Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-22-Speech-2-300"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050222.15.2-300"6
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spoken text |
".
Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@en4
|
lpv:translated text |
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@cs1
"Tak for Deres spørgsmål. Årsagen til, at vi nu taler om sukker, er, at vi har gjort fremskridt og gennemført reformer i mange forskellige landbrugssektorer, mens sukker har været uberørt i de sidste 40 år. Derfor må vi reformere sukkerindustrien.
Vi må også gøre det, fordi vi nu giver verdens 49 fattigste lande adgang til EU-markedet gennem Alt undtagen våben-initiativet. I 2006-2009 vil disse lande få stigende adgang til det europæiske marked til en pris, der er højere end verdensmarkedsprisen. På den måde vil de få en særlig chance for at undslippe fattigdommen. Dette er også et element i vores forslag om sukker."@da2
".
Vielen Dank für Ihre Frage. Der Grund dafür, dass wir jetzt über Zucker reden, ist darin zu suchen, dass wir in vielen verschiedenen Bereichen der Agrarwirtschaft Reformen eingeleitet und Fortschritte erzielt haben, dass aber der Zuckersektor in den letzten 40 Jahren unangetastet geblieben ist. Deshalb müssen wir den Zuckersektor reformieren.
Das ist auch deshalb erforderlich, weil wir im Rahmen der Initiative „Alles außer Waffen“ 49 der ärmsten Länder der Welt nunmehr Zugang zum EU-Markt gewähren. Zwischen 2006 und 2009 werden diese Länder nach und nach Zugang zum europäischen Markt zu einem Preis haben, der über dem Weltmarktpreis liegt. Damit bieten sich diesen Ländern bessere Chancen, der Armut zu entfliehen. Das ist auch ein Bestandteil unseres Vorschlags für den Zuckersektor."@de9
"Σας ευχαριστώ για την ερώτηση. Ο λόγος για τον οποίο μιλάμε τώρα για τη ζάχαρη είναι ότι έχουμε σημειώσει πρόοδο και επιτελέσει μεταρρυθμίσεις σε πολλούς διαφορετικούς τομείς της γεωργίας, αλλά ο τομέας της ζάχαρης έχει μείνει ανέγγιχτος τα τελευταία σαράντα χρόνια. Συνεπώς, πρέπει να μεταρρυθμίσουμε τη βιομηχανία της ζάχαρης.
Πρέπει να το κάνουμε επίσης επειδή παρέχουμε τώρα πρόσβαση στην αγορά της ΕΕ στις 49 φτωχότερες χώρες στον κόσμο μέσω της Συμφωνίας «Όλα εκτός από όπλα». Από το 2006 έως το 2009, αυτές οι χώρες θα έχουν προοδευτική πρόσβαση στην ευρωπαϊκή αγορά σε υψηλότερη τιμή από την τιμή παγκόσμιας αγοράς. Κατ’ αυτόν τον τρόπο θα έχουν μια ιδιαίτερη ευκαιρία να γλιτώσουν από τη φτώχεια. Αυτό είναι άλλο ένα στοιχείο της πρότασής μας για τον τομέα της ζάχαρης."@el10
".
Le agradezco su pregunta. Actualmente estamos hablando del azúcar debido a que hemos realizado avances e introducido reformas en numerosos sectores de la agricultura, pero la industria azucarera ha permanecido intacta durante los últimos 40 años. Por lo tanto, debemos reformarla.
También debemos hacerlo porque ahora estamos permitiendo el acceso al mercado de la UE a los 49 países más pobres del mundo a través del acuerdo «Todo menos las armas». De 2006 a 2009, estos países accederán progresivamente al mercado europeo a un precio superior que el precio de mercado mundial. De este modo tendrán una oportunidad especial de escapar de la pobreza. Esto también forma parte de nuestra propuesta sobre el azúcar."@es20
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@et5
".
Kiitos kysymyksestänne. Keskustelemme nyt sokerista siitä syystä, että olemme edistyneet ja toteuttaneet uudistuksia monilla eri maatalouden aloilla, mutta sokerialaan ei ole puututtu 40 viime vuoden aikana. Siksi meidän on uudistettava sokerialaa.
Meidän on tehtävä se myös siitä syystä, että myönnämme nyt pääsyn EU:n markkinoille 49:lle maailman köyhimmälle maalle "kaikkea paitsi aseet" -sopimuksen nojalla. Vuodesta 2006 vuoteen 2009 näillä mailla on asteittainen pääsy unionin markkinoille maailmanmarkkinahintoja korkeampaan hintaan. Tällä tavoin niille annetaan erityinen mahdollisuus torjua köyhyyttä. Tämä on myös osa sokerialan ehdotustamme."@fi7
".
