Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-22-Speech-2-304"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2005-02-22"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (komisjon)⁶
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050222.15.2-304"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-02-22-Speech-2-305⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Brian Crowley⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@en⁴
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Presidents (2004-07-20--2006-12-12)²² unknown; Fianna Fáil Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² co-chair; UEN (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² substitute; JURI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² substitute; PECH (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²²
lpv:translated text	"Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@cs¹ "Jeg vil blot henvise til kommissærens svar på hr. Aylwards oprindelige spørgsmål om muligheden for at overføre sukkerkvoter. Årsagen til, at vi diskuterer dette nu, er, at spørgsmålet er en del af Kommissionens forslag, og ikke, at det er noget, som medlemsstaterne ønskede. Vanskeligheden og faren er, at når først rettighederne til en kvote er overført, standser al produktion, og sukkerproduktionen samles i store multinationale virksomheder i stedet for i individuelle nationale virksomheder som nu. Disse sikrer en solid produktionsvækst, der tillader konkurrence og sikrer variation i udbud og produktion efterfølgende."@da² "Nur kurz noch ein Wort zur Antwort der Kommissarin auf Herrn Aylwards ursprüngliche Frage bezüglich der Übertragbarkeit von Zuckerquoten. Wir diskutieren dieses Problem deshalb jetzt, weil es Gegenstand eines Kommissionsvorschlags ist, und nicht, weil die Mitgliedstaaten das so wollen. Die Schwierigkeit und die Gefahr bestehen darin, dass die Produktion völlig eingestellt wird, sobald man das Recht und den Anspruch auf eine Quote abgibt, und die Zuckerproduktion wird Teil großer multinationaler Unternehmen, anstatt wie bisher Bestandteil einzelner nationaler Unternehmen. Diese gewährleisten solides Produktwachstum, das den Wettbewerb ermöglicht und anschließend eine breit gefächerte Versorgung und Produktion sichert."@de⁹ "Θα ήθελα απλώς να αναφερθώ στην απάντηση της Επιτρόπου στην αρχική ερώτηση του κ. Aylward όσον αφορά τη δυνατότητα μεταφοράς των ποσοστώσεων ζάχαρης. Ο λόγος για τον οποίο το συζητάμε αυτό τώρα είναι επειδή περιλαμβάνεται στην πρόταση της Επιτροπής, και όχι επειδή είναι κάτι το οποίο επιθυμούσαν τα κράτη μέλη. Η δυσκολία και ο κίνδυνος είναι ότι άπαξ και μεταβιβαστεί το δικαίωμα σε μία ποσόστωση, τότε όλη η παραγωγή σταματά και η παραγωγή ζάχαρης συγχωνεύεται σε μεγάλα πολυεθνικά συμφέροντα, αντί για ξεχωριστά εθνικά συμφέροντα όπως επί του παρόντος. Αυτά διασφαλίζουν μία ακλόνητη ανάπτυξη του προϊόντος η οποία επιτρέπει τον ανταγωνισμό και διασφαλίζει την ποικιλία της μετέπειτα προσφοράς και παραγωγής."@el¹⁰ "Quisiera referiorme a la respuesta de la señora Comisaria a la pregunta original del señor Aylward con respecto a la posibilidad de transferir las cuotas de azúcar. El motivo por el que estamos debatiendo esto ahora es que la cuestión forma parte de una propuesta de la Comisión, y no porque se trate de algo que buscaban los Estados miembros. La dificultad y el peligro radican en que una vez que se transfiere el derecho a una cuota se detiene toda la producción azucarera, que se amalgama con los intereses de las grandes multinacionales y no con los intereses de cada país, como sucede en la actualidad. Estos garantizan un sólido crecimiento del producto que permite la competencia y garantiza después la diversidad de la oferta y de la producción."@es²⁰ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@et⁵ "Haluan vain viitata komission jäsenen jäsen Aylwardin alkuperäiseen kysymykseen antamaan vastaukseen sokerikiintiöiden siirrettävyydestä. Keskustelemme tästä kysymyksestä nyt, koska aihe on osa komission ehdotusta, emmekä siksi, että jäsenvaltiot olisivat pyytäneet sen tarkastelemista. Asian tekee kuitenkin vaikeaksi ja vaaralliseksi se, että kun kiintiötä koskeva oikeus ja lupa on siirretty, koko tuotanto pysähtyy ja sokerintuotanto sekoittuu osaksi isoja monikansallisia etuja eikä palvele enää yksittäisiä kansallisia etuja. Näillä varmistetaan vakaa tuotekasvu, joka sallii kilpailun ja jolla varmistetaan myöhemmin monipuolinen tarjonta ja tuotanto."@fi⁷ "Je reviens sur la réponse de la Commissaire à la question de départ de M. Aylward sur les possibilités de transfert des quotas de sucre. Nous en parlons maintenant parce que ce point fait partie de la proposition de la Commission et non pas parce que les États membres le souhaitaient. La difficulté et le danger résident dans le fait qu’une fois que vous avez transféré le droit d’exploitation d’un quota, toute la production est stoppée et la production de sucre fusionne avec les intérêts de grandes multinationales plutôt qu’avec les intérêts nationaux individuels, comme c’est le cas à présent. Ces derniers favorisent une croissance solide du produit, qui garantit la concurrence et assure la diversité des approvisionnements et de la production par la suite."@fr⁸ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@hu¹¹ "Vorrei soltanto ricollegarmi alla risposta data dalla signora Commissario all’interrogazione iniziale dell’onorevole Aylward in merito alla trasferibilità dei contingenti. Il motivo per cui ne stiamo discutendo oggi è che la questione forma parte della proposta della Commissione, e non perché si tratti di una richiesta degli Stati membri. La difficoltà e il pericolo sono rappresentati dal fatto che, una volta trasferito il diritto alla quota, tutta la produzione dello zucchero si interrompe e diventa oggetto dei grandi interessi multinazionali, e non più dei singoli interessi nazionali, come avviene attualmente. Sono questi ultimi che assicurano una forte crescita del prodotto, che consente successivamente la concorrenza e assicura la diversità dell’offerta e della produzione."@it¹² "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@lt¹⁴ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@lv¹³ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@mt¹⁵ "Ik kom even terug op het antwoord van de commissaris op de oorspronkelijke vraag van de heer Aylward over de overdraagbaarheid van suikerquota. De reden waarom we het daar nu over hebben, is dat de kwestie onderdeel is van een voorstel van de Commissie, en niet omdat het iets is dat de lidstaten hebben gezocht. Het probleem en het gevaar is dat, zodra men het recht en de aanspraak op een quotum overdraagt, alle productie ophoudt en de suikerproductie wordt geïntegreerd in grote multinationale belangen, in plaats van in belangen van afzonderlijke landen, zoals nu het geval is. Deze stellen een betrouwbare gewasteelt veilig, die daarna concurrentie mogelijk maakt en de diversiteit van het aanbod en de productie garandeert."@nl³ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@pl¹⁶ "Apenas uma referência à resposta da Senhora Comissária à pergunta original do senhor deputado Aylward, no que se refere à transferência das quotas de açúcar. A razão que nos leva a debater hoje esta questão é o facto de fazer parte da proposta da Comissão, e não por se tratar de algo que os Estados-Membros anseiem. A dificuldade e o perigo prendem-se com o seguinte: uma vez que se transfira o direito e a titularidade de uma quota, então toda a produção estagna e a produção do açúcar fica à mercê das grandes multinacionais, em vez de beneficiar empresas nacionais como acontece actualmente. Estas asseguram um crescimento sólido da produção, que permite a concorrência e garante a diversidade do abastecimento e da futura produção."@pt¹⁷ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@sk¹⁸ "Just to refer to the Commissioner's response to Mr Aylward's original question with regard to the transferability of sugar quotas. The reason we are discussing this now is because the issue is part of a Commission proposal, and not because it is something that Member States were looking for. The difficulty and danger is that once you transfer the right and entitlement to a quota, then all production stops and sugar production is amalgamated into big multinational interests, rather than into individual national interests as at present. These ensure a solid product growth that allows competition and ensures the diversity of supply and production afterwards."@sl¹⁹ "Bara en hänvisning till kommissionsledamotens svar på Liam Aylwards första fråga om sockerkvoternas överförbarhet. Att vi diskuterar detta nu beror på att frågan utgör en del av ett förslag från kommissionen och inte på att det är någonting som medlemsländerna har eftersträvat. Svårigheterna och riskerna är att när man väl överför rätten och rättigheterna till en kvot så upphör all produktion och sockerproduktionen inlemmas i stora multinationella intressen i stället för i individuella nationella intressen som för närvarande. Dessa garanterar en stabil produkttillväxt som möjliggör konkurrens och garanterar ett varierat utbud och produktion därefter."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(ΕΝ)"¹⁰ "Crowley (UEN )."^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,10,13,4}