Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-13-Speech-3-336"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2005-04-13"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (nõukogu)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050413.21.3-336"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-04-13-Speech-3-337⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:David Martin⁶
lpv:spoken text	"I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2006-12-31)²² member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; PETI (2004-10-13--2007-01-14)²² unknown; Labour Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² substitute; AGRI (2004-07-21--2006-03-15)²² member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²²
lpv:translated text	"I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@cs¹ "Jeg vil gerne støtte Rådet i den holdning, det indtager til Hizbollah. Der er en vis logik. Hvis man er modstander af terrorisme - hvad vi alle er, og vi ved, at Hizbollah har forbindelse til terrorisme - så lad os forbyde Hizbollah. Dog ville dette være en meget kortsigtet løsning, for der vil ikke blive nogen permanent løsning i Mellemøsten uden aktiv deltagelse af Hizbollah. Derfor er det måske rigtigt, at Rådet igen ser på dette spørgsmål om at forbyde organisationen, men det vil på kort sigt være langt bedre at få en dialog."@da² "Ich möchte den Rat in seiner Sichtweise auf die Hisbollah bestärken. Es liegt eine gewisse Logik darin. Wenn Sie gegen Terrorismus sind – so wie wir alle, und wir wissen, dass die Hisbollah Verbindungen zum Terrorismus hat –, dann verbieten Sie die Hisbollah. Allerdings wäre dies ein sehr kurzfristiger Ansatz, da es ohne aktive Beteiligung der Hisbollah keine dauerhafte Lösung für den Nahen Osten geben wird. Deshalb tut der Rat natürlich recht daran, die Frage des Verbots dieser Organisation weiterhin zu prüfen, doch kurzfristig wäre es wesentlich besser, einen Dialog zu führen."@de⁹ "Θέλω να δηλώσω ότι στηρίζω τη στάση του Συμβουλίου έναντι της Χεζμπολλάχ. Στηρίζεται στη λογική. Εάν αντιτασσόμαστε στην τρομοκρατία –και αυτό ισχύει για όλους μας, ενώ γνωρίζουμε επίσης ότι η Χεζμπολλάχ έχει δεσμούς με την τρομοκρατία– τότε πρέπει να κατατάξουμε τη Χεζμπολλάχ στις τρομοκρατικές οργανώσεις. Ωστόσο, αυτή η προσέγγιση θα ήταν πολύ κοντόφθαλμη, διότι δεν πρόκειται να επιτευχθεί οριστική διευθέτηση της κρίσης στη Μέση Ανατολή χωρίς την ενεργό συμμετοχή της Χεζμπολλάχ. Συνεπώς, αν και το Συμβούλιο ορθώς διατηρεί σε εκκρεμότητα το θέμα της ένταξης αυτής της οργάνωσης στον κατάλογο των τρομοκρατικών οργανώσεων, θα ήταν πολύ προτιμότερο προς το παρόν να επιλέξουμε την οδό του διαλόγου."@el¹⁰ "Quiero expresar mi apoyo al enfoque del Consejo respecto a Hezbolá. Tiene una cierta lógica. Si nos oponemos al terrorismo, y todos nos oponemos y todos sabemos que Hezbolá tiene vínculos con el terrorismo, entonces debemos proscribir a Hezbolá. Sin embargo, sería un planteamiento a muy corto plazo, porque no habrá una resolución permanente del conflicto de Oriente Próximo sin la participación activa de Hezbolá. Por lo tanto, aunque el Consejo tiene razón de seguir estudiando el tema de la proscripción de esa organización, a corto plazo el diálogo sería mucho mejor."@es²⁰ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@et⁵ "Haluan tukea neuvostoa ja sen valitsemaa lähestymistapaa Hizbollahiin. Siinä on tiettyä johdonmukaisuutta. Jos vastustamme terrorismia – kuten me kaikki teemme, ja tiedämme, että Hizbollahilla on yhteyksiä terrorismiin – kiellämme Hizbollahin. Se olisi kuitenkin hyvin lyhytnäköistä, koska Lähi-idän tilanteen pysyvä ratkaiseminen edellyttää Hizbollahin aktiivista osallistumista. Tästä syystä, vaikka neuvosto onkin oikeassa harkitessaan järjestön kieltämistä, lyhyellä aikavälillä olisi paljon parempi käydä vuoropuhelua."@fi⁷ "Je voudrais soutenir le Conseil dans l’approche qu’il adopte concernant le Hezbollah. Il y a une certaine logique. Si vous être contre le terrorisme - ce qui est le cas de nous tous et nous savons que le Hezbollah est lié au terrorisme -, proscrivez le Hezbollah. Toutefois, il s’agirait d’une approche à très court terme, car il n’y aura pas de règlement permanent au Moyen-Orient sans la participation active du Hezbollah. Par conséquent, si le Conseil a raison de continuer à étudier la question de l’interdiction de cette organisation, il serait bien mieux à court terme de maintenir un dialogue."@fr⁸ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@hu¹¹ "Desidero sostenere l’atteggiamento del Consiglio nei confronti di che ha una certa logica. Se ci si oppone al terrorismo – atteggiamento che tutti condividiamo, e sappiamo che ha legami con il terrorismo – allora va bandito. Tuttavia si tratterebbe di un approccio a brevissimo termine, poiché non può esservi una soluzione permanente in Medio Oriente senza una partecipazione attiva di . Pertanto, se da una parte il Consiglio ha ragione a rivedere periodicamente la questione relativa alla messa al bando di tale organizzazione, è preferibile avere un dialogo nell’immediato futuro."@it¹² "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@lt¹⁴ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@lv¹³ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@mt¹⁵ "Ik wil de Raad steunen in zijn aanpak met betrekking tot de Hezbollah. Daar zit een zekere logica in. Als u tegen terrorisme bent - en dat zijn wij allemaal, en wij weten dat de Hezbollah banden onderhoudt met het terrorisme - zet u de Hezbollah dan op de lijst. Dat zou echter een kortetermijnaanpak zijn, aangezien er in het Midden-Oosten nooit een permanente regeling zal zijn zonder de actieve participatie van de Hezbollah. Daarom heeft de Raad weliswaar gelijk als hij het vraagstuk van het op de lijst plaatsen van deze organisatie openhoudt, maar het zou op korte termijn veel beter zijn als er een dialoog kwam."@nl³ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@pl¹⁶ "Quero expressar o meu apoio ao Conselho na sua abordagem à questão do Hezbollah. Há nela alguma lógica. Se combatemos o terrorismo – coisa que todos fazemos, e sabemos que o Hezbollah tem ligações com o terrorismo – então, devemos banir o Hezbollah. Contudo, uma abordagem desse tipo seria útil apenas a muito curto prazo, pois não haverá colonização permanente no Médio Oriente sem a participação activa do Hezbollah. Assim, embora o Conselho proceda correctamente ao manter sobre a mesa a hipótese de banir essa organização, seria muito melhor, para já, passar ao diálogo."@pt¹⁷ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@sk¹⁸ "I wish to support the Council in the approach it takes to Hizbollah. There is a certain logic. If you oppose terrorism – which we all do and we know Hizbollah has links to terrorism – then proscribe Hizbollah. However, that would be a very short-term approach, because there will be no permanent settlement in the Middle East without the active participation of Hizbollah. Therefore, while the Council is right to keep the issue of proscribing this organisation under review, it would be far better in the short run to have a dialogue."@sl¹⁹ "Jag vill stödja rådet i dess förhållningssätt till Hizbullah. Där finns en viss logik. Om man är emot terrorism – vilket vi alla är och vi vet att Hizbullah har kopplingar till terrorism – förbjud då Hizbullah. Emellertid vore detta ett väldigt kortsiktigt angreppssätt eftersom ingen varaktig lösning kommer att komma till stånd i Mellanöstern utan Hizbullahs aktiva medverkan. Därför vore det mycket bättre på kort sikt att föra en dialog även om rådet gör rätt i att fortsätta att pröva frågan om ett förbud mot organisationen."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Martin, David (PSE )."^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4}