Je vous remercie pour cette question. Nous avons fait des progrès et entrepris des réformes dans de nombreux secteurs différents de l’agriculture, mais le sucre n’a connu aucun changement depuis 40 ans. C’est la raison pour laquelle nous parlons du sucre actuellement et c’est pourquoi nous devons réformer l’industrie du sucre.
Nous devons le faire également car nous autorisons maintenant l’accès au marché européen aux 49 pays les plus pauvres du monde dans le cadre du programme «Tout sauf des armes». Entre 2006 et 2009, ces pays auront un accès progressif au marché européen à un prix plus élevé que celui du marché mondial. De cette façon, ils auront une occasion spéciale d’échapper à la pauvreté. Cela fait également partie de notre proposition sur le sucre."@fr8
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@hu11
".
La ringrazio per la sua domanda. Il motivo per cui stiamo parlando dello zucchero è che abbiamo fatto progressi e intrapreso riforme in molti settori dell’agricoltura, ma lo zucchero non è stato toccato per almeno 40 anni. Occorre quindi riformare il settore zuccheriero.
Lo dobbiamo fare anche perché attualmente assicuriamo l’accesso al mercato dell’Unione europea ai 49 paesi più poveri in virtù dell’iniziativa “Tutto fuorché le armi”. Dal 2006 al 2009 questi paesi avranno progressivamente accesso al mercato europeo ad un prezzo maggiore rispetto a quello del mercato mondiale. In questo modo, sarà data loro un’opportunità privilegiata per uscire dalla povertà. Anche questo elemento rientra nella nostra proposta sullo zucchero."@it12
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@lt14
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@lv13
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@mt15
".
Dank u voor de vraag. De reden waarom we het nu over suiker hebben, is dat we vooruitgang hebben geboekt en hervormingen hebben ondernomen in allerlei verschillende sectoren van de landbouw, maar dat suiker de afgelopen veertig jaar ongemoeid is gelaten. We moeten de suikerindustrie daarom hervormen.
Dit moeten we ook doen omdat we de 49 armste landen in de wereld nu toegang tot de EU-markt geven door de overeenkomst 'Alles behalve wapens'. Van 2006 tot en met 2009 hebben deze landen progressieve toegang tot de Europese markt tegen een hogere prijs dan de wereldmarktprijs. Op die manier hebben ze een grotere kans om aan de armoede te ontsnappen. Dit is ook een element van ons voorstel over suiker."@nl3
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@pl16
".
Obrigada pela sua pergunta. A razão por que falamos hoje do açúcar prende-se com o facto de termos vindo a fazer progressos e a levar a cabo reformas em muitos sectores distintos da agricultura, tendo, no entanto, o sector do açúcar permanecido intocado, pelo menos, nos últimos 40 anos. Por conseguinte, é preciso reformar este sector.
É preciso fazê-lo também porque estamos agora a conceder acesso ao mercado da UE aos 49 países mais pobres do mundo, ao abrigo do Acordo “Tudo Menos Armas”. Entre 2006 e 2009, estes países terão progressivamente acesso ao mercado europeu a preços mais elevados do que os praticados no mercado mundial. Dessa forma, disporão de uma oportunidade especial para fugir à pobreza. Este é também um elemento da nossa proposta sobre o sector do açúcar."@pt17
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@sk18
"Thank you for the question. The reason why we are now talking about sugar is that we have been making progress and undertaking reforms in many different sectors of agriculture, but sugar has been untouched for the last 40 years. Therefore, we must reform the sugar industry.
We must do so also because we are now granting access to the EU market to the 49 poorest countries in the world through the 'Everything But Arms' Agreement. From 2006 to 2009, these countries will have progressive access to the European market at a price higher than the world market price. In that way they will have a special chance to escape from poverty. This is also an element of our proposal on sugar."@sl19
".
Tack för er fråga. Anledningen till att vi nu talar om socker är att vi har gjort framsteg och genomfört reformer inom många jordbrukssektorer. Socker har emellertid varit undantaget de senaste 40 åren. Därför måste vi reformera sockerindustrin.
Vi måste också göra det eftersom vi nu beviljar de 49 fattigaste länderna i världen tillträde till EU:s marknad genom avtalet ”Allt utom vapen”. Från 2006 till 2009 kommer de här länderna att få ökat tillträde till EU:s marknad till ett pris som är högre än världsmarknadspriset. På så sätt får de en särskild möjlighet att ta sig ur fattigdomen. Detta är också en del av vårt sockerförslag."@sv21
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"(ΕΝ)"10
"Fischer Boel,"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,10,13,4
"Member of the Commission"5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,11,13,4
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples