Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-12-Speech-2-264"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20050412.29.2-264"6
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
". I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@en4
lpv:translated text
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@cs1
"Jeg kan forsikre Dem for, at Kommissionen har til hensigt også at anvende princippet om, at "forureneren betaler", på den nukleare sektor. Både Kommissionens endelige afgørelse om omstruktureringen af British Energy og dens beslutning om at indlede proceduren om Nuclear Decommissioning Authority viser tydeligt, at operatører af atomkraftværker i henhold til princippet om, at "forureneren betaler", har hovedansvaret for betalingen af håndteringen af deres affald og andre nukleare passiver, herunder planlagt afvikling. Man må dog huske på, at princippet om, at "forureneren betaler", som alle fællesskabslovgivningens principper skal afstemmes med andre fællesskabsprincipper og -målsætninger, der i visse tilfælde kan være i modstrid med det. I sagen om British Energy f.eks. skulle princippet om, at "forureneren betaler", afstemmes med behovet for at bevare den nukleare sikkerhed, der som bekendt også er en vigtig målsætning for Fællesskabet, som er fastsat i Euratom-traktaten. I sådanne tilfælde forsøger Kommissionen at opnå den bedst mulige balance mellem forskellige principper til Fællesskabets bedste."@da2
". Ich kann Ihnen versichern, dass die Kommission beabsichtigt, das Verursacherprinzip auch auf den Kernkraftsektor anzuwenden. Sowohl die endgültige Entscheidung der Kommission zur Umstrukturierung von British Energy als auch ihre Entscheidung zur Einleitung eines Verfahrens im Falle der Nuclear Decommissioning Authority machen deutlich, dass nach dem Verursacherprinzip die Betreiber von Kernkraftanlagen die Hauptverantwortung für die Entsorgung ihrer Abfälle und die Erfüllung anderer Pflichten einschließlich der planmäßigen Stilllegung tragen. Wie bei allen Grundsätzen des Gemeinschaftsrechts ist jedoch auch in diesem Fall zu bedenken, dass das Verursacherprinzip mit anderen gemeinschaftlichen Grundsätzen und Zielen in Einklang zu bringen ist, die sich unter bestimmten Umständen gegebenenfalls im Widerspruch zum Verursacherprinzip befinden. Im Falle von British Energy beispielsweise musste das Verursacherprinzip mit dem Erfordernis der Gewährleistung der nuklearen Sicherheit in Einklang gebracht werden, das, wie Sie wissen, eines der wichtigsten gemeinschaftlichen Ziele darstellt und im Euratom-Vertrag verankert ist. In derartigen Fällen bemüht sich die Kommission zum Wohle der Gemeinschaft um das bestmögliche Gleichgewicht zwischen den gegensätzlichen Prinzipien."@de9
"Σας διαβεβαιώνω ότι η Επιτροπή προτίθεται να εφαρμόσει την αρχή «ο ρυπαίνων πληρώνει» και στον τομέα της πυρηνικής ενέργειας. Τόσο η τελική απόφαση της Επιτροπής για την αναδιάρθρωση της επιχείρησης παραγωγής ενέργειας British Energy όσο και η απόφασή της για έναρξη των διαδικασιών όσον αφορά την αρμόδια για την παύση λειτουργίας πυρηνικών μονάδων αρχή (Nuclear Decommissioning Agency) καθιστούν σαφές ότι, σύμφωνα με την αρχή «ο ρυπαίνων πληρώνει», οι φορείς εκμετάλλευσης πυρηνικών σταθμών φέρουν την πρωταρχική ευθύνη για την πληρωμή της διαχείρισης των αποβλήτων τους και άλλων πυρηνικών υποχρεώσεων, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της προγραμματισμένης παύσης λειτουργίας. Εντούτοις, πρέπει να ληφθεί υπόψη ότι, όπως με όλες τις αρχές του κοινοτικού δικαίου, η αρχή «ο ρυπαίνων πληρώνει» πρέπει να συνάδει με άλλες κοινοτικές αρχές και στόχους, οι οποίοι ενδέχεται, σε ορισμένες περιπτώσεις, να έρχονται σε διάσταση με αυτή. Στην περίπτωση της επιχείρησης παραγωγής ενέργειας British Energy, για παράδειγμα, η αρχή «ο ρυπαίνων πληρώνει» έπρεπε να συνάδει με την ανάγκη διατήρησης της πυρηνικής ασφάλειας, η οποία αποτελεί επίσης, όπως γνωρίζετε, σημαντικό κοινοτικό στόχο που διακηρύσσεται στη Συνθήκη Ευρατόμ. Σε τέτοιες περιπτώσεις, η Επιτροπή προσπαθεί να επιτύχει την καλύτερη δυνατή ισορροπία ανάμεσα στις διιστάμενες αρχές προς όφελος της Κοινότητας."@el10
". Puedo asegurarle que la Comisión pretende aplicar también el principio de «quien contamina paga» al sector de la industria nuclear. Tanto la decisión final de la Comisión sobre la reestructuración de British Energy como su decisión de abrir un expediente contra la autoridad encargada del desmantelamiento de las centrales nucleares dejan claro que al amparo del principio de quien contamina paga, los operadores de centrales nucleares son los principales responsables del pago de la gestión de sus residuos y otras responsabilidades nucleares, incluido el desmantelamiento programado. Sin embargo, uno ha de tener en cuenta que, al igual que con los principios del Derecho comunitario, el principio de quien contamina paga tiene que conciliarse con otros principios y objetivos comunitarios que, en determinadas circunstancias, pueden entrar en conflicto con este. En el caso de British Energy, por ejemplo, el principio de quien contamina paga no encaja con la necesidad de preservar la seguridad nuclear, que, como saben, también es un importante objetivo comunitario consagrado en el Tratado Euratom. En estos casos, la Comisión pretende encontrar el mejor equilibrio posible entre los principios divergentes en beneficio de la Comunidad."@es20
