Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-12-Speech-2-270"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2005-04-12"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (komisjon)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050412.29.2-270"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-04-12-Speech-2-271⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Kroes⁶
lpv:spoken text	". I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@en⁴
lpv:translated text	"I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@cs¹ "Jeg forstår Deres bevæggrunde for at stille dette spørgsmål. Det er relevant i sig selv, og derfor er jeg glad for, at spørgsmålet er blevet rejst, for det giver mig mulighed for at forklare. Vi må ikke undervurdere Leixlip-fabrikkens betydning for den lokale økonomi. Dette er støtte til et mobilt fabrikationsprojekt, som vil bevare et stort antal job i regionen i syv år, men det vil ikke skabe flere arbejdspladser. Ærligt talt er Irland et eksempel på, hvor vigtigt EU og vores politik til stimulering af økonomien er. Men i dette tilfælde ville der ikke blive skabt nogen nye job. Der er f.eks. ingen tegn på, at projektet ville medføre overførsel af nogen væsentlig del af virksomhedens forsknings- og udviklingsaktiviteter fra USA til Europa eller ville udvikle andre synergi- eller overløbseffekter, som til gengæld ville bidrage til innovation i Europa, der rækker ud over de specifikke fabrikationsprocesser. Dette er et rent fabrikationsprojekt til masseproduktion af mikrochips, som vil hjælpe Intel med at fastholde sin position som førende på det pågældende marked. Det var netop kombinationen af de forhold og argumenter, der fik os til at mene, det vi mente, indtil den irske regering trak notifikationen tilbage."@da² ". Ich verstehe, weshalb Sie diese Frage stellen. Die Frage an sich ist durchaus berechtigt und deshalb freue ich mich, dass diese Problematik angesprochen wurde, weil mir das die Gelegenheit zu einer Erklärung gibt. Wir sollten die Bedeutung der Anlagen in Leixlip nicht unterschätzen. Für die lokale Wirtschaft handelt es sich um eine Beihilfe für eine Produktionsstätte zur Herstellung von Rechentechnik, die für einen Zeitraum von sieben Jahren zur Erhaltung einer großen Zahl von Arbeitsplätzen beitragen, aber keine neuen Arbeitsplätze schaffen wird. Offen gesagt ist Irland ein Beispiel, an dem deutlich wird, wie wichtig die Europäische Union und unsere Politik zur Wirtschaftsförderung sind. In diesem Falle würden jedoch keine neuen Arbeitsplätze entstehen. Es deutet nichts darauf hin, dass das Unternehmen im Zuge des Projekts wichtige Teile seiner Forschungs- und Entwicklungsbasis von den USA nach Europa verlagern würde. Ebenso wenig sind sonstige Synergien oder Ausstrahlungseffekte zu erwarten, die über die reine Produktion hinausgehen und zur Innovation in Europa beitragen würden. Es handelt sich um ein reines Produktionsprojekt für die Großproduktion von Mikrochips, das Intel helfen wird, seine Position als Marktführer in dem entsprechenden Segment zu erhalten. Eben diese Kombination von Aspekten hat uns zu unseren Überlegungen veranlasst, und dann hat die irische Regierung ihren Antrag zurückgezogen."@de⁹ "Κατανοώ το λόγο για τον οποίο απευθύνετε αυτή την ερώτηση. Αξίζει τον κόπο και για τον λόγο αυτό είμαι ιδιαίτερα ικανοποιημένη που τέθηκε αυτό το θέμα, διότι μου δίνει την ευκαιρία να εξηγήσω. Δεν πρέπει να υποτιμούμε τη σημασία των εγκαταστάσεων στο Leixlip για την τοπική οικονομία. Πρόκειται για ενίσχυση ενός σχεδίου κατασκευής κινητής τηλεφωνίας, το οποίο θα διατηρήσει μεγάλο αριθμό θέσεων εργασίας στην περιοχή για επτά έτη, αλλά δεν θα δημιουργήσει νέες θέσεις απασχόλησης. Για να είμαι ειλικρινής, η Ιρλανδία αποτελεί ένα παράδειγμα που αποδεικνύει πόσο σημαντική είναι η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και η πολιτική μας για την τόνωση της οικονομίας. Εντούτοις, σε αυτή την περίπτωση δεν θα δημιουργηθούν νέες θέσεις εργασίας. Δεν υπάρχει καμία ένδειξη ότι το πρόγραμμα θα οδηγήσει σε μεταφορά σημαντικού τμήματος της ερευνητικής και αναπτυξιακής βάσης της εταιρίας στην Ευρώπη από τις ΗΠΑ, για παράδειγμα, ή ότι θα αναπτυχθούν άλλες συνέργιες ή άλλα δευτερογενή αποτελέσματα, τα οποία με τη σειρά τους θα συμβάλουν στην καινοτομία στην Ευρώπη, πέρα από τις συγκεκριμένες μεταποιητικές δραστηριότητες. Πρόκειται για ένα αμιγώς κατασκευαστικό σχέδιο για την παραγωγή μικροκυκλωμάτων μεγάλης κλίμακας που θα βοηθήσει την εταιρία Intel να διατηρήσει την ηγετική της θέση στην αντίστοιχη αγορά. Αυτός ακριβώς ο συνδυασμός στοιχείων και επιχειρημάτων μας οδήγησε σε αυτά που σκεφτόμασταν μέχρι τη στιγμή που η ιρλανδική κυβέρνηση απέσυρε την κοινοποίηση."@el¹⁰ ". Entiendo el motivo que tiene para formular esta pregunta. Merece la pena por sí mismo y, por lo tanto, me complace mucho que se haya planteado el asunto, ya que me brinda la oportunidad de dar una explicación. No debemos subestimar la importancia de las instalaciones de Leixlip para la economía local. Se trata de una ayuda para un proyecto de fabricación de teléfonos móviles, que mantendrá un gran número de puestos de trabajo en la región durante siete años, pero que no va a crear nuevos puestos de trabajo. Para ser sincera, Irlanda es un ejemplo que demuestra lo importante que es la Unión Europea y nuestra política de estimular la economía. Sin embargo, en este caso no se crearían nuevos puestos de trabajo. Nada indica que el proyecto dará lugar al traslado de una parte considerable de la base de investigación y desarrollo de la empresa de los Estados Unidos a Europa, por ejemplo, o que desarrollará otras sinergias o efectos indirectos que a su vez contribuirían a la innovación en Europa e irían más allá de las operaciones de fabricación concretas en cuestión. Se trata de un proyecto puramente industrial para la producción masiva de microchips que ayudará a Intel a mantener su liderazgo en ese mercado. Ha sido exactamente la combinación de estos aspectos y argumentos la que nos indujo a pensar lo que estábamos pensando hasta que el Gobierno irlandés ha retirado la notificación."@es²⁰ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@et⁵ ". Ymmärrän syynne tämän kysymyksen esittämiseen. Kysymys on arvokas jo sinänsä, ja olenkin hyvin iloinen, että tämä asia on otettu esiin, koska saan näin tilaisuuden selittää. Meidän ei pitäisi aliarvioida Leixlipin tuotantolaitosten merkitystä paikalliselle taloudelle. Kyse on valtiontuesta matkapuhelinten valmistukseen liittyvälle hankkeelle, jolla turvataan useita työpaikkoja alueella seitsemäksi vuodeksi mutta jolla ei luoda yhtään uusia työpaikkoja. Irlanti on totta puhuen hyvä esimerkki siitä, miten tärkeitä Euroopan unioni ja talouden elvyttämiseen tähtäävä politiikkamme ovat. Kyseisessä tapauksessa ei kuitenkaan luotaisi uusia työpaikkoja. Ei ole myöskään viitteitä siitä, että hanke johtaisi yrityksen merkittävien tutkimus- ja kehitystoimintojen siirtämiseen Eurooppaan esimerkiksi Yhdysvalloista tai että hankkeella olisi muita synergia- tai heijastusvaikutuksia, mikä puolestaan edistäisi eurooppalaista innovaatiota asianomaisten valmistustoimintojen lisäksi. Kyse on puhtaasti mikrosirujen laajamittaista tuotantoa koskevasta hankkeesta, joka auttaa Inteliä säilyttämään asemansa johtavana valmistajana kyseisillä markkinoilla. Juuri näiden seikkojen ja perustelujen yhdistelmä sai meidät tekemään omat johtopäätöksemme ennen kuin Irlannin hallitus perui hakemuksensa."@fi⁷ "Je comprends ce qui motive votre question. Elle est intéressante en soi et je suis donc très heureuse qu’elle ait été posée, parce que cela me donne l’occasion de donner des explications. Nous ne devrions pas sous-estimer l’importance des installations de Leixlip pour l’économie locale. Il s’agit d’une aide en faveur d’un projet d’industrie mobile qui permettra de maintenir un grand nombre d’emplois dans la région pour sept ans, mais qui ne créera aucun nouvel emploi. Pour être honnête, l’Irlande est un exemple qui prouve combien l’Union européenne et notre politique de stimulation de l’économie sont importantes. Toutefois, dans ce cas, aucun nouvel emploi ne serait créé. Rien n’indique que ce projet aboutirait au transfert en Europe d’une partie significative de la base américaine de recherche et développement de l’entreprise, par exemple, ou au développement d’autres synergies ou à des retombées qui contribueraient à leur tour à l’innovation en Europe et iraient au-delà des opérations spécifiques de fabrication concernées. Il s’agit purement d’un projet industriel de production à grande échelle de microprocesseurs qui aidera Intel à maintenir sa position de leader sur le marché concerné. C’est exactement la combinaison de ces faits et de ces arguments qui nous ont conduits à former notre opinion, jusqu’à ce que le gouvernement irlandais retire la notification."@fr⁸ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@hu¹¹ "Capisco la ragione che la spinge a porre questa domanda intrinsecamente valida e pertanto sono lieta che la questione sia stata sollevata perché mi offre l’opportunità di fornire un chiarimento. Non dobbiamo sottovalutare l’importanza delle infrastrutture di Leixlip per l’economia locale. Si tratta di aiuti destinati a un progetto di produzione nel campo della memorizzazione portatile che manterrà un gran numero di posti di lavoro nella regione per sette anni, ma non creerà nuova occupazione. A dirla tutta, l’Irlanda è un esempio che dimostra quanto siano importanti l’Unione e la nostra politica per stimolare l’economia. Tuttavia, in questo caso non saranno creati nuovi posti di lavoro. Non c’è niente, per esempio, che indichi che il progetto comporterà un trasferimento dall’America all’Europa di una qualunque parte significativa della base di ricerca e sviluppo dell’azienda, né che il progetto creerà altre sinergie o effetti diffusivi che potrebbero contribuire, a loro volta, all’innovazione in Europa, andando oltre le specifiche produzioni in questione. Questo è un mero progetto di produzione per la fabbricazione su larga scala di che aiuterà a mantenere la sua posizione sul mercato specifico. E’ stata proprio la combinazione di questi aspetti e argomenti che ci ha indotti a formulare il nostro parere prima che il governo irlandese ritirasse la notifica."@it¹² "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@lt¹⁴ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@lv¹³ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@mt¹⁵ ". Ik begrijp waarom u deze vraagt stelt. De vraag is op zichzelf de moeite waard en ik ben daarom blij dat de kwestie naar voren wordt gebracht, want het geeft mij de kans een en ander uit te leggen. We mogen het belang van de faciliteiten in Leixlip voor de lokale economie niet onderschatten. Dit is steun voor een mobiel productieproject, dat in de regio zeven jaar lang een groot aantal banen in stand zal houden, maar geen nieuwe werkgelegenheid zal scheppen. Om heel eerlijk te zijn, is Ierland een voorbeeld dat het belang laat zien van de Europese Unie en ons beleid om de economie te stimuleren. In dit geval zouden echter geen nieuwe banen worden geschapen. Er zijn geen aanwijzingen dat het project zou leiden tot bijvoorbeeld de verplaatsing van een belangrijk deel van de onderzoeks- en ontwikkelingsactiviteiten van de onderneming van de Verenigde Staten naar Europa, of dat het project tot andere synergieën of effecten zou leiden, die op hun beurt zouden bijdragen tot innovatie in Europa die verder gaat dan de specifieke productieactiviteiten in kwestie. Dit is een puur fabricageproject voor de grootschalige productie van microchips, dat zal helpen zijn positie als een van de leiders in de markt in kwestie te behouden. Het was precies deze combinatie van punten en argumenten die ons deed denken wat we dachten voordat de Ierse regering haar kennisgeving introk."@nl³ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@pl¹⁶ "Compreendo a razão por que me coloca esta pergunta. É em si mesma muito útil, pelo que me congratulo com o facto de a ter apresentado, pois dá-me a possibilidade de esclarecer a questão. Não deveremos subestimar a importância das instalações de Leixlip para a economia local. Estão em causa auxílios a um projecto para o fabrico de telemóveis, que manterá um elevado número de postos de trabalho na região ao longo de sete anos, porém este não criará quaisquer postos de trabalho novos. Para ser muito franca, a Irlanda é um exemplo que prova a importância da União Europeia e da nossa política para o estímulo à economia. No entanto, neste caso, não serão criados novos postos de trabalho. Não há indicação de que o projecto venha a conduzir à transferência de qualquer sector significativo da base de investigação e desenvolvimento da empresa nos Estados Unidos, por exemplo, para a Europa, ou que venham a desenvolver-se outras sinergias ou efeitos multiplicadores, que, por seu turno, contribuiriam para a inovação na Europa, indo para além das operações de fabrico específicas em causa. Trata-se de um mero projecto de fabrico em grande escala de microprocessadores, que ajudará a Intel a manter a sua posição de líder no mercado da especialidade. Foi exactamente a combinação destes aspectos e argumentos que nos levou a seguir a linha de raciocínio que estávamos a trilhar, até ao momento em que o Governo irlandês retirou a notificação."@pt¹⁷ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@sk¹⁸ "I understand your reason for asking this question. It is worthwhile in itself and therefore I am quite happy that the matter has been raised, because it gives me an opportunity to explain. We should not underestimate the importance of the facilities in Leixlip for the local economy. This is aid for a mobile manufacturing project, which will maintain a large number of jobs in the region for seven years, but will not create any new employment. To be quite frank, Ireland is an example that proves how important the European Union and our policy to stimulate the economy is. However, in this case no new jobs would be created. There is no indication that the project would lead to a transfer of any significant part of the company’s research and development base to Europe from the US, for example, or would develop other synergies or spillover effects, which would in turn contribute to innovation in Europe, going beyond the specific manufacturing operations concerned. This is a pure manufacturing project for the large-scale production of microchips that will help Intel to maintain its position as a leader in the relevant market. It was exactly the combination of those points and arguments that led us to think what we were thinking until the Irish Government withdrew the notification."@sl¹⁹ ". Jag förstår varför ni ställer denna fråga. Den är värd att ställa, och det gläder mig därför att ärendet kommit upp till diskussion, eftersom det ger mig en möjlighet att förklara. Vi bör inte underskatta den betydelse som anläggningen i Leixlip har för den lokala ekonomin. Detta är ett stöd för ett rörligt tillverkningsprojekt, som kommer att bevara ett stort antal arbetstillfällen i regionen under minst sju år, men som inte kommer att skapa några nya arbeten. För att vara helt ärlig är Irland ett exempel som visar hur viktig Europeiska unionen och vår politik är för att stimulera ekonomin. I detta fall kommer dock inga nya arbetstillfällen att skapas. Det finns inga tecken på att projektet skulle leda till en förflyttning av någon betydande del av företagets forsknings- och utvecklingsbas till Europa från exempelvis Förenta staterna, eller utveckla andra samverkans- eller överskottseffekter, vilka i sin tur skulle kunna bidra till nyskapande inom EU genom att gå utöver de särskilda tillverkningsverksamheter som berörs. Detta är ett rent produktionsprojekt för storskalig tillverkning av mikrochips, som kommer att hjälpa Intel att behålla sin ledande ställning på den berörda marknaden. Det var just kombinationen av dessa punkter och argument som ledde oss fram till den uppfattning vi hade tills den irländska regeringen drog tillbaka anmälan."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Intel"^3,12 "Kroes,"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "Member of the Commission"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4} "leader"¹² "microchip"¹² "spillover"³