Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-08-Speech-3-044"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20050608.3.3-044"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@en4
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@cs1
"Hr. formand, kommissionsformand Barroso sagde, at vi ikke skulle starte på gensidige beskyldninger. Vi bør imidlertid helt sikkert sætte spørgsmålstegn ved Det Europæiske Råds troværdighed i forbindelse med stimuleringen og håndteringen af den store debat om Europas sociale og økonomiske fremtid. Det Europæiske Råd bør og vil sandsynligvis indstille ratifikationsprocessen, men det bør ikke trække stikket ud til hele forfatningsprojektet. I stedet bør det i princippet acceptere at opstille et nyt konvent - pluralistisk, parlamentarisk og gennemsigtigt - med et bredere grundlag end i Laeken og specielt med henblik på at modernisere og opfriske del III for at bringe de fælles politikker på linje med borgernes forventninger og bekymringer. Den nye forfatning bør også bryde det stive forhold mellem første, anden og tredje del og skabe et ordentligt hierarki mellem dem, så politikkerne i del III bliver underordnet del I. Denne gruppe og Parlamentet vil fuldt ud deltage i udarbejdelsen af et sådant konvent."@da2
"Herr Präsident! Präsident Barroso sagte, dass wir auf gegenseitige Schuldzuweisungen verzichten sollten. Trotzdem sollten wir uns fragen, ob der Europäische Rat die richtige Stelle ist, um die umfassende Debatte über die soziale und wirtschaftliche Zukunft Europas anzustoßen und zu leiten. Der Europäische Rat sollte und wird wahrscheinlich auch den Ratifizierungsprozess aussetzen, aber er sollte nicht das gesamte Verfassungsprojekt auf Eis legen. Stattdessen sollte er seine grundsätzliche Bereitschaft zur Einberufung eines neuen – pluralistischen, parlamentarischen und transparenten – Konvents erklären, dessen Auftrag über den von Laeken hinausgeht und insbesondere die Modernisierung und Neugestaltung von Teil III umfasst, damit in den gemeinsamen Politiken den Wünschen und Ängsten unserer Bürger Rechnung getragen werden kann. Der neue Konvent sollte außerdem aufgefordert werden, die starre Verbindung zwischen dem ersten, zweiten und dritten Teil aufzulösen und eine angemessene Rangfolge zwischen diesen Teilen herzustellen, damit deutlich gemacht wird, dass die Politiken in Teil III Teil I ergänzen sollen. Diese Fraktion und das Parlament werden einen solchen Konvent tatkräftig unterstützen."@de9
"Κύριε Πρόεδρε, ο Πρόεδρος Barroso δήλωσε ότι δεν πρέπει να αρχίσουμε να κατηγορούμε ο ένας τον άλλον. Οπωσδήποτε, όμως, οφείλουμε να αμφισβητήσουμε την αξιοπιστία του Ευρωπαϊκού Συμβουλίου στο θέμα της προώθησης και της διεύθυνσης του σημαντικού διαλόγου σχετικά με το κοινωνικό και οικονομικό μέλλον της Ευρώπης. Το Ευρωπαϊκό Συμβούλιο οφείλει –και πιθανότατα θα το πράξει– να αναστείλει τη διαδικασία των κυρώσεων, όμως δεν πρέπει να εγκαταλείψει οριστικά την όλη συνταγματική διαδικασία. Απεναντίας, πρέπει να συμφωνήσει καταρχήν στη συγκρότηση μιας νέας συνέλευσης –πολυφωνικής, κοινοβουλευτικής και διαφανούς– με εντολή ευρύτερη από αυτή του Λάκεν, κυρίως όσον αφορά τον εκσυγχρονισμό και την ανανέωση του Μέρους III της Συνθήκης, προκειμένου οι κοινές πολιτικές να εναρμονίζονται με τις προσδοκίες και τις ανησυχίες των πολιτών μας. Από τη νέα συνέλευση πρέπει επίσης να ζητηθεί να διαρρήξει την άκαμπτη σύνδεση μεταξύ του πρώτου, του δεύτερου και του τρίτου μέρους και να θεσπίσει την ενδεδειγμένη ιεραρχία μεταξύ τους, έτσι ώστε οι πολιτικές του Μέρους III να καταστούν σαφώς επικουρικές του Μέρους I. Η πολιτική μας ομάδα και το παρόν Κοινοβούλιο θα διαδραματίσουν κεντρικό ρόλο στην προώθηση μιας τέτοιας συνέλευσης."@el10
"Señor Presidente, el Presidente Barroso ha dicho que no deberíamos empezar a repartir reproches. Sin embargo, es cierto que tendríamos que poner en duda la credibilidad del Consejo Europeo estimulando y gestionando el gran debate sobre el futuro social y económico de Europa. El Consejo Europeo debería suspender y probablemente suspenda el proceso de ratificación, pero no debería desactivar todo el proyecto constitucional. En su lugar, en principio debería acordar la creación de una nueva convención –pluralista, parlamentaria y transparente– con un mandato más amplio que el de Laeken, especialmente para modernizar y renovar la Parte III, a fin de ajustar las políticas comunes a las aspiraciones y preocupaciones de nuestros ciudadanos. Asimismo, habría que pedir también a la nueva convención que rompa la rígida relación entre la primera parte, la segunda y la tercera, y que cree una jerarquía adecuada entre ellas, para que en la Parte III las políticas pasen a estar claramente subordinadas a la Parte I. Este Grupo y el Parlamento participarán activamente en la promoción de esta convención."@es20
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@et5
"Arvoisa puhemies, komission puheenjohtaja Barroso sanoi, ettemme saa ryhtyä metsästämään syyllisiä. Meidän on kuitenkin totisesti syytä kyseenalaistaa Eurooppa-neuvoston uskottavuus sen elvyttäessä ja hallinnoidessa suurta keskustelua Euroopan sosiaalisesta ja taloudellisesta tulevaisuudesta. Eurooppa-neuvoston on keskeytettävä ratifiointiprosessi, minkä se luultavasti tekeekin, mutta se ei saa pysäyttää koko perustuslakihanketta, vaan sen on sovittava periaatteellisella tasolla uuden – moniarvoisen, parlamentaarisen ja avoimen – valmistelukunnan perustamisesta. Tämän valmistelukunnan vastuun oltava laajempi kuin Laekenilla, mikä koskee etenkin III osan uudistamista ja kohentamista sekä yhteisten toimien saattamista yhdenmukaisiksi kansalaistemme toiveiden ja huolenaiheiden kanssa. Uutta valmistelukuntaa on myös kehotettava rikkomaan I, II ja III osan välinen jäykkä yhteys ja luomaan niiden välille asianmukainen hierarkia, niin että III osan politiikoista tulee selvästi alisteisia I osalle. Ryhmämme ja tämä parlamentti tukevat tällaista valmistelukuntaa kaikin keinoin."@fi7
"Monsieur le Président, le président Barroso a déclaré que nous ne devons pas commencer à nous rejeter la responsabilité. Toutefois, nous devons sans conteste mettre en doute la crédibilité de la capacité du Conseil européen à stimuler et à gérer le grand débat sur l’avenir social et économique de l’Europe. Le Conseil européen doit suspendre le processus de ratification, ce qu’il fera probablement, mais il ne doit pas débrancher l’ensemble du projet constitutionnel. Au contraire, il doit convenir en principe de l’organisation d’une nouvelle Convention - pluraliste, parlementaire et transparente -, chargée d’une mission plus vaste que celle de Laeken, afin avant tout de moderniser et de revigorer la partie III, d’aligner les politiques communes sur les aspirations et les craintes de nos concitoyens. Il convient également de demander à la nouvelle Convention de briser le lien rigide entre les première, deuxième et troisième parties et d’instaurer une véritable hiérarchie entre elles, de manière à ce que les politiques de la partie III soient clairement secondaires par rapport à la partie I. Ce groupe et le Parlement joueront un rôle à part entière dans les efforts visant à encourager la mise en place d’une telle Convention."@fr8
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@hu11
"Signor Presidente, il Presidente Barroso ha detto che non dovremmo iniziare con il gioco delle colpe. Di certo dovremmo però interrogarci sulla credibilità del Consiglio europeo nello stimolare e gestire il grande dibattito sul futuro economico e sociale dell’Europa. Il Consiglio europeo dovrebbe, e probabilmente lo farà, sospendere il processo di ratifica, ma non dovrebbe interrompere l’intero progetto costituzionale. In linea di principio, il Consiglio dovrebbe accettare di istituire una nuova convenzione, con un compito più ampio di quello di Laeken, volto in particolare a rendere più moderna e aggiornata la Parte III e ad adeguare le politiche comuni alle aspirazioni e alle ansie dei cittadini. La nuova convenzione dovrebbe inoltre spezzare il rigido legame tra la prima, la seconda e la terza parte e definire un’adeguata gerarchia tra di esse, cosicché nella Parte III le politiche diventino distintamente sussidiarie alla Parte I. Il nostro gruppo e il Parlamento appoggeranno pienamente tale convenzione."@it12
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@lt14
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@lv13
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@mt15
"Mijnheer de Voorzitter, voorzitter Barroso heeft gezegd dat we niet met een beschuldigende vinger moeten gaan wijzen. We moeten echter wel degelijk vraagtekens plaatsen bij de geloofwaardigheid van de Europese Raad, waar het gaat om de manier waarop deze het grote debat over de sociale en economische toekomst van Europa stimuleert en leidt. De Raad zou het ratificatieproces moeten opschorten, en zal dit waarschijnlijk ook doen, maar hij zou niet de stekker uit het hele constitutionele project mogen trekken. In plaats daarvan zou de Raad in beginsel moeten afspreken om een nieuwe grondwet, pluralistisch, parlementair en transparant, op te stellen met een bredere opdracht dan die van Laken, met name om deel III te moderniseren en te vernieuwen, om het gemeenschappelijk beleid in overeenstemming te brengen met de aspiraties en zorgen van onze burgers. Van de nieuwe grondwet zou ook moeten worden gevraagd dat zij de starre relatie tussen het eerste, tweede en derde deel doorbreekt, en dat zij een goede hiërarchie aanbrengt tussen deze delen, zodat het beleid in deel III duidelijk ondergeschikt wordt aan deel I. Deze fractie en het Parlement zullen volledig meewerken aan het bevorderen van zo'n grondwet."@nl3
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@pl16
"Senhor Presidente, o Senhor Presidente Barroso disse que não deveríamos começar a atribuir culpas uns aos outros. No entanto, deveremos certamente questionar a credibilidade do Conselho Europeu para incentivar e gerir o grande debate sobre o futuro social e económico da Europa. O Conselho Europeu deveria suspender o processo de ratificação, e provavelmente fá-lo-á, mas não deverá deixar ir por água abaixo todo o projecto constitucional. Em vez disso, deveria concordar, em princípio, em organizar uma nova convenção - pluralista, parlamentar e transparente - com um plano mais alargado do que o de Laeken, em especial para modernizar e actualizar a Parte III, para sintonizar as políticas comuns com as aspirações e as ansiedades dos nossos cidadãos. Também se deveria pedir à nova convenção que quebrasse a relação rígida que existe entre a primeira, a segunda e a terceira partes e estabelecesse uma hierarquia adequada entre elas, a fim de que na Parte III as políticas passassem a ser marcadamente subsidiárias da Parte I. Este grupo e este Parlamento desempenharão plenamente o seu papel na promoção dessa convenção."@pt17
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@sk18
"Mr President, President Barroso said that we should not start the blame game. However, we should certainly question the credibility of the European Council in stimulating and managing the great debate about the social and economic future of Europe. The European Council should, and probably will, suspend the ratification process but it should not pull the plug on the whole constitutional project. Instead, it should agree in principle to set up a new convention – pluralistic, parliamentary and transparent – with a broader brief than that of Laeken, especially to modernise and refresh Part III, to bring the common policies into line with the aspirations and anxieties of our citizens. The new convention should also be asked to break the rigid relationship between the first, second and third parts and to create a proper hierarchy between them, so that in Part III the policies become distinctly subsidiary to Part I. This Group and Parliament will play a full part in fostering such a convention."@sl19
"Herr talman! Ordförande Barroso sade att vi inte skulle börja anklaga varandra. Vi bör dock definitivt ifrågasätta Europeiska rådets trovärdighet när det gäller att stimulera och hantera den stora debatten om Europas sociala och ekonomiska framtid. Europeiska rådet bör skjuta upp ratificeringsprocessen, och det kommer förmodligen att göra det, men det bör inte dra ur kontakten för hela konstitutionsprojektet. Det bör i stället nå en principöverenskommelse om att skapa ett nytt konvent – pluralistiskt, parlamentariskt och öppet – med ett bredare mandat än enligt Laekenförklaringen, särskilt för att modernisera och återuppliva del III, så att den gemensamma politiken anpassas efter våra medborgares förhoppningar och farhågor. Det nya konventet bör också bryta det stela förhållandet mellan den första, andra och tredje delen och skapa en ordentlig hierarki mellan dem, så att politiken i del III blir mer distinkt underordnad del I. Denna grupp och detta parlament kommer att spela en viktig roll för att stödja ett sådant konvent."@sv21
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Andrew Duff (ALDE )."5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz
22http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph