravet om, at midlertidigt ophør af aktiviteter skal ledsages af en reduktion af kapaciteten, trækkes tilbage, og i stedet genindsættes de nuværende FIUF-bestemmelser, hvorved grænsen for EF-støtte går ved alle former for midlertidigt ophør. I Rådet anførte vi, at EFF-finansierede planer, der fremlægges efter vedtagelse af nødforanstaltninger, også kan dække aktuelle lukninger på grund af yngelkoncentration eller gydning. Det foreslås at udvide EFF-støtten til at omfatte mellemstore virksomheder inden for akvakultur, forarbejdning og afsætning, mens små virksomheder og mikrovirksomheder prioriteres. Akvakultur er gjort mere synlig. Vi har medtaget akvakultur i definitionen af fiskerisektoren, og støtte til akvakultur anføres udtrykkeligt som en af Den Europæiske Fiskerifonds målsætninger. Bestemmelser om støtte til fiskeri i indre farvande, undtagen bygning af fartøjer, samt etablering og omstrukturering af producentorganisationer er genindført."@da²
lpv:translated text	". Κύριε Πρόεδρε, κυρίες και κύριοι βουλευτές, δεδομένου του περιορισμένου χρόνου που έχω στη διάθεσή μου, μπορώ μόνο να σχολιάσω σε γενικές γραμμές το πνεύμα των τροπολογιών που έχουν κατατεθεί. Προσφέρονται νέες δυνατότητες χρηματοδότησης για την ενίσχυση και προστασία του περιβάλλοντος στους τομείς του προγράμματος Natura 2000 οι οποίοι σχετίζονται με αλιευτικές δραστηριότητες. Εκτός των υπολοίπων διατάξεων σχετικά με τις ίσες ευκαιρίες, προσθέσαμε τη στήριξη συλλογικών δράσεων οι οποίες αποσκοπούν στη δημιουργία δικτύων και την ανταλλαγή εμπειριών μεταξύ οργανώσεων οι οποίες προωθούν την ισότητα ευκαιριών μεταξύ ανδρών και γυναικών. Η Επιτροπή δεν μπορεί να δεχτεί τις ακόλουθες προτάσεις οι οποίες περιλαμβάνονται στην έκθεσή σας. Η κατασκευή ή αντικατάσταση σκαφών, ακόμη και χωρίς αύξηση της αλιευτικής ικανότητας. Η Επιτροπή δεν μπορεί να δεχτεί μια πρόταση η οποία αντίκειται στην πολιτική μας για τη διατήρηση των αλιευτικών πόρων. Οι ενισχύσεις αυτού του είδους θα συνέβαλλαν στη διατήρηση της πλεονάζουσας αλιευτικής ικανότητας των στόλων. Η Επιτροπή δεν είναι διατεθειμένη να μετακινηθεί από αυτή τη θέση, η οποία παραμένει για εμάς θεμελιώδης πυλώνας της βιώσιμης αλιείας. Το ίδιο ισχύει και όσον αφορά τις ενισχύσεις για τη δημιουργία κοινών επιχειρήσεων. Οι ενισχύσεις αυτού του είδους ωφελούν κυρίως τους ατομικούς ιδιοκτήτες σκαφών, ενώ θα έρχονταν σε αντίθεση με τις δεσμεύσεις που έχουμε αναλάβει στο πλαίσιο διεθνών οργανισμών. Ωστόσο, επικρατεί συμφωνία ως προς το ότι θα μπορούσαν να χρηματοδοτηθούν μελέτες για τη βιωσιμότητα τέτοιων κοινών επιχειρήσεων. Όσον αφορά την αντικατάσταση των κινητήρων των σκαφών όλων των τύπων, επιτρέψτε μου να επαναλάβω ότι κατά τις διαβουλεύσεις με το Συμβούλιο η Επιτροπή δέχτηκε έναν συμβιβασμό σύμφωνα με τον οποίο η αντικατάσταση των κινητήρων θα επιτρέπεται για σκάφη μικρής κλίμακας. Άκουσα τις απόψεις σας σχετικά με την επέκταση των ενισχύσεων πέραν των παραμέτρων τις οποίες έχει ήδη δεχτεί η Επιτροπή. Εμφανώς, αυτό χρήζει περαιτέρω αξιολόγησης. Νομίζω ότι η έναρξη δραστηριοτήτων των νέων υδατοκαλλιεργητών δεν χρειάζεται να χρηματοδοτηθεί όπως αυτή των νέων αλιέων, καθότι η υδατοκαλλιέργεια δεν αντιμετωπίζει τα ίδια προβλήματα εξεύρεσης προσωπικού με τον τομέα της αλιείας. Είμαι πρόθυμος, ωστόσο, να επανεξετάσω το θέμα. Προτείναμε την επαναφορά των ενισχύσεων της αλιείας εσωτερικών υδάτων. Όμως, η Επιτροπή δεν μπορεί να δεχτεί το αίτημα επέκτασης της ενίσχυσης για την κατασκευή σκαφών αλιείας σε εσωτερικά ύδατα, διότι προσοχή απαιτείται και σε αυτό το είδος αλιείας, για το οποίο υπάρχουν πληροφορίες ότι ορισμένα αλιευτικά αποθέματα βρίσκονται σε άσχημη κατάσταση, αλλά και λόγω των περιορισμένων επιστημονικών γνώσεων στον εν λόγω τομέα. Εντούτοις, πρόθεσή μας είναι τα σκάφη που δραστηριοποιούνται στον τομέα της αλιείας εσωτερικών υδάτων να αντιμετωπίζονται κατά τον ίδιο τρόπο όπως και τα σκάφη θαλάσσιας αλιείας. Τέλος, εξετάσαμε επίσης προσεκτικά τις τροπολογίες σας σχετικά με τα «οριζόντια θέματα» όσον αφορά τα συστήματα διαχείρισης, παρακολούθησης και ελέγχου. Όπως σίγουρα θα γνωρίζετε, οι διατάξεις αυτές εμπνέονται σε μεγάλο βαθμό από τις προτάσεις κανονισμού σχετικά με τα διαρθρωτικά ταμεία. Προκειμένου δε να επιτευχθεί συνεκτικότητα μεταξύ των κοινοτικών μέσων, θα περιμένουμε να σημειωθεί επαρκής πρόοδος στις διαπραγματεύσεις επί των εν λόγω προτάσεων. Η Επιτροπή μπορεί να συμφωνήσει με μια σειρά τροπολογιών, οι οποίες αντικατοπτρίζουν επίσης την πρόοδο που έχει συντελεστεί στο Συμβούλιο. Αυτές περιλαμβάνουν την επιλεξιμότητα για την αντικατάσταση των κινητήρων σκαφών μικρής κλίμακας υπό αυστηρές προϋποθέσεις προκειμένου να διασφαλιστεί ότι δεν οδηγούν σε αύξηση της αλιευτικής ικανότητας. Όσον αφορά την ενίσχυση νέων αλιέων οι οποίοι εργάζονται στην αλιεία μικρής κλίμακας και επιθυμούν να αγοράσουν μεταχειρισμένα αλιευτικά σκάφη, οι προτάσεις τις οποίες εξέτασε το Συμβούλιο περιορίζουν αυτές τις ενισχύσεις στην αγορά σκαφών μήκους κάτω των δώδεκα μέτρων τα οποία δεν χρησιμοποιούν ρυμουλκούμενα εξαρτήματα. Το αίτημά σας να δοθεί η δυνατότητα ενισχύσεων για όλα τα σκάφη χρήζει περαιτέρω εξέτασης. Το εύρος των κοινωνικοοικονομικών μέτρων έχει επεκταθεί στην κατάρτιση και την αποζημίωση των αλιέων οι οποίοι εργάζονται σε σκάφη η δραστηριότητα των οποίων έχει τερματιστεί οριστικά. Ο όρος οι ενισχύσεις για την προσωρινή παύση των δραστηριοτήτων να συνοδεύονται από μείωση της αλιευτικής ικανότητας αποσύρεται και αντικαθίσταται από την επαναφορά των ισχυουσών διατάξεων του χρηματοδοτικού μέσου προσανατολισμού της αλιείας (ΧΜΠΑ) οι οποίες ορίζουν το κατώτατο όριο κοινοτικής συνεισφοράς σε όλους τους τύπους προσωρινής παύσης. Δηλώσαμε στο Συμβούλιο ότι τα χρηματοδοτούμενα από το Ευρωπαϊκό Αλιευτικό Ταμείο σχέδια που προτείνονται μετά την έγκριση εκτάκτων μέτρων μπορούν επίσης να καλύπτουν προσωρινές παύσεις για λόγους συγκέντρωσης γόνου ή ωοτοκίας. Προτείνεται να επεκταθεί η στήριξη μέσω του Ευρωπαϊκού Αλιευτικού Ταμείου στις μεσαίες επιχειρήσεις οι οποίες λειτουργούν στους τομείς της υδατοκαλλιέργειας, της επεξεργασίας και της πώλησης, διατηρώντας συγχρόνως την προτεραιότητα των μικρών και πολύ μικρών επιχειρήσεων. Η υδατοκαλλιέργεια καθίσταται περισσότερο ορατή. Την συμπεριλάβαμε μάλιστα στον ορισμό του αλιευτικού τομέα, ενώ η στήριξή της αναφέρεται ρητώς ως ένας από τους στόχους και τα καθήκοντα του Ευρωπαϊκού Αλιευτικού Ταμείου. Η στήριξη της αλιείας εσωτερικών υδάτων, με την εξαίρεση της κατασκευής σκαφών, και η έναρξη και αναδιάρθρωση οργανώσεων παραγωγών επαναφέρονται."@el¹⁰
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@lv¹³
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	". Mijnheer de Voorzitter, geachte leden, aangezien ik niet veel tijd ter beschikking heb, kan ik slechts algemene opmerkingen maken over de strekking van de ingediende amendementen. Er worden nieuwe financieringsmogelijkheden geboden voor het bevorderen en beschermen van het milieu in Natura 2000-gebieden waar visserijactiviteiten plaatsvinden. Naast de overige bepalingen inzake gelijke kansen, hebben wij steun aan collectieve acties toegevoegd, die tot doel hebben netwerken tot stand te brengen en ervaringen uit te wisselen tussen organisaties die zich bezighouden met gelijke kansen voor mannen en vrouwen. De Commissie kan de volgende voorstellen uit uw verslag niet aanvaarden. De bouw of de vervanging van vaartuigen, ook al is er geen sprake van een capaciteitstoename. De Commissie kan geen enkel voorstel aanvaarden, dat indruist tegen ons beleid van instandhouding. Een dergelijke steun zou bijdragen tot het handhaven van de overcapaciteit van de vloot. De Commissie is niet bereid tot enige toegeving op dit punt, want voor ons blijft dit een hoeksteen van de duurzame visserij. Dit geldt trouwens ook voor de steun aan de oprichting van joint ventures. Een dergelijke steun zou vooral ten goede komen aan particuliere eigenaars van vaartuigen en zou indruisen tegen onze verbintenissen in het kader van internationale organisaties. We zijn het er echter wel mee eens dat haalbaarheidsstudies voor dergelijke gemeenschappelijke ondernemingen kunnen worden gefinancierd. In verband met het vervangen van motoren in alle soorten vaartuigen, wil ik nog eens herhalen dat de Commissie tijdens de beraadslagingen in de Raad een compromis heeft aanvaard, waardoor vervanging van de motoren is toegestaan in kleine vaartuigen. Ik heb naar uw argumenten geluisterd om de steun verder te laten gaan dan de parameters die de Commissie reeds heeft aanvaard. Het spreekt voor zich dat we dit verder moeten onderzoeken. Ik ben van mening dat de vestiging van jonge vistelers niet op dezelfde wijze moet worden gefinancierd als die van de jonge vissers, aangezien de aquacultuur niet dezelfde aanwervingsproblemen kent als de sector van de visvangst. Ik ben wel bereid dit verder te bestuderen. Wij stellen voor de steun voor de binnenvisserij opnieuw in te voeren. De Commissie kan echter niet instemmen met het voorstel om de steun uit te breiden tot de bouw van vaartuigen voor de binnenvisserij. Ook in deze visserijsector is voorzichtigheid geboden, want naar verluidt is de toestand van sommige bestanden benard en bovendien is de wetenschappelijke kennis terzake beperkt. Desalniettemin gaan wij ervan uit dat de vaartuigen die gebruikt worden voor de binnenvisserij op dezelfde wijze behandeld moeten worden als de vaartuigen uit de zeevisserij. Tenslotte hebben wij ook uw amendementen over de “horizontale thema’s” grondig bestudeerd, met betrekking tot het beheer, het toezicht en de controlestelsels. Zoals u wellicht weet, zijn deze bepalingen vooral ingegeven door de voorstellen voor een verordening betreffende de structuurfondsen. Om de samenhang tussen de communautaire instrumenten te kunnen waarborgen, moeten wij wachten tot er voldoende vooruitgang is geboekt in de onderhandelingen over deze voorstellen. De Commissie kan instemmen met een aantal amendementen die tevens de vooruitgang in de Raad weerspiegelen. Deze bevatten onder meer de criteria voor het vervangen van de motor in kleine vaartuigen onder strikte voorwaarden om ervoor te zorgen dat de visserijcapaciteit niet toeneemt. De voorstellen die de Raad momenteel behandelt, beperken de steun voor jonge vissers die actief zijn in de kleinschalige visserij en die een tweedehands vissersvaartuig willen aankopen, tot de aankoop van vaartuigen van minder dan twaalf meter die geen gesleepte vistuigen gebruiken. Wij moeten uw verzoek om deze mogelijkheid toe te passen op alle vaartuigen nog nader bekijken. De werkingssfeer van de sociaal-economische maatregelen is uitgebreid en omvat nu ook de opleiding en compensatie van vissers die werkten aan boord van vaartuigen die permanent uit de vaart zijn gehaald. De vereiste dat steun voor een tijdelijke stopzetting van de activiteiten gekoppeld moet zijn aan een capaciteitsvermindering is ingetrokken en in de plaats daarvan worden de huidige bepalingen van het FIOV weer ingevoerd, die de drempel vastleggen voor de communautaire bijdrage in alle soorten van tijdelijke stopzetting. In de Raad hebben wij gezegd dat met EVF-middelen gefinancierde plannen die werden ingediend na de goedkeuring van noodmaatregelen ook onmiddellijke sluitingen omwille van een concentratie van jonge exemplaren of van de paaitijd kunnen omvatten. Wij stellen voor de EVF-steun uit te breiden tot de middelgrote ondernemingen die actief zijn in de aquacultuur, de verwerkende en de verkoopssector, hoewel de kleine en micro-ondernemingen prioritair blijven. De aquacultuur krijgt meer zichtbaarheid. We hebben haar immers opgenomen in de definitie van de visserijsector. Bovendien vermelden we de steun aan de aquacultuur uitdrukkelijk als een van de doelstellingen en taken van het EVF. De steun voor de binnenvisserij, met uitzondering van de bouw van vaartuigen, alsook de steun voor het oprichten of herstructureren van producentenorganisaties worden opnieuw ingevoerd."@nl³
lpv:spoken text	". Mr President, honourable Members, given the limited time at my disposal I can only comment broadly on the spirit of the amendments tabled. There are new funding possibilities to enhance and protect the environment in Natura 2000 areas concerned by fisheries activities. In addition to other provisions on equal opportunities, we have added support for collective actions aimed at networking and the exchange of experience among organisations promoting equal opportunities between men and women. The Commission cannot accept the following proposals that have been included in your report. The construction or replacement of vessels, even with no increase of capacity. The Commission cannot accept a proposal that goes against our conservation policy. Such aid would contribute to maintaining the situation of fleet overcapacity. The Commission is not prepared to move on this point, which for us remains a fundamental pillar of sustainable fisheries. The same applies to aid for the establishment of joint ventures. Such aid benefits mainly private vessel owners and would run counter to our commitments made within international organisations. However, there is agreement that studies on the feasibility of such joint enterprises could be funded. Regarding the replacement of engines for all types of vessels, let me repeat that during the Council deliberations the Commission accepted a compromise whereby the replacement of engines would be allowed for small-scale vessels. I have listened to your views with regard to the extension of aid beyond the parameters already accepted by the Commission. Clearly, this must be further evaluated. I am of the view that the installation of young fish farmers need not be financed in the same way as that of young fishermen, because aquaculture is not facing the same recruitment problems as the catching sector. I am willing to look into this further. We have proposed the reinstatement of aid for inland fisheries. However the Commission cannot accept the request to extend aid for the construction of inland fishing vessels, because precaution is also required in inland fishing, where some stocks are reported to be in a bad situation, and given the limits of scientific knowledge in this area. We nevertheless envisage that vessels operating in inland fishing should enjoy the same treatment as vessels operating in marine fishing. Finally, we have also carefully examined your amendments concerning the 'horizontal issues' with regard to the management, monitoring and control systems. As you are no doubt aware, these provisions are very much inspired by the proposals for a Regulation on Structural Funds. For the sake of coherence among Community instruments, we shall await sufficient progress to be made in the negotiations on these proposals. The Commission can agree to a number of amendments, which also reflect the progress that has been achieved in the Council. These include eligibility for replacement of engines for small-scale vessels under strict conditions so as to ensure that there is no increase in fishing capacity. With respect to aid for young fishermen operating in small-scale fisheries and wishing to purchase a second-hand fishing vessel, proposals considered by the Council restrict such aid to the purchase of vessels below twelve metres not using towed gears. Your request to apply this possibility to all vessels requires further examination. The scope of socio-economic measures has been extended to training and to compensation for fishermen working on board vessels whose activity has been stopped permanently. The requirement whereby aid for temporary cessation of activities must be accompanied by a reduction of capacity is withdrawn and replaced by reinstating the current FIFG provisions setting the threshold of Community contribution to all types of temporary cessation. We stated in Council that EFF-funded plans put forward following the adoption of emergency measures may also cover real-time closures for reasons of concentration of juveniles or of spawning. It is proposed to extend EFF support to medium-sized enterprises operating in the aquaculture, processing and marketing sectors, while keeping small and micro-enterprises the priority. Aquaculture is made more visible. Indeed, we have included aquaculture in the definition of the fisheries sector, and support for aquaculture is explicitly quoted as one of the objectives and missions of the EFF. Support for inland fisheries, with the exclusion of vessel construction, and the starting-up and restructuring of producers' organisations are reinstated."@en⁴
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Joe Borg,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4}
lpv:translated text	". Señor Presidente, Señorías, dada la brevedad del tiempo de que dispongo, solo puedo comentar en términos generales el espíritu de las enmiendas presentadas. Hay nuevas posibilidades de financiación para recuperar y proteger el medio ambiente en zonas de Natura 2000 afectadas por la pesca. Junto a otras disposiciones sobre la igualdad de oportunidades, hemos incrementado la ayuda a las acciones colectivas encaminadas a la creación de redes y al intercambio de experiencias entre organizaciones que promuevan la igualdad de oportunidades entre hombres y mujeres. La Comisión no puede aceptar las siguientes propuestas incluidas en su informe. La construcción o sustitución de buques, aun sin incremento de la capacidad. La Comisión no puede aceptar una propuesta que vaya en contra de nuestra política conservacionista. Tal ayuda contribuiría a mantener la situación de sobrecapacidad de la flota. La Comisión no está dispuesta a ceder en este punto, pues para nosotros sigue siendo un pilar fundamental de la pesca sostenible. Lo mismo sucede con la ayuda a la constitución de empresas conjuntas. Esta ayuda beneficiaría sobre todo a los propietarios privados de barcos, e iría en contra nuestros compromisos con organizaciones internacionales. No obstante, hay consenso en que se podrían financiar estudios sobre la viabilidad de dichas empresas conjuntas. En cuanto a la sustitución de motores para todo tipo de barcos, quiero repetir que en las deliberaciones del Consejo la Comisión aceptó un compromiso según el cual el reemplazo de motores se admitiría para los barcos pequeños. He escuchado sus puntos de vista sobre la ampliación de la ayuda más allá de los parámetros ya aceptados por la Comisión. Está claro que es necesario un estudio más detenido. Yo soy de la opinión de que la instalación de jóvenes piscicultores no precise el mismo tipo de financiación que la de los jóvenes pescadores, pues la acuicultura no afronta los mismos problemas de personal que el sector extractivo. Tengo intención de seguir analizando este asunto. Hemos propuesto el restablecimiento de la ayuda para la pesca de interior. No obstante, la Comisión no puede aceptar la solicitud de ampliar la ayuda para la construcción de barcos pesqueros de interior, ya que se exige también precaución en esa pesca, algunos de cuyos recursos registran una mala situación, y por lo limitado del conocimiento científico en este terreno. Sin embargo, consideramos que los buques de la pesca de interior deben gozar el mismo tratamiento que los que operan en el mar. Por último, también hemos examinado detenidamente sus enmiendas relativas a los con respecto a los sistemas de gestión, supervisión y control. Como sin duda ya saben, estas disposiciones están inspiradas en gran medida en las propuestas de Reglamento sobre Fondos Estructurales. Por mor de la coherencia entre los instrumentos comunitarios, esperaremos a que se haya avanzado lo suficiente en la negociación de estas propuestas. La Comisión comparte una serie de ellas, que también reflejan el progreso alcanzado en el Consejo. Son enmiendas referidas a la posibilidad de sustitución de los motores para buques pequeños en condiciones muy estrictas, a fin de garantizar que no se incremente la capacidad pesquera. Con respecto a la ayuda a los jóvenes pescadores ocupados en la pesca a pequeña escala que deseen comprar un buque pesquero de segunda mano, las propuestas estudiadas por el Consejo limitan esa ayuda a la adquisición de barcos de menos de doce metros que no utilicen artes de arrastre. Su solicitud de extender esta opción a todos los barcos exige un estudio más detallado. El alcance de las medidas socioeconómicas ha sido ampliado a la formación y a la compensación para los pescadores empleados en buques cuya actividad haya sido detenida permanentemente. El requisito para la ayuda por cese temporal de la actividad –que esta venga acompañada de una reducción de la capacidad– ha sido eliminado y sustituido por el restablecimiento de disposiciones del IFOP que fijen el umbral de la contribución comunitaria para todos los tipos de cese temporal. En el Consejo declaramos que los planes basados en el FEP propuestos tras la adopción de medidas de emergencia también pueden incluir cierres en tiempo real por motivos de concentración de alevines o de huevas. Se ha propuesto extender el apoyo del FEP a las empresas medianas que operen en los sectores de acuicultura, transformación y comercialización, manteniendo la prioridad en las pequeñas empresas y las microempresas. La acuicultura se ha hecho más visible. De hecho, la hemos incluido en la definición del sector pesquero, y el apoyo a la acuicultura consta explícitamente como uno de los objetivos y misiones del FEP. Se ha restablecido el apoyo a la pesca de interior, con exclusión de la construcción de buques, y a la institución y reestructuración de organizaciones de productores."@es²⁰
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"asuntos horizontales"²⁰
lpv:translated text	". Herr Präsident, verehrte Abgeordnete! Da mir nur begrenzte Zeit zur Verfügung steht, kann ich mich nur ganz allgemein zum Tenor der eingebrachten Änderungsanträge äußern. Es bestehen neue Fördermöglichkeiten für die Sanierung und den Schutz der Umwelt in Natura-2000-Gebieten, die von Fischereitätigkeiten betroffen sind. Zusätzlich zu anderen Bestimmungen im Bereich der Chancengleichheit haben wir Beihilfen für Maßnahmen von allgemeinem Interesse aufgenommen, deren Ziel die Vernetzung und der Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Organisationen ist, die die Chancengleichheit von Männern und Frauen fördern. Die folgenden in Ihrem Bericht enthaltenen Vorschläge kann die Kommission nicht akzeptieren: Bau oder Ersatz von Fischereifahrzeugen, selbst wenn dies nicht mit einer Kapazitätserhöhung einhergeht. Die Kommission kann keinem Vorschlag zustimmen, der gegen unsere Politik der Bestandserhaltung gerichtet ist. Eine derartige Förderung würde zur Beibehaltung der Überkapazität der Fangflotten beitragen. Die Kommission ist nicht bereit, von diesem Standpunkt abzuweichen, der für uns nach wie vor ein Eckpfeiler einer nachhaltigen Fischerei ist. Dasselbe gilt für Beihilfen zur Gründung von Joint Ventures. Solche Beihilfen nutzen in erster Linie den privaten Reedern und laufen den Verpflichtungen zuwider, die wir gegenüber internationalen Organisationen abgegeben haben. Allerdings besteht Übereinstimmung dahingehend, dass Machbarkeitsstudien über solche gemischten Gesellschaften gefördert werden könnten. Im Hinblick auf den Ersatz von Motoren für alle Arten von Fischereifahrzeugen möchte ich wiederholen, dass die Kommission während der Beratungen im Rat einen Kompromiss dahingehend einging, dass der Ersatz von Motoren für kleine Fischereifahrzeuge subventionierbar ist. Ich habe Ihren Ausführungen zu einer Ausweitung der Förderung über die von der Kommission bereits akzeptierten Parameter hinaus aufmerksam zugehört. Hier besteht eindeutig weiterer Evaluierungsbedarf. Meiner Meinung nach muss die Existenzgründung junger Fischzüchter nicht auf dieselbe Weise gefördert werden wie die junger Fischer, da in der Aquakultur nicht dieselben Nachwuchsprobleme bestehen wie im Fangsektor. Ich bin bereit, mich näher damit zu befassen. Wir haben die Wiederaufnahme der Förderung für die Binnenfischerei vorgeschlagen. Die Kommission kann jedoch nicht dem Antrag auf Subventionierung des Baus von Binnenfischereifahrzeugen zustimmen, denn Vorsorge ist auch in der Binnenfischerei notwendig, da sich bestimmte Bestände Berichten zufolge in einem schlechten Zustand befinden und da sich die wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisse auf diesem Gebiet in Grenzen halten. Dennoch haben wir vor, die Fischereifahrzeuge gleich zu behandeln, egal ob sie in der Binnenfischerei oder in der Seefischerei eingesetzt werden. Sorgfältig geprüft haben wir schließlich auch Ihre Änderungsanträge zu den „horizontalen Fragen“ im Hinblick auf die Verwaltungs-, Begleitungs- und Kontrollsysteme. Wie Sie sicherlich wissen, lehnen sich diese Bestimmungen sehr stark an die Vorschläge für eine Strukturfondsverordnung an. Im Interesse der Kohärenz zwischen den Gemeinschaftsinstrumenten werden wir abwarten, bis die Verhandlungen zu diesen Vorschlägen ausreichend vorangekommen sind. Die Kommission kann einer Reihe von Änderungsanträgen zustimmen, in denen sich auch die im Rat erzielten Fortschritte widerspiegeln. Dazu gehört die Förderfähigkeit des Ersatzes von Motoren für kleine Fischereifahrzeuge unter ganz bestimmten Voraussetzungen, die gewährleisten sollen, dass es nicht zu einer Steigerung der Fangkapazität kommt. Was die Förderung für junge Fischer anbelangt, die in der kleinen Fischerei tätig sind und ein gebrauchtes Fischereifahrzeug kaufen möchten, so beschränken sich die vom Rat erörterten Vorschläge auf die Förderung des Erwerbs von Schiffen unter zwölf Metern, bei denen keine Zug- und Schleppgeräte eingesetzt werden. Ihr Antrag auf die Ausweitung dieser Möglichkeit auf alle Fischereifahrzeuge erfordert eine weitere Prüfung. Neu im Spektrum der sozioökonomischen Maßnahmen sind die Ausbildung und die bei endgültiger Einstellung der Tätigkeit gewährte Entschädigung für Fischer, die an Bord von Fischereifahrzeugen gearbeitet haben. Die Anforderung, dass die Beihilfe für die vorübergehende Einstellung der Tätigkeit mit einer Verringerung der Fangkapazität einhergehen muss, wird zurückgenommen und an ihre Stelle treten erneut die geltenden FIAF-Bestimmungen, in denen die Schwellenwerte für den Gemeinschaftsbeitrag zu allen Arten von vorübergehender Einstellung festgelegt sind. Wir haben im Rat erklärt, dass die vom EFF finanzierten Pläne, die nach der Annahme von Notfallmaßnahmen vorgelegt werden, auch Echtzeitschließungen bei hoher Jungfischkonzentration oder zu Fortpflanzungszeiten beinhalten könnten. Es wird vorgeschlagen, die EFF-Förderung auf mittelständische Unternehmen in den Bereichen Aquakultur, Verarbeitung und Vermarktung auszudehnen, wobei der Schwerpunkt weiterhin auf den Klein- und Kleinstunternehmen liegen soll. Die Aquakultur wird stärker ins Blickfeld gerückt. Mehr noch, wir haben die Aquakultur in die Definition des Fischereisektors aufgenommen und die Förderung der Aquakultur wird ausdrücklich als eine der Zielsetzungen und Aufgaben des EFF genannt. Die Binnenfischerei – mit Ausnahme des Schiffbaus – sowie die Gründung und Umstrukturierung von Erzeugerorganisationen sind erneut förderfähig."@de⁹
lpv:translated text	"Senhor Presidente, Senhoras e Senhores Deputados, dado o tempo limitado de que disponho, apenas posso tecer considerações de carácter geral sobre o espírito das alterações apresentadas. Voltámos a incluir o apoio à pesca em águas interiores, excluindo a construção de navios, e ao arranque e reestruturação de organizações de produtores. Prevêem-se novas possibilidades de financiamento destinadas a reforçar e proteger o ambiente em zonas da Natura 2000 afectadas por actividades de pesca. Para além de outras disposições relacionadas com a igualdade de oportunidades, acrescentámos o apoio a acções colectivas que visem a criação de redes e a troca de experiências entre organizações que promovem a igualdade de oportunidades entre homens e mulheres. A Comissão não pode aceitar as propostas incluídas no vosso relatório que indico a seguir. A construção ou substituição de navios, mesmo que não envolva um aumento de capacidade. A Comissão não pode aceitar uma proposta contrária à sua política de conservação. Prever ajuda para este efeito iria contribuir para se manter a situação de excesso de capacidade da frota. A Comissão não está disposta a mudar de posição relativamente a este ponto, que, para nós, continua a ser um pilar fundamental da pesca sustentável. O mesmo se aplica à ajuda para a constituição de empresas comuns. Este tipo de ajuda beneficia principalmente os armadores privados e é contrária aos compromissos que assumimos no âmbito de organizações internacionais. Contudo, aceitamos a possibilidade de financiar a realização de estudos sobre a viabilidade de tais empresas. Relativamente à substituição de motores para todos os tipos de navios, permitam-me que repita que, durante as deliberações do Conselho, a Comissão aceitou um compromisso segundo o qual a substituição de motores seria permitida no caso de navios de pequena dimensão. Ouvi as vossas opiniões sobre o alargamento da ajuda para além dos parâmetros já aceites pela Comissão. Trata-se, nitidamente, de um assunto que necessita de ser apreciado mais aprofundadamente. A Comissão pode aceitar uma série de alterações, que também reflectem os progressos alcançados no Conselho. Entre elas inclui-se o estabelecimento de condições de elegibilidade rigorosas para substituição dos motores no caso de navios de pequena dimensão, de modo a garantir que não haja um aumento da capacidade de pesca. Sou da opinião de que o estabelecimento de jovens piscicultores não necessita de ser financiado da mesma forma que o de jovens pescadores, porque a aquicultura não se debate com os mesmos problemas de recrutamento que o sector da pesca. Estou disposto a examinar mais atentamente este assunto. Propusemos que fosse reposta a ajuda à pesca em águas interiores. No entanto, a Comissão não pode aceitar o pedido no sentido de a ajuda ser alargada à construção de navios utilizados nesta actividade, porque é necessária também precaução relativamente à pesca em águas interiores, onde algumas unidades populacionais se encontram numa situação precária, para além de os conhecimentos científicos nesta área serem limitados. Consideramos, contudo, que os navios utilizados na pesca em águas interiores devem beneficiar de um tratamento idêntico ao de navios utilizados na pesca no mar. Por último, examinámos também, cuidadosamente, as vossas alterações sobre as "questões horizontais" relacionadas com os sistemas de gestão, monitorização e controlo. Com sabem, estas disposições inspiram-se, em grande medida, nas propostas relativas ao regulamento sobre os Fundos Estruturais. Por uma questão de coerência entre os instrumentos comunitários, iremos aguardar que se façam progressos suficientes nas negociações sobre essas propostas. No que se refere à ajuda a jovens pescadores que se dedicam à pesca artesanal e desejam adquirir um navio de pesca em segunda mão, as propostas consideradas pelo Conselho restringem a concessão de tal ajuda à aquisição de navios com menos de 12 metros que não utilizem redes rebocadas. O vosso pedido no sentido de essa possibilidade ser extensiva a todos os navios necessita de ser examinado mais atentamente. O âmbito das medidas socioeconómicas foi alargado à formação e a compensação de pescadores que trabalham a bordo de navios cuja actividade cessou permanentemente. A exigência de que a ajuda à cessão temporária de actividade seja acompanhada de uma redução de capacidade foi retirada e substituída pela reposição das actuais disposições IFOP que estabelecem o limite máximo da contribuição comunitária para todos os tipos de cessação temporária. Afirmámos no Conselho que os planos financiados pelo FEP e apresentados após a adopção de medidas de emergência também podem abranger encerramentos em tempo real por motivos de concentração de juvenis ou de desova. Propõe-se que o apoio do FEP seja alargado a empresas de dimensão média que desenvolvem a sua actividade nos sectores da aquicultura, transformação e comercialização, continuando a atribuir-se prioridade às micro e pequenas empresas. Confere-se maior visibilidade à aquicultura. Com efeito, incluímos a aquicultura na definição de sector da pesca, e o apoio à aquicultura é explicitamente referido como um dos objectivos e missões do FEP."@pt¹⁷
lpv:translated text	". Signor Presidente, onorevoli deputati, visto il poco tempo che ho a disposizione, mi limiterò a commentare in modo generale lo spirito degli emendamenti presentati. Vi sono nuove possibilità di finanziamento volte a favorire e a proteggere l’ambiente nelle aree Natura 2000 interessate da attività di pesca. Oltre ad altre disposizioni in materia di pari opportunità, abbiamo aggiunto un sostegno alle azioni collettive tese a creare reti e scambi di esperienze tra le organizzazioni che promuovono le pari opportunità tra uomini e donne. La Commissione non può accogliere le seguenti proposte che sono state incluse nella vostra relazione. La costruzione o la sostituzione dei pescherecci, anche senza aumento dello sforzo di pesca. La Commissione non può accettare una proposta che va contro la nostra politica di conservazione. Tali forme di aiuto contribuirebbero a mantenere la situazione di sovracapacità della flotta. La Commissione non è disposta a modificare la propria posizione su questo punto, che rimane per noi un pilastro fondamentale della pesca sostenibile. Lo stesso vale per gli aiuti alla creazione di . Tali aiuti vanno principalmente a vantaggio dei proprietari di pescherecci privati e sarebbero contrari all’impegno che abbiamo assunto nell’ambito delle organizzazioni internazionali. Tuttavia, c’è consenso in merito alla possibilità di finanziare gli studi di fattibilità di queste . Per quanto riguarda la sostituzione dei motori di tutti i tipi di pescherecci, desidero ribadire che, in sede di deliberazioni del Consiglio, la Commissione ha accettato un compromesso in virtù del quale la sostituzione dei motori sarebbe stata consentita per i pescherecci di piccole dimensioni. Ho ascoltato i vostri punti di vista in merito all’estensione degli aiuti oltre i parametri già accettati dalla Commissione. E ovvio che si tratta di un aspetto che deve essere ulteriormente valutato. Sono dell’idea che l’avvio dell’attività dei giovani acquacoltori non debba essere finanziato come quello dei giovani pescatori, poiché l’acquacoltura non è confrontata agli stessi problemi di reclutamento che si registrano nel settore della pesca. Tuttavia vorrei analizzare in maggior dettaglio questo aspetto. Abbiamo proposto il ripristino degli aiuti per la pesca nelle acque interne. La Commissione non può tuttavia accettare la richiesta di estendere gli aiuti per la costruzione dei pescherecci destinati alla pesca nelle acque interne, in quanto è necessaria una certa cautela anche in questo tipo di pesca. Infatti ci è stato riferito che anche nelle acque interne alcuni sono in situazione di difficoltà, visti anche i limiti delle conoscenze scientifiche in questo settore. Ciononostante, riteniamo che i pescherecci che operano nelle acque interne dovrebbero godere dello stesso trattamento dei pescherecci che operano nel settore della pesca marittima. Infine, abbiamo esaminato attentamente anche i vostri emendamenti relativi alle “questioni orizzontali” in merito ai sistemi di gestione, monitoraggio e controllo. Come sicuramente saprete, queste disposizioni si sono ampiamente ispirate alle proposte di regolamento sui Fondi strutturali. Per garantire la coerenza tra gli strumenti comunitari, dovremo attendere che si registrino sufficienti progressi nell’ambito dei negoziati su dette proposte. La Commissione può accettare una serie di emendamenti che riflettono anche i progressi compiuti in seno al Consiglio, tra cui l’ammissibilità per la sostituzione dei motori dei pescherecci di piccole dimensioni a condizioni molto rigorose al fine di garantire che non vi sia un aumento dello sforzo di pesca. In merito all’assistenza ai giovani pescatori che operano nel settore della piccola pesca e che desiderano acquistare una nave da pesca usata, le proposte contemplate dal Consiglio limitano tale assistenza all’acquisto di pescherecci di lunghezza inferiore a dodici metri che non utilizzano attrezzi trainati. La vostra richiesta di estendere questa possibilità a tutti i pescherecci esige un’ulteriore disamina. Il campo di applicazione delle misure socioeconomiche è stato esteso alla formazione e alle indennità compensative per i pescatori che lavorano a bordo di pescherecci, in caso di arresto definitivo della loro attività. Il requisito in virtù del quale gli aiuti in caso di arresto temporaneo delle attività devono essere accompagnati da una riduzione della capacità è stato ritirato e sostituito con il ripristino delle attuali disposizioni SFOP che fissano il limite del contributo comunitario per tutti i tipi di arresto temporaneo. Al Consiglio abbiamo detto che i piani finanziati con il FEP presentati a seguito dell’adozione di misure di emergenza possono anche comprendere chiusure in tempo reale a causa di concentrazioni di avannotti o uova. Si propone di estendere il sostegno del FEP alle medie imprese che operano nel settore dell’acquacoltura, della trasformazione e della commercializzazione, pur mantenendo un accento prioritario sulle piccole imprese e le microimprese. L’acquacoltura è dotata di maggiore visibilità. Abbiamo infatti incluso l’acquacoltura nella definizione del settore della pesca e il sostegno all’acquacoltura è esplicitamente citato come uno degli obiettivi e delle missioni del FEP. Sono stati ripristinati il sostegno alla pesca nelle acque interne, con l’esclusione della costruzione dei pescherecci, e la creazione e la ristrutturazione delle organizzazioni di produttori."@it¹²
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"stock"¹²
lpv:translated text	"Monsieur le Président, chers députés, compte tenu du temps limité à ma disposition, je ne pourrai commenter que dans les grandes lignes l’esprit des amendements déposés. Il existe de nouvelles possibilités de financement destinées à améliorer et à protéger l’environnement dans les zones Natura 2000 concernées par les activités de pêche. En plus d’autres dispositions sur l’égalité des chances, nous avons introduit un soutien pour les actions collectives visant à créer des réseaux et à échanger des expériences entre des organisations promouvant l’égalité des chances entre les hommes et les femmes. La Commission ne peut accepter les propositions suivantes qui ont été incluses dans votre rapport. La construction ou le remplacement de navires, même s’il n’y a pas d’augmentation de la capacité. La Commission ne peut accepter une proposition qui va à l’encontre de notre politique de conservation. Une telle aide contribuerait à maintenir la situation de surcapacité de la flotte. La Commission n’est pas prête à changer d’avis sur ce point, qui constitue à nos yeux un pilier fondamental d’une pêche durable. Cela vaut aussi pour l’aide aux associations d’entreprises. Une telle aide bénéficie essentiellement aux propriétaires de navires privés et irait à l’encontre des engagements que nous avons pris au sein d’organisations internationales. Il existe toutefois un accord en vertu duquel des études sur la faisabilité de ces associations d’entreprises pourraient être financées. En ce qui concerne le remplacement des moteurs de tous les types de navires, permettez-moi de répéter que lors des délibérations du Conseil, la Commission a accepté un compromis en vertu duquel le remplacement des moteurs serait autorisé pour les petits navires. J’ai écouté vos points de vue concernant l’extension de l’aide au-delà des paramètres déjà acceptés par la Commission. Il est clair que ce point doit être évalué plus avant. Je suis d’avis que l’installation de jeunes pisciculteurs ne doit pas être financée de la même manière que celle de jeunes pêcheurs, dans la mesure où l’aquaculture n’est pas confrontée aux mêmes problèmes de recrutement que le secteur de la capture. Je suis disposé à étudier ce point de manière plus approfondie. Nous avons proposé la réintroduction de l’aide pour la pêche dans les eaux intérieures. La Commission ne peut toutefois pas accepter la demande d’étendre l’aide à la construction de bateaux pour la pêche dans les eaux intérieures, car la prudence est également requise au niveau de ce type de pêche, dans la mesure où certains stocks seraient en mauvais état et compte tenu des connaissances scientifiques limitées dans ce domaine. Nous envisageons cependant d’accorder aux navires de pêche dans les eaux intérieures le même traitement qu’aux navires de pêche marine. Enfin, nous avons également examiné avec le plus grand soin vos amendements concernant les «questions horizontales» relatives aux systèmes de gestion, de surveillance et de contrôle. Comme vous en êtes certainement conscients, ces dispositions s’inspirent très fortement des propositions de règlements relatives aux Fonds structurels. Par souci de cohérence entre les instruments communautaires, nous attendrons que des progrès suffisants aient été faits dans les négociations relatives à ces propositions. La Commission est en mesure d’accepter un certain nombre d’amendements, qui reflètent également les progrès faits au Conseil. Ceux-ci incluent l’éligibilité du remplacement des moteurs des petits navires dans des conditions strictes afin de d’assurer que la capacité de pêche n’augmente pas. En ce qui concerne l’aide aux jeunes pêcheurs travaillant dans le secteur de la petite pêche et désireux d’acheter un bateau de pêche d’occasion, les propositions examinées par le Conseil limitent cette aide à l’achat de navires inférieurs à douze mètres et n’utilisant pas d’engins remorqués. Votre demande d’appliquer cette possibilité à tous les navires requiert un examen supplémentaire. La portée des mesures socio-économiques a été étendue à la formation et à la compensation des pêcheurs travaillant à bord de navires dont l’activité a été interrompue de manière permanente. L’exigence selon laquelle l’aide en cas d’arrêt temporaire des activités doit être accompagnée par une réduction de la capacité a été supprimée et remplacée par la réintroduction des dispositions de l’actuel IFOP définissant le seuil de la contribution de la Communauté pour tous les types d’arrêts temporaires. Nous avons déclaré au Conseil que les plans financés par le FEP présentés à la suite de l’adoption de mesures d’urgence pouvaient également couvrir les fermetures en temps réel pour cause de concentration de jeunes poissons ou de frai. Il est proposé d’élargir le soutien du FEP aux moyennes entreprises travaillant dans les secteurs de l’aquaculture, de la transformation et de la commercialisation, tout en maintenant la priorité sur les micro et petites entreprises. L’aquaculture occupe une place plus visible. Nous avons en effet inclus l’aquaculture dans la définition du secteur de la pêche et le soutien à l’aquaculture est spécifiquement cité comme l’un des objectifs et des missions du FEP. Le soutien à la pêche dans les eaux intérieures, à l’exclusion de la construction de navires, et le lancement et la restructuration des organisations de producteurs ont été réintroduits."@fr⁸
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"joint ventures"¹²
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2005-07-05"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Struktuurifondid⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050705.26.2-245"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-07-05-Speech-2-246⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Joe Borg⁶