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@et5
". Voin vakuuttaa teille, että komissio aikoo soveltaa saastuttaja maksaa -periaatetta myös ydinvoima-alaan. Sekä komission British Energy -energiayhtiön uudelleenjärjestelyjä koskevasta lopullisesta päätöksestä että komission päätöksestä aloittaa jäsenyysvelvoitteiden noudattamatta jättämistä koskeva menettely NDA:n osalta käy selväksi, että saastuttaja maksaa -periaatteen mukaisesti ydinvoimaloiden käyttäjillä on päävastuu laitoksissa syntyvän jätteen käsittelykustannuksista ja muista ydinvoimaan liittyvistä vastuukysymyksistä ja näin ollen myös laitosten suunnitellusta saneeraamisesta. On kuitenkin muistettava, että kuten kaikkien yhteisön lainsäädäntöön sisältyvien periaatteiden kohdalla, saastuttaja maksaa -periaatekin on sovitettava yhteen muiden yhteisön periaatteiden ja tavoitteiden kanssa, vaikka nämä saattavat tietyissä tapauksissa olla ristiriidassa sen kanssa. Esimerkiksi British Energy -energiayhtiön tapauksessa saastuttaja maksaa -periaatteen soveltamisessa oli otettava lisäksi huomioon ydinturvallisuuden säilyttäminen, joka on, kuten tiedättekin, myös Euratomin perustamissopimuksessa vahvistettu yhteisön keskeinen tavoite. Tällaisissa tapauksissa komissio pyrkii löytämään eri periaatteiden välillä mahdollisimman hyvän tasapainon yhteisön hyväksi."@fi7
"Je peux vous assurer que la Commission entend appliquer le principe du «pollueur payeur» au secteur nucléaire également. La décision finale de la Commission sur la restructuration de et sa décision d’introduire une procédure concernant la montre clairement qu’en vertu du principe du pollueur payeur, les opérateurs de centrales nucléaires assumeront la responsabilité principale du paiement de la gestion de leurs déchets et autres obligations relatives au nucléaire, y compris le déclassement planifié. Toutefois, il ne faut pas oublier que, comme pour tous les principes du droit communautaire, le principe du pollueur payeur doit être concilié avec d’autres principes et objectifs communautaires, lesquels peuvent, dans certaines circonstances, s’avérer incompatibles avec celui-ci. Dans le cas de par exemple, il fallait concilier le principe du pollueur payeur avec la nécessité de préserver la sûreté nucléaire, ce qui est également, comme vous le savez, un objectif communautaire majeur inscrit dans le traité Euratom. Dans de tels cas, la Commission cherche à établir le meilleur équilibre possible entre des principes divergents, dans l’intérêt de la Communauté."@fr8
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@hu11
"Posso garantirle che la Commissione intende applicare anche al settore nucleare il principio “chi inquina paga”. Tanto la decisione definitiva della Commissione sulla ristrutturazione della quanto la sua decisione di avviare un procedimento per la chiariscono che, in base al principio “chi inquina paga”, i gestori delle centrali nucleari sono i primi responsabili del costo di trattamento dei rifiuti e degli altri costi del nucleare, compreso lo smantellamento pianificato. Tuttavia bisogna considerare che, come tutti i principi del diritto comunitario, il principio “chi inquina paga” va conciliato con altri principi e obiettivi comunitari che possono, in alcune circostanze, entrare in conflitto con esso. Nel caso della per esempio, questo principio doveva essere conciliato con la necessità di preservare la sicurezza nucleare che, come lei sa, è uno dei principali obiettivi comunitari stabiliti dal Trattato EURATOM. In questi casi la Commissione cerca di perseguire, a vantaggio della Comunità, il miglior equilibrio possibile tra principi divergenti."@it12
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@lt14
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@lv13
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@mt15
"Ik kan u verzekeren dat de Commissie van plan is het beginsel van ‘de vervuiler betaalt’ ook op de nucleaire sector toe te passen. Zowel het definitieve besluit van de Commissie over de herstructurering van als haar besluit een procedure in te stellen in verband met de maakt duidelijk dat beheerders van kerncentrales op grond van het beginsel van ‘de vervuiler betaalt’ de primaire verantwoordelijkheid dragen voor het betalen van de afvalverwerking en andere nucleaire lasten, waaronder geplande ontmanteling. Men moet evenwel niet vergeten dat het beginsel van ‘de vervuiler betaalt’, zoals alle beginselen van de communautaire wetgeving, moet worden afgestemd op andere communautaire beginselen en doelstellingen, die hier onder bepaalde omstandigheden mee in strijd kunnen zijn. In het geval van moest het beginsel van ‘de vervuiler betaalt’ bijvoorbeeld worden afgestemd op de nucleaire veiligheid, hetgeen, zoals u weet, een belangrijke communautaire doelstelling is die in het Euratom-Verdrag is vastgelegd. In dergelijke gevallen streeft de Commissie in het belang van de Gemeenschap naar zo veel mogelijk evenwicht tussen uiteenlopende beginselen."@nl3
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@pl16
"Posso assegurar que a Comissão pretende aplicar o princípio do poluidor-pagador também ao sector nuclear. Tanto a decisão final da Comissão sobre a reestruturação da empresa de energia “British Energy”, como a sua decisão de abrir um inquérito sobre a “NDA”, deixam claro que, ao abrigo do princípio do poluidor-pagador, os operadores das centrais nucleares detêm a responsabilidade primordial pelo pagamento da gestão dos seus resíduos e por outras responsabilidades inerentes ao facto de a central ser nuclear, o que inclui o desmantelamento planificado. No entanto, há que ter em conta, tal como em todos os princípios da legislação comunitária, que o princípio do poluidor-pagador tem de ser conciliado com outros princípios e objectivos comunitários, que podem, em algumas circunstâncias, entrar em conflito. No caso da “British Energy”, por exemplo, o princípio do poluidor-pagador tinha de ser conciliado com a necessidade de preservar a segurança nuclear, que é também, como sabe, um importante objectivo consagrado no Tratado Euratom. Neste tipo de casos, a Comissão procura encontrar o melhor equilíbrio possível entre princípios divergentes entre si, de modo a beneficiar a Comunidade."@pt17
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@sk18
"I can assure you that the Commission intends to apply the ‘polluter pays’ principle to the nuclear sector as well. Both the Commission’s final decision on the restructuring of British Energy and its decision to open proceedings on the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority make it clear that under the polluter pays principle, operators of nuclear stations bear the primary responsibility for the payment of the management of their waste and other nuclear liabilities, including planned decommissioning. However, one has to keep in mind that, as with all principles of Community law, the polluter pays principle must be reconciled with other Community principles and objectives, which may, in certain circumstances, conflict with it. In the British Energy case, for instance, the polluter pays principle had to be reconciled with the need to preserve nuclear safety, which is also, as you know, a major Community objective enshrined in the Euratom Treaty. In such cases the Commission seeks to strike the best possible balance between diverging principles for the benefit of the Community."@sl19
". Jag kan försäkra er om att kommissionen har för avsikt att tillämpa principen om att ”förorenaren betalar” även i kärnkraftsektorn. Både i kommissionens slutliga beslut om omstruktureringen av British Energy och i dess beslut att inleda förfaranden när det gäller Nuclear Decommissioning Authority klargörs det att operatörer för kärnkraftverk, enligt principen om att förorenaren betalar, bär det yttersta ansvaret för betalningen av hanteringen av sitt avfall och andra skadeståndsansvar på kärnenergins område, inbegripet planerad avveckling. Man måste dock komma ihåg att principen om att förorenaren betalar, som med alla principer i gemenskapsrätten, måste förenas med övriga principer och mål inom gemenskapen, mot vilka den under vissa omständigheter kan strida. I fallet med British Energy till exempel var man tvungen att förena principen om att förorenaren betalar med behovet att bevara kärnsäkerheten, som också är ett viktigt gemenskapsmål och ingår i Euratomfördraget, som ni känner till. I sådana fall försöker kommissionen att skapa bästa möjliga balans mellan avvikande principer till nytta för gemenskapen."@sv21
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Kroes,"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4
"Member of the Commission"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Czech.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Danish.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Dutch.ttl.gz
4http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
5http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Estonian.ttl.gz
6http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
7http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Finnish.ttl.gz
8http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/French.ttl.gz
9http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/German.ttl.gz
10http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Greek.ttl.gz
11http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Hungarian.ttl.gz
12http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Italian.ttl.gz
13http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Latvian.ttl.gz
14http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Lithuanian.ttl.gz
15http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Maltese.ttl.gz
16http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Polish.ttl.gz
17http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Portuguese.ttl.gz
18http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovak.ttl.gz
19http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Slovenian.ttl.gz
20http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Spanish.ttl.gz
21http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Swedish.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph